Delta-shaped anastomosis vs circular stapler anastomosis after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with Billroth I reconstruction: A randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of delta-shaped anastomosis compared to circular stapler anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with Billroth I reconstruction. METHODS: This is a single-center randomized controlled study. Eligibility criteria included histologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma in the lower third of the stomach, clinical stage I tumor. Patients were preoperatively randomized to circular stapler anastomosis or delta-shaped anastomosis. The primary endpoint is the number of analgesics used during three days after surgery. We compared the surgical outcomes of the two groups. Postoperative quality of life was evaluated using the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45. This trial was registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000025160. RESULTS: Between December 2016 and September 2018, 39 patients (delta-shaped anastomosis 18, circular stapler anastomosis 21) were enrolled. There was no difference in the number of analgesics used during three days after surgery (median nine: delta-shaped anastomosis vs nine: circular stapler anastomosis, P = .91). There was no difference in the overall proportion with in-hospital grade II-IIIB surgical complications (11%: delta-shaped anastomosis, 14%: circular stapler anastomosis). There was no operation-related death in either arm. Regarding postoperative quality of life evaluated one month after surgery, diarrhea subscale was significantly worse in delta-shaped anastomosis than in circular stapler anastomosis. CONCLUSION: We did not demonstrate the advantage of delta-shaped anastomosis in terms of postoperative pain. Since delta-shaped anastomosis tended to cause postoperative abdominal symptoms related to diarrhea, we should carefully apply the delta-shaped anastomosis to laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with Billroth I reconstruction.

Comprehensive Exploration to Identify Predictive DNA Markers of ΔNp63/SOX2 in Drug Resistance in Human Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: OBP-801 is a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor being developed as an anticancer drug. In this study, we explored genes to predict drug resistance in human cancer. METHODS: OBP-801 resistance was assessed in 37 strains of human cancer cell lines. Expression microarrays harboring 54,675 genes were used to focus on candidate genes, which were validated for both functional and clinical relevance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). RESULTS: OBP-801 is sensitive to esophageal, gastric, and thyroid cancer, and resistant to some esophageal and colorectal cancers. We therefore used ESCC to explore genes. Comprehensive exploration focused on ΔNp63/SOX2, which were both genetically and epigenetically overexpressed in ESCC. Genomic amplifications of ΔNp63/SOX2 were tightly correlated each other (r = 0.81). Importantly, genomic amplification of ΔNp63/SOX2 in the resected tumors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was significantly associated with histological grade of response (G1). Forced expression of either of these two genes did not induce each other, suggesting that their functional relevances were independent and showed robust drug resistance in OBP-801, as well as 5-fluorouracil. Furthermore, ΔNp63 could exert a potent oncogenic potential. RNA interference of ΔNp63 supported its oncological properties, as well as drug resistance. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive exploration of genes involved in anticancer drug residence could identify critical oncogenes of ΔNp63/SOX2 that would predict chemotherapy response in ESCC.

Prediction of onset of remnant gastric cancer by promoter DNA methylation of CDO1/HOPX/Reprimo/E-cadherin.

BACKGROUND: Early detection of remnant gastric cancer (RGC) is required to reduce the risk of death, but long-term endoscopic surveillance is difficult after gastrectomy. In this study, data for the methylation status of 4 methylation genes (CDO1, HOPX, Reprimo, and E-cadherin) to predict the onset of RGC are presented. RESULTS: The 4 genes showed hypermethylation in RGC tumors in contrast to the corresponding non-cancerous mucosa tissues. The methylation level in the non-cancerous mucosa tissues of the initial surgery was obviously high in initial malignant disease for CDO1 (P = 0.0001), while in initial benign one for E-cadherin (P = 0.003). Promoter DNA methylation status in the remnant non-cancerous mucosa tissues together with the basic clinical data in turn predicted either initial malignant disease or initial benign disease with a high AUC score of 0.94, suggesting that methylation events are differentially recognized between the initial malignant and benign disease. We then finally confirmed that 4 genes hypermethylation of the non-cancerous tissues by biopsy prior to onset of RGC could predict terms until RGC occurred (P < 0.0001). METHODS: A total of 58 RGC patients were used to establish the model. The 4 genes promoter methylation were analyzed for DNA obtained from the patient's specimens using quantitative methylation specific polymerase chain reaction. CONCLUSIONS: This risk model would help provide guidance for endoscopic surveillance plan of RGC after gastrectomy.

Cancer-specific promoter DNA methylation of Cysteine dioxygenase type 1 (CDO1) gene as an important prognostic biomarker of gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: There have been few available prognostic biomarkers in gastric cancer. We rigorously assessed the clinical relevance of promoter DNA methylation of Cysteine dioxygenase type 1 (CDO1) gene, a cancer-specific aberration, in human gastric cancer. METHODS: Quantitative CDO1 methylation value (TaqMeth V) was initially calculated in 138 gastric cancer patients operated in 2005, and its clinical significance was elucidated. As a subsequent expanded set, 154 gastric cancer patients with pathological stage (pStage) II / III with no postoperative therapy were validated between 2000 and 2010. RESULTS: (1) Median TaqMeth V of CDO1 gene methylation of gastric cancer was 25.6, ranging from 0 to 120.9. As pStage progressed, CDO1 TaqMeth V became higher (p < 0.0001). (2) The optimal cut-off value was determined to be 32.6; gastric cancer patients with high CDO1 gene methylation showed a significantly worse prognosis than those with low CDO1 gene methylation (p < 0.0001). (3) A multivariate cox proportional hazards model identified high CDO1 gene methylation (p = 0.033) as an independent prognostic factor. (4) The results were recapitulated in the expanded set in pStage III, where high CDO1 gene methylation group had a significantly worse prognosis than low CDO1 gene methylation group (p = 0.0065). Hematogenous metastasis was unique in pStage III with high CDO1 gene methylation (p = 0.0075). (5) Anchorage independent growth was reduced in several gastric cancer cell lines due to forced expression of the CDO1 gene, suggesting that abnormal CDO1 gene expression may represent distant metastatic ability. CONCLUSIONS: Promoter DNA hypermethylation of CDO1 gene was rigorously validated as an important prognostic biomarker in primary gastric cancer with specific stage.

Lymph Node Progression and Optimized Node Dissection of Middle Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Latest Therapeutic Surgical Strategy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to elucidate the optimized lymph node dissection range in middle thoracic (Mt) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) requiring surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 165 ESCC patients who underwent surgery with curative intent between 2009 and 2016, including 99 (60%) with MtESCC. Preoperative chemotherapy was administered in more than 80% of cStage II/III MtESCC patients. The rates of pathological and potential metastasis (representing recurrences) to lymph nodes and prognosis (median follow-up 52 months) were clarified. Lymph node dissection efficacy was assessed by calculating the efficacy index (EI) for each lymph node. RESULTS: No. 2R had the highest rate of metastasis, with frequencies of 13/38/46% in cStage I/II/III, respectively, with the highest EI in MtESCC. Recurrences were seen in about 2-10% in the regional (nos. 1, 2L, 4R, and 10) and extraregional lymph nodes (paraaortic lymph node). The EI of lymph nodes was found to exhibit the highest score of 15 for no. 2R, followed by 11.5 for no. 17. The 5-year overall survival (OS) in MtESCC patients who underwent no. 2R lymph node dissection was 73.8%, while those who did not undergo no. 2R dissection did never reach 5-year OS (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Meticulous lymph node dissection of no. 2R is the most important for long-term survival, and mandatory with the highest priority in MtESCC.

Safety and Feasibility of Robotic Distal Gastrectomy for Stage IA Gastric Cancer: A Phase II Trial.

