Inhaled mRNA therapy for treatment of cystic fibrosis: Interim results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1/2 clinical study.

BACKGROUND: MRT5005, a codon-optimized CFTR mRNA, delivered by aerosol in lipid nanoparticles, was designed as a genotype-agnostic treatment for CF lung disease. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 1/2 study performed in the US. Adults with 2 severe class I and/or II CFTR mutations and baseline ppFEV1 values between 50 and 90% were randomized 3:1 (MRT5005: placebo). Six dose levels of MRT5005 (4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 mg) or placebo (0.9% Sodium Chloride) were administered by nebulization. The single ascending dose cohort was treated over a range from 8 to 24 mg; the multiple ascending dose cohort received five weekly doses (range 8-20 mg); and the daily dosing cohort received five daily doses (4 mg). RESULTS: A total of 42 subjects were assigned to MRT5005 [31] or placebo [11]. A total of 14 febrile reactions were observed in 10 MRT5005-treated participants, which were mild [3] or moderate [11] in severity; two subjects discontinued related to these events. Additionally, two MRT5005-treated patients experienced hypersensitivity reactions, which were managed conservatively. The most common treatment emergent adverse events were cough and headache. No consistent effects on FEV1 were noted. CONCLUSIONS: MRT5005 was generally safe and well tolerated through 28 days of follow-up after the last dose, though febrile and hypersensitivity reactions were noted. The majority of these reactions resolved within 1-2 days with supportive care allowing continued treatment with MRT5005 and careful monitoring. In this small first-in-human study, FEV1 remained stable after treatment, but no beneficial effects on FEV1 were observed.

Meta-analyses of the efficacy of pharmacotherapies and sublingual allergy immunotherapy tablets for allergic rhinitis in adults and children.

BACKGROUND: Treatment options for seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis (SAR/PAR) include pharmacotherapies and allergy immunotherapy. These meta-analyses evaluated the efficacy of pharmacotherapies and sublingual immunotherapy tablets (SLIT-tablets) versus placebo on nasal symptoms associated with SAR and PAR. METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were identified from systematic PubMED/EMBASE searches through 7/18/2019 (PROSPERO protocol CRD42018105632). The primary outcome was mean numerical difference in total nasal symptom score (TNSS; 0-12) between active treatment and placebo at the end of the assessment period. Random-effects meta-analyses estimated the mean difference for each medication group weighted by the inverse of the trial variance. Publication bias assessments and sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Rescue symptom-relieving pharmacotherapy was prohibited in most pharmacotherapy trials but was allowed in all SLIT-tablet trials. For adult/adolescent SAR, the mean numerical difference (95% CI) in TNSS versus placebo was: intranasal corticosteroids (INCS)=1.38 (1.18, 1.58; 39 trials); combination intranasal antihistamine/INCS=1.34 (1.15, 1.54; 4 trials); intranasal antihistamines=0.72 (0.56, 0.89; 13 trials); oral antihistamine=0.62 (0.35, 0.90; 18 trials); SLIT-tablets=0.57 (0.41, 0.73; 4 trials); and montelukast=0.48 (0.36, 0.60; 10 trials). For adult/adolescent PAR, mean difference in TNSS versus placebo (95% CI) was: INCS=0.82 (0.66, 0.97; 14 trials); SLIT-tablets=0.65 (0.42, 0.88; 3 trials); and oral antihistamine=0.27 (0.11, 0.42; 3 trials). The number of eligible trials limited meta-analyses for pediatric SAR/PAR. CONCLUSIONS: All treatments significantly improved nasal symptoms versus placebo. SLIT-tablets provided improvement in TNSS despite access to rescue symptom-relieving pharmacotherapy. Extensive trial heterogeneity and strong indications of publication bias preclude the comparison of treatment effects among treatment classes.

Universal screening for Clostridioides difficile in a tertiary hospital: risk factors for carriage and clinical disease.

