RESUMO
(1) Background: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are indoor pollutants absorbed by inhalation. The association of several VOCs with lung function in children and adolescents is unknown. (2) Methods: We analyzed 505 participants, 6-17-year-olds from the 2011-2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Multiple linear regression models were fitted to estimate the associations of VOC metabolites with spirometry outcomes adjusting for covariates. (3) Results: Urinary metabolites of xylene, acrylamide, acrolein, 1,3-butadiene, cyanide, toluene, 1-bromopropane, acrylonitrile, propylene oxide, styrene, ethylbenzene, and crotonaldehyde were all detected in ≥64.5% of participants. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) % predicted was lower in participants with higher levels of metabolites of acrylamide (ß: -7.95, 95% CI: -13.69, -2.21) and styrene (ß: -6.33, 95% CI: -11.60, -1.07), whereas the FEV1 to forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio % was lower in children with higher propylene oxide metabolite levels (ß: -2.05, 95% CI: -3.49, -0.61). FEV1 % predicted was lower with higher crotonaldehyde metabolite levels only in overweight/obese participants (ß: -15.42, 95% CI: -26.76, -4.08) (Pinteraction < 0.001) and with higher 1-bromopropane metabolite levels only in those with serum cotinine > 1 ng/mL (ß: -6.26, 95% CI: -9.69, -2.82) (Pinteraction < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: We found novel associations of metabolites for acrylamide, propylene oxide, styrene, 1-bromopropane and crotonaldehyde with lower lung function in children and adolescents.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Nitrate is a probable carcinogen regulated in drinking water by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to a maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 10 mg/L nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N; equivalent to 44.3 mg/L NO3). We aimed to determine the association of US drinking water nitrate levels with overall as well as cardiovascular, cancer, and other cause mortality. STUDY DESIGN: This study used a population-based retrospective cohort design. METHODS: We analyzed data from 2029 participants of the 2005-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey followed for mortality until 2019 for a median of 13.9 years. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for mortality associated with drinking water nitrate, adjusting for covariates that included socio-economic factors and pack-years of cigarette smoking. RESULTS: Drinking water nitrate was detected in 50.8 % of the samples, had a median concentration of 0.77 mg/L NO3, and was above US EPA MCL in 0.4 % of participants. In adjusted analysis, drinking water nitrate detection was associated with 73 % higher cancer mortality (HR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.19-2.51), whereas a 10-fold increase in drinking water nitrate levels was associated with 69 % higher cancer mortality (HR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.24-2.31) and 21 % higher overall mortality (HR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.00-1.46). Drinking water nitrate below EPA MCL was still associated with higher cancer mortality (HR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.07-2.43 per 10-fold increase and HR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.08-2.42 for detection). CONCLUSIONS: Levels of drinking water nitrate may be an overlooked contributor to cancer mortality in the United States.
Assuntos
Água Potável , Neoplasias , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Humanos , Nitratos/análise , Água Potável/análise , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study addresses the limited research on racial disparities in asthma hospitalization outcomes, specifically length of stay (LOS) and readmission, across the U.S. METHODS: We analyzed in-patient and emergency department visits from the All of Us Research Program, identifying various risk factors (demographic, comorbid, temporal, and place-based) associated with asthma LOS and 30-day readmission using Bayesian mixed-effects models. RESULTS: Of 17,233 patients (48.0% White, 30.7% Black, 19.7% Hispanic/Latino, 1.3% Asian, and 0.3% Middle Eastern and North African) with 82,188 asthma visits, Black participants had 20% shorter LOS and 12% higher odds of readmission, compared to White participants in multivariate analyses. Public-insured patients had 14% longer LOS and 39% higher readmission odds than commercially insured patients. Weekend admissions resulted in a 12% shorter LOS but 10% higher readmission odds. Asthmatics with chronic diseases had a longer LOS (range: 6-39%) and higher readmission odds (range: 9-32%) except for those with allergic rhinitis, who had a 23% shorter LOS. CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing asthma hospitalization, in conjunction with diverse datasets and clinical-community partnerships, can help physicians and policymakers to systematically address racial disparities, healthcare utilization and equitable outcomes in asthma care.
