RESUMO
Chronic nodular prurigo (CNP) is a chronic dermatological disease characterized by the presence of chronic pruritus and pruritic nodular lesions. The aim of this study was to reach consensus among a group of experts based on a non-systematic literature review and an algorithm for the clinical diagnosis of CNP. The resulting algorithm is structured in 3 blocks: 1) early identification of the patient with a possible diagnosis of CNP; 2) diagnosis and assessment of CNP; and 3) categorization of CNP (identification of the underlying causes or associated comorbidities). We believe that this clinical algorithm can facilitate the correct diagnosis of patients with CNP. Additionally, it raises awareness on the need for a multidisciplinary approach and specific treatment of CNP, steps of paramount importance to make better therapeutic decisions.
RESUMO
Antecedentes Diversos trabajos apoyan la hipótesis de que en España se está produciendo un aumento de incidencia de la escabiosis, y existen dudas sobre el posible desarrollo de resistencias y el incremento de formas clínicas atípicas. Los objetivos de este estudio fueron caracterizar el perfil demográfico y clínico de los pacientes de escabiosis atendidos por dermatólogos en España, identificar la posible aparición de escabiosis atípicas, así como describir la frecuencia y los posibles factores de riesgo de los fracasos terapéuticos previos. Métodos Realizamos un estudio observacional, transversal, multicéntrico con recogida de datos prospectiva, en abril y mayo de 2023 dentro de la plataforma CLINI-AEDVp de la Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología. Resultados Se reclutaron 186 casos de escabiosis activa (51% mujeres) en 31 centros participantes de 15 comunidades autónomas. Se requirió un nivel A, B o C de los criterios de consenso de la International Alliance for the Control of Scabies (IACS) para el diagnóstico. El 92% de los pacientes presentaron formas clínicas típicas de escabiosis y un 66% había recibido tratamiento escabicida previo para el episodio en curso. De los pacientes previamente tratados, solo un 36% había recibido y cumplimentado una pauta terapéutica adecuada que incluyera el tratamiento simultáneo de convivientes, y un 50% careció de un documento escrito y claro con las recomendaciones. Conclusiones Una elevada proporción de los casos de escabiosis atendidos actualmente ha recibido tratamiento previo. En estos se observan defectos corregibles que pueden justificar parte de los fracasos terapéuticos. Trabajar en la mejora de las deficiencias encontradas ayudará a un mejor control de la enfermedad y a evaluar la efectividad actual de los escabicidas disponibles (AU)
Background Several studies support the hypothesis that scabies is on the rise in Spain. There are also concerns about the possible development of resistance to treatment and an increase in atypical presentations. The aims of this study were to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with scabies seen by dermatologists in Spain, to identify the possible emergence of atypical forms of scabies, and to explore the frequency of treatment failures and associated risk factors. Methods We conducted an observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study of data collected prospectively in April and May 2023 using the CLINI-AEDVp platform created by the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV). Results Participating dermatologists from 31 hospitals in 15 of Spain's autonomous communities recorded 186 cases of active scabies (51% in women) during the study period. A diagnostic certainty level of A, B or C as per the International Alliance for the Control of Scabies Consensus Criteria was required for diagnosis. Overall, 92% of patients had typical scabies and 66% had already been treated with a scabicide for the current episode. Of the treated patients, only 36% had received and completed adequate treatment (including the simultaneous treatment of all household members) and 50% had not received clear written recommendations. Conclusions In a high proportion of the cases of scabies studied, the patient had already received treatment. In those cases, we observed several remediable shortcomings that could explain why some of these treatments had failed. Remedying these deficiencies should lead to better control of scabies and an improved assessment of the actual effectiveness of currently available scabicides (AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Escabiose/epidemiologia , Escabiose/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Transversais , Espanha/epidemiologia , IncidênciaRESUMO
