Cardiovascular Drug Use After Acute Kidney Injury Among Hospitalized Patients With a History of Myocardial Infarction.

Introduction: Patients who survive acute kidney injury (AKI) may receive fewer cardioprotective drugs. Our objective was to measure the difference in time to dispensing of evidence-based cardiovascular drugs in patients with a history of myocardial infarction (MI) with and without AKI. Methods: This was a population-based cohort study of patients 66 years of age and older with a history of MI who survived a hospitalization complicated with AKI, propensity-score matched to patients without AKI. The primary outcome was time to outpatient dispensing of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi)/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), statin, or ß-blocker within 1 year of hospital discharge. Results: We identified 28,871 patients with AKI, of whom 21,452 were matched 1:1 to patients without AKI. In the matched cohort, mean age was 80 years, 40% were female, and 34% had an MI during the index hospitalization. AKI was associated with less frequent dispensing of all 3 cardiovascular drug classes within 1 year of hospital discharge (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-0.95). This association was most pronounced in patients with stage 2 (sHR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.75-0.88) and stage 3 (sHR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.64-0.79) AKI. We observed less frequent dispensing of statins in patients with stage 2 (sHR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.81-0.92) and stage 3 (sHR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.93) AKI and less frequent dispensing of ß-blockers in patients with stage 3 AKI (sHR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.79-0.94). Conclusion: In patients with a history of MI, survivors of AKI were less likely to receive prescriptions for ACEi/ARB, statins, or ß-blockers within 1 year of hospital discharge. This association was most pronounced in patients with stages 2 and 3 AKI.

Timing of kidney replacement therapy initiation in acute kidney injury.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Over the past 5 years, four major randomized controlled trials were published informing our practice on the optimal timing for kidney replacement therapy (KRT) initiation in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). In this review, we summarize the main findings of these trails and discuss the knowledge gaps that still need to be addressed. RECENT FINDINGS: Four recent trials compared early versus delayed initiation of KRT in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Though each trial had unique design features, the three largest trials showed that earlier initiation of KRT did not reduce all-cause mortality. SUMMARY: A preemptive strategy for initiation of kidney replacement therapy does not confer better survival in critically ill patients with severe AKI. However, early initiation of KRT was associated with a greater risk of iatrogenic complications and one trial showed a higher risk of persistent dialysis dependence. In the absence of absolute indications for KRT, clinicians should defer KRT initiation in patients with AKI. Further research is needed to examine the safety of prolonged KRT deferral and identify markers of fluid overload that may serve to trigger KRT initiation.

Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Cancer: A Review of Onconephrology.

Over the past 2 decades, significant research and advancements have been made in oncology and its therapeutics. Thanks to novel diagnostic methods, treatments, and supportive measures, patients with cancer live longer and have a better quality of life. However, an unforeseen consequence of this progress has been increasing medical complications, including acute kidney injury. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the epidemiology and most common causes of acute kidney injury in patients with cancer unrelated to oncological treatment.