Dosing of 7 + 3 induction chemotherapy in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and morbid obesity.

INTRODUCTION: Traditional chemotherapy dosing is based on body surface area (BSA) using standard formulas, which can pose challenges in dosing patients at body weight extremes. Studies suggest that chemotherapy dosing according to actual body weight does not increase toxicity in obese patients and current guidelines recommend full weight-based dosing of chemotherapy regardless of body mass index (BMI). However, the dosing of anthracyclines in obese patients can be challenging given limitations in maximum cumulative dosage, particularly in those at very extreme BMI. In this case, we highlight the difficulties of dosing anthracycline-based induction chemotherapy in a patient with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and BMI >90 kg/m2. CASE REPORT: A 40-year-old female with morbid obesity is diagnosed with AML (nucleophosmin 1 (NPMI) and isocitrate dehydrogenase-2 mutated, FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-Internal tandem duplication negative). MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: The patient was initiated on induction therapy with 7 + 3 with dose capping of BSA at 2.75 m2 (cytarabine 200 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 24 h for 7 days, plus daunorubicin 60 mg/m2 slow intravenous push for 3 days), followed by two cycles of high-dose cytarabine consolidation therapy using actual BSA. The patient achieved morphologic complete remission; however, measurable residual disease testing for NPM1 remained positive after induction therapy. DISCUSSION: This case suggests that dose capping of anthracyclines in the treatment of newly diagnosed AML may be an effective and safe treatment alternative in those with extreme BMI elevations beyond what has been studied in the literature. Given the increasing incidence of morbid obesity, further studies are needed to confirm appropriate dosing of anthracycline-based regimens at upper BMI extremes (>60 kg/m2).

Predictors and Management of Relapse to Axicabtagene Ciloleucel in Patients with Aggressive B-cell Lymphoma.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Despite the success of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (aNHL), some patients still fail treatment, and their prognosis is dismal. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of aNHL patients treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) at two Mayo Clinic centers between 2018 and 2020. We evaluated predictive factors, toxicities, and responses to salvage regimens after CAR T-cell therapy. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients received axi-cel with a median length of hospitalization of 14 days. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome of any grade occurred in 91% and 41% of patients, respectively. Furthermore, 71% of patients responded to therapy, with 53% achieving a complete response (CR). The CRS grade and absolute lymphocyte count at leukapheresis (ALCLeuk) correlated with CR and overall survival (OS), respectively. After a median follow-up of 6.8 months (interquartile range [IQR] 4.6-14.9), 15 patients (44%) showed progressive disease (PD). Most patients (60%) progressed during the first 3 months and had persistent CD19 tumor expression. Elevated C-reactive protein at baseline increased the risk of PD, whereas elevated ferritin increased PD and mortality risk. Twelve patients received salvage therapy, but only three responded. Median OS of relapsed/refractory patients to axi-cel was 3 months (IQR 1.3-5.1). CONCLUSION: The grade of CRS and ALCLeuk correlated with better outcomes to axi-cel therapy. In addition, elevated inflammatory markers at baseline were associated with PD and shorter survival. Relapses after treatment frequently occur within months after axi-cel infusion; they confer a poor prognosis and create an urgent need for novel and effective treatment options in this patient population.

Incidence of thrombosis in relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoma treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel: Mayo Clinic experience.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is effective in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma and results in a unique toxicity profile, namely cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. The hyper-inflammatory state associated with these toxicities has been suggested to increase the risk of thrombosis. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) to assess the rate of thrombosis with axi-cel therapy from the time of CAR T-cell infusion until the end of hospitalization, when performed in the inpatient setting, or up to day +30 when performed in the outpatient setting. Ninety-two (95%) of 97 patients were hospitalized during axi-cel therapy and 85 (88%) developed CRS. Fifty-five patients (57%) received concurrent anticoagulation (53 as prophylaxis). Patients with prior VTE did not have progression or evidence of new VTE. Only 2 (2.1%) patients developed VTE. These results demonstrate a low-risk for thrombosis in axi-cel recipients.

Treatment outcomes for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasms with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis.

Myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis (MDS/MPN-RS-T) is characterized by anemia, ring sideroblast erythroid precursors, and persistent thrombocytosis. Case reports suggest lenalidomide may be effective in treating MDS/MPN-RS-T. We evaluated a large series of patients with MDS/MPN-RS-T to compare hematological improvement (HI) response rates among different drug therapies including lenalidomide. We identified 167 patients with MDS/MPN-RS-T. Among the patients tested, 84% had SF3B1 mutations and 43% had JAK2 V617F mutations. The median OS for the cohort was 81 months. Overall, 76 patients (46%) received erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), 47 patients (28%) received lenalidomide, and 45 patients (27%) received hypomethylating agents (HMAs). The HI rates were 58%, 53%, and 24%, respectively. The median duration of treatment was 11 months for lenalidomide compared to 6 months for HMAs. Rates of HI improvement were higher in patients with MDS/MPN-RS-T treated with ESAs or lenalidomide, in comparison to those treated with HMAs.

