Long term effects of early childhood traumatic brain injury on narrative discourse gist and psychosocial functioning.

Purpose: To examine the long-term consequences of early childhood traumatic brain injury (TBI), approximately 6.8 years post-injury, on cognitive communication competency within a complex interplay of individual, contextual, and psychosocial factors. Additionally, we were interested in looking at the association of communication competence with social competence and overall functioning.Methods: 64 children with orthopedic injury, 40 children with moderate traumatic brain injury, and 14 children with severe traumatic brain injury who were between 3 years and 6 years 11 months at injury completed a narrative discourse task and clinical measures in a single visit at a longer term follow up in early adolescence, an average of 6.8 years post injury. Analyses of covariance were conducted to compare groups on the discourse task, and hierarchical linear regressions were conducted to examine the association of discourse measures with clinical measures of cognitive and psychosocial functioning.Results: Children with severe traumatic brain injury performed worse than children with moderate traumatic brain injury and orthopedic injury on all discourse indices and clinical measures. Injury severity, pragmatic skills, and socioeconomic status were associated with discourse gist. Discourse gist was the most sensitive measure of communication competence, and it was significantly associated with psychosocial outcomes independent of group.Conclusion: Children who sustain a severe traumatic brain injury in early childhood are at risk for long-term cognitive communication impairments that may be related to a complex interplay of injury, individual, and social factors.Implications for rehabilitationThe assessment and treatment of cognitive communication impairments after traumatic brain injury are complex and require consideration of individual, contextual, and psychosocial factors.Discourse, in general, and gist reasoning specifically, is a sensitive measure for detecting cognitive communication competence several years after pediatric traumatic brain injury.Treatments to address gist reasoning deficits may support improvements in global and social functioning.

Grades I-II intraventricular hemorrhage in extremely low birth weight infants: effects on neurodevelopment.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the effect of grades I-II intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) on the neurosensory and cognitive outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants. STUDY DESIGN: Of 706 extremely low birth weight infants without major malformations admitted to our center from 1992 to 2000, 537 survived to 20 months' corrected age (CA) and had cranial ultrasound studies performed, of whom 490 (91%) had complete neurodevelopmental assessments. Infants with severe cranial ultrasound abnormalities or meningitis were excluded, leaving a population of 362 infants, 258 of whom had a normal cranial ultrasound and 104 had an isolated grade I-II IVH. The groups had similar birth weight (808 vs 801 grams) and gestational age (26.5 vs 26.3 weeks). Outcomes of infants with normal cranial ultrasound were compared with those with grades I-II IVH at 20 months' CA. Outcomes included the Bayley Scales of Infant Development Mental Developmental Index (MDI) and major neurosensory abnormality. Logistic regression was used to assess the effect of grades I-II IVH on outcomes while adjusting for other risk factors. RESULTS: Extremely low birth weight infants with grades I-II IVH had a significantly lower mean MDI score than infants with normal cranial ultrasound (74 +/- 16 vs 79 +/- 14, P = .006). They had higher rates of MDI <<70 (45% vs 25%; OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.20 to 3.30; P = .008), major neurologic abnormality (13% vs 5%; OR, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.06 to 6.36; P = .036), and neurodevelopmental impairment (47% vs 28%; OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.11 to 3.03; P = .018) at 20 months' CA, even when adjusting for confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: Extremely low birth weight infants with grades I-II IVH have poorer neurodevelopmental outcomes at 20 months' CA than infants with normal cranial ultrasound. Advanced radiologic imaging may indicate additional brain injury associated with grade I-II IVH, which could explain these outcomes.

Poor predictive validity of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development for cognitive function of extremely low birth weight children at school age.

OBJECTIVE: The Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Second Edition (BSID II) are commonly used to assess outcomes of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants. We sought to assess the predictive validity of the BSID II Mental Developmental Index (MDI) for cognitive function at school age. DESIGN/METHODS: Of 330 ELBW infants admitted in 1992-1995, 238 (72%) survived to the age of 8 years, of whom 200 (84%) were tested at both 20 months' corrected age (CA) and 8 years. Mean birth weight was 811 g, mean gestational age was 26.4 weeks, 41% were boys, and 60% were black. Measures included the BSID II at 20 months' CA and the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (KABC) Mental Processing Composite (MPC) at 8 years' postnatal age. BSID II MDI and MPC scores were compared and the predictive validity calculated for all 200 ELBW children and for the 154 ELBW neurosensory-intact subgroup. Predictors of stability or change in cognitive scores were examined via logistic regression adjusting for gender and sociodemographic status. RESULTS: For all ELBW children, the mean MDI was 75.6 +/- 16 versus a mean KABC of 87.8 +/- 19. For the neurosensory-intact subgroup, the mean MDI was 79.3 +/- 16 and the mean KABC was 92.3 +/- 15. Rates of cognitive impairment, defined as an MDI or KABC of <70, dropped from 39% at 20 months' CA to 16% at 8 years for the total ELBW population and from 29% to 7% for the neurosensory-intact subgroup. The positive predictive value of having an MPC of <70 given an MDI of <70 was 0.37 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.27, 0.49) for all ELBW infants, 0.20 (95% CI: 0.10, 0.35) for the neurosensory-intact subgroup, and 0.61 (95% CI: 0.42, 0.77) for the neurosensory-impaired subgroup. The negative predictive values were 0.98, 0.99, and 0.85 for the 3 groups, respectively. Neurosensory impairment at 20 months' CA predicted lack of improvement of cognitive function (odds ratio: 6.9; 95% CI: 2.4, 20.2). Children whose cognitive scores improved between 20 months and 8 years had significantly better school performance than those whose scores stayed at <70, but they did less well than those whose scores were persistently >70. CONCLUSIONS: The predictive validity of a subnormal MDI for cognitive function at school age is poor but better for ELBW children who have neurosensory impairments. We are concerned that decisions to provide intensive care for ELBW infants in the delivery room might be biased by reported high rates of cognitive impairments based on the use and presumptive validity of the BSID II MDI.