OBJECTIVES: The role of asymptomatic carriers in Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) epidemiology is not fully understood. Our aim was to evaluate CD carriage prevalence on admission, associated risk factors, and the risk of developing CDI. METHODS: A 10-week surveillance program for CD carriage of all medical patients admitted to the Sheba Medical Centre was implemented, utilizing an admission rectal swab PCR. Healthcare facility-onset CDI (HO-CDI) was recorded and divided into HO-CDI diagnosed in CD carriers and non-carriers. RESULTS: A total of 4601 admissions were recorded in 3803 patients; 2368 patients had technically analysable rectal swabs, of whom 81 (3.4%) were CD carriers. A multivariate logistic regression model showed that previous hospitalization, old age (>85 years) and low Norton scores were significant independent predictors of CD carriage. Carriers were more likely to receive antimicrobial therapy during hospitalization than non-carriers were. The incidence of HO-CDI in non-carriers was 4.6 cases per 10 000 patient-days; the incidence of HO-CDI in carriers was 76.7 cases per 10 000 patient-days (RR 16.6, 95% CI 4.0-69.1, p .002). CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective study, the rate of CD carriage on admission in medical patients was 3.4%. CD carriers were older, frailer, and more likely to have been hospitalized recently. HO-CDI incidence was significantly higher among CD carriers than among non-carriers, with at least a third of CDI in screened patients developing in carriers. Targeted screening of high-risk groups for CD carriage should be further considered.

Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines: 2016 revision

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) affects 10% to 40% of the population. It reduces quality of life and school and work performance and is a frequent reason for office visits in general practice. Medical costs are large, but avoidable costs associated with lost work productivity are even larger than those incurred by asthma. New evidence has accumulated since the last revision of the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines in 2010, prompting its update. OBJECTIVE: We sought to provide a targeted update of the ARIA guidelines. METHODS: The ARIA guideline panel identified new clinical questions and selected questions requiring an update. We performed systematic reviews of health effects and the evidence about patients' values and preferences and resource requirements (up to June 2016). We followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) evidence-to-decision frameworks to develop recommendations. RESULTS: The 2016 revision of the ARIA guidelines provides both updated and new recommendations about the pharmacologic treatment of AR. Specifically, it addresses the relative merits of using oral H1-antihistamines, intranasal H1-antihistamines, intranasal corticosteroids, and leukotriene receptor antagonists either alone or in combination. The ARIA guideline panel provides specific recommendations for the choice of treatment and the rationale for the choice and discusses specific considerations that clinicians and patients might want to review to choose the management most appropriate for an individual patient. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate treatment of AR might improve patients' quality of life and school and work productivity. ARIA recommendations support patients, their caregivers, and health care providers in choosing the optimal treatment.

Roflumilast for asthma: Safety findings from a pooled analysis of ten clinical studies.

BACKGROUND: The safety profile of roflumilast, a phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, has been extensively researched in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Adverse events (AEs) including headache, diarrhoea and weight loss have been reported. Much less is known about the safety of roflumilast treatment in patients with bronchial asthma. AIM: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of roflumilast using safety data from one open-label and ten pooled placebo-controlled phase II and III clinical studies completed between 1997 and 2005. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The studies were conducted at sites in Europe, North and South America, Africa, Australasia and Asia and study length varied from 4 to 40 weeks. Data for 5169 patients between 12 and 70 years of age, of whom 2851 received roflumilast at doses of 125, 250 and 500 µg, were analyzed. At randomization patients had a forced expiratory flow of 45-100%. RESULTS: Headache was the most frequent AE with an incidence rate of 50 and 29.2 per 100 patient-years in the 500 µg roflumilast and placebo groups, respectively. Gastrointestinal AEs were common. Nausea and diarrhoea occurred in 28.7 and 28.3 per 100 patient-years in the 500 µg roflumilast and placebo groups, respectively. The extent of weight loss in roflumilast-treated patients was small. AEs reported in 465 patients in the 4-week open-label follow-up study reflected those of the pooled studies. CONCLUSIONS: The severity and incidence of AEs reported from this pooled safety analysis confirm that roflumilast is generally well tolerated by patients with asthma. This reflects the general safety profile reported previously in patients with COPD. All studies were funded by Takeda. Trial registration numbers available on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00073177, NCT00076076, NCT00163527.

