Evaluation of a pharmacotherapy context-learning programme for preclinical medical students.

AIM: To evaluate a context-learning pharmacotherapy programme for approximately 750 2nd, 3rd and 4th year preclinical medical students with respect to mastering cognitive pharmacotherapeutic skills, i.e. choosing a (drug) treatment and determining patient information. METHODS: The context-learning pharmacotherapy programme consists of weekly organized role play sessions in the form of consulting hours. Fourth year students sit for a therapeutic Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in the form of consulting hours at the outpatient clinic. Sixty-one 2nd, 74 3rd and 49 4th year medical students who attended the role play sessions and the OSCE were randomly selected. Their performances were assessed by clinical examiners and clinical experts and compared with a reference group of 6th year graduated students. Additionally, the scores of a questionnaire on study load and appreciation were collected. RESULTS: The level of the pharmacotherapeutic skills of the 4th year students who followed the pharmacotherapy context-learning programme was not far below that of 6th year graduates who had finished their clinical clerkships, but had not followed the pharmacotherapy programme. The time spent on the programme was about 1% of the total study load per year. The students appreciated the role play sessions and OSCE by around 80% and 99% of the maximum possible scores. CONCLUSIONS: Preclinical pharmacotherapy context learning has a modest but positive effect on learning cognitive pharmacotherapeutic skills, i.e. choosing a drug treatment and determining patient information. This effect has been obtained with role play sessions, a suboptimal form of context learning, with a minimal study load and a high appreciation by students.

Curriculum development in pharmacotherapy: testing the ability of preclinical medical students to learn therapeutic problem solving in a randomized controlled trial.

AIMS: To determine whether preclinical medical students are able to learn therapeutic problem solving simultaneously with gaining knowledge of pharmacology. METHODS: A randomized controlled pre/post-test study among 85 3rd year preclinical medical students from two medical faculties in Amsterdam. In addition to the normal curriculum, the study group followed a course, which was a copy of the obligatory training in cognitive therapeutic skills for 5th year students who had gained knowledge first, followed by applying the knowledge. Before, immediately after and 9 months after the training both the study group and a control group took a test (T0, T1, T2). The level of knowledge and cognitive therapeutic skills were assessed. As a reference, 38 5th year students also took the tests. RESULTS: On T0 the levels of cognitive therapeutic skills of the study and control groups were similar (26.7% and 27.4% of the required level for graduation, respectively). On T1 and T2, the study group scored significantly higher compared with the control group: 46.0/36.7% and 41.3/36.3%, respectively (P<0.05). In comparison with T0, the scores of the study group on T1 increased significantly and showed no significant decline on T2. There were no differences between the groups with respect to the level of knowledge in any of the three tests. The level of cognitive therapeutic skills in the 5th year reference group increased slightly but not significantly from 40.3% to 44.5% after the training; the level of knowledge increased significantly from 48.8% to 68.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Preclinical medical students are able to learn cognitive therapeutic skills simultaneously with gaining knowledge of pharmacology.

[The level of first aid and basic life support for the next generation of physicians]. / Het niveau van eerstehulpverlening en basale reanimatie door aankomende artsen.

According to Dutch medical-education guidelines junior doctors are expected to be able to carry out first aid and basic life support. We determined the level of first aid and basic life support of junior doctors at the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, The Netherlands. Of the 300 junior doctors 54 (18%) were submitted to a theoretical test, consisting of 52 multiple-choice questions on first aid and basic life support. This was followed by a practical test consisting of two first aid and basic life support scenarios including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The scenarios were evaluated by certified examiners who used Berden's internationally accepted criteria. 19% of the junior doctors passed the theoretical test. The first-aid scenario was performed correctly in 11% of the cases. According to the examiners the CPR situation was performed correctly by 30% of the junior doctors but when assessed by Berden's international criteria only 6% of the junior doctors had performed CPR correctly. The level of first aid and basic life support amongst junior doctors was low and so the majority of them did not meet the required level as stated in the guidelines for practice of medical education in The Netherlands on this subject.

Factors predictive of successful learning in postgraduate medical education.

PURPOSE: To establish which personal and contextual factors are predictive of successful outcomes in postgraduate medical education. METHOD: We performed a follow-up study of 118 doctors on a postgraduate occupational health training programme on the management of mental health problems. The following personal and contextual variables were measured as potential predictors of outcome: gender; age; years of experience as a doctor; university of graduation; learning style (Kolb); present employer (occupational health service), and educational format (problem-based or lecture-based). The main outcome measures were: scores on knowledge tests consisting of true/false and open answer questions, and performance in practice based on self-report and performance indicators. To determine the effect of potential predictive factors univariate analyses of variance and repeated measurement analysis of variance was applied. RESULTS: The mean scores of knowledge (P < 0.001) and performance (P = 0.001) of the participants increased after the educational programme. After multivariate analysis female gender was positively related to accruements in both knowledge and performance (both P < 0.05), independently of the influence of other factors. Accommodator learning style showed a relation with knowledge increase (P = 0.05), but had no influence on performance (P = 0.79). The problem-based educational format yielded a better performance outcome (P = 0.05), but had no influence on knowledge tests (P = 0.31). CONCLUSION: Gender and learning style were found to be related to an increase in knowledge. Gender was also found to be related to improvement in performance after a postgraduate medical education programme. We found no interactions with course design (i.e. problem-based or non problem-based learning formats), but further research could reveal other cues, suggesting practical consequences of student characteristics for course design in postgraduate training.