BACKGROUND: Conventional laparoscopic and open distal gastrectomy procedures have inherent limitations such as restricted movement of straight forceps and tremor of the tip of the devices that can potentially be overcome using robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG). This single-institutional phase II trial aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of RDG with lymph node dissection for clinical stage IA gastric cancer. METHODS: The study included patients with clinical stage IA gastric cancer in the lower two-thirds of the stomach considered to be curatively resected via distal gastrectomy. The primary end point was the proportion of patients who developed intra-abdominal complications, requiring medical or interventional treatment. The planned sample size was 25, calculated based on an expected complication rate of 3% and a threshold complication rate of 15%, with a one-sided alpha of 10%, power of 70%. RESULTS: Overall postoperative complications rate was 16%. The proportion of patients who developed intra-abdominal complications, requiring treatment was 0% (90% confidence interval, 0-9.8%). No patient developed in-hospital adverse events of grade 3 or higher. The short-term clinical outcomes were as follows: the median duration of postoperative hospital stay was 7 d, and 10 patients (40.0%) had a body temperature of 38°C or higher during their hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: This trial confirmed the safety of RDG with limitation by the restriction of dedicated surgeons. A phase III trial to confirm the superiority of RDG to conventional laparoscopic distal gastrectomy is warranted.

Carcinosarcoma of the esophagus: A report of 6 cases associated with zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 1 expression.

Esophageal carcinosarcoma (ECS) has been suggested to result from an epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenomenon. However, knowledge on its underlying molecular features is limited. The clinical and pathological features, and the prognosis of ECS require further investigation. In the present study, a total of 325 patients with esophageal tumors were observed between January 2004 and December 2014, of which 6 patients were diagnosed pathologically with ECS. The clinicopathological features were compared with those of corresponding cases with the identical pathological T stage (pT) of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). In terms of the clinical T stage (cT), the 6 cases were composed of cT1, cT2, cT3 and cT4 in 1, 1, 3 and 1 case, respectively. Nevertheless, pT was eventually diagnosed as pT1 in all cases. There was a large discrepancy between clinically diagnosed depth of tumor invasion prior to surgery and depth of tumor invasion following surgery. Zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1), an EMT-associated transcription factor, was expressed only in the sarcoma component in all 6 cases of ECS. The ECS cases had a significantly poorer prognosis compared with the 115 pT1 ESCC cases. The present study suggests that the depth of invasion of ECS lesions does not correspond with their respective size, and the EMT of the carcinoma component may affect the prognosis by overexpression of the ZEB1 gene.

Comparison of double-flap and OrVil techniques of laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy in preventing gastroesophageal reflux: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy (LAPG) with esophagogastrostomy using the double-flap technique has been reported to rarely cause gastroesophageal reflux. However, quantitative evaluation of the reflux has hardly been performed. The aim of this study was to clarify the superiority of the double-flap technique of LAPG with esophagogastrostomy compared with the OrVil technique in terms of preventing gastroesophageal reflux. METHODS: A total of 40 and 51 patients who underwent LAPG with esophagogastrostomy using the double-flap and OrVil techniques, respectively, for upper one-third gastric cancer were included in this study. Of these, 22 and 13 patients in the double-flap and OrVil groups, respectively, consented to undergo a 24-h impedance-pH monitoring test at 3 months postoperatively. Postoperative complications, including gastroesophageal reflux and anastomotic stricture, were assessed retrospectively. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in the patients' background between both groups, except for a higher D1+ dissection rate observed in double-flap group than in the OrVil group (93% vs 25%, P < 0.001). Operative time was significantly longer in the double-flap group than in the OrVil group (353 min vs 280 min, P < 0.001). All reflux % time was significantly lower in the double-flap group than in the OrVil group (1.29% vs 2.62%, P = 0.043). On the other hand, the proportion of anastomotic stricture requiring endoscopic balloon dilatation was lower in the double-flap group than in the OrVil group but without statistical significance (18% vs 27%; P = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Despite its longer operative time and still relatively high anastomotic stricture rate, the double-flap technique would be better than the OrVil technique in terms of preventing gastroesophageal reflux in patients who underwent LAPG with esophagogastrostomy.

A phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1, followed by gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for high-risk advanced gastric cancer: results of the KDOG1001 trial.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with gastric cancer with bulky node metastasis, linitis plastica (type 4), or large ulcero-invasive-type tumors (type 3) remains poor. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 (DCS) for establishing a new treatment modality that improves prognosis. METHODS: Patients received up to four 28-day cycles of DCS therapy (docetaxel at 40 mg/m2, cisplatin at 60 mg/m2 on day 1, and S-1 at 40 mg/m2 twice daily for 2 weeks) followed by gastrectomy with D2 nodal dissection. S-1 chemotherapy was administered for 1 year after surgical resection. The primary endpoint was the percentage of complete resections of the primary tumor with clear margins (R0 resection). The planned sample size was 40; this was calculated based on an expected R0 rate of 85% and a threshold R0 rate of 65%, with a one-sided alpha of 5% and a power of 90%. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2017, 40 patients were enrolled. The R0 resection rate was 90%. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events during DCS therapy were leukocytopenia (27.5%), neutropenia (55.0%), and hyponatremia (22.5%). The most common grade 3 or 4 surgical morbidity was pancreatic fistula (12.5%); mortality was 0%. The pathological response rate was 57.5% with a grade 3 histological response rate of 8%. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with DCS was feasible and showed a sufficient R0 resection rate. A future study with a sufficient follow-up period should confirm survival outcomes.

Optimized lymph node dissection range during progression of lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the latest therapeutic surgical strategy: A retrospective analysis.

The distribution of lymph node metastases, including recurrences, remains elusive in lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LtESCC). The present study was a retrospective investigation into the optimized lymph node dissection range during LtESCC. Esophagectomies were performed on 163 patients with ESCC between 2009 and 2016, among whom 41 patients with LtESCC were examined. The rates of pathological and potential (including recurrences) metastases to lymph nodes and the prognosis (median, 34 months) were determined. Preoperative Docetaxel, Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy was administered in >60% of cStage II/III LtESCC. During stage progression, abdominal lymph node metastasis rapidly becomes aggressive in LtESCC and lymph node metastases to the para-aortic area were more dominant than cervical and recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) areas. There were few control failures of regional lymph node metastases in LtESCC with surgery, if 1 unique case with cStage III who had metastases and recurrences of multiple lymph nodes during the clinical course was excluded. Defective lymph node dissection around the RLN did not worsen LtESCC prognosis with no RLN palsy. In the context of the potent preoperative chemotherapy and esophagectomy, lymph node dissection of cervical, para-aortic and RLN areas are putatively not mandatory to all LtESCC patients.

Patients' preoperative background causes gastric stasis after laparoscopy-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Despite technical improvements in laparoscopic gastrectomy, gastric stasis is still a serious problem in laparoscopy-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (LAPPG). The aim of this study was to investigate the factors that might cause gastric stasis in LAPPG. METHODS: From April 2004 through November 2012, 85 patients with cT1N0 middle-third gastric cancer who underwent LAPPG at Kitasato University Hospital; these patients were included in the present study. Infra-pyloric vein (IPV)-preserving LAPPG was performed in 41 patients. We compared the rate of gastric stasis in the IPV-preserving and the IPV-non-preserving groups, and analyzed the clinicopathological factors that might have caused gastric stasis. RESULTS: We did not demonstrate that preservation of the IPV could prevent gastric stasis in the early and late postoperative periods. Symptoms of gastric stasis were most frequently recognized 1 year after surgery. A significantly higher proportion of preoperative ASA class 2 patients had gastric stasis than did not (80.0% [12/15] vs 48.6% [34/70], P=0.02). Among the ASA class 2 patients, a significantly greater proportion of those with depressed activities of daily living than those with normal activities of daily living had gastric stasis (66.7% [4/6] vs 20.0% [8/40], P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical significance of the IPV preservation in LAPPG could not be demonstrated. LAPPG should be performed for ASA class 1 patients or those with maintained preoperative activities of daily living.

Prognostic relevance of FGFR2 expression in stage II/III gastric cancer with curative resection and S-1 chemotherapy.

