Perceptions and Challenges Experienced by African Physicians When Prescribing Methotrexate for Rheumatic Disease: An Exploratory Study.

OBJECTIVE: Guidelines for methotrexate (MTX) use in rheumatic disease may not be feasible for physicians practicing in the least developed countries. We aimed to understand the experiences of MTX prescribers relating to MTX use for rheumatic disease in African countries to inform the development of culturally and geographically appropriate recommendations. METHODS: African physicians who self-identified as MTX prescribers from countries classified as having a low versus a medium or high Human Development Index (L-HDI versus MH-HDI) participated in semistructured interviews between August 2016 and September 2017. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, coded thematically, and stratified by HDI. RESULTS: Physicians (23 rheumatologists; six internists) from 29 African countries were interviewed (15 L-HDI; 14 MH-HDI). Identified barriers to MTX use included inconsistent MTX supply (reported by 87% L-HDI versus 43% MH-HDI), compounded by financial restrictions (reported by 93% L-HDI versus 64% MH-HDI), patient hesitancy based partly on cultural beliefs and societal roles (reported by 71%), few prescribers (reported by 33%), prevalent infections (especially viral hepatitis, tuberculosis, and human immunodeficiency virus), and both availability and cost of monitoring tests. MTX pretreatment evaluation and starting and maximal doses were similar between L-HDI countries and MH-HDI countries. CONCLUSION: The challenges of treating rheumatic disease in African countries include unreliable drug availability and cost, limited subspecialists, and patient beliefs. Adapting recommendations for MTX use in the context of prevalent endemic infections; ensuring safe but feasible MTX monitoring strategies, enhanced access to stable drug supply, and specialized rheumatology care; and improving patient education are key to reducing the burden of rheumatic diseases in L-HDI countries.

Systematic review of recommendations on the use of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Most recommendations for the use of methotrexate (MTX) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are issued by developed countries. It is unknown whether they are relevant globally. We reviewed existing recommendations on the use of MTX for the treatment of RA and summarized areas of agreement that could be relevant for least developed countries (LDCs). METHODS: Electronic databases and registries were searched for recommendations on MTX use in RA, duplicates were eliminated, and the most updated version adopted when there were several versions on the same recommendation. Reviewers used the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument for study quality assessment. Similarities and discrepancies of recommendations are reported. RESULTS: After deduplication, 1693 unique citations were found; 25 full texts were screened and 12 included in the narrative synthesis. Average scores for the AGREE II domains ranged from 33.3 to 83.3%. Recommendations targeted rheumatologists and health care providers involved in RA care. Most covered some but not all of the following areas: baseline "pre-MTX" assessment (7/12;58%), prescription of MTX (10/12;83.3%), management of MTX side effects (6/12;50%), and special considerations (e.g., peri-operative management) (8/12; 66.7%). Recommendations agreed on baseline tests prior to starting MTX, monitoring, and need for folic acid supplementation. These aspects can serve as the foundation for the development of MTX recommendations relevant to LDCs. Recommendations disagreed on the MTX starting dose, optimal route, titration, and intervals to monitor toxicity. CONCLUSION: Existing recommendations do not uniformly address all aspects related to the use of MTX and disagree in relevant aspects of MTX use. Adaptations to these recommendations are needed to facilitate their implementation in LDCs. Key Points • This paper summarizes current recommendations on the use of methotrexate for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. • Areas of agreement between recommendations include the following: pre-methotrexate patient assessment, need for folic acid supplementation, and toxicity monitoring. • Areas of disagreement relate to methotrexate starting and maximal dose, titration, and frequency of assessments.

Career medical officers in psychiatry and addiction in NSW: description, role and educational needs.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the workforce of career medical officers (CMOs) working in psychiatry and addiction medicine across New South Wales (NSW) and to explore their training and education needs, and experience of their role. METHOD: A cross-sectional survey of CMOs in NSW working in psychiatry or addiction medicine. The survey consisted of quantitative data and free-text responses, and was conducted online in late 2017. RESULTS: Of the 41 CMOs identified and sent the survey link, 25 CMOs completed the survey (61% RR). Almost half had worked as a CMO for 11 years or longer. Only six respondents held a recognised senior CMO position. Common areas of expertise were clozapine, metabolic health, and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). One-quarter of respondents did not receive supervision. Suggested education and training improvements included an annual 1-day training symposium and monthly peer review group for CMOs. CONCLUSION: CMOs are an often senior group of clinicians working in important areas of service provision. Ongoing educational support for this group of medical practitioners is prudent to ensure the delivery of best practice mental health and drug health care.