Assuntos
Asma , Saúde da População , Fatores Raciais , Humanos , Asma/terapia , Teorema de Bayes , Tempo de Internação , Readmissão do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The association of prenatal exposure to organophosphate esters (OPEs) and replacement brominated flame retardants (RBFRs) with respiratory outcomes has not been previously investigated in humans, despite reports that these chemicals can cross the placenta and alter lung development as well as immune functions. METHODS: In a cohort of 342 pregnant women recruited between 2003 and 2006 in the greater Cincinnati, Ohio Metropolitan area, we measured indoor dust OPEs and RBFRs at 20 weeks of gestation and urinary OPEs at 16 and 26 weeks of gestation and at delivery. We performed generalized estimating equations and linear mixed models adjusting for covariates to determine the associations of prenatal OPEs and RBFRs exposures with adverse respiratory outcomes in childhood, reported every six months until age 5 years and with lung function at age 5 years. We used multiple informant modeling to examine time-specific associations between maternal urinary OPEs and the outcomes. RESULTS: Dust concentrations of triphenyl phosphate (TPHP) (RR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.18-1.66), 2-ethylhexyl-2,3,4,5-tetrabromobenzoate (RR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.23-1.85), and bis(2-ethylhexyl) tetrabromophthalate (RR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.28-1.94) were associated with higher risk of wheezing during childhood. Dust TPHP concentrations were associated with higher risk of respiratory infections (RR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.08-1.94), and dust tris-(2-chloroethyl) phosphate concentrations were associated with hay fever/allergies (RR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01-1.21). We also found that dust tris-(2-chloroethyl) phosphate loadings were associated with lower lung function. Urinary OPEs mainly at week 16 of gestation tended to be associated with adverse respiratory outcome, while bis(1-chloro-2-propyl) phosphate and diphenyl phosphate at delivery were associated with lower risk of hay fever/allergies. CONCLUSIONS: In-utero exposure to OPEs and RBFRs may be a risk factor for adverse respiratory outcomes in childhood, depending on the timing of exposure.
Assuntos
Retardadores de Chama , Hipersensibilidade , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal , Gravidez , Humanos , Feminino , Pré-Escolar , Retardadores de Chama/toxicidade , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal/induzido quimicamente , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal/epidemiologia , Fosfatos , Poeira , Organofosfatos/toxicidadeRESUMO
Objectives: An important step in preparing data for statistical analysis is outlier detection and removal, yet no gold standard exists in current literature. The objective of this study is to identify the ideal decision test using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2017-2018 dietary data. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of NHANES 24-h dietary recalls, considering the survey's multi-stage cluster design. Six outlier detection and removal strategies were assessed by evaluating the decision tests' impact on the Pearson's correlation coefficient among macronutrients. Furthermore, we assessed changes in the effect size estimates based on pre-defined sample sizes. The data were collected as part of the 2017-2018 24-h dietary recall among adult participants (N=4,893). Results: Effect estimate changes for macronutrients varied from 6.5 % for protein to 39.3 % for alcohol across all decision tests. The largest proportion of outliers removed was 4.0 % in the large sample size, for the decision test, >2 standard deviations from the mean. The smallest sample size, particularly for alcohol analysis, was most affected by the six decision tests when compared to no decision test. Conclusions: This study, the first to use 2017-2018 NHANES dietary data for outlier evaluation, emphasizes the importance of selecting an appropriate decision test considering factors such as statistical power, sample size, normality assumptions, the proportion of data removed, effect estimate changes, and the consistency of estimates across sample sizes. We recommend the use of non-parametric tests for non-normally distributed variables of interest.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Children are highly exposed to flame retardants in indoor environments, partly through inhalation. However, the associations of early life exposure to novel organophosphate (OPFRs) and replacement brominated flame retardants (RBFRs) with adverse respiratory outcomes during childhood are unclear. METHODS: We used a prospective birth cohort of 234 children recruited from the greater Cincinnati, Ohio metropolitan area between 2003 and 2006. OPFRs and RBFRs were analyzed in dust sampled from the homes' main activity room and the children's bedroom floor at child age 1 year. Caregivers reported subsequent respiratory symptoms every six months until child age 5 years and we measured forced expiratory volume in 1 s as well as peak expiratory flow (PEF) at child age 5 years. We performed generalized estimating equations and linear regression modeling adjusted for covariates to examine the exposure-outcome associations. RESULTS: Geometric means (GMs) (standard error [SE]) for dust concentrations were 10.27 (0.63) µg/g for total OPFRs (ΣOPFRs) and 0.48 (0.04) µg/g for total RBFRs (ΣRBFRs); GMs (SE) for dust loadings were 2.82 (0.26) µg/m2 for ΣOPFRs and 0.13 (0.01) µg/m2 for ΣRBFRs. Dust ∑OPFRs concentrations at age 1 year were associated with higher subsequent risks of wheezing (relative risk [RR]: 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.20-2.34), respiratory infections (RR: 4.01, 95% CI: 1.95-8.24), and hay fever/allergies (RR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.10-1.60), whereas ∑OPFRs dust loadings at age 1 year were associated with higher risks of subsequent respiratory infections (RR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.05-3.34) and hay fever/allergies (RR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.19-1.51). PEF (mL/min) was lower with higher ∑OPFRs dust loadings (ß: -12.10, 95% CI: -21.10, -3.10) and with the RBFR bis(2-ethylhexyl) tetrabromophthalate (ß: -9.05, 95% CI: -17.67, -0.43). CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to OPFRs and RBFRs during infancy may be a risk factor for adverse respiratory outcomes during childhood.
Assuntos
Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados , Retardadores de Chama , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal , Criança , Humanos , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Organofosfatos/toxicidade , Organofosfatos/análise , Retardadores de Chama/toxicidade , Retardadores de Chama/análise , Poeira/análise , Estudos Prospectivos , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/efeitos adversos , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/análise , Exposição Ambiental/análise , Éteres Difenil Halogenados/análise , Monitoramento AmbientalRESUMO
Rationale: Previous studies have identified risk factors for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) hospitalization in children. However, these studies have been limited in their ability to disentangle the contribution of racial disparities, allergic comorbidities, and environmental exposures to the development of severe COVID-19 in at-risk children with allergies. Objectives: To examine racial and ethnic disparities in COVID-19 hospitalization and their links to potentially underlying allergic comorbidities and individual and place-based factors in children with allergies. Methods: This is an electronic health record-based retrospective study of children in 2020. The outcome was COVID-19 hospitalization categorized as no hospital care for patients with asymptomatic/mild illness, short stay for patients admitted and discharged within 24 hours, and prolonged stay for patients requiring additional time to discharge (more than 24 h). Mixed-effects and mediation models were used to determine relationships among independent variables, mediators, and COVID-19 hospitalization. Results: Among the 5,258 children with COVID-19 positive test or diagnosis, 10% required a short stay, and 3.7% required a prolonged stay. Black and Hispanic children had higher odds of longer stays than non-Hispanic White children (both P < 0.001). Children with obesity and eosinophilic esophagitis diagnoses had higher odds of short and prolonged stay (all P < 0.05). Area-level deprivation was associated with short stay (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 15.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.16-45.47 for every 0.1-unit increase) and prolonged stay (AOR, 11.82; 95% CI, 2.25-62.01 for every 0.1-unit increase). Associations between race/ethnicity and COVID-19 hospitalization were primarily mediated by insurance and area-level deprivation, altogether accounting for 99% of the variation in COVID-19 hospitalization. Conclusions: There were racial and ethnic differences in children with allergies and individual and place-based factors related to COVID-19 hospitalization. Differences were primarily mediated by insurance and area-level deprivation, altogether accounting for 99% of the variation in COVID-19 hospitalization. A better understanding of COVID-related morbidity in children and the link to place-based factors is key to developing prevention strategies capable of equitably improving outcomes.