[Positioning proposal on the recommendations for the use of masks in health centers after the cessation of the mandatory use in Spain]. / Propuesta de posicionamiento sobre las recomendaciones para el uso de mascarillas en los centros sanitarios tras el cese de la obligatoriedad de su uso en España.

Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, the use of masks has been a fundamental pillar for controlling the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different areas. Its mandatory nature has been regulated by different regulations, and its effectiveness in reducing the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses has been strongly proven. In this regard, the beneficial impact stands out in healthcare centers where it has been shown to reduce the transmission of respiratory infections, both in patients and healthcare professionals. This document proposes recommendations for the use of masks in health centers at the current time when we find ourselves with an end to the mandatory use of masks in Spain. They are aimed at healthcare professionals, patients and companions/visitors and aim to protect them from acquiring acute respiratory infections as a result of the complex relationships established in the healthcare field.

Desde el inicio de la pandemia de la COVID-19 en marzo de 2020, el uso de la mascarilla ha constituido un pilar fundamental para el control de la transmisión del SARS-CoV-2 en diferentes ámbitos. Su obligatoriedad ha sido regulada por diferentes normativas, y la efectividad de la misma para la reducción de la transmisión del SARS-CoV-2 y de otros virus respiratorios ha sido fuertemente probada. Al respecto, destaca el impacto beneficioso en los centros sanitarios en los que ha demostrado reducir la transmisión de las infecciones respiratorias, tanto en pacientes como en profesionales sanitarios. Este documento plantea una propuesta de recomendaciones para el uso de la mascarilla en los centros sanitarios en el momento actual en el que nos encontramos con un cese de la obligatoriedad de su uso en España. Están dirigidas a profesionales sanitarios, pacientes y acompañantes/visitantes y pretenden protegerles de adquirir infecciones respiratorias agudas como consecuencia de las complejas relaciones establecidas en el ámbito sanitario.

Propuesta de posicionamiento sobre las recomendaciones para el uso de mascarillas en los centros sanitarios tras el cese de la obligatoriedad de su uso en España / Positioning proposal on the recommendations for the use of masks in health centers after the cessation of the mandatory use in Spain

Desde el inicio de la pandemia de la COVID-19 en marzo de 2020, el uso de la mascarilla ha constituido un pilar fundamental para el control de la transmisión del SARS-CoV-2 en diferentes ámbitos. Su obligatoriedad ha sido regulada por diferentes normativas, y la efectividad de la misma para la reducción de la transmisión del SARS-CoV-2 y de otros virus respiratorios ha sido fuertemente probada. Al respecto, destaca el impacto beneficioso en los centros sanitarios en los que ha demostrado reducir la transmisión de las infecciones respiratorias, tanto en pacientes como en profesionales sanitarios. Este documento plantea una propuesta de recomendaciones para el uso de la mascarilla en los centros sanitarios en el momento actual en el que nos encontramos con un cese de la obligatoriedad de su uso en España. Están dirigidas a profesionales sanitarios, pacientes y acompañantes/visitantes y pretenden protegerles de adquirir infecciones respiratorias agudas como consecuencia de las complejas relaciones establecidas en el ámbito sanitario.(AU)

Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, the use of masks has been a fundamental pillar for controlling the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different areas. Its mandatory nature has been regulated by different regulations, and its effectiveness in reducing the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses has been strongly proven. In this regard, the beneficial impact stands out in healthcare centers where it has been shown to reduce the transmission of respiratory infections, both in patients and healthcare professionals. This document proposes recommendations for the use of masks in health centers at the current time when we find ourselves with an end to the mandatory use of masks in Spain. They are aimed at healthcare professionals, patients and companions/visitors and aim to protect them from acquiring acute respiratory infections as a result of the complex relationships established in the healthcare field.(AU)

The Waning of BNT162b2 Vaccine Effectiveness for SARS-CoV-2 Infection Prevention over Time: A Test-Negative Study in Health Care Professionals of a Health Department from January 2021 to December 2021.

The duration of protection of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection has been evaluated in previous studies, but uncertainty remains about the persistence of effectiveness over time and the ideal timing for booster doses. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate BNT162b2 vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection in health care workers (HCWs) at a tertiary hospital depending on time elapsed since the completion of a two-dose vaccination regimen. We conducted a case-control with negative test study between 25 January and 12 December 2021 that included 1404 HCWs who underwent an active infection diagnostic test (AIDT) to rule out SARS-CoV-2 infection due to COVID-19 suspicion or prior close contact with patients diagnosed with COVID-19. The adjusted vaccine effectiveness (aVE) for the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection 12 to 120 days after completing the full two-dose vaccination regimen was 91.9%. Then, aVE decreased to 63.7% between 121 to 240 days after completing the full two-dose regimen and to 37.2% after 241 days since the second dose. Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection in HCWs remains highly effective after 12 to 120 days have elapsed since the administration of two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine; however, effectiveness decreases as time elapses since its administration.

