Prospective noninterventional study on the use of panitumumab monotherapy in patients with recurrent or progressive colorectal cancer: the VECTIS study.

PURPOSE: Epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted monoclonal antibodies are active as monotherapy beyond second-line treatment. Skin toxicities (STs) are common during treatment, and a positive association between ST severity and patient outcome has been reported. This study collected information on panitumumab monotherapy use in patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer in clinical practice. METHODS: This open-label, prospective, observational, noninterventional study included adult patients who had failed prior chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. Patients received panitumumab monotherapy (6 mg/kg every 2 weeks) for ≤18 cycles. Effectiveness was assessed as disease control rate (DCR), tumor response, and freedom from progression. The incidence of ST and other adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was recorded, as were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) and quality of life. The KRAS analysis process was also evaluated. FINDINGS: The full analysis set included 632 patients (64.6% male; mean age, 62.3 years), who completed a mean of 9.6 panitumumab cycles. ST, mainly grade 1/2, occurred in 84.3% of patients, 82.7% of whom required treatment. Nonskin ADRs occurred in 3.5% of patients. By the end of treatment, the DCR was 58.9% overall, and was 53.8% and 62.7%, respectively in patients with ST grade 0/1 and grade 2/3. Significant associations were observed between maximum ST grade and best response (P=0.0009), DCR (P=0.0046), tumor response (P=0.0002), and freedom from progression (P=0.0084). At the end of the study, 67.4% of the patients had an ECOG PS of 0/1. Quality of life was rated as "very good" or "good" in 70.3% of patients. Mean time to obtain KRAS results was 18.2 days; satisfaction with different aspects of KRAS testing was "very good" or "good" in 80%-97% of patients. CONCLUSION: Panitumumab monotherapy showed adequate effectiveness and safety in patients with heavily pretreated KRAS exon 2 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. The most common ADR was grade 1/2 ST.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and targeted therapy in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer; medical oncologist's point of view.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most frequent malignancies, with more than 1,000,000 new cases annually worldwide and more than 4,000 new cases annually in Bulgaria. Liver metastases (LM) occur in more than 50% of CRC patients, but curative liver resection is possible only in 15% of them, resulting in 5-year survival rates of 30% on average. Improving resectability rates and hopefully patient's prognosis by adding up front active chemotherapy and biological agents in metastatic CRC is a challenging opportunity for both medical and surgical oncologists. This review encompasses clinical trials of modern chemotherapy combinations in metastatic CRC and their application as neoadjuvant therapy before liver surgery. The different surgical methods for improving resectability of LM in patients with CRC are also discussed. In the neoadjuvant setting an emerging concern about chemotherapy-induced liver toxicity gained further attention. The recent data of liver injury following up front systemic chemotherapy are revealed. The impact of anti-angiogenesis agents on liver regeneration and wound healing, which is not yet fully understood, is being discussed, focusing on patient-to-patient individualized decision by multidisciplinary team.

Serum level changes of matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9, vascular endothelial growth factor and epidermal growth factor receptor during platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate serum changes of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) 2 and 9, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) levels in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and their association with main clinicopathological parameters during chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, consecutive patients with stage III and IV NSCLC were enrolled. Serum MMP2 and 9, VEGF and EGFR levels were monitored in blood samples taken on day 1 of starting chemotherapy (baseline 1st), and after 3 cycles of chemotherapy (2nd) using commercial sandwich ELISA method. RESULTS: 116 patients were evaluated. Males / females 100 / 6, ECOG performance status (PS) 0/1/2: 47/65/4, stage III / IV: 49/67, squamous /adeno/large cell carcinoma 41/31/19. Forty-two (36%) patients achieved partial response (PR), 32 (28%) stable disease (SD) and 42 (36%) showed progressive disease (PD). Mean serum values -/+ standard deviation (SD) of the analyzed markers at baseline/at response evaluation were: EGFR 86 -/+ 87/96 -/+ 47 fmol/ml; MMP9 236 -/+ 156/162 -/+ 133 ng/ml ; MMP2 525 -/+ 189/569 -/+ 201 ng/ml; VEGF 555 -/+ 476/599 -/+ 611 pg/ml; VEGF adjusted for platelets (PLT) 1.9 -/+ 1.45/2.4 -/+ 2.78 pg/10(6). In logistic regression model for response rate adjusted for stage, the increase in MMP9 levels during chemotherapy (mean = 74 ng/ml -/+ SD 140) was predictive for progression (p=0.041) with 5% increase in the odds of progression for an increase of 10 ng. CONCLUSION: MMP9 level increase was found to be predictive of disease progression. EGFR levels could refl ect extracellular domain (ECD) loss from resistant cells and its shedding into the circulation.