Ibubrofen in the treatment of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants: what we know, what we still do not know.

The patency of the ductus arteriosus has ever been considered as a pathological situation in preterm infants and one likely cause of mortality and morbidity, including broncho-pulmonary dysplasia, necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular haemorrhage, retinopathy of prematurity. The incidence of patent ductus arteriosus is inversely proportional to gestational age and infants with the lowest gestational ages are the most exposed to the complications of prematurity. So, associations between patent ductus arteriosus and the other morbidities may not be causative and patent ductus arteriosus could be more a sign of immaturity and severity of disease than the cause of these problems. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, such as indomethacin or ibuprofen, have been shown to be effective in closing or preventing patent ductus arteriosus, with differences in side effects. However nearly all randomized controlled trials have been designed with the closure of the ductus arteriosus, not mortality or morbidity, as the main endpoint. Thus, evidence is still lacking on the eventual benefits for the patient of pharmacological or surgical intervention on PDA. Moreover, both ibuprofen and indomethacin efficacy seems markedly reduced in extremely low gestational age infants, who are the most likely to benefit from such intervention. The explanation of the reduced pharmacodymanic effect in such population is unclear; so far, studies using increased dosing of ibuprofen have failed to show a clear benefit. Prophylaxis with indomethacin or ibuprofen has failed to show sustained benefits on neurodevelopment at 2 years of age in low gestational age infants. New curative trials may aim at investigating the effects of early curative administration of ibuprofen, which has reduced side effects compared to indomethacin, on immature kidney function, on mortality and morbidity in very low gestational age infants, ideally with a combined endpoint such as survival in the absence of severe neurodevelopmental alteration at 2 years age. Despite an understandable reluctance given the historical background of systematic, therapeutic closure of ductus arteriosus in preterm infants, there are no definite ethical obstacles to a placebo-controlled design.

Therapeutic closure of the ductus arteriosus: benefits and limitations.

Patency of the ductus arteriosus (PDA), a common complication of preterm birth, has been associated to increased risk for intraventricular cerebral hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia and death. Consequently, prophylactic or curative treatment has been advocated before the critical left-to-right shunting occurs. A host of studies has shown that both pharmacological agents and surgical closure are effective in closing the ductus arteriosus in premature infants. Indomethacin has long been the drug of choice. However, renal and cerebral haemodynamic side effects have been frequently reported. Strategies to minimise adverse effects of indomethacin, such as the association with frusemide, dopamine or the use of low-dose prolonged treatment with indomethacin have failed or shown partial benefit. Other NSAIDs have been investigated. But either the profile of adverse effects was unfavourable, as in the case of mefenamic acid, or their efficacy was less than that of indomethacin for PDA closure. More recently, ibuprofen has been proposed for the treatment of PDA as it was shown to induce less adverse effects on cerebral blood flow, intestinal and renal hemodynamics, while retaining similar efficacy to indomethacin. However, since renal perfusion, GFR and diuresis in early neonatal life strongly depend on the vasodilator effects of PGs on the afferent glomerular arterioles, ibuprofen, as other COX-inhibitors may not be exempt of some renal undesirable effects. While numerous studies have shown that PDA is a risk factor associated with immaturity and with increased incidence of complications of preterm birth, including broncho-pulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity, necrotizing enterocolitis and death, there is little evidence that such association is causative. Moreover, still little evidence exists from even recent randomized controlled trials that the pharmacological closure of PDA benefits to premature infants in terms of clinically significant short-term or medium-term outcomes, beyond a positive effect on DA patency. The use of COX-inhibitors for the prophylaxis or closure of PDA during the first hours or days of life should thus be cautious and based on an individual evaluation of benefit and risk. There is need of a randomized, placebo-controlled trials designed to assess the benefits in terms of mortality and morbidity outcomes of an early, or even very early pharmacological closure of PDA in extremely low gestational age infants.