Methotrexate exposure and risk of strongyloidiasis.

OBJECTIVE: Rheumatologic disease patients receiving immunomodulating drugs such as methotrexate (MTX) have increased infection rates. Strongyloides, a global endemic intestinal parasite, can cause significant or fatal disease in immunocompromised patients. The risk of serious Strongyloides infection with MTX dosed for rheumatologic disease is unknown. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review searching EMBASE, Medline and Web of Science databases. All studies reporting humans exposed to MTX and tested for Strongyloides were reviewed. Exclusion criteria were bone marrow transplantation, intrathecal route and MTX exposure completed >1 year prior to clinically apparent Strongyloides disease. RESULTS: After excluding duplicates, 294 articles were reviewed. Of these, 29 cases were described in 27 papers. Twenty cases (69%) had an underlying rheumatologic or dermatologic disease, the rest had a haematologic disease. Hyperinfection or dissemination was found in 59% of cases (52% low-dose MTX; 75% high-dose MTX). Death occurred in 34% of cases (19% low-dose MTX; 75% high-dose MTX, P < 0.01). All eight patients on high-dose MTX received other immunosuppressants. Corticosteroids were taken in 18/21 patients on low-dose MTX. One of the three patients on MTX monotherapy had hyperinfection syndrome. None had disseminated Strongyloides. CONCLUSIONS: Serious Strongyloides infection can occur with low-dose MTX particularly when given with other immunosuppression. Global travel and greater awareness of rheumatologic conditions in low- to middle-income countries will increase the exposure of individuals prescribed MTX (with or without corticosteroids) to Strongyloides. Strongyloides screening and treatment should be considered for individuals receiving low-dose MTX therapy, particularly if combined with additional immunosuppression.

OBJECTIF: Les patients atteints de maladies rhumatologiques recevant des médicaments immunomodulateurs tels que le méthotrexate (MTX) présentent des taux d'infection plus élevés. Strongyloides, un parasite intestinal endémique mondial, peut causer une maladie grave ou fatale chez les patients immunodéprimés. Le risque d'infection sévère à Strongyloides sous administration de MTX pour le traitement de la maladie rhumatologique est inconnu. MÉTHODES: Nous avons effectué une revue systématique de la littérature en recherchant les bases de données EMBASE, Medline et Web of Science. Toutes les études rapportant sur des humains exposés au MTX et testés pour Strongyloides ont été passées en revue. Les critères d'exclusion étaient la greffe de moelle osseuse, la voie intrathécale et l'exposition au MTX complétée plus d'un an avant l'apparition de la maladie à Strongyloides cliniquement apparente. RÉSULTATS: Après exclusion des doublons, 294 articles ont été analysés. Parmi ceux-ci, 29 cas ont été décrits dans 27 articles. Vingt cas (69%) avaient une maladie rhumatologique ou dermatologique sous-jacente, les autres avaient une maladie hématologique. Une hyperinfection ou dissémination a été constatée dans 59% des cas (52% sous MTX à faible dose; 75% sous MTX à forte dose). La mort est survenue dans 34% des cas (19% des cas sous MTX à faible dose; 75% des cas sous MTX à forte dose, p <0,01). Tous les huit patients ayant reçu une dose élevée de MTX avaient reçu d'autres immunosuppresseurs. Des corticostéroïdes ont été administrés à 18 patients sur 21 sous MTX à faible dose. Un des trois patients sous MTX en monothérapie avait un syndrome d'hyperinfection. Aucun n'avait une infection disséminée à Strongyloides. CONCLUSIONS: Une infection sévère à Strongyloides peut survenir avec le MTX à faible dose, en particulier lorsqu'administré avec une autre immunosuppression. Les voyages à travers le monde et une plus grande sensibilisation aux conditions rhumatologiques dans les pays à revenu faible et intermédiaire augmenteront l'exposition à Strongyloides chez les individus chez qui le MTX (avec ou sans corticostéroïdes) est prescrit. Le dépistage et le traitement de Strongyloides devraient être envisagés chez les personnes recevant un traitement au MTX à faible dose, en particulier lorsqu'associé à une immunosuppression supplémentaire.

