Interobserver Agreement and Satisfaction With the use of Telemedicine for Evaluating low Back Pain: A Primary, Observational, Cross-Sectional, Analytical Study.

STUDY DESIGN: A primary, observational, cross-sectional, analytical study. OBJECTIVE: The development of a framework for systematic telemedicine (TM) for orthopedic physicians in frequent clinical care may increase agreement in diagnosis and satisfaction among users of TM. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the agreement in the diagnosis of low back pain (LBP) between TM, systematized by a self-completed digital questionnaire, and face-to-face (FF) care in patients with LBP. METHODS: This study included adults up to 75 years of age with LBP for more than 6 weeks. They were evaluated at 2 independent time points (TM and FF) by different orthopedists with 3 different levels of expertise. Professionals evaluated the sample without prior knowledge of the diagnosis, and each orthopedist provided a diagnosis. Diagnostic agreement was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were the duration of the visit and satisfaction among healthcare professionals. RESULTS: A total of 168 participants were eligible, of whom 126 sought care through TM and 122 sought FF care (mean age, 47 years [range, 18-75 years]; 66.4% women). The agreement among professionals regarding the diagnosis was moderate (kappa = .585, P = .001). TM was faster than FF (11.9 minutes (standard deviation = 4.1) vs 18.6 (SD = 6.9), P < .001). Professional satisfaction was higher among spine specialists than among orthopedic residents and orthopedists who were not specialists in spine surgery. CONCLUSION: Agreement in diagnosis was moderate for TM, with a 30% shorter visit duration than FF. Satisfaction varied by professional expertise and was higher among spine specialists than among professionals with other expertise.

TRANSOLECRANON FRACTURE-DISLOCATION: CONCEPTS AND FUNCTIONAL RESULTS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the functional results of the treatment protocol for the treatment of transolecranon fracture-dislocation, by surgical reduction and osteosynthesis with plate and screws, in patients attended at a referral hospital for orthopedic trauma, with a minimum follow-up period of six months. Methods: Twenty-five individuals treated surgically from January 2014 to November 2018 were selected for a primary observational longitudinal study using questionnaires to assess upper limb and elbow function (DASH and MEPS), quality of life (SF-12), pain (visual analog scale - VAS), and radiographic evaluation in anteroposterior and lateral views of the elbow. Results: Fifteen patients were male, and the mean age was 46.8 years. All participants had their fractures consolidated, with no radiolgraphic signs of implant failure, or degenerative arthritis. Mean range of motion was reduced relative to the contralateral limb: 102.6º for flexion-extension and 132.8º for pronation-supination. The mean MEPS and DASH scores were 89.6 and 16.5 respectively. There was no residual pain in 84% of the cases according to the VAS. Conclusion: The surgical treatment proposed for transolecranon fracture-dislocations showed satisfactory results according to MEPS, DASH scores and quality of life measures. Evidence Level IV; Retrospective observational study.

Objetivo: Avaliar os resultados funcionais do protocolo de tratamento da fratura-luxação transolecraniana, por redução cirúrgica e osteossíntese com placa e parafusos, nos pacientes atendidos em hospital de referência para trauma ortopédico, com seguimento mínimo de seis meses. Métodos: vinte e cinco indivíduos tratados cirurgicamente de janeiro de 2014 a novembro de 2018 foram selecionados para um estudo longitudinal observacional primário, utilizando questionários para avaliar a função do membro superior e cotovelo (DASH e MEPS), qualidade de vida (SF-12), dor (visual escala analógica - EVA), e avaliação radiográfica nas incidências anteroposterior e perfil do cotovelo. Resultados: Quinze pacientes eram do sexo masculino e a média de idade foi de 46,8 anos. Todos os participantes tiveram suas fraturas consolidadas, sem sinais radiográficos de falha do implante ou artrite degenerativa. A amplitude média do movimento foi reduzida em relação ao membro contralateral: 102,6º para flexo-extensão e 132,8º para pronossupinação. Os escores médios de MEPS e DASH foram 89,6 e 16,5, respectivamente. Não houve dor residual em 84% dos casos de acordo com a EAV. Conclusão: O tratamento cirúrgico proposto para a fratura-luxação transolecraniana apresentou resultados satisfatórios de acordo com MEPS, escores DASH e medidas de qualidade de vida. Nível de evidência IV; Estudo observacional retrospectivo.

Protocol of HOTFy: randomised clinical trial to hyperbaric oxygen therapy in fibromyalgia.

INTRODUCTION: Fibromyalgia is a polysymptomatic syndrome with a prevalence between 0.2% and 13% of the population and causes work disabilities in approximately half of affected patients. Several treatments to fibromyalgia have been proposed with partial improvement. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy and when it should be introduced to fibromyalgia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a protocol for an open-label, crossover, randomised clinical trial comparing treatment with hyperbaric oxygen therapy and standardised treatment to fibromyalgia. In the proposed study, 56 individuals with fibromyalgia will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio into a single, fixed, random block, in which one group will receive hyperbaric oxygen therapy and another will receive standard treatment. Subsequently, the groups will be crossed. Participants will be evaluated at baseline, eight and 16 weeks based on functional impairment assessed with the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-Brazilian Portuguese version, psychopathological symptoms questionnaire and short-form quality of life questionnaire. The improvement of symptoms concerning the moment of therapy used will be compared between groups. For sample size calculation, a moderate effect size, 80% power and 95% CI will be estimated, in a total of 46 patients. Considering a dropout of 20%, 56 patients should be recruited. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora Teaching Hospital ethics committee and assigned the number 53058421.9.0000.5133 (version 3). The results will be disseminated via publications in peer-reviewed journals and presentations in medical meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: RBR-6prps8g)/UTN U1111-1278-3224.

