Resilience of stormwater biofilters following the deposition of wildfire residues: Implication on downstream water quality management in wildfire-prone regions.

Stormwater treatment systems such as biofilters could intercept and remove pollutants from contaminated runoff in wildfire-affected areas, ensuring the protection of water quality downstream. However, the deposition of wildfire residues such as ash and black carbon onto biofilters could potentially impair their stormwater treatment functions. Yet, whether and how wildfire residue deposition could affect biofilter functions is unknown. This study examines the impact of wildfire residue deposition on biofilter infiltration and pollutant removal capacities. Exposure to wildfire residues decreased the infiltration capacity based on the amount of wildfire deposited. Wildfire residues accumulated at the top layer of the biofilter, forming a cake layer, but scraping this layer restored the infiltration capacity. While the deposition of wildfire residues slightly changed the pore water geochemistry, it did not significantly alter the removal of metals and E. coli. Although wildfire residues leached some metals into pore water within the simulated root zone, the leached metals were effectively removed by the compost present in the filter media. Collectively, these results indicate that biofilters downstream of wildfire-prone areas could remain resilient or functional and protect downstream water quality if deposited ash is periodically scraped to restore any loss of infiltration capacity following wildfire residue deposition.

Do drinking water treatment residuals underperform in the presence of compost in stormwater media filters?

Drinking water treatment residuals (WTR), a waste-derived product, are often recommended to use as an amendment in stormwater biofilters to enhance their capacity to remove phosphate and microbial pollutants. However, their efficacy has been assumed to remain high in the presence of compost, one of the most common amendments used in biofilters. This study tests the validity of that assumption by comparing the removal capacities of WTR-amended biofilters with and without the presence of compost. Our results show that amending sand with WTR increased E. coli removal by at least 1-log, but the addition of compost in the sand-WTR media lowered the removal capacity by 13 %. Similarly, the addition of WTR to sand improved phosphate removal to nearly 1177 %, but the removal decreased slightly by 8 % when adding compost to the media. The results confirmed that dissolved organic carbon (DOC) leached from the compost could compete for adsorption sites for bacteria and phosphate, thereby lowering WTR's adsorption capacity based on the amount of DOC adsorbed on WTR. Collectively, these results indicate that the stormwater treatment industry should avoid mixing compost with WTR to get the maximum benefits of WTR for bacterial removal and improve the performance lifetime of WTR-amended biofilters.