Background Several studies support the hypothesis that scabies is on the rise in Spain. There are also concerns about the possible development of resistance to treatment and an increase in atypical presentations. The aims of this study were to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with scabies seen by dermatologists in Spain, to identify the possible emergence of atypical forms of scabies, and to explore the frequency of treatment failures and associated risk factors. Methods We conducted an observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study of data collected prospectively in April and May 2023 using the CLINI-AEDVp platform created by the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV). Results Participating dermatologists from 31 hospitals in 15 of Spain's autonomous communities recorded 186 cases of active scabies (51% in women) during the study period. A diagnostic certainty level of A, B or C as per the International Alliance for the Control of Scabies Consensus Criteria was required for diagnosis. Overall, 92% of patients had typical scabies and 66% had already been treated with a scabicide for the current episode. Of the treated patients, only 36% had received and completed adequate treatment (including the simultaneous treatment of all household members) and 50% had not received clear written recommendations. Conclusions In a high proportion of the cases of scabies studied, the patient had already received treatment. In those cases, we observed several remediable shortcomings that could explain why some of these treatments had failed. Remedying these deficiencies should lead to better control of scabies and an improved assessment of the actual effectiveness of currently available scabicides (AU)
Antecedentes Diversos trabajos apoyan la hipótesis de que en España se está produciendo un aumento de incidencia de la escabiosis, y existen dudas sobre el posible desarrollo de resistencias y el incremento de formas clínicas atípicas. Los objetivos de este estudio fueron caracterizar el perfil demográfico y clínico de los pacientes de escabiosis atendidos por dermatólogos en España, identificar la posible aparición de escabiosis atípicas, así como describir la frecuencia y los posibles factores de riesgo de los fracasos terapéuticos previos. Métodos Realizamos un estudio observacional, transversal, multicéntrico con recogida de datos prospectiva, en abril y mayo de 2023 dentro de la plataforma CLINI-AEDVp de la Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología. Resultados Se reclutaron 186 casos de escabiosis activa (51% mujeres) en 31 centros participantes de 15 comunidades autónomas. Se requirió un nivel A, B o C de los criterios de consenso de la International Alliance for the Control of Scabies (IACS) para el diagnóstico. El 92% de los pacientes presentaron formas clínicas típicas de escabiosis y un 66% había recibido tratamiento escabicida previo para el episodio en curso. De los pacientes previamente tratados, solo un 36% había recibido y cumplimentado una pauta terapéutica adecuada que incluyera el tratamiento simultáneo de convivientes, y un 50% careció de un documento escrito y claro con las recomendaciones. Conclusiones Una elevada proporción de los casos de escabiosis atendidos actualmente ha recibido tratamiento previo. En estos se observan defectos corregibles que pueden justificar parte de los fracasos terapéuticos. Trabajar en la mejora de las deficiencias encontradas ayudará a un mejor control de la enfermedad y a evaluar la efectividad actual de los escabicidas disponibles (AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Escabiose/epidemiologia , Escabiose/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Transversais , Espanha/epidemiologia , IncidênciaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Several studies support the hypothesis that scabies is on the rise in Spain. There are also concerns about the possible development of resistance to treatment and an increase in atypical presentations. The aims of this study were to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with scabies seen by dermatologists in Spain, to identify the possible emergence of atypical forms of scabies, and to explore the frequency of treatment failures and associated risk factors. METHODS: We conducted an observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study of data collected prospectively in April and May 2023 using the CLINI-AEDVp platform created by the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV). RESULTS: Participating dermatologists from 31 hospitals in 15 of Spain's autonomous communities recorded 186 cases of active scabies (51% in women) during the study period. A diagnostic certainty level of A, B or C as per the International Alliance for the Control of Scabies Consensus Criteria was required for diagnosis. Overall, 92% of patients had typical scabies and 66% had already been treated with a scabicide for the current episode. Of the treated patients, only 36% had received and completed adequate treatment (including the simultaneous treatment of all household members) and 50% had not received clear written recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: In a high proportion of the cases of scabies studied, the patient had already received treatment. In those cases, we observed several remediable shortcomings that could explain why some of these treatments had failed. Remedying these deficiencies should lead to better control of scabies and an improved assessment of the actual effectiveness of currently available scabicides.