Efectividad de la vacuna BNT162b2 para prevenir la COVID-19 en personal sanitario / Effectiveness of BNT162b2 vaccine to preventing COVID-19 in healthcare personnel

Objetivo: Conocer la efectividad de la vacuna BNT162b2 en personal sanitario de un departamento de salud. Método: Estudio de casos y controles con prueba negativa. Se incluyó personal sanitario con sospecha de COVID-19 y personal sanitario que fue contacto estrecho de casos de COVID-19 entre el 25 de enero y el 6 de junio de 2021. Se les realizó prueba de reacción en cadena de la polimerasa (PCR) para SARS-CoV-2; aquellos con PCR positiva fueron considerados casos y aquellos con PCR negativa fueron considerados controles. Se calculó la efectividad vacunal ajustada (EVa) para prevenir casos de COVID-19 y su intervalo de confianza del 95% (IC95%), mediante la fórmula EV = (1 − odds ratio) × 100. Resultados: Se incluyeron 624 profesionales sanitarios; de ellos, 43 (6,9%) casos y 581 (93,1%) controles. La EVa de la pauta completa fue del 96,3% (IC95%: 82,5-99,2) y la de la pauta incompleta del 68,0% (IC95%: 30,0-85,4). Conclusiones: La administración de la pauta completa de vacuna es efectiva para la prevención de casos de COVID-19 en el personal sanitario. (AU)

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of the vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 (BNT162b2) in healthcare personnel of a health department. Method: Test-negative case̶control study. Healthcare personnel with suspected COVID-19 and healthcare personnel close contacts of COVID-19 cases were included between January 27th and June 6 th, 2021. They were PCR tested for SARS-CoV-2; those with positive PCR were considered cases and those with negative PCR were considered controls. The adjusted vaccine effectiveness (aVE) to prevent COVID-19 cases and their 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were calculated using the formula VE = (1 − odds ratio) × 100. Results: 624 healthcare personnel were included, of which 43 (6.9%) were considered cases and 581 (93.8%) controls. The aVE of the complete regimen was 96.3% (95%CI: 82.5̶99.2). The aVE of the incomplete pattern was 68.0% (95%CI: 30.0̶85.4). Conclusions: The administration of the complete pattern of BNT162b2 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 is effective for the prevention of cases of COVID-19 in healthcare personnel. (AU)

Bacteraemia and quick Sepsis Related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) are independent risk factors for long-term mortality in very elderly patients with suspected infection: retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: In older adult patients, bloodstream infections cause significant mortality. However, data on long-term prognosis in very elderly patients are scarce. This study aims to assess 1-year mortality from bacteraemia in very elderly patients. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study in inpatients aged 80 years or older and suspected of having sepsis. Patients with (n = 336) and without (n = 336) confirmed bacteraemia were matched for age, sex, and date of culture, and their characteristics were compared. All-cause mortality and risk of death were assessed using the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR). RESULTS: Compared to controls, cases showed a higher 1-year mortality (34.8% vs. 45.2%) and mortality rate (0.46 vs. 0.69 deaths per person-year). Multivariable analysis showed significant risk of 1-year mortality in patients with bacteraemia (aHR: 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.67), quick Sepsis Related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score of 2 or more (aHR: 2.71, 95% CI 2.05-3.57), and age of 90 years or older (aHR 1.53, 95% CI 1.17-1.99). CONCLUSIONS: In elderly patients suspected of sepsis, bacteraemia is associated with a poor prognosis and higher long-term mortality. Other factors related to excess mortality were age over 90 years and a qSOFA score of 2 or more.

[Effectiveness of BNT162b2 vaccine to preventing COVID-19 in healthcare personnel]. / Efectividad de la vacuna BNT162b2 para prevenir la COVID-19 en personal sanitario.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of the vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 (BNT162b2) in healthcare personnel of a health department. METHOD: Test-negative case̶control study. Healthcare personnel with suspected COVID-19 and healthcare personnel close contacts of COVID-19 cases were included between January 27th and June 6th, 2021. They were PCR tested for SARS-CoV-2; those with positive PCR were considered cases and those with negative PCR were considered controls. The adjusted vaccine effectiveness (aVE) to prevent COVID-19 cases and their 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were calculated using the formula VE=(1-odds ratio)×100. RESULTS: 624 healthcare personnel were included, of which 43 (6.9%) were considered cases and 581 (93.8%) controls. The aVE of the complete regimen was 96.3% (95%CI: 82.5̶99.2). The aVE of the incomplete pattern was 68.0% (95%CI: 30.0̶85.4). CONCLUSIONS: The administration of the complete pattern of BNT162b2 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 is effective for the prevention of cases of COVID-19 in healthcare personnel.