Roflumilast for asthma: Efficacy findings in placebo-controlled studies.

BACKGROUND: The role of roflumilast as a potential asthma treatment is not yet fully understood. A series of placebo-controlled trials were undertaken in order to investigate the safety and efficacy of roflumilast in asthma. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of roflumilast in nine randomized proof-of-concept, placebo-controlled monotherapy and combination therapy phase II and III clinical studies performed between 1997 and 2005. METHODS: The studies were conducted at sites in Europe, North and South America, Africa, Australasia and Asia and study length varied from 4 to 24 weeks. Data were analyzed from 4873 patients, 12-70 years of age, of whom 2668 received roflumilast. At randomization patients had a forced expiratory flow (FEV1) of 45-90%. Roflumilast was investigated at doses of 125, 250 and 500 µg versus placebo. In two studies, 500 µg roflumilast was added on top of standard therapy with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), 250 µg fluticasone propionate, or 400 µg beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP). Improvement in FEV1 from baseline was the primary endpoint in seven studies. Key secondary endpoints included asthma symptom scores and time to first severe exacerbation. RESULTS: Roflumilast consistently improved FEV1 across the nine studies compared with placebo, reaching statistical significance in three studies. When given in addition to ICS, roflumilast provided additional improvements in FEV1 which was statistically significant for 500 µg roflumilast/400 µg BDP versus placebo/400 µg BDP. CONCLUSION: Together these studies show that roflumilast has potential as an effective anti-inflammatory therapy for the treatment of asthma. Additional beneficial effects are observed when given in combination with ICS, which warrant further investigation. All studies were funded by Takeda. Trial registration numbers available on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00073177, NCT00076076, NCT00163527.

Clinical development of an advanced intranasal delivery system of azelastine hydrochloride and fluticasone propionate.

There is no shortage of pharmacologic treatments available for the management of allergic rhinitis (AR), but none regularly provide full relief from all symptoms. MP29-02 (Dymista®) is a novel intranasal formulation of azelastine hydrochloride (AZE) and fluticasone propionate (FP), benefiting from an enhanced formulation and improved device characteristics compared to marketed intranasal corticosteroid (INS) formulations. Results from large, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, head-to-head trials versus first-line therapies, confirmed MP29-02 as the evidence-based drug-of-choice for AR treatment. MP29-02 was twice as effective as AZE or FP for nasal and ocular symptom relief in moderate to severe seasonal AR patients, with superiority documented regardless of season, and in more severe patients. More MP29-02-treated patients experienced clinically relevant responses (i.e., halving of nasal symptom burden and complete/near-to-complete relief) days faster than those on INS or intranasal antihistamine monotherapy. MP29-02's efficacy was sustained long-term versus FP (up to 52 weeks) in chronic rhinitis patients (perennial AR or nonallergic rhinitis), with 7 out of 10 patients first becoming symptom-free following 1 month's treatment with MP29-02, and days faster than with the INS. These results confirm MP29-02's superiority over the historical gold-standard therapy for AR (i.e., INS), and position it now as first-line treatment for moderate to severe AR patients, the majority of whom are uncontrolled on existing medications.

Epithelial clara cell injury occurs in bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after human lung transplantation.

