Consenso de la SEPG sobre la depresión en el anciano / Consensus of the SEPG on depression in the elderly

Antecedentes. La limitación del conocimiento clínico epidemiológico y de la evidencia sobre efectividad terapéutica en la depresión en los pacientes ancianos y muy ancianos genera una excesiva variabilidad de prácticas en la atención clínica a estos pacientes en nuestro sistema sanitario. La Sociedad Española de Psicogeriatría (SEPG) se plantea la necesidad de unificar criterios mediante un método estructurado de consenso profesional. Objetivos. Desarrollar un consenso experto de recomendaciones clínicas para optimizar el abordaje clínico de la depresión en el paciente anciano en España, bajo auspicio de la Sociedad Española de Psicogeriatría (SEPG).Métodos. Consenso Delphi modificado en dos rondas. El estudio se efectuó en cuatro fases: 1) constitución de un comité científico, impulsor del proyecto y responsable de la revisión bibliográfica y de la formulación de las recomendaciones a debate; 2) constitución de un panel experto multicéntrico con representantes de la especialidad; 3) encuesta postal en dos rondas con procesamiento intermedio de opinión ese informe a los panelistas; y 4) discusión de resultados en sesión presencial del comité científico. Resultados. 61 expertos consultados completaron las dos rondas de evaluación del cuestionario. En la primera rondase logran consensuar 39 de las 54 cuestiones analizadas. Tras la interacción del panel se aumenta el consenso hasta un total de 46 ítems de la encuesta (85% de los contenidos propuestos). En las 8 cuestiones restantes no se consigue un consenso suficientemente unánime, bien por disparidad de opiniones entre los profesionales, bien por falta de criterio establecido en la mayoría de los expertos. Conclusiones. Se presenta un amplio listado de criterios profesionales y recomendaciones clínicas que pretenden racionalizar el manejo de la depresión en el paciente anciano y reducir el exceso de variabilidad en la práctica clínica. Las recomendaciones se cualifican según el grado de acuerdo profesional en que se sustentan y pueden considerarse vigentes hasta la aparición de nueva información científica que justifique su revisión (AU)

Background. The limitation of clinical-epidemiological know-how and evidence regarding therapeutic efficiency in depression among the elderly and extremely elderly patients has given rise to an excessive variety of practices in clinical care of these patients in the Spanish health system. The Spanish Society of Psychogeriatrics (SEPG) has raised the question of the need to unify criteria through a structured approach based on professional consensus. Objectives. To develop an expert consensus of clinical recommendations to improve the clinical treatment of depression in elderly patients in Spain, sponsored by the Spanish Society of Psychogeriatrics (SEPG). Methods. Modified Delphi Consensus, in two rounds. The study was conducted in four phases: 1) constitution of a Scientific Committee, project promoter and responsible for bibliographic review and formulation of recommendations for discussion 2) constitution of a multicenter Panel of Experts with representatives from this specialist field 3) postal survey comprised of two rounds, with interim processing of opinions and a report for the experts and 4) discussion of results during an onsite meeting of the Scientific Committee. Results. The survey evaluation was completed by 61experts consulted, in two rounds. In the first round, consensus was reached in 39 of the 54 questions analyzed. Following interaction by the panel, this consensus was increased to a total of 46 survey items (85% of the proposed contents). It was impossible to obtain a sufficiently unanimous consensus on the remaining 8questions, either due to differences of opinion among the professionals or a lack of established criterion in most of the experts. Conclusions. A full list of criteria and clinical recommendations for the purpose of rationalizing the treatment of depression in elderly patients and reducing excessive variability in clinical practice is presented. The recommendations are qualified in accordance with the degree of consensus of the professionals endorsing the mand can be considered valid until new scientific information becomes available that justifies their review (AU)

Consensus of the SEPG on depression in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: The limitation of clinical-epidemiological know-how and evidence regarding therapeutic efficiency in depression among the elderly and extremely elderly patients has given rise to an excessive variety of practices in clinical care of these patients in the Spanish health system. The Spanish Society of Psychogeriatrics (SEPG) has raised the question of the need to unify criteria through a structured approach based on professional consensus. OBJECTIVES: To develop an expert consensus of clinical recommendations to improve the clinical treatment of depression in elderly patients in Spain, sponsored by the Spanish Society of Psychogeriatrics (SEPG). METHODS: Modified Delphi Consensus, in two rounds. The study was conducted in four phases: 1) constitution of a Scientific Committee, project promoter and responsible for bibliographic review and formulation of recommendations for discussion 2) constitution of a multicenter Panel of Experts with representatives from this specialist field 3) postal survey comprised of two rounds, with interim processing of opinions and a report for the experts and 4) discussion of results during an on-site meeting of the Scientific Committee. RESULTS: The survey evaluation was completed by 61 experts consulted, in two rounds. In the first round, consensus was reached in 39 of the 54 questions analyzed. Following interaction by the panel, this consensus was increased to a total of 46 survey items (85% of the proposed contents). It was impossible to obtain a sufficiently unanimous consensus on the remaining 8 questions, either due to differences of opinion among the professionals or a lack of established criterion in most of the experts. CONCLUSIONS: A full list of criteria and clinical recommendations for the purpose of rationalizing the treatment of depression in elderly patients and reducing excessive variability in clinical practice is presented. The recommendations are qualified in accordance with the degree of consensus of the professionals endorsing them and can be considered valid until new scientific information becomes available that justifies their review.