Assuntos
Escabiose , Humanos , Feminino , Escabiose/tratamento farmacológico , Escabiose/epidemiologia , Espanha/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Falha de Tratamento , Academias e InstitutosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Several studies support the hypothesis that scabies is on the rise in Spain. There are also concerns about the possible development of resistance to treatment and an increase in atypical presentations. The aims of this study were to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with scabies seen by dermatologists in Spain, to identify the possible emergence of atypical forms of scabies, and to explore the frequency of treatment failures and associated risk factors. METHODS: We conducted an observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study of data collected prospectively in April and May 2023 using the CLINI-AEDVp platform created by the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV). RESULTS: Participating dermatologists from 31 hospitals in 15 of Spain's autonomous communities recorded 186 cases of active scabies (51% in women) during the study period. A diagnostic certainty level of A, B or C as per the International Alliance for the Control of Scabies Consensus Criteria was required for diagnosis. Overall, 92% of patients had clinical features of classic scabies and 66% had already been treated with a scabicide for the current episode. Of the treated patients, only 36% had received and completed adequate treatment (including the simultaneous treatment of all household members) and 50% had not received clear written recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: In a high proportion of scabies cases, the patient has already received treatment. In those cases, we observe several remediable shortcomings that could explain why some of these treatments fail. Remedying these deficiencies should lead to better control of scabies and an improved assessment of the actual effectiveness of currently available scabicides.
Assuntos
Escabiose , Humanos , Feminino , Escabiose/diagnóstico , Escabiose/tratamento farmacológico , Escabiose/epidemiologia , Espanha/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Falha de Tratamento , Academias e InstitutosRESUMO
Antecedentes En los últimos años se ha producido una revolución en el conocimiento de la dermatitis atópica (DA) que ha revertido en un salto cualitativo en las expectativas terapéuticas. En este contexto, resulta fundamental disponer de datos de práctica clínica de calidad. Material y método BIOBADATOP es el Registro Español de Dermatitis Atópica, un estudio observacional, prospectivo y multicéntrico, con una cohorte de pacientes de cualquier edad con DA que requieren el empleo de tratamiento sistémico (convencional o innovador). Se registraron los datos demográficos, de diagnóstico, los tratamientos y los acontecimientos adversos (AA). Resultados Se incluyeron 258 pacientes, con 347 tratamientos sistémicos iniciados para la DA. Se suspendieron el 29,4% de los tratamientos, principalmente por falta de eficacia (10,7%). Durante el período de seguimiento se registraron 132AA. Del total, el 65% (86) relacionaron con el tratamiento sistémico iniciado, siendo los más frecuentes dupilumab (39AA) y ciclosporina (38AA). Los AA más frecuentes fueron: conjuntivitis (11pacientes), cefalea (6), hipertricosis (5) y náuseas (4). Se registró un AA grave (mastoiditis aguda) relacionado con ciclosporina. Conclusiones En este primer informe, la descripción de AA está limitada por los cortos períodos de seguimiento, que no permiten el cálculo de tasas de incidencias crudas ni ajustadas y no se han realizado comparaciones. Hasta la fecha del análisis no se han registrado AA graves en relación a las nuevas terapias. BIOBADATOP permitirá generar conocimiento en términos de efectividad y seguridad de los tratamientos sistémicos clásicos y las nuevas terapias en DA (AU)
Background In recent years, remarkable improvements in our understanding of atopic dermatitis (AD) have revolutionized treatment perspectives, but access to reliable data from clinical practice is essential. Materials and method The Spanish Atopic Dermatitis Registry, BIOBADATOP, is a prospective, multicenter database that collects information on patients of all ages with AD requiring systemic therapy with conventional or novel drugs. We analyzed the registry to describe patient characteristics, diagnoses, treatments, and adverse events (AEs). Results We studied data entries for 258 patients who had received 347 systemic treatments for AD. Treatment was discontinued in 29.4% of cases, mostly