Effectivity of a Program for the Control and Prevention of COVID-19 Healthcare-Associated Infections in a Spanish Academic Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Although recommendations to prevent COVID-19 healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) have been proposed, data on their effectivity are currently limited. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the effectivity of a program of control and prevention of COVID-19 in an academic general hospital in Spain. METHODS: We captured the number of COVID-19 cases and the type of contact that occurred in hospitalized patients and healthcare personnel (HCP). To evaluate the impact of the continuous use of a surgical mask among HCP, the number of patients with COVID-19 HAIs and accumulated incidence of HCP with COVID-19 was compared between the preintervention and intervention periods. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-two patients with COVID-19 have been admitted to the hospital. Seven of them had an HAI origin (6 in the preintervention period and 1 in the intervention period). One hundred forty-two HCP were infected with SARS-CoV-2. Of them, 22 (15.5%) were attributed to healthcare (2 in the emergency department and none in the critical care departments), and 120 (84.5%) were attributed to social relations in the workplace or during their non-work-related personal interactions. The accumulated incidence during the preintervention period was 22.3 for every 1000 HCP and 8.2 for every 1000 HCP during the intervention period. The relative risk was 0.37 (95% confidence interval, 0.25 to 0.55) and the attributable risk was -0.014 (95% confidence interval, -0.020 to -0.009). CONCLUSIONS: A program of control and prevention of HAIs complemented with the recommendation for the continuous use of a surgical mask in the workplace and social environments of HCP effectively decreased the risk of COVID-19 HAIs in admitted patients and HCP.

[Effectiveness of the first dose of BNT162b2 vaccine to preventing covid-19 in healthcare personnel.] / Efectividad de la primera dosis de vacuna BNT162b2 para prevenir la COVID-19 en personal sanitario.

OBJECTIVE: A first protective dose of vaccine may allow delaying the second dose in a context of low supply. The objective is to assess the effectiveness of a single dose of vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 (BNT162b2) after twelve days of its administration in healthcare personnel (HCP) of a Health Department. METHODS: A case-control study was made. HCP with suspected COVID-19 and HCP close contacts of COVID-19 cases were included between January 27 and February 7, 2021. They were PCR tested for SARS-CoV-2; those with positive PCR were considered cases and those with negative PCR were considered controls. The crude (VE) and adjusted (VEa) vaccine effectiveness to prevent COVID-19 cases and their 95% confidence interval were calculated using the formula VE = (1-Odds ratio) x 100. RESULTS: 268 HCP were included, of which 70 (26.1%) were considered cases and 198 (73.9%) controls. The frequency of vaccine exposure in cases was 55.7% vs. 69.7% in controls (p=0.035). The VEa of the first vaccine dose was 52.6% (95%CI: 1.1-77.3). The VEa in the subgroup of HCP studied for suspected disease was 74.6% (CI95%: 38.4-89.5). CONCLUSIONS: One dose of BNT162b2 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 offers early protection after twelve days of administration. These data could be considered to adapt strategies and consider postponing the second dose in situations of limited vaccine supply in order to achieve the maximum number of people covered with a first dose.

OBJETIVO: Una primera dosis de vacuna protectora permitiría aplazar la segunda dosis en un contexto de suministro escaso. El objetivo de este trabajo fue conocer la efectividad de una dosis de vacuna frente a SARS-CoV-2 (BNT162b2) tras doce días de su administración en personal sanitario (PS) de un Departamento de Salud. METODOS: Se realizó un estudio de casos y controles. Se incluyó a PS con sospecha de COVID-19 y PS que tuvo contactos estrechos con casos de COVID-19 entre el 27 de enero y el 7 de febrero de 2021. Se les realizó una PCR para determinar SARS-CoV-2; aquellos con PCR positiva fueron considerados casos y aquellos con PCR negativa fueron considerados controles. Se calculó la efectividad vacunal cruda (EV) y ajustada (EVa) para prevenir casos de COVID-19 y su intervalo de confianza al 95%, mediante la fórmula EV = (1-Odds ratio) x 100. RESULTADOS: Fueron incluidos 268 PS, de los cuales 70 (26,1%) fueron considerados casos y 198 (73,9%) controles. La frecuencia de exposición a la vacuna en los casos fue del 55,7% frente al 69,7% en los controles (p=0,035). La EVa de la primera dosis de vacuna fue del 52,6% (IC95%: 1,1-77,3). La EVa en el subgrupo de PS estudiados por sospecha de enfermedad fue del 74,6% (IC95%: 38,4-89,5). CONCLUSIONES: Una dosis de vacuna BNT162b2 frente a SARS-CoV-2 ofrece protección temprana tras doce días de su administración. Estos datos podrían considerarse para adaptar estrategias y valorar aplazar la segunda dosis en situaciones de limitación de suministro de vacuna, con el fin de conseguir el máximo número de personas cubiertas con una primera dosis.

