Does pes anserinus tenotomy affect surgical site infection rate in operative tibial plateau fractures?

PURPOSE: To assess if pes anserinus tenotomy (PAT) during definitive open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of tibial plateau fractures is associated with a decreased risk of surgical site infection (SSI) and other postoperative complications. METHODS: A retrospective review of all adults who underwent ORIF for tibial plateau fractures from April 2005 to February 2022 at single level 1 trauma center was performed. Patients who had a medial approach to the plateau with minimum three-month follow-up were required for inclusion. All patients with fasciotomy for compartment syndrome or with traumatically avulsed or damaged pes anserinus prior to ORIF were excluded. Two groups were created: those who received a pes anserinus tenotomy with repair (PAT group) and those whose pes anserinus were spared and left intact (control group). Patient demographics, injury and operative characteristics, and surgical outcomes were compared. The primary outcomes were rates of deep and superficial SSI. RESULTS: The PAT group had significantly lower rates of deep SSI (9.2% vs. 19.7%, P = 0.009), superficial SSI (14.2% vs. 26.5%), P = 0.007), and any SSI (15.8% vs. 28.9%, P = 0.005). Multiple logistic regression showed that heart failure (aOR = 7.215, 95% CI 2.291-22.719, P < 0.001), and presence of open fracture (aOR = 4.046, 95% CI 2.074-7.895, P < 0.001) were independently associated with increased odds of deep SSI, while PAT was associated with a decreased odds of deep SSI (aOR = 0.481, 95% CI 0.231-0.992, P = 0.048). PAT had significantly lower rates of unplanned return to the operating room (20.8% vs. 33.7%, P = 0.010) and implant removal (10.0% vs. 18.0%, P = 0.042). CONCLUSION: While these data do not allow for discussion of functional recovery or strength, pes anserinus tenotomy was independently associated with significantly lower rates of infection, unplanned operation, and implant removal. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Comparison of Total Ankle Replacement and Ankle Arthrodesis for Ankle Arthropathy in Patients With Bleeding Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is limited literature comparing the publications on ankle arthrodesis (AA) and total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) in the setting of hemophilic arthropathy. Our objective is to systematically review the existing literature and to assess ankle arthroplasty as an alternative to ankle arthrodesis in this patient population. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted and presented according to the PRISMA statement standards. A search was conducted on March 7-10, 2023, using MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Studies. This search was restricted to full-text human studies published in English, and articles were screened by 2 masked reviewers. Systematic reviews, case reports with less than 3 subjects, letters to the editor, and conference abstracts were excluded. Two independent reviewers rated study quality using the MINORS tool. RESULTS: Twenty-one of 1226 studies were included in this review. Thirteen articles reviewed the outcomes associated with AA in hemophilic arthropathy whereas 10 reviewed the outcomes associated with TAA. Two of our studies were comparative and reviewed the outcomes of both AA and TAA. Additionally, 3 included studies were prospective. Studies showed that the degree of improvement in American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society hindfoot-ankle score, visual analog scale pain scores, and the mental and physical component summary scores of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey were similar for both surgeries. Complication rates were also similar between the 2 surgeries. Additionally, studies showed a significant improvement in ROM after TAA. CONCLUSION: Although the level of evidence in this review varies and results should be interpreted with caution, the current literature suggests similar clinical outcomes and complication rates between TAA and AA in this patient population.