Curative gastrectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy using S-1 is a standard treatment for stage II/III gastric cancer in Japan. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic relevance of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)2 expression in patients with stage II/III gastric cancer that underwent postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded surgical specimens were retrospectively examined in 167 patients with stage II/III gastric cancer that underwent curative gastrectomy followed by adjuvant S1 chemotherapy. FGFR2 expression was measured using immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining. The IHC results for FGFR2 were as follows: Grade 1+, 32; grade 2+, 80; grade 3+, 55 patients. The FGFR2 expression level was not significantly associated with relapse-free or overall survival rates. However, in the diffuse type, the FGFR2 expression level tended to be negatively correlated with relapse-free survival. In particular, the proportion of patients who recurred >5 years following surgery was significantly larger in the FGFR2 grade 3+ group than in the grade 1+, 2+ group (4/22 vs. 1/35; P=0.047). The recurrent sites of long-term failure were mostly peritoneum among the diffuse type. To the best of our knowledge, the present study indicated for the first time that FGFR2 could predict long-term failure of adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy in curative advanced gastric cancer. There was no interaction between FGFR2 expression and patient survival outcomes in stage II/III gastric cancer. Patients with FGFR2 3+ in stage II/III gastric cancer should carefully be followed-up for >5 years after surgery.

Prognoses of advanced esophago-gastric junction cancer may be modified by thoracotomy and splenectomy.

Globally, the incidence of esophago-gastric junction (EGJ) cancer is rapidly increasing. However, the proposed strategies for the treatment of these types of cancer are so diverse that there is no established consensus on the optimal treatment. The aim of the present study was to identify independent prognostic factors to delineate the optimal strategies for the treatment of EGJ cancer. The medical records of 150 patients with EGJ cancer who underwent curative surgery at the Kitasato University were retrospectively reviewed. The median follow-up period was 48 months. The patients with tumors that were classified as post-treatment primary tumor stage 3 [(y)pT3] or higher had a 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate of 53%, whereas those with tumors that were classified as (y)pT0-2 had a 5-year DSS rate of 90%. Therefore, prognostic analysis was restricted to those tumors that were designated (y)pT3 or higher. A multivariate Cox's proportional hazards model identified the following independent prognostic factors that negatively influenced the DSS: i) Presence of tumors classified as post-treatment regional lymph node stage 1-3 [(y)pN1-3] [hazard ratio (HR), 3.62; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.39-12.36]; ii) not undergoing treatment with splenectomy (HR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.15-5.15); and iii) undergoing treatment with thoracotomy (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.02-4.23). In patients with (y)pN0 tumors, the DSS rate was significantly improved for those who underwent splenectomy than for those who did not (P=0.024). In patients with (y)pN1-3 tumors, the DSS rate was significantly worse for those who underwent thoracotomy compared with those who did not (P=0.004). Splenectomy and thoracotomy may critically affect prognosis in locally advanced EGJ cancer that are classified as (y)pN0 and (y)pN1-3, respectively. Surgical treatments require optimization in order to improve prognoses in advanced EGJ cancer.

Esophagogastric junction cancer successfully treated by laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy and lower esophagectomy with intrathoracic double-flap technique: A case report.

A 66-year-old man was referred to our hospital for treatment of esophagogastric junction cancer. He was diagnosed as cT2N0M0, and the esophageal invasion was found to be 1 cm from the esophagogastric junction. He underwent laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy and lower esophagectomy with esophagogastrostomy using the intrathoracic double-flap technique through the transhiatal approach. The operative time was 662 min (suturing time was 198 min), and blood loss was 200 mL. The operative time was much longer for this procedure than for esophagogastrostomy with the conventional (intra-abdominal) double-flap technique. The postoperative course was uneventful. No abnormal gastroesophageal reflux, esophageal motility, or lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure was demonstrated 3 months after the operation. Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy and lower esophagectomy with esophagogastrostomy using the double-flap technique through the transhiatal approach is safe and feasible. It may be recommended for patients with esophagogastric junction cancer with esophageal invasion of about 1 cm.

