Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 24(4): 344-50, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21737758

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The government is encouraging the adoption of electronic medical records (EMRs). There is little information about using EMRs in the obstetric literature and none about using them in family medicine residencies. Our purpose was to assess if using an EMR was associated with improvement in the ordering and availability of prenatal tests. METHODS: A retrospective chart review comparing the rate at which prenatal laboratory values were present on the chart, ordered on time, and recorded on a prenatal flow sheet. RESULTS: Comparison of charts before and after implementation of an EMR showed statistically significant improvement in the percent of patients with all first trimester (87.5% vs 96.0%; P=.0025), quadruple screening tests (91.1% vs 98.1%; P=.012), and second trimester screening results (93.5% vs 100%; P=.044) in their charts; first trimester laboratory tests (91.6% vs 99.5%; P=.001) and second trimester ultrasounds (90.9% vs 97.3%; P=.027) being ordered on time; and first trimester results (88.2% vs 95.5%; P=.009), quad screen results (93.1% vs 98.0%; P=.0495), and second trimester ultrasounds (93.5% vs 100%; P=.003) being recorded on the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists flow sheet. CONCLUSION: Adopting an EMR was associated with an improved rate at which prenatal tests were ordered on time, present on the chart, and recorded on a prenatal flow sheet.


Assuntos
Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal/normas , Adulto , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/normas , Medicina de Família e Comunidade , Feminino , Humanos , Internato e Residência , New Jersey , Gravidez , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
3.
Am Fam Physician ; 81(1): 15, 2010 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20052957

RESUMO

Injections are valuable procedures for managing musculoskeletal conditions commonly encountered by family physicians. Corticosteroid injections into articular, periarticular, or soft tissue structures relieve pain, reduce inflammation, and improve mobility. Injections can provide diagnostic information and are commonly used for postoperative pain control. Local anesthetics may be injected with corticosteroids to provide additional, rapid pain relief. Steroid injection is the preferred and definitive treatment for de Quervain tenosynovitis and trochanteric bursitis. Steroid injections can also be helpful in controlling pain during physical rehabilitation from rotator cuff syndrome and lateral epicondylitis. Intra-articular steroid injection provides pain relief in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. There is little systematic evidence to guide medication selection for therapeutic injections. The medication used and the frequency of injection should be guided by the goal of the injection (i.e., diagnostic or therapeutic), the underlying musculoskeletal diagnosis, and clinical experience. Complications from steroid injections are rare, but physicians should understand the potential risks and counsel patients appropriately. Patients with diabetes who receive periarticular or soft tissue steroid injections should closely monitor their blood glucose for two weeks following injection.


Assuntos
Injeções Intra-Articulares/instrumentação , Competência Clínica , Humanos
4.
Phys Sportsmed ; 33(10): 50-8, 2005 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20086336

RESUMO

First metatarsal stress fractures are uncommon in young athletes, and to have them occur bilaterally is even more unusual, as in this case of a 14-year-old female field hockey player. The patient sought treatment after several days of bilateral foot pain with swelling and tenderness to palpation over the proximal aspect of the first metatarsals. Initial plain x-rays were negative, but a subsequent bone scan and MRI revealed bilateral first metatarsal stress fractures. The patient was successfully treated with relative rest and rigid-soled shoes. Clinicians should be aware that initial x-rays may not reveal first metatarsal stress fractures, and further imaging may be needed.

5.
Curr Sports Med Rep ; 2(2): 84-90, 2003 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12831664

RESUMO

In athletes with upper respiratory infections (URIs), the question of who plays and who sits can be difficult to answer. Acute exercise suppresses several aspects of the immune system. None of these immunologic changes, however, consistently correlate with the incidence of URIs in athletes. The risk of infection with exercise seems to follow a J-curve relationship, with regular, moderate exercisers having a lower risk than sedentary people, and regular, strenuous exercisers having the highest risk of all. The decision to allow an athlete to play or not can be guided by the "neck check" rules, and can also take into account nonmedical factors. The athlete with infectious mononucleosis warrants more careful attention, as there are strict guidelines for return-to-play in these individuals, to avoid the possibility of splenic rupture.


Assuntos
Infecções Respiratórias/terapia , Medicina Esportiva/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Suscetibilidade a Doenças/imunologia , Exercício Físico/fisiologia , Humanos , Sistema Imunitário/fisiologia , Incidência , Mononucleose Infecciosa/complicações , Mononucleose Infecciosa/terapia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Educação Física e Treinamento/normas , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica/imunologia , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Infecções Respiratórias/imunologia , Fatores de Risco , Corrida/estatística & dados numéricos , Ruptura Esplênica/etiologia , Ruptura Esplênica/prevenção & controle
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA