CYP2C8 Genotype Significantly Alters Imatinib Metabolism in Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to determine the effects of the CYP2C8*3 and *4 polymorphisms on imatinib metabolism and plasma imatinib concentrations in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients. METHODS: We genotyped 210 CML patients from the TIDELII trial receiving imatinib 400-800 mg/day for CYP2C8*3 (rs11572080, rs10509681) and *4 (rs1058930). Steady-state trough total plasma N-desmethyl imatinib (major metabolite):imatinib concentration ratios (metabolic ratios) and trough total plasma imatinib concentrations were compared between genotypes (one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc). RESULTS: CYP2C8*3 (n = 34) and *4 (n = 15) carriers had significantly higher (P < 0.01) and lower (P < 0.01) metabolic ratios, respectively, than CYP2C8*1/*1 (n = 147) patients (median ± standard deviation: 0.28 ± 0.08, 0.18 ± 0.06 and 0.22 ± 0.08, respectively). Plasma imatinib concentrations were consequently > 50% higher for CYP2C8*1/*4 than for CYP2C8*1/*1 and CYP2C8*3 carriers (2.18 ± 0.66 vs. 1.45 ± 0.74 [P < 0.05] and 1.36 ± 0.98 µg/mL [P < 0.05], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: CYP2C8 genotype significantly alters imatinib metabolism in patients through gain- and loss-of-function mechanisms.

CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 involvement in the primary oxidative metabolism of hydrocodone by human liver microsomes.

AIM: To determine the Michaelis-Menten kinetics of hydrocodone metabolism to its O- and N-demethylated products, hydromorphone and norhydrocodone, to determine the individual cytochrome p450 enzymes involved, and to predict the in vivo hepatic intrinsic clearance of hydrocodone via these pathways. METHODS: Liver microsomes from six CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers (EM) and one CYP2D6 poor metabolizer (PM) were used to determine the kinetics of hydromorphone and norhydrocodone formation. Chemical and antibody inhibitors were used to identify the cytochrome p450 isoforms catalyzing these pathways. Expressed recombinant cytochrome p450 enzymes were used to characterize further the metabolism of hydrocodone. RESULTS: Hydromorphone formation in liver microsomes from CYP2D6 EMs was dependent on a high affinity enzyme (Km = 26 microm) contributing 95%, and to a lesser degree a low affinity enzyme (Km = 3.4 mm). In contrast, only a low affinity enzyme (Km = 8.5 mm) formed this metabolite in the liver from the CYP2D6 PM, with significantly decreased hydromorphone formation compared with the livers from the EMs. Norhydrocodone was formed by a single low affinity enzyme (Km = 5.1 mm) in livers from both CYP2D6 EM and PM. Recombinant CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 formed only hydromorphone and only norhydrocodone, respectively. Hydromorphone formation was inhibited by quinidine (a selective inhibitor of CYP2D6 activity), and monoclonal antibodies specific to CYP2D6. Troleandomycin, ketoconazole (both CYP3A4 inhibitors) and monoclonal antibodies specific for CYP3A4 inhibited norhydrocodone formation. Extrapolation of in vitro to in vivo data resulted in a predicted total hepatic clearance of 227 ml x h-1 x kg-1 and 124 ml x h-1 x kg-1 for CYP2D6 EM and PM, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The O-demethylation of hydrocodone is predominantly catalyzed by CYP2D6 and to a lesser extent by an unknown low affinity cytochrome p450 enzyme. Norhydrocodone formation was attributed to CYP3A4. Comparison of recalculated published clearance data for hydrocodone, with those predicted in the present work, indicate that about 40% of the clearance of hydrocodone is via non-CYP pathways. Our data also suggest that the genetic polymorphisms of CYP2D6 may influence hydrocodone metabolism and its therapeutic efficacy.

Quantification of the O- and N-demethylated metabolites of hydrocodone and oxycodone in human liver microsomes using liquid chromatography with ultraviolet absorbance detection.

High-performance liquid chromatographic assays for the O- and N-demethylated oxidative metabolites of hydrocodone and oxycodone formed in human liver microsomes are described. A solvent-solvent extraction/re-extraction procedure followed by reversed-phase HPLC with UV detection at 210 nm allows for the quantification of hydromorphone, norhydrocodone, oxymorphone and noroxycodone. Calibration curve concentration ranges were 0.63-400 microM (0.18-114 microg/ml) and 1.25-400 microM (0.36-114 microg/ml) for hydromorphone and norhydrocodone, respectively and 0.13-20 microM (0.04-6.03 microg/ml) and 1-200 microM (0.30-60 microg/ml) for oxymorphone and noroxycodone, respectively. Assay performance was determined by intra- and inter-assay precision and inaccuracies for quality control samples and was <15% for all metabolites at each quality control concentration. These methods provide good precision, accuracy and sensitivity for use in in vitro kinetic studies investigating the oxidative metabolism of hydrocodone and oxycodone in human liver microsomes.

Methadone maintenance patients are cross-tolerant to the antinociceptive effects of morphine.

We have previously shown that methadone maintenance patients are hyperalgesic. Very little is known about the antinociceptive effects of additional opioids in these patients. This study (1) compared the intensity and duration of antinociceptive responses, at two pseudo-steady-state plasma morphine concentrations (C(SS1) and C(SS2)), between four patients on stable, once daily, doses of methadone and four matched control subjects; and (2) determined, in methadone patients, whether the antinociceptive effects of morphine are affected by changes in plasma R(-)-methadone concentration that occur during an inter-dosing interval. Two types of nociceptive stimuli were used: (1) a cold pressor test (CP), (2) electrical stimulation (ES). Morphine was administered intravenously to achieve the two consecutive plasma concentrations. Blood samples were collected, concurrently with nociceptive responses, to determine plasma morphine concentrations. Methadone patients achieved mean C(SS1) and C(SS2) of 16 and 55 ng/ml respectively; those of controls were 11 and 33 ng/ml. Methadone patients were hyperalgesic to pain induced by CP but not ES. Despite significantly greater plasma morphine concentrations, methadone patients experienced minimal antinociception in comparison with controls. Furthermore in methadone patients, the antinociception ceased when the infusion ended. In comparison, the duration of effect in control subjects was 3 h. The fluctuations that occurred in plasma R(-)-methadone concentration during an inter-dosing interval had little effect on patients' responses to morphine. Our findings suggest that methadone patients are cross-tolerant to the antinociceptive effects of morphine, and conventional doses of morphine are likely to be ineffective in managing episodes of acute pain amongst this patient group. Further research is needed to determine whether other drugs are more effective than morphine in managing acute pain in this patient population.