Postprandial lipoprotein changes in patients taking antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection.

OBJECTIVE: Dyslipidemia is common among patients receiving antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection. The purpose of this study was to determine whether postprandial lipemia contributes to the dyslipidemia observed in HIV-positive patients taking antiretroviral therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: A standardized fat load was administered to 65 subjects (group 1 35 HIV-positive subjects receiving protease inhibitors [PIs]; group 2 20 HIV-positive subjects not receiving PIs; group 3 10 HIV-negative controls). Serum triglycerides, retinyl palmitate, and lipoproteins were measured using enzymatic and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic techniques. Compared with HIV-negative controls, peak postprandial retinyl palmitate and large very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) levels occurred later in both HIV-positive groups, and a delayed decrease in serum triglycerides was observed. However, postprandial areas under the curve (AUCs) for triglycerides, retinyl palmitate, chylomicrons, and large VLDL were similar. Postprandial AUCs for intermediate-density lipoproteins (IDLs) and low-density lipoproteins (LDLs) were higher in group 1 than groups 2 and 3 (all P<0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Postprandial clearance of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins is delayed in HIV-positive individuals receiving antiretroviral therapy. Compared with HIV-positive individuals not on PIs, those taking PIs do not have increased postprandial triglyceride-rich lipoproteins but do have increased postprandial IDLs and LDLs. An oral fat load was administered to 55 HIV-positive and 10 HIV-negative individuals. Postprandial clearance of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins was delayed in HIV-positive individuals. Compared with HIV-positive subjects not on PIs, those taking PIs do not have increased postprandial triglyceride-rich lipoproteins but do have increased postprandial intermediate-density and low-density lipoproteins.

Effects of pravastatin on lipoproteins and endothelial function in patients receiving human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Although recommended as initial therapy for patients with dyslipidemia who are taking human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitors (HIV PIs), the effects of pravastatin on lipoproteins and arterial reactivity have not been elucidated. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of pravastatin on lipoprotein subfractions and endothelial function in patients with dyslipidemia who are receiving HIV PIs. METHODS: This was a placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study comparing pravastatin (40 mg) to placebo in 20 patients who were taking HIV PIs. Lipoprotein subfractions were measured with nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic analysis. Flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) of the brachial artery was evaluated with high-resolution ultrasound scanning. RESULTS: At baseline, subjects had an increased concentration of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles (1756 +/- 180 nmol/L), which tended to be small (19.9 +/- 0.2 nm), a low concentration of large high-density lipoproteins (HDL; 0.94 +/- 0.07 mmol/L), and an increased concentration of large very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL; 1.90 +/- 0.58 mmol/L). FMD was impaired (4.5% +/- 1.1%). Compared with placebo, pravastatin resulted in a 20.8% reduction in LDL particles (P =.030), a 26.7% reduction in small LDL (P =.100), and a 44.9% reduction in small VLDL (P =.023). Total and non-HDL cholesterol levels decreased by 18.3% (P <.001) and 21.7% (P <.001), respectively. FMD tended to increase in patients receiving pravastatin (0.7% +/- 0.6%); however, the difference between treatment phases was not statistically significant (P =.080). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the effects of statin therapy on lipids, lipoprotein subfractions, and endothelial function in patients taking HIV PIs. Pravastatin reduced concentrations of atherogenic lipoproteins, particularly those most associated with future coronary events.

Examination of the kinetic mechanism of mitogen-activated protein kinase activated protein kinase-2.

The kinetic mechanism of mitogen-activated protein kinase activated protein kinase-2 (MAPKAPK2) was investigated using a peptide (LKRSLSEM) based on the phosphorylation site found in serum response factor (SRF). Initial velocity studies yielded a family of double-reciprocal lines that appear parallel and indicative of a ping-pong mechanism. The use of dead-end inhibition studies did not provide a definitive assignment of a reaction mechanism. However, product inhibition studies suggested that MAPKAPK2 follows an ordered bi-bi kinetic mechanism, where ATP must bind to the enzyme prior to the SRF-peptide and the phosphorylated product is released first, followed by ADP. In agreement with these latter results, surface plasmon resonance measurements demonstrate that the binding of the inhibitor peptide to MAPKAPK2 requires the presence of ATP. Furthermore, competitive inhibitors of ATP, adenosine 5'-(beta,gamma-imino)triphosphate (AMPPNP) and a staurosporine analog (K252a), can inhibit this ATP-dependent binding providing further evidence that the peptide substrate binds preferably to the E:ATP complex.