RESUMO
Numerous learning styles, schemes, and models are described in the literature. Most common are VARK (visual, auditory, read/write, kinesthetic) model of learning style and Kolb's experiential learning. Since the concept of learning style was first described, educational psychologists and medical educators have debated its validity. Notwithstanding these disagreements, VARK model is the one most utilized by teachers and students. This article describes how medical students with different learning styles learn anatomy and integrate multiple learning styles (multimodal) to achieve the learning goals and focuses on the approach taken by kinesthetic learners. In addition to clay modeling, drawing, and sketching, kinesthetic learners adopted "crochet" to create a three-dimensional (3-D) conceptual model that helped them mentally visualize the structures in situ. From the lectures and cadaveric dissection, a kinesthetic learner could create a 3-D mental model. However, by "crochet" and clay modeling, kinesthetic learners are able to gain broader visuospatial understanding.
RESUMO
The success of problem-based learning (PBL) depends on case quality and facilitator preparation. We developed a literature-based tool, the R2ICE form, to improve faculty case review. Its implementation and survey of end users showed the tool was expedient and advantageous. Literature-based tools can guide PBL construction and improve case development.
RESUMO
This article provides a detailed, step-by-step description of the introduction of technology (iPad® use of ExamSoft® web-based assessment software) for administering and grading cadaver-oriented anatomy practical examinations. We explain the advantages of computer-based testing in the delivery and grading of practical examinations, including minimizing human error inherent in hand grading, improving the efficiency of reporting, and mapping the examination to course objectives. Furthermore, item analysis (including item difficulty, discrimination indices, and point biserial correlations) allows evaluation of laboratory teaching and testing and monitoring of the curriculum. We also address how the advantages of this format override any limitation, such as cost. In conclusion, we describe our future directions and how others could adopt this approach.
RESUMO
The pedagogical approach for both didactic and laboratory teaching of anatomy has changed in the last 25 years and continues to evolve; however, assessment of student anatomical knowledge has not changed despite the awareness of Bloom's taxonomy. For economic reasons most schools rely on multiple choice questions (MCQ) that test knowledge mastered while competences such as critical thinking and skill development are not typically assessed. In contrast, open-ended question (OEQ) examinations demand knowledge construction and a higher order of thinking, but more time is required from the faculty to score the constructed responses. This study compares performances on MCQ and OEQ examinations administered to a small group of incoming first year medical students in a preparatory (enrichment) anatomy course that covered the thorax and abdomen. In the thorax module, the OEQ examination score was lower than the MCQ examination score; however, in the abdomen module, the OEQ examination score improved compared to the thorax OEQ score. Many students attributed their improved performance to a change from simple memorization (superficial learning) for cued responses to conceptual understanding (deeper learning) for constructed responses. The results support the view that assessment with OEQs, which requires in depth knowledge, would result in student better performance in the examination. Anat Sci Educ 11: 254-261. © 2017 American Association of Anatomists.