V.I.T.A.M. in COVID 19: A Systematic Approach to a Global Pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: In the unprecedented era of COVID-19, ongoing research and evolution of evidence has led to ever-changing guidelines for clinical monitoring and therapeutic options. Formulating treatment protocols requires the understanding and application of the evolving research. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study is to present a systematic evidence-based approach to synthesize the necessary data in order to optimize the management of COVID-19. METHODS: At Mayo Clinic Florida, we developed a multidisciplinary centralized COVID Treatment Review Panel (TRP) of expert pulmonologists, intensivists, infectious disease specialists, anesthesiologists, hematologists, rheumatologists, and hospitalists that in real-time reviews the latest evidence in peer-reviewed journals, the available clinical trials, and help guide the rapid application of therapeutics or interventions to the patient and the bedside provider. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: The multi-disciplinary team approach of synthesizing clinical data and coordinating care is effective in responding to rapidly evolving and changing evidence. Systematic data collection and evidence-based treatment algorithms enable physicians to rapidly translate the current literature to clinical practice, and improve care and outcomes of patients.

Impact of hypoalbuminemia on the prognosis of relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoma treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel.

INTRODUCTION: Hypoalbuminemia is a known adverse prognostic factor in lymphomas. Yet, it is unknown if axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) overcomes the adverse prognostic impact of hypoalbuminemia in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis across three Mayo Clinic centers to assess the relationship of hypoalbuminemia (defined as a serum albumin (SA) levels ≤ 3.5 g/dL) on outcomes of patients treated with axi-cel. RESULTS: This analysis included 81 patients. Two patients had no available SA levels preceding axi-cel infusion. Eighteen patients (22.8%) had hypoalbuminemia with a median SA of 3.3 g/dL. Patients with normal SA had a statistically higher ORR than those without hypoalbuminemia (P = .018). There was no difference in 1-year PFS and OS between the group with hypoalbuminemia and the group with normal SA levels (48% vs 49%, P = .81) and (74% vs 73%, P = .97), respectively. There was no difference in the severity or median duration of cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Notwithstanding the limitations related to the relatively small sample size, axi-cel therapy appears to overcome the adverse effect of hypoalbuminemia on OS and PFS. Large multicenter clinical studies are certainly needed to validate these findings.

C-reactive protein and ferritin levels and length of intensive care unit stay in patients with B-cell lymphomas treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell is an effective therapy in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphomas that, due to its unique toxicities, often requires escalation of care to the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. C-reactive protein (CRP) and ferritin are serum inflammatory markers associated with onset and persistence of CAR T-cell-related toxicity. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 34 patients treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) who were divided into two groups: patients requiring admission to the ICU during initial hospitalization (n = 13, 38%) and those who did not (n = 21, 62%). Primary objective was to examine possible relationships between serum ferritin and/or CRP levels with the need for, and length of, ICU stay between these groups. RESULTS: All 13 patients admitted to the ICU developed cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and 11 of them also developed neurotoxicity (NT). Of the 21 patients in the non-ICU group, 18 developed CRS and 5 patients developed NT. Grade of CRS and NT were higher in ICU versus non-ICU patients (p = .03 and .001, respectively). There was no correlation between CRP levels at time of ICU admission and length of ICU stay (correlation of 0.41, p = .17). Yet, there was an association between serum ferritin levels and length of ICU stay (R2 = 0.73) which did not reach statistical significance (correlation of 0.21, p = .49). CONCLUSION: Notwithstanding the limitations of the small sample size, our study suggests that an elevated ferritin level at the time of escalation of medical care may be possibly indicative of anticipated prolonged ICU hospitalization in patients treated with axi-cel. A large multicenter study is certainly needed to confirm this observation.

Use of Tocilizumab in Management of Post-Operative Myelomonocytic Leukemoid Reaction.

Interleukin 6 receptor (IL6R) inhibitor, tocilizumab, has been effectively used in the treatment of cytokine release syndrome in patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Here we present a patient with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) who developed a steroid refractory, post-operative myelomonocytic leukemoid reaction (PO-MMLR), effectively treated with tocilizumab. Although, further studies are needed to validate the effectiveness of tocilizumab in management of PO-MMLR, this case serves to provide a new management approach in treatment of this rare but lethal syndrome with no standardized treatment options.