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Hipersensibilidade , Humanos , Criança , Estudos Retrospectivos , População Branca , Análise Multinível , Hospitalização , Hipersensibilidade/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are associated with adverse respiratory outcomes at high occupational exposures. However, whether exposure levels found in the general population have similar effects is unknown. METHODS: We analyzed data on 1342 adult participants in the 2011-2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey aged ≥18 years old who had urinary VOC metabolites and spirometry measurements available. Linear regression models adjusting for covariates were fitted to estimate the associations of VOC exposures levels and spirometry outcomes, while accounting for survey design and sampling weights to generate nationally representative estimates. RESULTS: The urinary metabolites for xylene, acrylamide, acrolein, 1,3-butadiene, cyanide, toluene, 1-bromopropane, acrylonitrile, propylene oxide, styrene, ethylbenzene, and crotonaldehyde in our analysis were all detected in >75% of participants. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) to forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio % was lower with urinary metabolites of acrylamide (ß: -2.65, 95% CI: -4.32, -0.98), acrylonitrile (ß: -1.02, 95% CI: -2.01, -0.03), and styrene (ß: -3.13, 95% CI: -5.35, -0.90). FEV1% predicted was lower with the urinary metabolites of acrolein (ß: -7.77, 95% CI: -13.29, -2.25), acrylonitrile (ß: -2.05, 95% CI: -3.77, -0.34), propylene oxide (ß: -2.90, 95% CI: -5.50, -0.32), and styrene (ß: -4.41, 95% CI: -6.97, -1.85). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study of a representative sample of the U.S. adult population to reveal associations of acrylonitrile, propylene oxide, and styrene urinary metabolites with reduced lung function at non-occupational exposures. Results also support previous evidence of acrylamide and acrolein's association with adverse respiratory outcomes.
Assuntos
Compostos Orgânicos Voláteis , Adulto , Humanos , Adolescente , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Acrilamida , Estireno , Pulmão/metabolismoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Oxidative stress plays a key role in the pathogenesis of respiratory diseases; however, studies on antioxidant vitamins and respiratory outcomes have been conflicting. We evaluated whether lower serum levels of vitamins A, C, D, and E are associated with respiratory morbidity and mortality in the U.S. adult population. METHODS: We conducted a pooled analysis of data from the 1988-1994 and 1999-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (participants aged ≥ 20 years). We estimated covariate-adjusted odds ratios (aOR) per interquartile decrease in each serum vitamin level to quantify associations with respiratory morbidity, and covariate-adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) to quantify associations with respiratory mortality assessed prospectively through 2015. Vitamin supplementation and smoking were evaluated as potential effect modifiers. RESULTS: Lower serum vitamin C increased the odds of wheeze among all participants (overall aOR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.01-1.16). Among smokers, lower serum α-tocopherol vitamin E increased the odds of wheeze (aOR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.04-1.19) and chronic bronchitis/emphysema (aOR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.03-1.24). Conversely, lower serum γ-tocopherol vitamin E was associated with lower odds of wheeze and chronic bronchitis/emphysema (overall aORs: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.79-0.92 and 0.85, 95% CI: 0.76-0.95, respectively). Lower serum vitamin C was associated with increased chronic lower respiratory disease (CLRD) mortality in all participants (overall aHR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.07-1.51), whereas lower serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) tended to increase mortality from CLRD and influenza/pneumonia among smokers (aHR range: 1.33-1.75). Mortality from influenza/ pneumonia increased with decreasing serum vitamin A levels in all participants (overall aHR: 1.21, 95% CI: 0.99-1.48). In pooled analysis, vitamin C deficiency and 25-OHD insufficiency were associated with mortality from influenza/pneumonia, increasing mortality risk up to twofold. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis of nationally representative data on over 34,000 participants showed that lower serum levels of vitamins A, C, D, and α-tocopherol vitamin E are associated with increased respiratory morbidity and/or mortality in U.S. adults. The results underscore the importance of antioxidant vitamins in respiratory health.