Ethical challenges in rheumatology: a survey of the American College of Rheumatology membership.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the frequency of ethical issues arising in patient care, ethical discourse in the rheumatology literature is negligible. To better understand the scope of ethical problems occurring in our specialty, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Committee on Ethics and Conflict of Interest surveyed ACR members. Specific objectives of the survey were 1) to learn the perceived frequency of ethical issues in rheumatology, 2) to identify activities that pose ethical problems in rheumatologic practice, 3) to determine the extent of education on, and self-perceived knowledge about, ethics among ACR members, and 4) to determine member interest in, and suggest content for, future ACR-sponsored educational activities related to bioethics. METHODS: The survey included 12 non-open-ended questions addressing 5 core areas: 1) ethical dilemmas in daily practice, 2) ethical concerns in basic and clinical research, 3) influence of industry, 4) ethics of regulatory policies, potential conflicts, and disclosure, and 5) personal education on and interest in ethics. Two open-ended questions were also included, asking respondents to list the ethical issues most relevant to rheumatology and to provide any comments. Data analysis was descriptive. RESULTS: Seven hundred seventy-one responses were received. Respondents believed that ethical issues arise most frequently in practice and in clinical research. The most common ethical issues cited were the high cost of treatment for patients (51% of respondents) and for society (48%), and the practice of defensive medicine (45%). CONCLUSION: The survey results suggest that ethical problems in rheumatology are of concern to the ACR membership. Further, there is a perceived need for educational programs targeted at helping members address such professional challenges.

Payer decision-making with limited comparative and cost effectiveness data: the case of new pharmacological treatments for gout.

CONTEXT: The need for comparative effectiveness (CE) data continues to grow, fuelled by market demand as well as health reform. There may be an assumption that new drugs result in improved efficacy compared with the standard of care, therefore warranting premium prices. Gout treatment has recently become controversial, as expensive new drugs enter the market with limited CE data. METHODS: The authors reviewed published clinical trials and conducted a cost effectiveness analysis on a new drug (febuxostat) versus the standard (allopurinol) to illustrate the limitations in using these data to inform evidence-based decision-making. FINDINGS: Although febuxostat trials included allopurinol as a comparator, methodological limitations make comparative effectiveness evaluations difficult. However, when available trial data were input to a decision analytic model, the authors found that a significant reduction in febuxostat cost would be required in order for it to dominate allopurinol in cost effectiveness analysis. This case exemplifies the challenges of using clinical trial data in comparative and cost effectiveness analyses.

Conflicts of interest in cardiovascular clinical practice guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) serve as standards of care in practice, quality improvement, and reimbursement. The extent of conflicts of interest (COIs) in cardiology guideline production has not been well studied. Herein, we describe the scope of COIs in CPGs. METHODS: We examined the 17 most recent American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines through 2008. Using disclosure lists, we cataloged COIs for each participant as receiving a research grant, being on a speaker's bureau and/or receiving honoraria, owning stock, or being a consultant or member of an advisory board. We also cataloged the companies and institutions reported in each disclosure. "Episode" describes 1 instance of participation in 1 guideline by 1 person. "Individual" describes 1 person who may be involved in multiple episodes. "Company" describes a commercial or industry affiliation reported by an individual in a single episode. Analysis involved descriptive statistics and correlation analyses (Pearson correlation coefficient, χ(2) and R(2)). RESULTS: Fifty-six percent of the 498 individuals reported a COI, corresponding to 56% of the 651 episodes. Being a consultant or member of an advisory board was the most common type. The percentage of episodes involving a COI varied between guidelines (range, 13%-87%). The number of episodes per individual was associated with both presence and number of disclosures (P < .001 for both comparisons). Of 478 companies, the number per guideline ranged from 2 to 242 companies (mean, 38 companies). One company was the most frequently reported company in 7 of 17 guidelines. CONCLUSION: Conflicts of interest are prevalent in cardiology guidelines, but there seems to be a significant number of experienced experts without COIs.