[Is intraoperative ICD-testing still necessary?]. / Ist die intraoperative ICD-Testung noch nötig?

Intraoperative ICD-testing is traditionally performed in many hospitals in order to ensure reliable sensing, detection, and defibrillation of induced ventricular fibrillation. The technical progress of defibrillators allows rapid detection and delivery of high energy shocks which defibrillates effectively in the vast majority all patients at implant. This review describes arguments pro and contra of systematic testing of the defibrillation threshold in all patients. Many reasons argue against testing in all patients: experimental considerations, patients' specific and nonspecific factors, e.g., underlying severity of cardiac disease, ischemia, and medication, as well as factors specific to the ICD system, e.g., implanted type and location of electrodes and active cans. Finally, the testing method is very important, since it bears the risk of false negative test results because the a priori probability of a positive test result is >95%. Therefore, data from prospective randomized studies are necessary in order to abandon the tradition of ICD-testing on an evidence-based background.

Experience with an ICD incorporating biventricular pacing.

Biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization is a promising therapy for symptomatic improvement in selected patients with underlying severe congestive heart failure. ICD treatment has been shown to prolong life in patients with life threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias, but it does not improve quality of life. This review discusses current experience with ICD's incorporating biventricular pacing.

[Visualization of pulmonary vein stenosis after radio frequency ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation using multidetector computed tomography with retrospective gating]. / Darstellung von Pulmonalvenenstenosen nach Radiofrequenzablation zur Behandlung von Vorhofflimmern unter Verwendung der Multidetektor Computertomographie mit retrospektivem Gating.

PURPOSE: With the number of radio frequency ablations (RFA) for treatment of chronic atrial fibrillation increasing, the diagnostic evaluation for RFA associated pulmonary vein stenosis is getting more important. This study investigates the feasibility of the visualization of pulmonary vein stenosis using non-invasive multidetector computed tomography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients were examined following RFA-treatment. A 4-slice (20 patients) and a 16-slice (8 patients) multidetector CT scanner (SOMATOM Volume Zoom and Sensation 16, Siemens, Forchheim, Germany) with retrospective gating was used to assess the pulmonary veins. Lesion severity was determined on a semi-quantitative scale (< 30 %, 30 - 50 %, > 50 %). RESULTS: CT was performed without any complications in all patients. Diagnostic image quality could be obtained in all examinations. The pulmonary veins showed lesions < 30 % in four patients, lesions of 30 -, 50 % in five patients and a stenosis > 50 % in one patient. Eighteen patients showed no lesions. CONCLUSION: Multidetector CT of the pulmonary veins seems to be able to visualize high-grade and low-grade lesions, but larger catheter-controlled studies are needed for further assessment of the diagnostic accuracy and clinical reliability of this noninvasive method.

Enhanced detection criteria in implantable cardioverter defibrillators: sensitivity and specificity of the stability algorithm at different heart rates.

The lack of specificity in the detection of ventricular tachyarrhythmias remains a major clinical problem in the therapy with ICDs. The stability criterion has been shown to be useful in discriminating ventricular tachyarrhythmias characterized by a small variation in cycle lengths from AF with rapid ventricular response presenting a higher degree of variability of RR intervals. But RR variability decreases with increasing heart rate during AF. Therefore, the aim of the study was to determine if the sensitivity and specificity of the STABILITY algorithm for spontaneous tachyarrhythmias is related to ventricular rate. Forty-two patients who had received an ICD (CPI Ventak Mini I, II, III or Ventak AV) were enrolled in the study. Two hundred ninety-eight episodes of AF with rapid ventricular response and 817 episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias were analyzed. Sensitivity and specificity in the detection of ventricular tachyarrhythmias were calculated at different heart rates. When a stability value of 30 ms was programmed the result was a sensitivity of 82.7% and a specificity of 91.4% in the detection of slow ventricular tachyarrhythmias (heart rate < 150 beats/min). When faster ventricular tachyarrhythmias with rates between 150 and 169 beats/min (170-189 beats/min) were analyzed, a stability value of 30 ms provided a sensitivity of 94.5% (94.7%) and a specificity of 76.5% (54.0%). For arrhythmia episodes > or = 190 beats/min, the same stability value resulted in a sensitivity of 78.2% and a specificity of 41.0%. Even when other stability values were taken into consideration, no acceptable sensitivity/specificity values could be obtained in this subgroup. RR variability decreases with increasing heart rate during AF while RR variability remains almost constant at different cycle lengths during ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Thus, acceptable performance of the STABILITY algorithm appears to be limited to ventricular rate zones < 170 beats/min.