Frequency, Associated Risk Factors, and Characteristics of COVID-19 Among Healthcare Personnel in a Spanish Health Department.

INTRODUCTION: This study examines the frequency, associated factors, and characteristics of healthcare personnel coronavirus disease 2019 cases in a healthcare department that comprises a tertiary hospital and its associated 12 primary healthcare centers. METHODS: This study included healthcare personnel that showed symptoms or were in contact with a coronavirus disease 2019 case patient from March 2, 2020 to April 19, 2020. Their evolution and characteristics (age, sex, professional category, type of contact) were recorded. Correlations between the different characteristics and risk of developing coronavirus disease 2019 and severe coronavirus disease 2019 were analyzed using chi-square tests. Their magnitudes were quantified with ORs, AORs, and their 95% CIs using a logistic regression model. RESULTS: Of the 3,900 healthcare professionals in the department, 1,791 (45.9%) showed symptoms or were part of a contact tracing study. The prevalence of those with symptoms was 20.1% (784/3,900; 95% CI=18.8, 21.4), with coronavirus disease 2019 was 4.0% (156/3,900; 95% CI=3.4, 4.6), and with severe coronavirus disease 2019 was 0.5% (18/3,900; 95% CI=0.2, 0.7). The frequency of coronavirus disease 2019 in symptomatic healthcare personnel with a nonprotected exposure was 22.8% (112/491) and 13.7% (40/293) in those with a protected exposure (AOR=2.2, 95% CI=1.2, 3.9). The service in which the healthcare personnel performed their activity was not significantly associated with being diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019. A total of 26.3% (10/38) of male healthcare personnel with coronavirus disease 2019 required hospitalization, compared with 6.8% (8/118) among female healthcare personnel (OR=4.9, 95% CI=1.8, 13.6). CONCLUSIONS: A surveillance and monitoring program centred on healthcare personnel enables an understanding of the risk factors that lead to coronavirus disease 2019 among this population. This knowledge allows the refinement of the strategies for disease control and prevention in healthcare personnel during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

Infective endocarditis in elderly and very elderly patients.

AIMS: To compare the clinical and epidemiological characteristics and the evolution of infective endocarditis in adults aged under 65 years, 65-79 years, and 80 years or older. METHODS: An observational retrospective cohort study in patients with infective endocarditis was performed in a public hospital in Spain from January 2013 to December 2017. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were treated: 26 (36.1%) were under 65 years old, 28 (38.9%) were 65-79 years old, and 18 (25%) were aged 80 or older. Prosthetic valve endocarditis was less common in patients aged 65-79 years (3.6%) than in younger (23.1%; p = 0.047) or older (38.9%; p = 0.004) patients. In contrast, degenerative heart disease was more prevalent in the 65-79 year age group [64.3% compared to 15.4% (p < 0.001) in the youngest group, and 33.3% (p = 0.04) in the oldest]. Surgical interventions were similar in patients aged 65-79 (50%) and under 65 years (42.3%), but less common in people over 80 years (16.7%; p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: The characteristics of infective endocarditis are different in patients aged 65-79 years and in those over 80 years.

Asociación entre marcadores inflamatorios y traslocación bacteriana en pacientes con infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana en tratamiento antirretroviral / Association between inflammatory markers and microbial translocation in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection taking antiretroviral treatment