Robust vascular invasion concurrent with intense EGFR immunostaining can predict recurrence in patients with stage IB node-negative gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: The prognosis of most patients with stage IB node-negative gastric cancer is good without postoperative chemotherapy; however, about 10% suffer recurrence and inevitably die. We conducted this study to establish the optimal indications for postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients at risk of recurrence. METHODS: The subjects of this retrospective study were 124 patients with stage IB node-negative gastric cancer, who underwent gastrectomy at the Kitasato University East Hospital, between 2001 and 2010. We reviewed EGFR immunohistochemistry (IHC) as well as clinicopathological factors. RESULTS: Of the 124 patients, 47 (38%) showed intense EGFR IHC (2+ or 3+), with significantly less frequency than in stage II/III advanced gastric cancer (p < 0.001). According to univariate analysis, intense EGFR IHC was significantly associated with relapse-free survival (RFS) (p = 0.023) and associated with overall survival (OS) (p = 0.045) as well as vascular invasion (p = 0.031). On the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, intense EGFR IHC(p = 0.016) was an independent prognostic predictor for RFS, and both vascular invasion (p = 0.033) and intense EGFR IHC (p = 0.031) were independent prognostic predictors for OS. The combination of both factors increased the risk of recurrence (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In stage IB node-negative gastric cancer, vascular invasion and intense EGFR IHC increase the likelihood of recurrence. We recommend adjuvant chemotherapy for such patients because of the high risk of metachronous recurrence.

The H19-PEG10/IGF2BP3 axis promotes gastric cancer progression in patients with high lymph node ratios.

We previously demonstrated that the lymph node ratio (LNR) is a prognostic factor associated with EGFR expression, among first priority genes amplified or overexpressed in cancer. Here, we investigated the associations between high LNR and second, third, and fourth priority genes. We performed mRNA expression microarray analysis of tumor tissue from patients with stage III gastric cancer and high or low LNRs. Candidate high LNR-associated genes were further evaluated in 39 patients with stage III gastric cancer. The functional relevance of these genes was evaluated in gastric cancer cell lines. We focused on five genes: H19,PEG10, IGF2BP3, CD177, and PGA3. H19 and PEG10 were confirmed as high LNR-associated genes. H19, PEG10, and IGF2BP3 were found to promote each other's expression. Knocking down H19 or PEG10 using RNAi decreased cell proliferation, invasion, anchorage-independent growth, and chemoresistance. These genes had a mutual relationship in MKN7 cells. H19 knockdown decreased expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition-associated genes in MKN74 cells to suppress transformation. Thus, H19 promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition in gastric cancer and is a potential therapeutic target.

Video-assisted thoracic surgery and jejunal reconstruction in a case of situs inversus totalis with esophageal cancer.

A 78-year-old man with situs inversus totalis who had a previous history of distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer was referred to our hospital for treatment of esophageal cancer. He was diagnosed as cT2N0M0 and underwent video-assisted thoracic surgery and open completion gastrectomy with jejunal reconstruction via the ante-thoracic route. The postoperative period was uneventful except for transient palsy of the right recurrent laryngeal nerve. Based on a preoperative assessment of anatomical abnormality and an intraoperative adaptation to the mirror image of the standard procedure, video-assisted esophagectomy was considered safe and feasible. It can be recommended for patients with esophageal cancer complicated by situs inversus totalis. This is the first case report of a patient with situs inversus totalis who underwent video-assisted esophagectomy with jejunal reconstruction. Relevant literature is also discussed and reviewed.

Optimal treatment for Siewert type II and III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: A retrospective cohort study with long-term follow-up.