Open reduction and internal fixation of Ideberg type IA glenoid fractures: Tricks, pearls, and potential pitfalls based on a retrospective cohort of 33 patients focusing on the rehabilitation protocol.

INTRODUCTION: The standard treatment of anterior glenaoid fractures carrying > 20% of the glenoid fossa is open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). In the herein study, we report our outcomes in a retrospective cohort of anterior and anteroinferior glenoid rim fractures using an accelerated postoperative rehabilitation protocol. A secondary aim is to describe the surgical steps for ORIF of anterior and anteroinferior glenoid rim fractures using the anterior axillary approach, describing the tricks, pearls, and pitfalls of this surgical technique. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of skeletally mature patients treated for an anterior glenoid rim fracture carrying > 20% of the glenoid fossa during a 10-year period were operated on using a vertical axillary incision, osteosynthesis with 2.0-mm cortical screws, and labral repair with small diameter metallic anchors and non-absorbable sutures. Rehabilitation began on the first postoperative day, including passive external rotation exercises and active-assisted flexion, adduction, and abduction exercises as tolerated. The exercises are performed with the patient sitting or lying down. Phase 1 is continued for 6-10 weeks until the patient regains painless, normal, or near-normal ROM. Usually by 10 weeks, the fracture and labrum are healed, so phase 2 rehabilitation begins with strengthening and ROM exercises. Radiologic and clinical outcomes, including active range of motion (ROM), glenohumeral stability, and visual analogue scale (VAS) were measured. RESULTS: About 33 patients (35 fractures) had complete medical records and pre- and post-operative imaging exams available for further analysis regarding the surgical protocol, with a mean of 4.8 years. The mean DASH questionnaire was 3.75 ± 9.0 and the mean CM score was 62.5 ± 0.1. Active flexion and internal rotation were recovered in all patients, while external rotation presented an average loss of 8° (p = 0.12) and abduction of 5° (p = 0.33). The mean VAS was 1.1 ± 0.8. No patient reported major or disabling symptoms, or great difficulty or inability to perform daily or recreational activities. No patient presented residual instability of the glenohumeral joint. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective cohort, ORIF using a vertical axillary incision, osteosynthesis with 2.0-mm screws, and labral repair with small diameter metallic anchors and non-absorbable sutures was a safe approach, with a minimal risk of complications and residual instability. The accelerated postoperative rehabilitation protocol, allowing immediate passive external rotation of the operated shoulder, resulted in a non-significant loss of ROM compared to the contralateral side. Therefore, we recommend this management strategy for anterior glenoid rim fractures in patients with unstable shoulder joint after traumatic glenohumeral dislocation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: Therapeutic Study (Surgical technique and Retrospective cohort).

Protocol of BRICS: Brazilian multicentric pragmatic randomised trial of surgical interventions for displaced diaphyseal clavicle fracture study: MIPO versus ORIF for the treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Fractures of the diaphysis of the clavicle are common; however, treatment guidelines for this condition are lacking. Surgery is associated with a lower risk of non-union and better functional outcomes but a higher risk of complications. Open reduction and internal fixation with plates and screws are the most commonly performed techniques, but they are associated with paraesthesia in the areas of incisions, extensive surgical exposure and high rates of implant removal. Minimally invasive techniques for treating these fractures have a lower rate of complications. The aim of this study is to evaluate which surgical treatment option (minimally invasive osteosynthesis or open reduction and internal fixation) has better prognosis in terms of complications and reoperations. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study proposed is a multicentric, pragmatic, randomised, open-label, superiority clinical trial between minimally invasive osteosynthesis and open reduction and internal fixation for surgical treatment of patients with displaced fractures of the clavicle shaft. In the proposed study, 190 individuals with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures, who require surgery as treatment, will be randomised. The assessment will occur at 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 weeks, respectively. The primary outcome of the study will be the number of complications and reoperations. For sample size calculation, a moderate effective size between the techniques was considered in a two-tailed test, with 95% confidence and 90% power. Complications include cases of infection, hypertrophic scarring, non-union, refracture, implant failure, hypoesthesia, skin irritation and shoulder pain. Reoperations are defined as the number of surgeries for pseudoarthrosis, implant failure, infection and elective removal of the implant. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Study approved by the institutional ethics committee (number 34249120.9.0000.5505-V.3). The results will be disseminated by publications in peer-reviewed journals and presentations in medical meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: RBR-3czz68)/UTN U1111-1257-8953.

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy as treatment for bilateral arm compartment syndrome after CrossFit: case report and literature review.

INTRODUCTION: CrossFit is a physical fitness program characterized by high-intensity workouts that can be associated with serious injury. Acute compartment syndrome in the upper limbs is a rare occurrence. It may occur after intense physical exercise, and its usual treatment is surgical. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy is a treatment described as adjunctive in cases of compartmental syndrome. PRESENTATION: We describe the case of a CrossFit practitioner who, after intense training, developed progressive symptoms of rhabdomyolysis and acute bilateral arm compartment syndrome, who was successfully treated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy and required no fasciotomy as surgical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Acute compartment syndrome in the arms after intense physical exercise is a rare occurrence that should be suspected by practitioners of physical activity experiencing intense, disproportionate and progressive pain. In the case presented, hyperbaric oxygen therapy was successfully used in the treatment of the disorder, with satisfactory progress, and without the need for a surgical fasciotomy as therapy.