Content validation of the Patient-Reported Hamilton Inventory for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: Validité de contenu du Hamilton Inventory for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, une mesure des résultats déclarés par le patient.

BACKGROUND: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a perplexing neurological condition, and persons with CRPS experience substantial loss of daily roles and activities. A condition-specific measure is being developed to evaluate CRPS. PURPOSE: We describe the use of cognitive interviews to examine content validity of this patient-reported outcome measure for CRPS. METHOD: Interviews with 44 persons with CRPS were analyzed to identify problems with wording and support content validation. Item-total correlations were calculated for proposed subscales, and scores were plotted to consider floor/ceiling effects. FINDINGS: Interviews identified questions where respondents considered factors unrelated to the construct of interest or were underaddressed by the questionnaire, including depression and skin temperature. The symptoms, daily function, and coping/social impact scales demonstrated satisfactory correlations (Cronbach's alpha 0.76-0.86). Despite a sampling bias of severity, no frank floor/ceiling effects were noted. IMPLICATIONS: This study builds a foundation for continuing development and evaluation of the measurement properties of the Patient-Reported Hamilton Inventory for CRPS. It makes explicit the iterative decisions involved in rigorous instrument development.

The push-off test: development of a simple, reliable test of upper extremity weight-bearing capability.

STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal clinical measurement study. INTRODUCTION: The push-off test (POT) is a novel and simple measure of upper extremity weight-bearing that can be measured with a grip dynamometer. There are no published studies on the validity and reliability of the POT. The relationship between upper extremity self-report activity/participation and impairment measures remain an unexplored realm. PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this study is to estimate the intra and inter-rater reliability and construct validity of the POT. The secondary purpose is to estimate the relationship between upper extremity self-report activity/participation questionnaires and impairment measures. METHODS: A convenience sample of 22 patients with wrist or elbow injuries were tested for POT, wrist/elbow range of motion (ROM), isometric wrist extension strength (WES) and grip strength; and completed two self-report activity/participation questionnaires: Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and the Hand (DASH) and Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ-26). POT's inter and intra-rater reliability and construct validity was tested. Pearson's correlations were run between the impairment measures and self-report questionnaires to look into the relationship amongst them. RESULTS: The POT demonstrated high inter-rater reliability (ICC affected = 0.97; 95% C.I. 0.93-0.99; ICC unaffected = 0.85; 95% C.I. 0.68-0.94) and intra-rater reliability (ICC affected = 0.96; 95% C.I. 0.92-0.97; ICC unaffected = 0.92; 95% C.I. 0.85-0.97). The POT was correlated moderately with the DASH (r = -0.47; p = 0.03). While examining the relationship between upper extremity self-reported activity/participation questionnaires and impairment measures the strongest correlation was between the DASH and the POT (r = -0.47; p = 0.03) and none of the correlations with the other physical impairment measures reached significance. At-work disability demonstrated insignificant correlations with physical impairments. CONCLUSION: The POT test provides a reliable and easily administered quantitative measure of ability to bear the load through an injured arm. Preliminary evidence supports a moderate relationship between loading bearing measured by the POT and upper extremity function measured by the DASH. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1b.

Factors that influence the clinical decision making of physical therapists in choosing a balance assessment approach.

BACKGROUND: Many methods for examining patients with balance deficits are supported by the literature. How or why therapists choose specific balance assessment methods during examination of patients remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were: (1) to explore decision making during examination of patients with balance deficits, (2) to understand the selection and use of assessment methods from the clinician's perspective, and (3) to explore why specific methods were selected. DESIGN: A qualitative design using a grounded theory approach permitted exploration of clinical decision making. METHODS: Eleven therapists were purposefully selected (6 from outpatient offices, 5 from inpatient rehabilitation settings) to participate in repeated interviews. Credibility of the findings was established through low-inference data, member check, and triangulation among participants and multiple data sources. RESULTS: A highly individualized approach to patient examination based on therapists' practical knowledge emerged from the data, with limited influence of the literature. Movement observation was the primary assessment and diagnostic tool. When selecting assessment approaches for specific patients, the perceived value of information gathered mattered more than testing time. A 3-stage model of assessment decision making portrayed both the process and reasons influencing therapists' choices. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of the complex and busy nature of clinical practice, therapists gathered data that they considered meaningful during patient examination. The findings provide insight into factors influencing assessment decisions and suggest mechanisms to foster translation of research into clinical practice.

Examination of the elbow: linking diagnosis, prognosis, and outcomes as a framework for maximizing therapy interventions.

A conceptual framework for examination of the elbow by the therapist is presented. The role of history taking including patient life-style factors, comorbidities and goals; pain assessment; utility of provocative maneuvers and range of motion analysis are presented. Assessment of strength using hand-held dynamometry is described. Pain and disability measures relevant to patients with elbow pathology are discussed and one patient self report instruments is appended (the Patient-rated Elbow Evaluation). The psychometrics properties of tests for the elbow, when available, are reviewed. A template for recording an elbow examination is provided.

Is there a role for ultrasound and electrical stimulation following injury to tendon and nerve?

Ultrasound (US) and electrical stimulation have been widely used in hand therapy to promote recovery after nerve and tendon injuries. There is support for the use of low-dosage continuous wave and pulsed US for carpal tunnel syndrome and tendonitis. Iontophoresis with dexamethasone sodium phosphate can relieve pain in acute elbow tendonitis, but there is no support for phonophoresis for any tendonitis. Animal model research supports the use of low-dosage US to improve the mechanical properties of the Achilles tendon when initiated immediately after tenorrhaphy. There are no studies available which have examined US applied to tendons in humans after repair. Electrical stimulation has been extensively studied in animal models after nerve axonotmesis and neurotmesis with nerve repair, with some support of enhancing recovery. There is a void in the literature on the use of electrical stimulation for humans after nerve transection and repair.

Conservative interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome.

The assessment and conservative interventions in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) are described in this paper. Information about surgical procedures and postoperative care has also been included. It is difficult to make definitive conclusions about the literature regarding success of treatment for CTS due to variations in outcome measures, severity of CTS, and inconsistencies in duration, dosage, and follow-up time for interventions. Based on what is known to date, this author recommends that patients with mild or moderate CTS be provided with a conservative program of splinting the wrist in neutral for nocturnal wear. In addition, intermittent exercise (nerve-gliding exercises) and activity modification, including avoidance of protracted periods of sustained gripping activities and awkward wrist positions, can be useful. This conservative program may be complemented by pain-relieving modalities during times of activity and supplemental participation in other exercise such as yoga. If symptoms are not relieved to the satisfaction of the patient, or they recur, then it is incumbent upon the therapist to refer the patient to a hand surgeon for injection or possible surgical decompression.

Therapy interventions for improving joint range of motion: A systematic review.

The authors conducted a systematic review of the published evidence on conservative interventions for loss of upper extremity joint range of motion following selected musculoskeletal conditions. Several databases (Medline, CINAHL, PEDRO, PubMed, and Cochrane) were searched for articles that met inclusion criteria. Two reviewers determined abstract selection; two reviews performed critical appraisal of 26 articles. Level of evidence and quality on a 24-item quantitative critical appraisal form were determined for all articles meeting selection criteria. The primary outcome considered was range-of-motion measurement. Overall, the quantity and quality of evidence were moderate to low. Sackett's levels 2b, 3, and 4 evidence has shown that joint mobilization, a supervised exercise program, and splinting can all increase joint range of motion. There were no studies found in the literature that examined techniques of physical agent or electrotherapeutic modalities. Future studies are needed to delineate selection of appropriate candidates for these techniques and effective dosage.