Pathophysiology and Management of Pulmonary Embolism.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is one of the most common etiologies of cardiovascular mortality. It could be linked to several risk factors including advanced age. The pathogenesis of PE is dictated by the Virchow's triad that includes venous stasis, endothelial injury, and a hypercoagulable state. The diagnosis of PE is difficult and is often missed due to the nonspecific symptomatology. Hypoxia is common in the setting of PE, and the degree of respiratory compromise is multifactorial and influenced by underlying cardiac function, clot location, and ability to compensate with respiratory mechanics. Right ventricular dysfunction/failure is the more profound cardiovascular impact of acute PE and occurs due to sudden increase in afterload. This is also the primary cause of death in PE. High clinical suspicion is required in those with risk factors and presenting signs or symptoms of venous thromboembolic disease, with validated clinical risk scores such as the Wells, Geneva, and pulmonary embolism rule out criteria in estimating the likelihood for PE. Advancement in capture time and wider availability of computed tomographic pulmonary angiography and D-dimer testing have further facilitated the rapid evaluation and diagnosis of suspected PE. Treatment is dependent on clinical presentation and initially involves providing adequate oxygenation and stabilizing hemodynamics. Anticoagulant therapy is indicated for the treatment of PE. Treatment is guided by presence or absence of shock and ranges from therapeutic anticoagulation to pharmacologic versus mechanical thrombectomy. The prognosis of patients can vary considerably depending on the cardiac and pulmonary status of patient and the size of the embolus.

Perniosis in the COVID-19 era.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV-2) and the most common symptoms include fever, dry cough, dyspnea, fatigue, anorexia, ageusia, and anosmia. Cutaneous manifestations are less common and we share our experience with an otherwise healthy and asymptomatic young man. The patient presented with painless acrocynosis of the left toes which progressed to desquamation by day 16 of disease onset. Disease progression is documented via multiple photographs that portray progression of disease and subsequent resolution over approximately six weeks. Symptomatic treatment included non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, leg elevation, and warm compresses.

Professionalism and inter-communication skills (ICS): a multi-site validity study assessing proficiency in core competencies and milestones in medical learners.

BACKGROUND: Interpersonal and Communication Skills (ICS) and Professionalism milestones are challenging to evaluate during medical training. Paucity in proficiency, direction and validity evidence of assessment tools of these milestones warrants further research. We validated the reliability of the previously-piloted Instrument for Communication skills and Professionalism Assessment (InCoPrA) in medical learners. METHODS: This validity approach was guided by the rigorous Kane's Framework. Faculty-raters and standardized patients (SPs) used their respective InCoPrA sub-component to assess distinctive domains pertinent to ICS and Professionalism through multiple expert-built simulated-scenarios comparable to usual care. Evaluations included; inter-rater reliability of the faculty total score; the correlation between the total score by the SPs; and the average of the total score by two-faculty members. Participants were surveyed regarding acceptability, realism, and applicability of this experience. RESULTS: Eighty trainees and 25 faculty-raters from five medical residency training sites participated. ICC of the total score between faculty-raters was generally moderate (ICC range 0.44-0.58). There was on average a moderate linear relationship between the SPs and faculty total scores (Pearson correlations range 0.23-0.44). Majority of participants ascertained receiving a meaningful, immediate, and comprehensive patient-faculty feedback. CONCLUSIONS: This work substantiated that InCoPrA was a reliable, standardized, evidence-based, and user-friendly assessment tool for ICS and Professionalism milestones. Validating InCoPrA showed generally-moderate agreeability and high acceptability. Using InCoPrA also promoted engaging all stakeholders in medical education and training-faculty, learners, and SPs-using simulation-media as pathway for comprehensive feedback of milestones growth.