due to a lack of effectiveness (in 10.7% of cases). A total of 132 AEs were described during follow-up. Eighty-six AEs (65%) were linked to a systemic treatment, most commonly dupilumab (39AEs) and cyclosporine (38AEs). The most common AEs were conjunctivitis (11patients), headache (6), hypertrichosis (5), and nausea (4). There was 1severe AE (acute mastoiditis) associated with cyclosporine. Conclusions Initial findings on AEs from the Spanish BIOBADATOP registry are limited by short follow-up times precluding comparisons or calculation of crude and adjusted incidence rates. At the time of our analysis, no severe AEs had been reported for novel systemic therapies. BIOBADATOP will help answer questions on the effectiveness and safety of conventional and novel systemic therapies in AD (AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Prontuários Médicos , Estudos Prospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , EspanhaRESUMO
Background In recent years, remarkable improvements in our understanding of atopic dermatitis (AD) have revolutionized treatment perspectives, but access to reliable data from clinical practice is essential. Materials and method The Spanish Atopic Dermatitis Registry, BIOBADATOP, is a prospective, multicenter database that collects information on patients of all ages with AD requiring systemic therapy with conventional or novel drugs. We analyzed the registry to describe patient characteristics, diagnoses, treatments, and adverse events (AEs). Results We studied data entries for 258 patients who had received 347 systemic treatments for AD. Treatment was discontinued in 29.4% of cases, mostly due to a lack of effectiveness (in 10.7% of cases). A total of 132 AEs were described during follow-up. Eighty-six AEs (65%) were linked to a systemic treatment, most commonly dupilumab (39AEs) and cyclosporine (38AEs). The most common AEs were conjunctivitis (11patients), headache (6), hypertrichosis (5), and nausea (4). There was 1severe AE (acute mastoiditis) associated with cyclosporine. Conclusions Initial findings on AEs from the Spanish BIOBADATOP registry are limited by short follow-up times precluding comparisons or calculation of crude and adjusted incidence rates. At the time of our analysis, no severe AEs had been reported for novel systemic therapies. BIOBADATOP will help answer questions on the effectiveness and safety of conventional and novel systemic therapies in AD (AU)
Antecedentes En los últimos años se ha producido una revolución en el conocimiento de la dermatitis atópica (DA) que ha revertido en un salto cualitativo en las expectativas terapéuticas. En este contexto, resulta fundamental disponer de datos de práctica clínica de calidad. Material y método BIOBADATOP es el Registro Español de Dermatitis Atópica, un estudio observacional, prospectivo y multicéntrico, con una cohorte de pacientes de cualquier edad con DA que requieren el empleo de tratamiento sistémico (convencional o innovador). Se registraron los datos demográficos, de diagnóstico, los tratamientos y los acontecimientos adversos (AA). Resultados Se incluyeron 258 pacientes, con 347 tratamientos sistémicos iniciados para la DA. Se suspendieron el 29,4% de los tratamientos, principalmente por falta de eficacia (10,7%). Durante el período de seguimiento se registraron 132AA. Del total, el 65% (86) relacionaron con el tratamiento sistémico iniciado, siendo los más frecuentes dupilumab (39AA) y ciclosporina (38AA). Los AA más frecuentes fueron: conjuntivitis (11pacientes), cefalea (6), hipertricosis (5) y náuseas (4). Se registró un AA grave (mastoiditis aguda) relacionado con ciclosporina. Conclusiones En este primer informe, la descripción de AA está limitada por los cortos períodos de seguimiento, que no permiten el cálculo de tasas de incidencias crudas ni ajustadas y no se han realizado comparaciones. Hasta la fecha del análisis no se han registrado AA graves en relación a las nuevas terapias. BIOBADATOP permitirá generar conocimiento en términos de efectividad y seguridad de los tratamientos sistémicos clásicos y las nuevas terapias en DA (AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Prontuários Médicos , Estudos Prospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , EspanhaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In recent years, remarkable improvements in our understanding of atopic dermatitis (AD) have revolutionized treatment perspectives, but access to reliable data from clinical practice is essential. MATERIALS AND METHOD: The Spanish Atopic Dermatitis Registry, BIOBADATOP, is a prospective, multicenter database that collects information