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is a condition of progressive airflow obstruction that affects a majority of lung transplant recipients and limits long-term posttransplant survival. Although epithelial injury appears central to the development of BOS, little is known regarding the specific epithelial cell types that are affected in this condition. We hypothesized that BOS would involve preferential injury to the secretory Clara cells that function in innate defense and epithelial repair. To test this hypothesis, we assessed tissue transcript, tissue protein and lung fluid protein expression of Clara cell secretory protein (CCSP), a marker for Clara cells, in lung transplant recipients with BOS, BOS-free patients and in donor controls. Our results demonstrate that CCSP tissue transcript and protein expression are significantly reduced in lung transplant recipients with BOS compared to BOS-free or donor controls. In addition, we demonstrate that CCSP protein levels are significantly reduced in the lung fluid of patients with BOS compared to BOS-free controls, in cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis. Collectively, these complementary results illustrate that BOS involves a selective alteration in the distribution and function of bronchiolar Clara cells.

Mometasone furoate/formoterol reduces asthma deteriorations and improves lung function.

This study evaluated the effect of mometasone furoate (MF)/formoterol (F) versus its monocomponents, each administered via metered-dose inhaler, on asthma deteriorations and lung function. This 26-week, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled study included subjects aged ≥12 yrs with not well-controlled asthma on low-dose inhaled corticosteroids. After a 2-3-week open-label run-in (MF 100 µg b.i.d.), 746 subjects were randomised to receive placebo, F 10 µg, MF 100 µg or MF/F 100/10 µg b.i.d. Co-primary end-points were time to first asthma deterioration (MF/F versus F to assess effect of MF) and change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) area under the curve of serial spirometry measurements over the 12-h period following the morning dose (AUC(0-12h)) (baseline to week 12; MF/F versus MF to assess effect of F). The therapeutic effect of MF in the combination was demonstrated by a reduction in asthma deterioration incidence with MF/F versus F and a delayed time to first asthma deterioration (p<0.001). Asthma deterioration incidence was also reduced with MF/F versus MF (p=0.006). The therapeutic effect of F in the combination was demonstrated by MF/F versus MF in FEV(1) AUC(0-12h) change (4.00 versus 2.53 L·h, respectively; p=0.001). MF/F treatment also resulted in a marked improvement in health-related quality of life. MF/F 100/10 µg b.i.d. treatment showed greater clinical efficacy than its individual components or placebo; both components contributed to the efficacy of MF/F.

Molecular and clinical pharmacology of intranasal corticosteroids: clinical and therapeutic implications.

Intranasal corticosteroids (INSs) are effective treatments for allergic rhinitis, rhinosinusitis, and nasal polyposis. In recent years, increased understanding of corticosteroid and glucocorticoid receptor pharmacology has enabled the development of molecules designed specifically to achieve potent, localized activity with minimal risk of systemic exposure. Pharmacologic potency studies using affinity and other assessments have produced similar rank orders of potency, with the most potent being mometasone furoate, fluticasone propionate, and its modification, fluticasone furoate. The furoate and propionate ester side chains render these agents highly lipophilic, which may facilitate their absorption through nasal mucosa and uptake across phospholipid cell membranes. These compounds demonstrate negligible systemic absorption. Systemic absorption rates are higher among the older corticosteroids (flunisolide, beclomethasone dipropionate, triamcinolone acetonide, and budesonide), which have bioavailabilities in the range of 34-49%. Studies, including 1-year studies with mometasone furoate, fluticasone propionate, and budesonide that evaluated potential systemic effects of INSs in children have generally found no adverse effects on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function or growth. Clinical data suggest no significant differences in efficacy between the INSs. Theoretically, newer agents with lower systemic availability may be preferable, and may come closer to the pharmacokinetic/pharmacologic criteria for the ideal therapeutic choice.

Internal obturator muscle abscess caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Obturator internus muscle abscess is an infrequent form of pyomyositis. To date, this disease has been described almost exclusively in children and young adults, and in most cases the causative agents are Gram-positive bacteria. We present the first report of obturator internus muscle abscess caused by a highly antibiotic resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, in an elderly diabetic patient. Once considered very rare, Gram-negative pyomyositis is increasingly reported, and is an important concern in diabetic patients. Since pyomyositis can easily be missed if not considered, physicians should become familiar with this condition, and consider it in the differential diagnosis of septic diabetic patients.