Follicular lymphoma associated paraneoplastic myositis.

This case illustrates an unusual presentation of paraneoplastic myositis in stage IV follicular lymphoma managed with high-dose steroids, a previously unreported entity in the literature.

Case report: use of lenzilumab and tocilizumab for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019.

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a novel disease associated with a cytokine-mediated, severe, acute respiratory syndrome. Tocilizumab and lenzilumab are recombinant monoclonal antibodies against IL-6 and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor, respectively, and have been proposed as a potential treatment for acute, hypoxic respiratory failure associated with COVID-19. Results & methodology: We present the case of a 68-year-old man with COVID-19 who was initially treated with hydroxychloroquine and lenzilumab, but continued to develop hypoxemia, requiring an increase in respiratory support with an associated rise in serum inflammatory markers. He was subsequently treated with tocilizumab with marked clinical improvement and a decrease in acute phase reactants within 48 h. Discussion & conclusion: This case demonstrates the effective use of tocilizumab in the treatment of COVID-19 and suggests the superiority of tocilizumab over lenzilumab in the management of this cytokine-mediated syndrome.

Defining Acute Myeloid Leukemia Ontogeny in Older Patients.

BACKGROUND: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in elderly patients is associated with poor outcomes and often arises from antecedent hematologic disorders (AHD), classified as secondary AML (sAML). PATIENTS AND METHODS: To validate the use of somatic mutations to determine AML ontogeny in the elderly population, we identified 178 elderly (> 70 years) patients with AML with NexGen Sequencing data. Patients were divided clinically into primary AML (pAML) or sAML based on prior history of AHD. Patients were then reclassified into 4 groups based on somatic mutations and cytogenetics as suggested by Lindsley et al: group 1 (pAML) with CBF rearrangements, 11q23/MLL, and NPM1 mutation (MT); group 2 (sAML) with SRSF2, SF3B1, U2AF1, ZRSR2, ASXL1, EZH2, BCOR, or STAG2 MT; group 3 with TP53 MT; and group 4 as not otherwise specified (NOS). RESULTS: Based on clinical criteria, 95 patients were classified as pAML and 82 patients as sAML. Based on the AML ontogeny proposed, 8 patients were classified as pAML, 72 patients as sAML, 28 patients had TP53 MT, and 70 patients were classified as NOS. The median overall survival was 22.4,14, 2.8, and 11.2 months, respectively. Clinical versus molecular classification was discordant where 25% (n = 2) of patients classified as pAML by molecular signature had a history of AHD, whereas 44% (n = 32) of patients classified molecularly as sAML had no prior AHD. In the TP53 MT and NOS categories, 37% (n = 28) and 43% (n = 70) of patients had AHD, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our data shows that molecular annotation of elderly patients with AML reclassifies a significant proportion of patients as sAML, which may have therapeutic implications.

Decoding Bone Marrow Fibrosis in Myelodysplastic Syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Bone marrow fibrosis (BMF), a poor prognostic factor in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), in the context of new risk stratifications of MDS has not been fully explored. We examined the relationship between BMF in MDS and survival outcomes, and explored the landscape of somatic gene mutations in the setting of BMF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 2624 MDS patients for BMF who were divided into 2 groups: grade 0-2 BMF (96%) and severe/grade 3 BMF (4%) based on analysis presented. Commonly MDS tested acquired somatic mutations were also compared between those 2 groups of patients with available next-generation sequencing data. RESULTS: Only grade 3 BMF was associated with worse overall survival independent from the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) (hazard ratio = 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-1.9; P < .005). More patients with severe BMF were classified as MDS-EB1 and -EB2 by the World Health Organization 2016 classification, a higher-risk International Prognostic Scoring System score, and a high/very high IPSS-R risk category than patients with grade 0-2 BMF. A complex karyotype, higher bone marrow myeloblasts, lower platelets, and higher rate of elevated lactate dehydrogenase were observed more often in patients with severe BMF. No differences in response to hypomethylating agents or lenalidomide were observed. Among somatic gene mutations tested in MDS, TP53 mutation and SETBP1 were more frequent in patients with grade 3 BMF. CONCLUSION: The presence of grade 3 BMF is associated with reduced overall survival independent from IPSS-R; however, BMF grade did not affect response to hypomethylating agent or lenalidomide treatment. TP53 and SETBP1 mutations occurred with greater frequency among patients with severe fibrosis.

Molecular and phenotypic characterization of an early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic lymphoma harboring PICALM-MLLT10 fusion with aberrant expression of B-cell antigens.