AIM: To determine the optimal treatment strategy for Siewert type II and III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 83 patients with Siewert type II and III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and calculated both an index of estimated benefit from lymph node dissection for each lymph node (LN) station and a lymph node ratio (LNR: ratio of number of positive lymph nodes to the total number of dissected lymph nodes). We used Cox proportional hazard models to clarify independent poor prognostic factors. The median duration of observation was 73 mo. RESULTS: Indices of estimated benefit from LN dissection were as follows, in descending order: lymph nodes (LN) along the lesser curvature, 26.5; right paracardial LN, 22.8; left paracardial LN, 11.6; LN along the left gastric artery, 10.6. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 58%. Cox regression analysis revealed that vigorous venous invasion (v2, v3) (HR = 5.99; 95%CI: 1.71-24.90) and LNR of > 0.16 (HR = 4.29, 95%CI: 1.79-10.89) were independent poor prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSION: LN along the lesser curvature, right and left paracardial LN, and LN along the left gastric artery should be dissected in patients with Siewert type II or III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Patients with vigorous venous invasion and LNR of > 0.16 should be treated with aggressive adjuvant chemotherapy to improve survival outcomes.

Conversion surgery after combination chemotherapy of docetaxel, cisplatin and S-1 (DCS) for far-advanced gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: A triplet regimen of docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1(DCS) is highly effective against metastatic gastric cancer. We performed this study to clarify the safety and efficacy of surgical resection in patients with initially unresectable gastric cancer, after down-staging or disease control was achieved by DCS chemotherapy. METHODS: The subjects of this retrospective study were 31 consecutive patients with initially unresectable gastric cancer, who underwent surgical resection between October, 2006 and December, 2012, after down-staging or disease control was achieved by DCS chemotherapy. We evaluated the clinicopathological factors and clinical outcomes and assessed radiographic response based on the RECIST criteria, not by central review. RESULT: Before DCS chemotherapy, 18 patients had extra-regional lymph node metastasis, 5 had liver metastasis, 8 had macroscopic peritoneal metastasis, and 8 had pancreatic head invasion. Twenty-three (74.2%) of the 31 patients underwent R0 resection. Postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were 16.1 and 0%. During chemotherapy, grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (54.8%), leukopenia (32.3%), and anemia (16.1%). Median progression-free survival and median overall survival (OS) were 42.1 and 56.1 months, respectively. These results were similar for all patients, except those with locally advanced disease alone. In the multivariate analysis for OS, ypN remained an independent negative prognostic factor (p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Surgical resection after DCS chemotherapy for initially unresectable gastric cancer was safe and provided a reasonable R0 resection rate and good mid-term survival.

Macroscopic appearance of Type IV and giant Type III is a high risk for a poor prognosis in pathological stage II/III advanced gastric cancer with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.

AIM: To evaluate whether a high risk macroscopic appearance (Type IV and giant Type III) is associated with a dismal prognosis after curative surgery, because its prognostic relevance remains elusive in pathological stage II/III (pStage II/III) gastric cancer. METHODS: One hundred and seventy-two advanced gastric cancer (defined as pT2 or beyond) patients with pStage II/III who underwent curative surgery plus adjuvant S1 chemotherapy were evaluated, and the prognostic relevance of a high-risk macroscopic appearance was examined. RESULTS: Advanced gastric cancers with a high-risk macroscopic appearance were retrospectively identified by preoperative recorded images. A high-risk macroscopic appearance showed a significantly worse relapse free survival (RFS) (35.7%) and overall survival (OS) (34%) than an average risk appearance (P = 0.0003 and P < 0.0001, respectively). A high-risk macroscopic appearance was significantly associated with the 13th Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA) pT (P = 0.01), but not with the 13th JGCA pN. On univariate analysis for RFS and OS, prognostic factors included 13th JGCA pStage (P < 0.0001) and other clinicopathological factors including macroscopic appearance. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model for univariate prognostic factors identified high-risk macroscopic appearance (P = 0.036, HR = 2.29 for RFS and P = 0.021, HR = 2.74 for OS) as an independent prognostic indicator. CONCLUSION: A high-risk macroscopic appearance was associated with a poor prognosis, and it could be a prognostic factor independent of 13th JGCA stage in pStage II/III advanced gastric cancer.