on patients of all ages with AD requiring systemic therapy with conventional or novel drugs. We analyzed the registry to describe patient characteristics, diagnoses, treatments, and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: We studied data entries for 258 patients who had received 347 systemic treatments for AD. Treatment was discontinued in 29.4% of cases, mostly due to a lack of effectiveness (in 10.7% of cases). A total of 132 AEs were described during follow-up. Eighty-six AEs (65%) were linked to a systemic treatment, most commonly dupilumab (39AEs) and cyclosporine (38AEs). The most common AEs were conjunctivitis (11patients), headache (6), hypertrichosis (5), and nausea (4). There was 1severe AE (acute mastoiditis) associated with cyclosporine. CONCLUSIONS: Initial findings on AEs from the Spanish BIOBADATOP registry are limited by short follow-up times precluding comparisons or calculation of crude and adjusted incidence rates. At the time of our analysis, no severe AEs had been reported for novel systemic therapies. BIOBADATOP will help answer questions on the effectiveness and safety of conventional and novel systemic therapies in AD.
Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica , Humanos , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Dermatite Atópica/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Ciclosporina/uso terapêutico , Administração Cutânea , Sistema de Registros , Resultado do Tratamento , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the efficacy of the hands-eyes-mouth distraction technique (HEM-DT) in reducing anxiety and pain levels and improving the behaviour of pre-school children during inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) administration to that of the covering patient's vision technique (CPV-T). METHODS: This study included 52 children aged 3-5 years old with primary dentition, no history of receiving local anaesthesia, and whose treatments required an IANB. These children were randomly assigned into two groups: HEM-DT (G1; n = 26) and CPV-T (G2; n = 26). Anxiety and pain levels were assessed using the Facial Image Scale and the Wong-Baker Scale, respectively, while the patient's behaviour was evaluated using the Frankl Behaviour Scale. This study was divided into two sessions including the treatment session (administration of IANB) and the control session (7 days after anaesthesia). Chi-square test, the Mann-Whitney U test and Wilcoxon test were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: The patients' anxiety levels did not increase 7 days after IANB in G1 (p value = 0.798); however, higher anxiety levels were observed in the G2 group (p value = 0.039). No significant differences in pain levels and behaviour were observed between the groups during administration of anaesthesia (p value > 0.005). CONCLUSION: HEM-DT and CPV-T showed efficacy in terms of pain and behaviour during IANB administration. Pre-school children in the HEM-DT group exhibited lower anxiety levels in the control session. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE OF REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02591797). October 28, 2015.
Assuntos
Anestesia Local , Face , Nervo Mandibular , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Boca , Dor , Ansiedade ao Tratamento OdontológicoRESUMO
Sexual reproduction and meiotic sex are deeply rooted in the eukaryotic tree of life, but mechanisms determining sex or mating types are extremely varied and are only well characterized in a few model organisms1. In malaria parasites, sexual reproduction coincides with transmission to the vector host. Sex determination is non-genetic, with each haploid parasite capable of producing either a male or a female gametocyte in the human host2. The hierarchy of events and molecular mechanisms that trigger sex determination and maintenance of sexual identity are yet to be elucidated. Here we show that the male development 1 (md1) gene is both necessary and sufficient for male fate determination in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. We show that Md1 has a dual function stemming from two separate domains: in sex determination through its N terminus and in male development from its conserved C-terminal LOTUS/OST-HTH domain. We further identify a bistable switch at the md1 locus, which is coupled with sex determination and ensures that the male-determining gene is not expressed in the female lineage. We describe one of only a few known non-genetic mechanisms of sex determination in a eukaryote and highlight Md1 as a potential target for interventions that block malaria transmission.