[Atrial tachycardia, atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation: curative therapy by focal ablation in a pulmonary vein]. / Atriale Tachykardie, Vorhofflattern, Vorhofflimmern: Kurative Therapie durch fokale Ablation in einer Pulmonalvene.

We describe the case of a 50-year-old woman with the clinical diagnosis of cardiomyopathy associated with supraventricular tachycardia refractory to pharmacological treatment. The totally irregular tachyarrhythmia was the result of different episodes of atrial tachycardia, atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation that could be identified in the surface ECG. These findings and the patient's symptoms were all caused by a single focal tachycardia originating from the left upper pulmonary vein. Ablation of this focus represented a curative antiarrhythmic therapy also restoring a normalized ventricular function. Thus, an ablation of the AV node with consecutive pacemaker implantation could be prevented.

Comparison of the efficacy of a subcutaneous array electrode with a subcutaneous patch electrode, a prospective randomized study.

The patch electrode and the array electrode are the two types of subcutaneous leads available as an adjunct to a transvenous lead system in patients with high defibrillation thresholds. A prospective randomized study was conducted in 30 consecutive patients comparing the efficacy and the long-term performance of a patch electrode with an array electrode. After determination of the defibrillation threshold for the transvenous lead alone, a subcutaneous patch or an array electrode was implanted in random order. Adding a patch electrode decreased the defibrillation threshold in seven out of 15 patients (47%) from 13.2+/-6.6 to 10.5+/-5.1 J (P<0.05). In 13 out of 15 patients (87%), the implantation of an array electrode caused a significant lowering of the defibrillation threshold from 15.4+/-6.6 to 8.2+/-5.0 J (P<0.0001). The array electrode was significantly more effective in lowering the defibrillation threshold than the patch electrode (P<0.01). Complications during follow-up associated with the subcutaneous patch electrode were observed in four patients whereas no complications were associated with the array electrode (P<0.01). The additional implantation of an array electrode is more effective and associated with fewer complications compared to a patch electrode.

Variable responsiveness of anterograde and retrograde fast pathway conduction to adenosine in patients with typical AV-nodal reentry tachycardia.

Adenosine is known as a substance which depresses predominantly the slow pathway of the av-node. However, the effect of adenosine on the anterograde and retrograde fast pathway (FP) has not been studied in a large patient population. Ninety-one patients with inducible typical av-nodal reentrant tachycardias (AVNRT) were included. The clinically used dosage of 12 mg adenosine was administered subsequently as bolus injection during a constant atrial and ventricular pacing (500 ms) in all patients. Electrophysiological av-nodal parameters were determined. A higher responsiveness of the anterograde compared to the retrograde FP was observed: the majority of patients (76%) blocked anterogradely and 55% blocked retrogradely within the FP after the administration of 12 mg adenosine. Thirty-six percent of all patients revealed a differential behaviour to adenosine. Sixteen percent of all patients were completely resistant to adenosine (P=0.012). Electrophysiological parameters did not predict the responsiveness of the FP to adenosine. In patients with typical AVNRT the anterograde FP shows a higher sensitivity than the retrograde FP to adenosine. This might reflect an anatomical and/or functional distinction between anterograde and retrograde FP. The variable response to adenosine could be due to individual anatomical and electrophysiological heterogenity of the perinodal tissue and the av-node.

High variability of retrograde fast pathway sensitivity to adenosine.