Bupropión: farmacología e interacciones / Bupropion: pharmacology and interactions

Bupropión es una aminocetona monocíclica introducida en España para el tratamiento de la depresión en la formulación XR/XL de liberación modificada que permite su administración en una única toma diaria. Se metaboliza en su principal metabolito activo, el hidroxibupropión (OHBUP) por el citocromo P450 2B6 (CYP2B6), teniendo una vida media de eliminación de alrededor de 20 h. Es un inhibidor de la recaptación de la noradrenalina y la dopamina, con un efecto sobre el transportador de serotonina prácticamente nulo. Presenta una baja (12-35%), pero persistente ocupación del transportador estriatal de dopamina. No tiene efectos clínicamente significativos sobre los receptores histaminérgicos, muscarínicos, alfa-adrenérgicos o dopaminérgicos. Las interacciones principales están relacionadas con la inhibición o inducción del CYP2B6, responsable del metabolismo del bupropión, o la inhibición del CYP2D6 por el bupropión. Se aconseja un uso cuidadoso conjuntamente con fármacos que disminuyan el umbral convulsivo. Está contraindicado durante la supresión brusca de alcohol o sedantes y durante el tratamiento con inhibidores de la monoaminooxidasa. El presente artículo responde a preguntas frecuentes que se plantean durante el uso clínico del bupropión, especialmente en situaciones clínicas especiales o durante el tratamiento con otros fármacos habituales. Estas situaciones incluyen, entre otras, uso conjunto de fármacos anticonvulsivantes, antipsicóticos en depresión psicótica, corticosteroides, antidiabéticos, otros antidepresivos como venlafaxina, anticonceptivos orales, terapia hormonal sustitutiva, disulfiram, alcohol o drogas de abuso y vareniclina (AU)

Bupropion is a monocyclic aminoketone introduced into Spain for the treatment of depression with the extended release (XL) formulation that makes it possible to administer it in a single daily dose. It is metabolized in its principal active metabolite, the hydroxybupropion (OH-BUP) by the cytochrome P450 2B6 (CYP2B6), with a mean elimination half life of about 20 h. It is a norepinephrine and dopamine reuptake inhibitor with an almost null effect on the serotonin transporter. It has low (12%-35%) but persistent occupancy of the striatal dopaminetransporter. It has no clinically significant effects on the histaminergic, muscarinic, alpha-adrenergicor domaminergic receptors. Its principal interactions are related with inhibition or induction of CYP2B6, responsible for the bupropion metabolism, or inhibition of CYP2D6 by bupropion. It should be used carefully together with drugs that decrease the seizure threshold. This is contraindicated during sudden suppression of alcohol or sedatives and during treatment with monoaminooxidade inhibitors. The present paper answers frequent questions posed during the clinical use of bupropion, especially under special clinical situations or during treatment with other common drugs. These situations include, among others, combined use of anti-seizure drugs, antipsychotics in psychotic depression, corticosteroids, antidiabetics, other antidepressants such as venlafaxin, oral contraceptives, hormone replacement hormone therapy, disulfiram, alcohol or abuse drugs and varenicline (AU)

[Transcultural adaptation of the Liver Disease Quality of Life instrument (LDQOL 1.0) for its use in the Spanish population]. / Adaptación transcultural del cuestionario específico de calidad de vida para hepatopatías crónicas (LDQOL 1.0) para su uso en la población española.

Instruments of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) help us to interpret the results of treatments and health interventions. In Spain there is no HRQOL instrument specifically designed for use in patients with liver disease or to measure the effect of interventions such as liver transplantation. The Liver Disease Quality of Life (LDQOL 1.0) questionnaire is an American instrument developed for use in these patients. The aim of this study was to produce an appropriate version of this questionnaire for use in Spain. Cultural adaptation was performed in 3 phases: a) modification for use in Spain of a Hispanic version of this questionnaire supplied by the original authors; b) back-translation to English of a new version of the questionnaire and comparison with the original version in English, and c) a pilot test in a small sample of patients. In the first phase consisting of revision of the Hispanic version, the changes were mainly linguistic due to cultural and idiomatic differences. The validated Spanish version of the SF-36 was directly incorporated and items that could be of interest to local investigators were added. Few changes were made in the second phase of the process: changes involved an item on the appearance of feces and another item on taking naps. In the final phase, various changes suggested by the patients were introduced. Before applying the new version of the LDQOL 1.0 in clinical studies in Spain, its psychometric properties (its reliability, validity and sensitivity to change) must be verified in a subsequent validation study.