Fundamento y objetivo: Ciertos marcadores inflamatorios están elevados en pacientes con infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH). El tratamiento antirretroviral (TAR) mejora algunos de estos parámetros, pero no suele normalizarlos. El objetivo de este estudio es determinar los factores, incluida la traslocación bacteriana, asociados a una mayor actividad inflamatoria en pacientes con infección por VIH en tratamiento. Pacientes y métodos: Estudio observacional transversal. Se incluyeron pacientes con infección por VIH que recibían TAR y tenían carga viral plasmática del VIH (CVP-VIH) < 400 copias/ml. Se seleccionaron pacientes consecutivos entre noviembre de 2011 y enero de 2012. Las variables de resultado fueron los valores séricos de interleucina 6 (IL-6) y de tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α, «factor de necrosis tumoral α»). La variable explicativa principal fueron los marcadores de traslocación bacteriana (ADN ribosomal 16S y sCD14). Los pacientes con valores de IL-6 o TNF-α por encima del percentil 75 (grupo 1) se compararon con el resto de pacientes (grupo 2), y se calcularon las odds ratio (OR) brutas y ajustadas (análisis multivariante). Resultados: Se incluyeron 81 pacientes (73% varones, edad mediana 45 años, 48% en estadio C). El 26% tenía hepatitis crónica C. La mediana de linfocitos CD4 era de 493 cél/mm3 y el 30% tenía CVP-VIH detectable. Se detectó ADN ribosomal en el 21% de los pacientes. Los integrantes del grupo 1 presentaron con mayor frecuencia ADN ribosomal (OR 77, p < 0,0001), valores altos de sCD14 (p < 0,0001) y antecedentes de enfermedad cardiovascular (OR 15, p < 0,01). En el análisis multivariante la asociación se mantuvo para la presencia de ADN ribosomal (OR 62, p < 0,0001) y antecedentes cardiovasculares (OR 25, p < 0,01). Conclusiones: En pacientes con infección por VIH en tratamiento, los mayores valores de marcadores inflamatorios se observan en aquellos casos con traslocación bacteriana y antecedentes de enfermedad cardiovascular (AU)

Background and objective: Inflammatory biomarkers are increased in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Antiretroviral treatment (ART) improves some parameters but do not normalize them. The aim of this study is to determine those factors (including microbial translocation) associated with higher inflammation in HIV treated patients. Patients and methods: Transversal observational study. Inclusion criteria: HIV patients receiving ART with an HIV viral load (VL) < 400 copies/mL. Selection of patients: consecutively between November 2011 and January 2012. Main variable: plasma levels of interleukin 6 (IL-6) and tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α). Main explanatory variable: microbial translocation markers (16S ribosomal DNA and sCD14). Patients with IL-6 or TNF-α levels above percentile 75 (group 1) were compared with the rest of patients (group 2). Odds ratio (OR) were determined. Results: Eighty-one patients were included (73% male, median age 45 years, 48% stage C). Twenty-six percent had chronic hepatitis C. Median CD4 cell was 493/mm3 and 30% had detectable HIV VL. 16S ribosomal DNA was detected in 21% of patients. Factors associated with the higher levels of inflammatory markers were 16S ribosomal DNA (OR 77, P < .0001), sCD14 levels (P < .0001) and history of cardiovascular disease (OR 15, P < .01). In multivariate analysis, associations remained for 16S ribosomal DNA (OR 62, P < .0001) and previous cardiovascular disease (OR 25, P < .01). Conclusions: In patients with HIV infection receiving treatment, the higher levels of inflammatory markers are associated with microbial translocation and past cardiovascular events (AU)

[Association between inflammatory markers and microbial translocation in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection taking antiretroviral treatment]. / Asociación entre marcadores inflamatorios y traslocación bacteriana en pacientes con infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana en tratamiento antirretroviral.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Inflammatory biomarkers are increased in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Antiretroviral treatment (ART) improves some parameters but do not normalize them. The aim of this study is to determine those factors (including microbial translocation) associated with higher inflammation in HIV treated patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Transversal observational study. INCLUSION CRITERIA: HIV patients receiving ART with an HIV viral load (VL)<400 copies/mL. Selection of patients: consecutively between November 2011 and January 2012. Main variable: plasma levels of interleukin 6 (IL-6) and tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α). Main explanatory variable: microbial translocation markers (16S ribosomal DNA and sCD14). Patients with IL-6 or TNF-α levels above percentile 75 (group 1) were compared with the rest of patients (group 2). Odds ratio (OR) were determined. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients were included (73% male, median age 45 years, 48% stage C). Twenty-six percent had chronic hepatitis C. Median CD4 cell was 493/mm(3) and 30% had detectable HIV VL. 16S ribosomal DNA was detected in 21% of patients. Factors associated with the higher levels of inflammatory markers were 16S ribosomal DNA (OR 77, P<.0001), sCD14 levels (P<.0001) and history of cardiovascular disease (OR 15, P<.01). In multivariate analysis, associations remained for 16S ribosomal DNA (OR 62, P<.0001) and previous cardiovascular disease (OR 25, P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HIV infection receiving treatment, the higher levels of inflammatory markers are associated with microbial translocation and past cardiovascular events.