BACKGROUND: Adenosine is widely used as a tool to assess the effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation of concealed accessory pathways. HYPOTHESIS: The goal of this study was to determine the reliability of this test by studying the retrograde fast pathway sensibility in a large patient population with typical atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentry tachycardias. We sought also to determine whether AV nodal properties were predictive of a retrograde fast pathway sensitivity to adenosine. METHODS: In all, 124 patients with inducible AV nodal reentrant tachycardia were included in this study. All patients received a clinically used standard dose of 12 mg adenosine during ventricular pacing, with 500 ms and a constant ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction via the fast pathway. Electrophysiologic parameters of the AV node were determined in all patients in order to correlate them with the adenosine sensitivity of the retrograde pathway. RESULTS: In 74 patients, the injection of 12 mg adenosine resulted in a transient VA block, whereas no VA block occurred in the remaining 50 patients. In two patients, concealed accessory pathways were unmasked after the injection of adenosine. The adenosine sensitivity of the retrograde fast pathway was associated with longer retrograde conduction times and cycle lengths during AV nodal reentrant tachycardias. CONCLUSION: This study shows a high variability of retrograde fast pathway sensitivity to adenosine. Thus, in 40% of patients the lack of VA block after adenosine injection is not specific for persistent accessory pathway function after radiofrequency ablation. Electrophysiologic properties of patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardias were different in patients with and without adenosine-sensitive retrograde fast pathways, possibly indicating differential patterns of penetration of the retrograde fast pathway into the compact AV node.

[Administration of adenosine for termination of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia: induction of atrial fibrillation with rapid conduction over an accessory pathway and unmasking of concomitant Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome]. / Adenosingabe zur Terminierung einer atrio-ventrikulär-nodalen-Reentry-Tachykardie: Induktion von Vorhofflimmern mit schneller Uberleitung bei Demaskierung eines konkomitierenden Wolff-Parkinson-White-Syndroms.

The antiarrhythmic properties of adenosine, its ultra-short half-life and the absence of frequent serious side effects make it a front-line agent in arrhythmia management, especially in the treatment of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Due to a shortening of atrial refractoriness, adenosine can facilitate the induction of atrial fibrillation. Life threatening tachycardias may result from a potential rapid conduction of atrial fibrillation over an accessory pathway especially if the latter one has a short antegrade refractory period. We report a case of a 59 year old female patient in which intravenous administration of adenosine during typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia was followed by atrial fibrillation with rapid conduction over a hitherto unknown accessory pathway. After intravenous administration of adenosine the tachycardia was terminated successfully within 38 s. After a short period of asystole, spontaneous atrial fibrillation developed unmasking an antegrade preexcitation with subsequent rapid ventricular response (210 b/min). The three-lead ECG showed a narrow QRS complex tachycardia. Because of spontaneous conversion to sinus rhythm and the absence of hemodynamic compromise there was no need for external cardioversion. During electrophysiological study an antidromic atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia was recorded over a left posteroseptal accessory pathway including antegrade conduction properties only. Because of its ultrashort half-life, serious side effects after adenosine administration are rare. The possibility of life threatening proarrhythmias after intravenous adenosine administration should be taken into consideration if the etiology of a paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia is not clear and a concomitant Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome cannot be excluded. As with application of all intravenous antiarrhythmic agents, the administration of adenosine should only be performed if continuous ECG monitoring and cardioversion facilities are available and possible.

[Ventricular fibrillation in intra-atrial cardioversion of atrial fibrillation]. / Kammerflimmern bei intraatrialer Kardioversion von Vorhofflimmern.

Recently intra-atrial defibrillation has become an interesting alternative to external defibrillation and drug therapy for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Low-energy intra-atrial defibrillation can be used to restore sinus rhythm f.ex. after a failed external cardioversion or during an electrophysiologic study when the administration of antiarrhythmic drugs should be avoided. Additionally this new technique has led to the development of implantable atrial defibrillators for the treatment of selected patients suffering from chronic atrial fibrillation. Intra-atrial defibrillation seems to be a highly effective and safe method, but little experience exists concerning the outcome so far. Especially the potential risk of inducing ventricular pro-arrhythmia is subject of current controversy. We report the case of a 79-year-old patient suffering from WPW syndrome with a concealed bypass tract who was subject to an intra-atrial defibrillation during an electrophysiologic study. At the beginning of the study atrial fibrillation could be converted to sinus rhythm by a single low-energy atrial defibrillation (3 J.). After a short period of time a second intra-atrial defibrillation had to be performed in the same way because of recurrent atrial fibrillation. By this atrial shock ventricular fibrillation was induced, so that high energy external defibrillation became necessary. Analyzing the ECG a correct R-wave synchronization was found, but a rather short preceding RR interval (252 ms). In conclusion, low energy atrial defibrillation is gaining importance as a highly effective new technique to restore sinus rhythm in patients suffering from atrial fibrillation resistant to conventional therapies. Nevertheless potential risks have to be considered such as the induction of ventricular pro-arrhythmia. Therefore, a correct R-wave synchronization is obligatory and shock delivery should be withheld after short RR intervals. Future prospective randomized studies will have to show whether this new technique is really safe enough and superior to the conventional methods for restoring sinus rhythm in patients suffering from atrial fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation in coronary artery disease.

