Treatment options for cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: There is no agreed-upon standard option for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA HNSCC) unfit for cisplatin-based regimens. Therefore, we performed a systematic review to explore alternative options for this population. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases for observational studies and clinical trials (CTs) assessing treatment options for LA HNSCC cisplatin-ineligible patients. This study was registered in PROSPERO under the number CRD42023483156. RESULTS: This systematic review included 24 studies (18 observational studies and 6 CTs), comprising 4450 LA HNSCC cisplatin-ineligible patients. Most patients were treated with cetuximab-radiotherapy [RT] (50.3%), followed by carboplatin-RT (31.7%). In seven studies reporting median overall survival (OS) in patients treated with cetuximab-RT, it ranged from 12.8 to 46 months. The median OS was superior to 40 months in two studies assessing carboplatin-RT, and superior to 15 months in two studies assessing RT alone. For other regimens such as nimotuzumab-RT, docetaxel-RT, and carboplatin-RT plus paclitaxel the median OS was 21, 25.5, and 28 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review supports the use of a variety of therapy combinations for LA HNSCC cisplatin-ineligible patients. We highlight the urgent need for clinical studies assessing treatment approaches in this population.

EGFR-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Retreatment in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Previously Exposed to EGFR-TKI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) retreatment in advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane databases, ASCO, and ESMO websites for studies evaluating EGFR-TKI retreatment in advanced/metastatic NSCLC patients. All analyses were performed using R software (v.4.2.2). We included 19 studies (9 CTs and 10 retrospective cohorts) with a total of 886 patients. In a pooled analysis of all patients during retreatment with TKI, median OS was 11.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.2-13.4 months) and PFS was 3.2 months (95% CI 2.5-3.9 months). ORR was 15% (95% CI 10-21%) and DCR was 61% (95% CI 53-67%). The subanalysis by generation of TKI in the rechallenge period revealed a slightly better ORR for patients on 3rd generation TKI (p = 0.05). Some limitations include the high heterogeneity of some of the analyses and inability to perform certain subanalyses. Our results unequivocally support the benefit of EGFR-TKI rechallenge in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients progressing on TKI treatment after a TKI-free interval. These findings may be especially valuable in areas where access to novel therapeutic drugs and clinical trials is limited.

COVID-19 outcomes in patients with sickle cell disease and sickle cell trait compared with individuals without sickle cell disease or trait: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Clinical manifestations and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection in individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD) and sickle cell trait (SCT) are not well understood yet. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess COVID-19 outcomes in individuals with SCD or SCT compared to individuals without sickle cell disease or trait. An electronic search on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was performed on August 3, 2023. Two authors (IFM and ISP) independently screened (IFM and ISP) and extracted data (IFM and ILC) from included studies. Main exclusion criterion was the absence of the non-SCD/SCT group. Exposure effects for binary endpoints were compared using pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). I2 statistics was used to assess the heterogeneity and DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models were applied for all analyses to minimize the impact of differences in methods and outcomes definitions between studies. The overall quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE system. Review Manager 5.4 and R software (v4.2.2) were used for statistical analyses. Registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022366015. Findings: Overall, 22 studies were included, with a total of 1892 individuals with SCD, 8677 individuals with SCT, and 1,653,369 individuals without SCD/SCT. No difference in all-cause mortality was seen between SCD/SCT and non-SCD/SCT (OR 1.18; 95% CI 0.78-1.77; p = 0.429; I2 = 82%). When considering only studies adjusted for confounders (8 studies), patients with SCD/SCT were shown to be at increased risk of death (OR 1.86; 95% CI 1.30-2.66; p = 0.0007; I2 = 34%). No significant difference was seen between individuals with SCD and SCT (p = 0.863). The adjusted for confounders analysis for hospitalisation revealed higher rates for the SCD (OR 5.44; 95% CI 1.55-19.13; p = 0.008; I2 = 97%) and the SCT groups (OR 1.31; 95% CI 1.10-1.55; p = 0.002; I2 = 0) compared to the non-SCD/SCT population. Moreover, it was significantly higher for the SCD group (test for subgroup difference; p = 0.028). Interpretation: Our findings suggest that patients with SCD or SCT may present with a higher mortality and hospitalisation rates due to COVID-19 infection. Funding: None.