Assuntos
Bronquite Crônica , Enfisema , Influenza Humana , Adulto , Antioxidantes , Ácido Ascórbico , Humanos , Morbidade , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Vitamina A , Vitaminas , alfa-TocoferolRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Age of asthma onset has emerged as an important determinant of asthma phenotypes; however, the comorbidities that predominate in either childhood- or adult-onset asthma are not known. OBJECTIVE: To identify comorbidities associated with adult-onset asthma vs childhood-onset asthma and with age of asthma diagnosis. METHODS: We analyzed data on 27,437 adult participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys conducted from 2001 to 2018. Logistic regression adjusted for covariates was used to identify comorbidities associated with the asthma phenotypes and age of asthma diagnosis. RESULTS: Approximately 12.6% of participants were ever diagnosed with asthma; the prevalence of childhood-onset (before 18 years old) and adult-onset (≥ 18 years old) current asthma was 2.7% and 5.5%, respectively. After adjustment for covariates including age, adult-onset asthma was associated with higher odds of obesity (odds ratio [OR], 1.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.96), hypercholesterolemia (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.08-2.56), borderline high serum triglycerides (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.17-2.71), and osteoarthritis (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.04-2.20) than was childhood-onset asthma. Older age of asthma diagnosis (per 5-year increase) was also associated with higher odds of diabetes (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.00-1.07) and hypertension (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.07), whereas younger age of asthma diagnosis was associated with higher odds of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.04-1.19). CONCLUSION: Age- and covariates-adjusted prevalence of obesity, dyslipidemia, arthritis, diabetes, and hypertension is higher in adult-onset asthma than in childhood-onset asthma, and with older age of asthma diagnosis. Conversely, the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease increases with younger age of asthma diagnosis.
Assuntos
Asma , Hipertensão , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Asma/diagnóstico , Humanos , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Obesidade , Prevalência , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Background: Ocular candidiasis is a known complication of candidemia. Given the poor ocular penetration of echinocandins, there is some concern that the increasing use of echinocandins may portend an increased incidence of ophthalmic complications. We examined the changing trends in antifungal prescribing patterns and the incidence of ophthalmic complications after candidemia. Methods: Patients with blood cultures positive for Candida species between January 2014 and June 2020 who underwent screening fundoscopic examination by an ophthalmologist were analyzed. The χ2 analysis was used to compare antifungal prescriptions and ocular exam findings before and after 2016. Trend analysis was also performed to assess temporal changes in prescribing practices and eye exam findings. Results: There were 226 candidemia cases during the study period, 129 (57.1%) of which underwent screening eye exams. From 2014 to 2015, 24 of 37 (64.5%) patients received eye-penetrating antifungals compared to 36 of 92 (39.1%) from 2016 to 2020 (Pâ =â .008). Overall, 30 of 129 (23.3%) patients had abnormal eye exams with the prevalence of abnormal findings being 7 of 37 (18.9%) before 2016 compared to 23 of 92 (25%, Pâ =â .46) thereafter. A trend analysis revealed an increase in abnormal eye findings over the study period (Pâ =â .008). Of the 30 patients who had abnormal eye exams, 9 (30%) had a change in systemic antifungal therapy from echinocandins to eye-penetrating antifungals. Echinocandin use was associated with abnormal eye findings. Conclusions: Prescription of eye-penetrating antifungals for candidemia has trended down since 2016. This was associated with a concomitant increase in abnormal findings on screening fundoscopy. Abnormal eye exams were not uncommon throughout our study period.