Assuntos
Regulação da Expressão Gênica , Malária Falciparum , Malária , Parasitos , Processos de Determinação Sexual , Transcrição Gênica , Animais , Humanos , Malária/parasitologia , Malária Falciparum/parasitologia , Parasitos/genética , Plasmodium falciparum/genética , Reprodução , Masculino , Feminino , Processos de Determinação Sexual/genética , Caracteres SexuaisRESUMO
Objetivo: Los pacientes diagnosticados de cáncer queratinocítico (carcinoma basocelular y carcinoma epidermoide cutáneo) o cáncer cutáneo no melanoma (CCNM) tienen un riesgo aumentado de desarrollar una segunda neoplasia cutánea. Nuestro objetivo es describir la frecuencia, tasa de incidencia y factores de riesgo predisponentes para desarrollar una segunda neoplasia cutánea en una cohorte de pacientes tratados mediante cirugía micrográfica de Mohs (CMM). Material y métodos: Estudio prospectivo de una cohorte nacional de pacientes incluidos para realización de CMM para tratar CCNM en 22 centros españoles (julio 2013-febrero 2020) REGESMOHS. Las variables analizadas incluyen las características demográficas, la frecuencia de aparición de segundas neoplasias cutáneas, sus tasas de incidencia y factores de riesgo, y se estimaron utilizando un modelo de regresión logístico multivariante de efectos mixtos. Resultados: Fueron intervenidos 4.768 pacientes: 4.397 (92%) carcinomas basocelulares, y 371 (8%) carcinomas epidermoides. El tiempo medio de seguimiento fue de 2,4 años. Se diagnosticó un nuevo tumor durante el seguimiento en 1.201 pacientes (25%); 1.013 (21%) fueron carcinomas basocelulares, 154 (3%) carcinomas epidermoides cutáneos, 20 melanomas (0,4%) La tasa de incidencia fue de 107 (101-113) por 1.000 personas/año para cualquier tumor; 90 (85-96) para el carcinoma basocelular, 14 (12-16) para el carcinoma epidermoide cutáneo y 2 (1-3) para el melanoma. El riesgo de nueva neoplasia fue mayor en varones que en mujeres 738 (61%) vs. 463 (39%). Los factores de riesgo más significativos fueron la historia de múltiples tumores previos al diagnóstico (RR: 4,6; IC 95%: 2,9-7,1); la inmunosupresión (RR: 2,1; IC 95%: 1,4-3,1) y paciente varón (RR: 1,6; IC 95%: 1,4-1,9) (AU)
Objective: Patients with nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC)ie, basal cell carcinoma (BCC) or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)have an increased risk of developing a second skin cancer. The aim of this study was to describe the frequency, incidence per 1000 person-years, and predictors of a second skin cancer in a cohort of patients with NMSC treated with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). Material and methods: Prospective study of a national cohort of patients with NMSC who underwent MMS at 22 Spanish hospitals between July 2013 and February 2020; case data were recorded in the REGESMOHS registry. The study variables included demographic characteristics, frequency and incidence per 1000 person-years of second skin cancers diagnosed during the study period, and risk factors identified using mixed-effects logistic regression. Results: We analyzed data for 4768 patients who underwent MMS; 4397 (92%) had BCC and 371 (8%) had SCC. Mean follow-up was 2.4 years. Overall, 1201 patients (25%) developed a second skin cancer during follow-up; 1013 of the tumors were BCCs (21%), 154 were SCCs (3%), and 20 were melanomas (0.4%). The incidence was 107 per 1000 person-years (95% CI, 101-113) for any cancer, 90 per 1000 person-years (95% CI, 85-96) for BCC, 14 (95% CI, 12-16) per 1000 person-years for SCC, and 2 (95% CI, 1-3) per 1000 person-years for melanoma. More men than women developed a subsequent skin cancer (738 [61%] vs 463 [39%]). The main risk factors were a history of multiple tumors before diagnosis (relative risk [RR], 4.6; 95% CI, 2.9-7.1), immunosuppression (RR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.4-3.1), and male sex (RR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.4-1.9). Conclusion: Patients have an increased risk of developing a second tumor after MMS treatment of NMSC. Risk factors are a history of multiple tumors at diagnosis, immunosuppression, and male sex (AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Basocelular/epidemiologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiologia , Cirurgia de Mohs , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/cirurgia , Carcinoma Basocelular/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos de Coortes , Fatores de Risco , Incidência , Espanha/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Objective: Patients with nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC)ie, basal cell carcinoma (BCC) or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)have an increased risk of developing a second skin cancer. The aim of this study was to describe the frequency, incidence per 1000 person-years, and predictors of a second skin cancer in a cohort of patients with NMSC treated with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). Material and methods: Prospective study of a national cohort of patients with NMSC who underwent MMS at 22 Spanish hospitals between July 2013 and February 2020; case data were recorded in the REGESMOHS registry. The study variables included demographic characteristics, frequency and incidence per 1000 person-years of second skin cancers diagnosed during the study period, and risk factors identified using mixed-effects logistic regression. Results: We analyzed data for 4768 patients who underwent MMS; 4397 (92%) had BCC and 371 (8%) had SCC. Mean follow-up was 2.4 years. Overall, 1201 patients (25%) developed a second skin cancer during follow-up; 1013 of the tumors were BCCs (21%), 154 were SCCs (3%), and 20 were melanomas (0.4%). The incidence was 107 per 1000 person-years (95% CI, 101-113) for any cancer, 90 per 1000 person-years (95% CI, 85-96) for BCC, 14 (95% CI, 12-16) per 1000 person-years for SCC, and 2 (95% CI, 1-3) per 1000 person-years for melanoma. More men than women developed a subsequent skin cancer (738 [61%] vs 463 [39%]). The main risk factors were a history of multiple tumors before diagnosis (relative risk [RR], 4.6; 95% CI, 2.9-7.1), immunosuppression (RR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.4-3.1), and male sex (RR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.4-1.9). Conclusion: Patients have an increased risk of developing a second tumor after MMS treatment of NMSC. Risk factors are a history of multiple tumors at diagnosis, immunosuppression, and male sex (AU)
Objetivo: Los pacientes diagnosticados de cáncer queratinocítico (carcinoma basocelular y carcinoma epidermoide cutáneo) o cáncer cutáneo no melanoma (CCNM) tienen un riesgo aumentado de desarrollar una segunda neoplasia cutánea. Nuestro objetivo es describir la frecuencia, tasa de incidencia y factores de riesgo predisponentes para desarrollar una segunda neoplasia cutánea en una cohorte de pacientes tratados mediante cirugía micrográfica de Mohs (CMM). Material y métodos: Estudio prospectivo de una cohorte nacional de pacientes incluidos para realización de CMM para tratar CCNM en 22 centros españoles (julio 2013-febrero 2020) REGESMOHS. Las variables analizadas incluyen las características demográficas, la frecuencia de aparición de segundas neoplasias cutáneas, sus tasas de incidencia y factores de riesgo, y se estimaron utilizando un modelo de regresión logístico multivariante de efectos mixtos. Resultados: Fueron intervenidos 4.768 pacientes: 4.397 (92%) carcinomas basocelulares, y 371 (8%) carcinomas epidermoides. El tiempo medio de seguimiento fue de 2,4 años. Se diagnosticó un nuevo tumor durante el seguimiento en 1.201 pacientes (25%); 1.013 (21%) fueron carcinomas basocelulares, 154 (3%) carcinomas epidermoides cutáneos, 20 melanomas (0,4%) La tasa de incidencia fue de 107 (101-113) por 1.000 personas/año para cualquier tumor; 90 (85-96) para el carcinoma basocelular, 14 (12-16) para el carcinoma epidermoide cutáneo y 2 (1-3) para el melanoma. El riesgo de nueva neoplasia fue mayor en varones que en mujeres 738 (61%) vs. 463 (39%). Los factores de riesgo más significativos fueron la historia de múltiples tumores previos al diagnóstico (RR: 4,6; IC 95%: 2,9-7,1); la inmunosupresión (RR: 2,1; IC 95%: 1,4-3,1) y paciente varón (RR: 1,6; IC 95%: 1,4-1,9) (AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Basocelular/epidemiologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiologia , Cirurgia de Mohs , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/cirurgia , Carcinoma Basocelular/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos de Coortes , Fatores de Risco , Incidência , Espanha/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Patients with nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC)-ie, basal cell carcinoma (BCC) or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)-have an increased risk of developing a second skin cancer. The aim of this study was to describe the frequency, incidence per 1000 person-years, and predictors of a second skin cancer in a cohort of patients with NMSC treated with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective study of a national cohort of patients with NMSC who underwent MMS at 22 Spanish hospitals between July 2013 and February 2020; case data were recorded in the REGESMOHS registry. The study variables included demographic characteristics, frequency and incidence per 1000 person-years of second skin cancers diagnosed during the study period, and risk factors identified using mixed-effects logistic regression. RESULTS: We analyzed data for 4768 patients who underwent MMS; 4397 (92%) had BCC and 371 (8%) had SCC. Mean follow-up was 2.4 years. Overall, 1201 patients (25%) developed a second skin cancer during follow-up; 1013 of the tumors were BCCs (21%), 154 were SCCs (3%), and 20 were melanomas (0.4%). The incidence was 107 per 1000 person-years (95% CI, 101-113) for any cancer, 90 per 1000 person-years (95% CI, 85-96) for BCC, 14 (95% CI, 12-16) per 1000 person-years for SCC, and 2 (95% CI, 1-3) per 1000 person-years for melanoma. More men than women developed a subsequent skin cancer (738 [61%] vs 463 [39%]). The main risk factors were a history of multiple tumors before diagnosis (relative risk [RR], 4.6; 95% CI, 2.9-7.1), immunosuppression (RR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.4-3.1), and male sex (RR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.4-1.9). CONCLUSION: Patients have an increased risk of developing a second tumor after MMS treatment of NMSC. Risk factors are a history of multiple tumors at diagnosis, immunosuppression, and male sex.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Basocelular , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Melanoma , Neoplasia de Células Basais , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Carcinoma Basocelular/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Basocelular/patologia , Carcinoma Basocelular/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/complicações , Cirurgia de Mohs , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/etiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cutaneous reactions after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines are poorly characterized. OBJECTIVE: To describe and classify cutaneous reactions after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. METHODS: A nationwide Spanish cross-sectional study was conducted. We included patients with cutaneous reactions within 21 days of any dose of the approved vaccines at the time of the study. After a face-to-face visit with a dermatologist, information on cutaneous reactions was collected via an online professional survey and clinical photographs were sent by email. Investigators searched for consensus on clinical patterns and classification. RESULTS: From 16 February to 15 May 2021, we collected 405 reactions after vaccination with the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech; 40·2%), mRNA-1273 (Moderna; 36·3%) and AZD1222 (AstraZeneca; 23·5%) vaccines. Mean patient age was 50·7 years and 80·2% were female. Cutaneous reactions were classified as injection site ('COVID arm', 32·1%), urticaria (14·6%), morbilliform (8·9%), papulovesicular (6·4%), pityriasis rosea-like (4·9%) and purpuric (4%) reactions. Varicella zoster and herpes simplex virus reactivations accounted for 13·8% of reactions. The COVID arm was almost exclusive to women (95·4%). The most reported reactions in each vaccine group were COVID arm (mRNA-1273, Moderna, 61·9%), varicella zoster virus reactivation (BNT162b2, Pfizer-BioNTech, 17·2%) and urticaria (AZD1222, AstraZeneca, 21·1%). Most reactions to the mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccine were described in women (90·5%). Eighty reactions (21%) were classified as severe/very severe and 81% required treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Cutaneous reactions after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are heterogeneous. Most are mild-to-moderate and self-limiting, although severe/very severe reactions are reported. Knowledge of these reactions during mass vaccination may help healthcare professionals and reassure patients.