Pill swallowing ability and training in children 6 to 11 years of age.

Despite the widespread view that children have difficulty swallowing pills, data are limited. In an observational cohort study, pill swallowing ability (small oral tablet) was assessed in children age 6 to 11 years. A total of 113 of 124 subjects (91%) swallowed a tablet using an ordinary cup or a patented pill cup. All 57 subjects who initially said they could swallow a pill were capable. Forty-seven learned with an ordinary cup and nine with the pill cup. Eleven did not learn. The majority of children (91%) age 6 to 11 years were able to successfully swallow a small oral tablet.

Pharmacologic and anti-IgE treatment of allergic rhinitis ARIA update (in collaboration with GA2LEN).

The pharmacologic treatment of allergic rhinitis proposed by ARIA is an evidence-based and step-wise approach based on the classification of the symptoms. The ARIA workshop, held in December 1999, published a report in 2001 and new information has subsequently been published. The initial ARIA document lacked some important information on several issues. This document updates the ARIA sections on the pharmacologic and anti-IgE treatments of allergic rhinitis. Literature published between January 2000 and December 2004 has been included. Only a few studies assessing nasal and non-nasal symptoms are presented as these will be discussed in a separate document.

Lipoid pneumonia: a preventable form of drug-induced lung injury.

We report a case where recurrent "pneumonia" was eventually diagnosed as lipoid pneumonia in an elderly patient with cerebrovascular disease. The discontinuation of paraffin oil laxative led to clinical improvement. Lipoid pneumonia, a foreign body-type reaction to the presence of lipid within lung parenchyma, is probably underdiagnosed and underreported, and paraffin oil laxative is the main causative agent. Paraffin oil is marketed as a food additive, and no information about its hazards is provided to clinicians or patients. We suggest that a change in paraffin oil licensing may decrease the incidence of lipoid pneumonia.

Nasal allergies and beyond: a clinical review of the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of mometasone furoate.

Mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS; Nasonex, Schering-Plough Corporation, Kenilworth, NJ, USA) is an effective and well-tolerated intranasal corticosteroid approved for the prophylactic treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis, and the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis. MFNS is a potent molecule with a rapid onset of action and excellent safety and efficacy profiles. Having recently received approval for the treatment of nasal polyposis, data indicate that MFNS may also be effective in rhinosinusitis.

Montelukast improves symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis over a 4-week treatment period.

BACKGROUND: Proinflammatory mediators such as the cysteinyl leukotrienes are important in the pathophysiology of allergic rhinitis. This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of montelukast, a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist, given once daily in the morning for treatment of seasonal (fall) allergic rhinitis for 4 weeks. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind trial with a placebo run-in and a 4-week treatment period. Patients (n = 1079) with a history of allergic rhinitis and a positive skin test to seasonal pollen allergens were assigned to placebo, montelukast 10 mg, or loratadine 10 mg. Symptoms were assessed with a daily diary. RESULTS: Montelukast was more effective than placebo in improving scores for the primary endpoint of daytime nasal symptoms (P = 0.003) and the secondary endpoints of night-time, composite, and daytime eye symptoms, patient's and physician's global evaluations of allergic rhinitis, and rhinoconjunctivitis quality-of-life (P

[Inflammatory bowel disease and osteoporosis--an evidence-based connection].

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) often have chronic or remittent course. Control of symptoms and disease activity often requires the administration of glucocorticoids. Osteoporosis is a frequent finding in patients with IBD. The evidence-based connection between the two conditions relies on a relatively limited number of cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. The cause of this connection has not been defined completely. Probably, both the chronic inflammation and the steroid therapy contribute to the osteopenia, through an increase in bone resorption without a compensatory increase in bone formation. There is little data regarding the efficacy of therapeutic interventions for the prevention of osteoporosis in patients with IBD. Recently, guidelines for the evaluation and treatment of osteoporosis and IBD have been published. There is need for further research on the relation between these conditions and on the efficacy of current therapy for this unique population.