To answer whether atrial ischemia plays an important role in the genesis of atrial fibrillation in patients with coronary artery disease, we analyzed the electrocardiograms obtained at the time of coronary angiography and left ventriculography in 3220 consecutive patients. Atrial fibrillation was found in 74 (2.3%). Among those with significant coronary artery disease were 49 (66.2%) patients with atrial fibrillation and 88.5% with sinus rhythm (P<0.02). Angiograms of patients with atrial fibrillation and significant (>50%) coronary stenosis were re-evaluated and results compared to the control group which consisted of 108 consecutive patients who were in sinus rhythm at the time of coronary angiography. There were no differences between groups with respect to either frequency of injury to the right coronary artery and circumflex branch of left coronary artery or localization of the injury to this region (before or after atrial branch take-off). But patients with atrial fibrillation significantly more often had heart failure (55.1% versus 18.5%, P<0.001) and three vessel disease (30.5% versus 20.4%, P=0.05) as well as mitral valve insufficiency (20.4% versus 10.2%, P<0.05). In conclusion, in patients with coronary disease, systolic heart failure may be more important than atrial ischemia in causing atrial fibrillation.

[Implantation of a dual chamber pacemaker-defibrillator (DDD-ICD) in a patient with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy]. / Implantation eines Zwei-Kammer-Schrittmacher-Defibrillators (DDD-ICD) bei einer Patientin mit hypertropher obstruktiver Kardiomyopathie.

A 70-year-old woman with severely symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy was unresponsive to drug treatment. She had recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias and syncope and was at high risk for sudden death; a dual chamber pacemaker defibrillator (DDD-ICD) was implanted. Her initial left ventricular outflow tract gradient was 80 mm Hg and fell to 40 mm Hg during dual-chamber pacing at an atrial ventricular delay of 140 ms. In the follow-up over six months she was asymptomatic with respect to angina pectoris; ventricular tachycardias could be successfully terminated by antitachycardia pacing or by shocks. A dual chamber pacemaker defibrillator is an important therapeutic option for patients with symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy and ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Clinical experience with the new detection algorithms for atrial fibrillation of a defibrillator with dual chamber sensing and pacing.

INTRODUCTION: A major drawback of therapy with an implantable defibrillator is the nonspecificity of detection. Theoretically, adding atrial sensing information to a decision algorithm could improve specificity of detection. METHODS AND RESULTS: This open-label nonrandomized study compares the detection algorithm of the Ventak AV and the Ventak Mini implantable defibrillators. The Ventak AV (n = 39) uses dual chamber detection as opposed to single chamber detection (with rate stability) in the Ventak Mini (n = 55). Programmed zone configurations, rate thresholds, and stability criteria were identical in all patients. In the Ventak AV group, 235 ventricular tachyarrhythmias were adequately detected and treated by the device. In the Mini group, 699 episodes of ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia occurred. All but six of the latter episodes were correctly identified and treated: one patient with incessant ventricular tachycardia had five episodes not terminated by the device, another episode occurred in a patient with a device/lead defect. In the Ventak AV group, 33 episodes of sinus tachycardia and 166 episodes of atrial fibrillation/flutter activated the device; inappropriate therapy was applied to 41% of atrial fibrillation/flutter episodes. In the Ventak Mini group, 226 supraventricular tachyarrhythmias activated the device, eight of which were sinus tachycardia and 218 were atrial fibrillation or flutter; of the atrial fibrillation/ flutter episodes 24% were treated inappropriately (fewer vs Ventak AV, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The new detection algorithm incorporated in the Ventak AV did not inadvertently withhold therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias, but at the same time the number of inappropriate therapies for atrial fibrillation was not decreased in comparison to a single chamber device.