RESUMO
Neonicotinoids are the most used pesticides in the world and, despite being harmful to honeybees, they are considered safe for mammals. However, they have been associated with decreasing testosterone levels in several experimental animal models. In the present study, we aimed to determine the association of urinary neonicotinoids with serum testosterone in humans. We analyzed data on 2014 male and female participants to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey conducted between 2015 and 2016 aged 6 or older. In linear regression adjusted for age and potential confounders, serum total testosterone was 37.78% lower with 10-fold increase in urinary total neonicotinoids (95% CI: -58.82, -6.00), 20.81% lower with 10-fold increase in urinary 5-hydroxy-imidacloprid (95% CI: -34.94, -3.62) and 25.01% lower with 10-fold increase in urinary n-desmethyl-acetamiprid (95% CI: -39.80, -6.58) among males. Serum free androgen index (FAI) was also decreased with higher urinary n-desmethyl-acetamiprid. In females, serum total testosterone was 32.91% lower with 10-fold increase in urinary total neonicotinoids (95% CI: -54.93, -0.13), 21.32% lower with 10-fold increase in urinary 5-hydroxy-imidacloprid (95% CI: -29.31, -12.42) and 15.42% lower with urinary detection of 5-hydroxy-imidacloprid (95% CI: -22.80, -7.34). FAI was likewise reduced with higher urinary levels of 5-hydroxy-imidacloprid and N-desmethyl-acetamiprid. In conclusion, this study using a sample representative of the US population is the first to report that exposure to neonicotinoids is associated with decreased serum testosterone levels in humans. However, future prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
Assuntos
Inseticidas , Praguicidas , Animais , Abelhas , Feminino , Humanos , Inseticidas/toxicidade , Masculino , Mamíferos , Neonicotinoides , Nitrocompostos , Inquéritos Nutricionais , TestosteronaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Smoking status does not indicate the amount or length of tobacco use, and thus, it is an imperfect measure to assess the association between cigarette smoking and severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes. This investigation assessed whether cigarette smoking status, intensity of smoking (i.e., average daily packs of cigarettes smoked), duration of smoking, and pack-years of smoking are associated with severe outcomes among adults diagnosed with COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study in which we identified consecutive patients diagnosed with COVID-19 at the University of Cincinnati healthcare system between 13 March 2020 and 30 September 2020 who had complete information on smoking status, severe COVID-19 outcomes, and covariates (i.e., demographics and comorbidities). We used logistic regression to evaluate the associations of smoking status and intensity of smoking with COVID-19 severity, defined as hospitalization, admission to intensive care unit (ICU), or death, adjusting for sociodemographics and comorbidities. RESULTS: Among the 4611 COVID-19 patients included in the analysis, 18.2% were current smokers and 20.7% were former smokers. The prevalence of COVID-19 outcomes was 28.9% for hospitalization, 9.8% for ICU admission, and 1.4% for death. In the adjusted analysis, current smoking (AOR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.02-1.49), former smoking (AOR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.07-1.54), and pack-years of smoking (AOR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.02-1.17) were associated with a higher prevalence of hospitalization. Average daily packs of cigarettes smoked was associated with a higher prevalence of hospitalization (AOR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.10-1.53) and ICU admission (AOR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.04-1.44). CONCLUSIONS: Smoking status, pack-years, and intensity of smoking were associated with hospitalizations in patients with COVID-19 and intensity of smoking was associated with ICU admission. The findings underscore the need for detailed information beyond smoking status when evaluating smokers with COVID-19 so that the potential for adverse sequelae may be optimally managed in at-risk patients.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Hospitalização , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Fumar/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Ecological studies have suggested an association between exposure to particulate matter ≤2.5 µm (PM2.5 ) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity. However, these findings are yet to be validated in individual-level studies. We aimed to determine the association of long-term PM2.5 exposure with hospitalization among individual patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). METHODS: We estimated the 10-year (2009-2018) PM2.5 exposure at the residential zip code of COVID-19 patients diagnosed at the University of Cincinnati healthcare system between 13 March 2020 and 30 September 2020. Logistic regression was used to determine the odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI for COVID-19 hospitalizations associated with PM2.5 , adjusting for socioeconomic characteristics and comorbidities. RESULTS: Among the 14,783 COVID-19 patients included in our study, 13.6% were hospitalized; the geometric mean (SD) PM2.5 was 10.48 (1.12) µg/m3 . In adjusted analysis, 1 µg/m3 increase in 10-year annual average PM2.5 was associated with 18% higher hospitalization (OR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.11-1.26). Likewise, 1 µg/m3 increase in PM2.5 estimated for the year 2018 was associated with 14% higher hospitalization (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.08-1.21). CONCLUSION: Long-term PM2.5 exposure is associated with increased hospitalization in COVID-19. Therefore, more stringent COVID-19 prevention measures may be needed in areas with higher PM2.5 exposure to reduce the disease morbidity and healthcare burden.
Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos , Poluição do Ar/efeitos adversos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Material Particulado/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Poluentes Atmosféricos/efeitos adversos , Poluentes Atmosféricos/análise , Poluição do Ar/análise , COVID-19/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Material Particulado/análise , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Ecological evidence suggests that exposure to air pollution affects coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes. However, no individual-level study has confirmed the association to date. METHODS: We identified COVID-19 patients diagnosed at the University of Cincinnati hospitals and clinics and estimated particulate matter ≤2.5 µm (PM2.5) exposure over a 10-year period (2008-2017) at their residential zip codes. We used logistic regression to evaluate the association between PM2.5 exposure and hospitalizations for COVID-19, adjusting for socioeconomic characteristics and comorbidities. RESULTS: Among the 1128 patients included in our study, the mean (standard deviation) PM2.5 was 11.34 (0.70) µg/m3 for the 10-year average exposure and 13.83 (1.03) µg/m3 for the 10-year maximal exposures. The association between long-term PM2.5 exposure and hospitalization for COVID-19 was contingent upon having pre-existing asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary (COPD) (Pinteraction = 0.030 for average PM2.5 and Pinteraction = 0.001 for maximal PM2.5). In COVID-19 patients with asthma or COPD, the odds of hospitalization were 62% higher with 1 µg/m3 increment in 10-year average PM2.5 (odds ratio [OR]: 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-2.64) and 65% higher with 1 µg/m3 increase in 10-year maximal PM2.5 levels (OR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.16-2.35). However, among COVID-19 patients without asthma or COPD, PM2.5 exposure was not associated with higher hospitalizations (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.65-1.09 for average PM2.5 and OR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.65-0.95 for maximal PM2.5). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term exposure to PM2.5 is associated with higher odds of hospitalization in COVID-19 patients with pre-existing asthma or COPD.
Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos/efeitos adversos , Poluição do Ar/efeitos adversos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Material Particulado/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Asma/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Blood type purportedly influences susceptibility to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, but whether it affects severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is unclear. Therefore, we examined the association of blood type and rhesus with hospitalization and disease severity among 428 COVID-19 patients diagnosed at the University of Cincinnati health system. In the sample, 50.2% of participants had the blood type O, 38.7% had the blood type A, 17.5% had the blood type B, and 3.5% had the blood type AB. In analysis adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics and comorbidities, the blood types A (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.54, 1.50), B (OR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.51, 1.69), AB (OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.20, 2.41), and O (OR: 1.18, 95%: 0.74, 1.98) were not associated with hospitalization for COVID-19. Similarly, the blood types A (OR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.52, 1.65), B (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.46, 1.84), AB (OR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.04, 2.44), and O (OR: 1.25, 95%: 0.73, 2.14) were not associated with admission to intensive care unit or death in COVID-19. In conclusion, blood type is not associated with hospitalization or disease severity in COVID-19; therefore, it may not be useful marker for identifying patients at risk for severe COVID-19.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) first identified in Wuhan in December 2019 became a pandemic within a few months of its discovery. The impact of COVID-19 is due to both its rapid spread and its severity, but the determinants of severity have not been fully delineated. OBJECTIVE: Identify factors associated with hospitalization and disease severity in a racially and ethnically diverse cohort of COVID-19 patients. METHODS: We analyzed data from COVID-19 patients diagnosed at the University of Cincinnati health system from March 13, 2020 to May 31, 2020. Severe COVID-19 was defined as admission to intensive care unit or death. Logistic regression modeling adjusted for covariates was used to identify the factors associated with hospitalization and severe COVID-19. RESULTS: Among the 689 COVID-19 patients included in our study, 29.2% were non-Hispanic White, 25.5% were non-Hispanic Black, 32.5% were Hispanic, and 12.8% were of other race/ethnicity. About 31.3% of patients were hospitalized and 13.2% had severe disease. In adjusted analyses, the sociodemographic factors associated with hospitalization and/or disease severity included older age, non-Hispanic Black or Hispanic race/ethnicity (compared to non-Hispanic White), and smoking. The following comorbidities: diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, asthma, COPD, chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular diseases, osteoarthritis, and vitamin D deficiency were associated with hospitalization and/or disease severity. Hematological disorders such as anemia, coagulation disorders, and thrombocytopenia were associated with both hospitalization and disease severity. CONCLUSION: This study confirms race and ethnicity as predictors of severe COVID-19. It also finds clinical risk factors for hospitalization and severe COVID-19 not previously identified such a vitamin D deficiency, hypercholesterolemia, osteoarthritis, and anemia.