Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Infect Control ; 2024 Feb 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38395313

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSI) are a common complication of hysterectomy. Surgical bundles have been shown to reduce SSIs. Here we describe a bundle that was used to combat an abnormal rise in SSI events that resulted in a greater than 75% reduction at our institution. METHODS: A hysterectomy-specific bundle was developed based on the prior success of SSI prevention bundles. Development involved longitudinal education and training to ensure accuracy and compliance. All inpatient abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed at a tertiary referral center were included. The preintervention, intervention, and postintervention periods were each one year in length. SSI rates were peer-reviewed monthly and overall trends were tracked, including compliance with bundle guidelines. RESULTS: Preintervention, an abnormal rise in SSI was identified at 3.76%. During the intervention, 309 inpatient hysterectomies were completed. In this period, 6 posthysterectomy SSI events occurred (3.76% vs 1.94%, P = .21). Four SSIs followed laparotomy and 2 followed laparoscopy. Compliance during the intervention period ranged from 79% to 89% with a mean of 85%. In the postintervention period, there were 6 SSI following 689 hysterectomies (3.76% vs 0.87%, P = .004). The majority of SSI occurred after abdominal hysterectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a hysterectomy-specific surgical bundle allowed for a significant reduction in post hysterectomy SSI during a yearlong intervention period and a sustained, further reduction in the postintervention period.

3.
Int Urogynecol J ; 32(9): 2353-2356, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34236468

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: While 2017 guidelines from The American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists called for pessary replacement every 3 to 4 months, a recent study in Obstetrics and Gynecology suggested that uninterrupted pessary use up to 6 months is not an independent risk factor for development of pessary-related complications. METHODS: Our recent experience throughout the Covid-19 pandemic highlights the potential ramifications of delayed clinical follow-up. RESULTS: During the Covid-19 pandemic, 3 of our patients developed rectovaginal fistulae secondary to Gellhorn pessary erosion in the context of delayed clinical follow-up. Our patients had previously attended routine appointments every 3 months without complications until missed appointments secondary to the pandemic led to fistulae formation. CONCLUSION: We believe that delayed clinical follow-up of pessary management beyond 3 months due to the Covid-19 pandemic may lead to fistula complications in elderly women with Gellhorn pessaries.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Pandemias , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/terapia , Pessários , SARS-CoV-2
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...