Use of Computed Tomography Angiography to Predict Complications in Tibia Fractures: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the ability of computed tomography angiography identified infrapopliteal vascular injury to predict complications in tibia fractures that do not require vascular surgical intervention. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective review. SETTING: Six Level I trauma centers. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: Two hundred seventy-four patients with tibia fractures (OTA/AO 42 or 43) who underwent computed tomography angiography maintained a clinically perfused foot not requiring vascular surgical intervention and were treated with an intramedullary nail. Patients were grouped by the number of vessels below the trifurcation that were injured. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Rates of superficial and deep infection, amputation, unplanned reoperation to promote bone healing (nonunion), and any unplanned reoperation. RESULTS: There were 142 fractures in the control (no-injury) group, 87 in the one-vessel injury group, and 45 in the two-vessel injury group. Average follow-up was 2 years. Significantly higher rates of nerve injury and flap coverage after wound breakdown were observed in the two-vessel injury group. The two-vessel injury group had higher rates of deep infection (35.6% vs. 16.9%, P = 0.030) and unplanned reoperation to promote bone healing (44.4% vs. 23.9%, P = 0.019) compared with controls, as well as increased rates of any unplanned reoperation compared with control and one-vessel injury groups (71.1% vs. 39.4% and 51.7%, P < 0.001), respectively. There were no significant differences in rates of superficial infection or amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Tibia fractures with two-vessel injuries were associated with higher rates of deep infection and unplanned reoperation to promote bone healing compared with those without vascular injury, as well as increased rates of any unplanned reoperation compared with controls and fractures with one-vessel injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Risk Factors for Postoperative Urinary Retention Following Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Review of Current Literature and Meta-Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common complication following lumbar spine surgery (LSS) and timely recognition is imperative to avoid long-term consequences. The aim of the current meta-analysis was to systematically review the literature in order to identify risk factors associated with POUR after LSS. METHODS: In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review of the literature was performed using Pubmed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE database for articles on POUR following LSS. A meta-analysis was performed comparing patients with and without POUR; and the factors associated with this adverse event were analyzed. The pooled data were reported as mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI; P < .05). Heterogeneity among the studies was evaluated using the I2 statistic. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 10 studies compromised of 30,300 patients. Based on our analysis, patients who were male, were older in age, underwent instrumented fusion, had diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, or benign prostatic hypertrophy had significantly higher risk of developing POUR. Additionally, patients in who developed POUR had significantly longer surgical times and higher volumes of intra-operative fluid administration, as compared with non-POUR patients. The POUR patients also had a significantly higher association with urinary tract infection. Prior surgery, BMI, length of stay, and smoking status did not reveal any statistical association with POUR. CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors associated with POUR following LSS include male gender, older age, longer surgical times, fusion procedures, larger volumes of intraoperative infusions, and associated comorbidities like DM, CAD, and BPH.

Risk of Acute Kidney Injury and Fracture-Related Infection After Antibiotic Prophylaxis With Piperacillin-Tazobactam in Open Fractures.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of prophylactic piperacillin-tazobactam (PT) on inpatient acute kidney injury (AKI) and fracture-related infection (FRI) in patients with open fractures. SETTING: The study was conducted at a Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: We reviewed 358 Gustilo-Anderson type II and III open fractures at our institution from January 2013 to December 2017. INTERVENTION: Administration of PT (the PT group) or antibiotics other than PT (the historical control group) during the first 48 hours of arrival for open fracture antibiotic prophylaxis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The main outcome measurements were rates of inpatient AKI and FRI within six months after definitive fixation. RESULTS: There were 176 patients in the PT group and 182 patients in the historical control group. The PT group had worse American Society of Anesthesiologists class ( P = 0.004) and injury severity scores ( P < 0.001), a higher average number of debridements before closure/coverage ( P = 0.043), and higher rates of gross soil contamination ( P = 0.049) and staged procedures ( P = 0.008) compared with the historical control group.There was no difference in the rate of AKI between the PT and historical control groups (5.7% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.166) nor when stratified by Gustilo-Anderson fracture classification (type II: 5.8% vs. 3.6%, P = 0.702; type III: 5.6% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.283). There was no significant difference in the rate of FRI between the PT and historical control groups (23.6% vs. 19.6%, P = 0.469). CONCLUSION: The use of PT in prophylactic antimicrobial treatment in patients with Gustilo-Anderson type II and III open fractures does not increase the rate of AKI or FRI. We believe PT can be used as an effective monotherapy in these patients without an increased risk of renal injury, but future investigations are necessary. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Risk Factors for Postoperative Ileus After Thoracolumbar and Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative ileus (POI) is a known complication after spine surgery. This study comprehensively reviews the existing literature and evaluates the risk factors associated with POI after thoracolumbar and lumbar fusion surgeries. METHODS: In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted for articles on ileus after the surgical treatment of spinal pathologies. Variables including gender, age, body mass index, comorbidities, approach, type of surgery performed, levels fused, anesthesia time, and length of stay were considered as the main outcomes of measurement. Meta-analyses were conducted using random models according to the between-study heterogeneity, estimated with I2. Sensitivity analysis was performed with heterogeneity greater than 50%. RESULTS: Ten articles compromising a total of 297,809 patients met the inclusion criteria. POI after lumbar surgery had a statistically significant association with increased age, surgical time, anesthesia time, estimated blood loss, and length of stay. The pooled mean differences were 1.70 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.52-1.87, P < 0.0001), 83.02 minutes (CI: 41.20-124.84, P = 0.0001), 64.97 minutes (CI: 31.43-98.50, P = 0.0001), 439.04 cc (CI: 250.60-627.49, P < 0.001), and 2.97 days (CI: 2.54-3.40, P < 0.001), respectively. Furthermore, individuals who underwent spinal fusion had higher odds of POI if they were male (odds ratio [OR]: 1.33; CI: 1.06-1.67; P = 0.01), if an anterior approach was performed (OR: 1.97; CI: 1.29-3.01; P = 0.002), or if >3 vertebral levels were fused (OR: 3.99; CI: 1.28-12.44; P = 0.02). Body mass index did not show any association with POI. CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors associated with POI after spinal fusion surgery include male gender, older age, longer surgical times, higher estimated blood loss, longer lengths of stay, greater numbers of levels of fusion, and anterior surgical approach.