T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (T-ALL/LBL) is usually diagnosed based on the presence of immature lymphoid marker terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT), and T-cell specific markers, specifically CD3, by immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining on bone marrow and/or extramedullary tissue. We present a novel, TdT and CD3 negative, aggressive early T-cell precursor LBL (ETP-LBL) initially misdiagnosed as a high grade B-cell lymphoma due to expression of CD79a and the erroneous detection of BCL2/IGH fusion. The patient was eventually evaluated using molecular diagnostic techniques, including fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and next generation sequencing (NGS) assays that demonstrated PICALM-MLLT10 fusion and a NOTCH1 mutation in the absence of BCL2/IGH fusion. The use of NGS, specifically mate-pair sequencing (MPseq), subsequently confirmed an in-frame PICALM-MLLT10 fusion. Our retrospective analysis showed that PICALM-MLLT10 fusion has no association with CD3/TdT negativity, as 6/49 T-ALL/LBL cases from Mayo Clinic database (01/1998-09/2018), including this case, were noted to have PICALM-MLLT10 fusion; however, none of the other cases were associated with CD3/TdT negativity. We emphasize the importance of a comprehensive hematopathologic evaluation including multiple molecular studies for the appropriate interrogation and classification of a difficult acute leukemia diagnosis, and to prevent potential diagnostic errors of clinical significance.

Comparison of Reconstructive Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients With Preexisting Subpectoral Implants: Implant-Sparing Mastectomy With Delayed Implant Exchange Versus Immediate Tissue Expander Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Women who have undergone prior augmentation mammoplasty represent a unique subset of breast cancer patients with several options available for breast reconstruction. We performed a single institution review of surgical outcomes of breast reconstruction performed in patients with breast cancer with prior history of subpectoral breast augmentation. METHODS: Institutional review board-approved retrospective review was conducted among patients with previously mentioned criteria treated at our institution between 2000 and 2014. Reconstructions were grouped into 2 categories as follows: (1) removal of preexisting subpectoral implant during mastectomy with immediate tissue expander placement and (2) implant-sparing mastectomy followed by delayed exchange to a larger implant. We reviewed demographics, tumor features, and reconstruction outcomes of these groups. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients had preexisting subpectoral implants. Of the 63 breast reconstructions performed, 18 (28.6%) had immediate tissue expander placed and 45 (71.4%) had implant-sparing mastectomy followed by delayed implant exchange. The groups were comparable based on age, body mass index, cancer type, tumor grade, TNM stage at presentation, and hormonal receptor status. No significant difference was noted between tumor margins or subsequent recurrence, mastectomy specimen weight, removed implant volume, volume of implant placed during reconstruction, or time from mastectomy to final implant placement. Rates of complications were significantly higher in the tissue expander group compared to the implant-sparing mastectomy group 7 (38.9%) versus 4 (8.9%) (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Implant-sparing mastectomy with delayed implant exchange in patients with preexisting subpectoral implants is safe and has fewer complications compared to tissue expander placement. There was no difference noted in the final volume of implant placed, time interval for final implant placement, or tumor margins.

Comparison of Reconstructive Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients With Preexisting Subpectoral Implants: Implant-Sparing Mastectomy With Delayed Implant Exchange Versus Immediate Tissue Expander Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Women who have undergone prior augmentation mammoplasty represent a unique subset of breast cancer patients with several options available for breast reconstruction. We performed a single institution review of surgical outcomes of breast reconstruction performed in patients with breast cancer with prior history of subpectoral breast augmentation. METHODS: Institutional review board-approved retrospective review was conducted among patients with previously mentioned criteria treated at our institution between 2000 and 2014. Reconstructions were grouped into 2 categories as follows: (1) removal of preexisting subpectoral implant during mastectomy with immediate tissue expander placement and (2) implant-sparing mastectomy followed by delayed exchange to a larger implant. We reviewed demographics, tumor features, and reconstruction outcomes of these groups. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients had preexisting subpectoral implants. Of the 63 breast reconstructions performed, 18 (28.6%) had immediate tissue expander placed and 45 (71.4%) had implant-sparing mastectomy followed by delayed implant exchange. The groups were comparable based on age, body mass index, cancer type, tumor grade, TNM stage at presentation, and hormonal receptor status. No significant difference was noted between tumor margins or subsequent recurrence, mastectomy specimen weight, removed implant volume, volume of implant placed during reconstruction, or time from mastectomy to final implant placement. Rates of complications were significantly higher in the tissue expander group compared to the implant-sparing mastectomy group 7 (38.9%) versus 4 (8.9%) (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Implant-sparing mastectomy with delayed implant exchange in patients with preexisting subpectoral implants is safe and has fewer complications compared to tissue expander placement. There was no difference noted in the final volume of implant placed, time interval for final implant placement, or tumor margins.