Risk Factors for Deep Infection and Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty After Operative Combined Pelvic Ring and Acetabular Fractures.

OBJECTIVES: To determine risk factors for deep infection and conversion total hip arthroplasty (THA) after operative management of combined pelvic ring and acetabular injuries. DESIGN: Retrospective case control study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: We reviewed 150 operative combined pelvic ring and acetabular injuries at our institution from 2010 to 2019, with an average follow-up of 690 (90-3282) days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Deep infection and conversion THA. RESULTS: Patients who developed deep infection (N = 17, 11.3%) had higher rates of hip dislocation ( P = 0.030), intraoperative transfusion ( P = 0.030), higher body mass index (BMI) ( P = 0.046), increased estimated blood loss ( P < 0.001), more intraoperative units transfused ( P = 0.004), and longer operative times ( P = 0.035). Of the 84 patients with 1-year follow-up, 24 (28.6%) required conversion to THA. Patients requiring conversion THA were older ( P = 0.022) and had higher rates of transverse posterior wall fracture pattern ( P = 0.034), posterior wall involvement ( P < 0.001), hip dislocation ( P = 0.031), wall comminution ( P = 0.002), and increased estimated blood loss ( P = 0.024). The order of the pelvic ring versus acetabular fixation did not affect rates of conversion to THA ( P = 0.109). Multiple logistic regression showed that an increased number of intraoperative units transfused [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.16-2.09, P = 0.003] and higher BMI (aOR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.01-1.16, P = 0.024) were independently associated with an increased odds of deep infection. Posterior wall involvement was independently associated with an increased odds of conversion THA (aOR = 5.73, 95% CI = 1.17-27.04, P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of deep infection and conversion THA after operative fixation of combined injuries were 11.3% and 28.6%, respectively. Higher average BMI and number of intraoperative units of blood transfused were independently associated with deep infection, whereas posterior wall involvement was independently associated with conversion to THA in these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Ankle Fracture and Length of Stay in US Adult Population Using Data From the National COVID Cohort Collaborative.

BACKGROUND: The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) is an innovative approach to integrate real-world clinical observations into a harmonized database during the time of the COVID-19 pandemic when clinical research on ankle fracture surgery is otherwise mostly limited to expert opinion and research letters. The purpose of this manuscript is to introduce the largest cohort of US ankle fracture surgery patients to date with a comparison between lab-confirmed COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of adults with ankle fracture surgery using data from the N3C database with patients undergoing surgery between March 2020 and June 2021. The database is an NIH-funded platform through which the harmonized clinical data from 46 sites is stored. Patient characteristics included body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and smoking status. Outcomes included 30-day mortality, overall mortality, surgical site infection (SSI), deep SSI, acute kidney injury, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, sepsis, time to surgery, and length of stay. COVID-19-positive patients were compared to COVID-19-negative controls to investigate perioperative outcomes during the pandemic. RESULTS: A total population of 8.4 million patient records was queried, identifying 4735 adults with ankle fracture surgery. The COVID-19-positive group (n=158, 3.3%) had significantly longer times to surgery (6.5 ± 6.6 vs 5.1 ± 5.5 days, P = .001) and longer lengths of stay (8.3 ± 23.5 vs 4.3 ± 7.4 days, P < .001), compared to the COVID-19-negative group. The COVID-19-positive group also had a higher rate of 30-day mortality. CONCLUSION: Patients with ankle fracture surgery had longer time to surgery and prolonged hospitalizations in COVID-19-positive patients compared to those who tested negative (average delay was about 1 day and increased length of hospitalization was about 4 days). Few perioperative events were observed in either group. Overall, the risks associated with COVID-19 were measurable but not substantial.Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.