Is succinylcholine after pretreatment with d-tubocurarine and lidocaine contraindicated for outpatient anesthesia?

UNLABELLED: Because succinylcholine has obvious advantages for facilitating endotracheal intubation in the ambulatory setting (e.g., low cost, fast onset, and no need for reversal of neuromuscular block), it is important to determine whether this muscle relaxant is indeed associated with an increased incidence of postoperative myalgias, compared with alternative but more expensive nondepolarizing muscle relaxants. We studied 119 outpatients undergoing endoscopic nasal sinus surgery or septoplasty. The anesthetic technique consisted of propofol/lidocaine for induction, followed by isoflurane/nitrous oxide/oxygen for maintenance. Oral tracheal intubation was performed by using a fiberscope. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two muscle relaxant groups. Group 1 patients received d-tubocurarine 3 mg followed by succinylcholine 1.5 mg/kg. Group 2 patients received mivacurium 0.2 mg/kg. After recovery from anesthesia, patients were asked whether they had any muscle pain and/or stiffness. Pain was categorized by location and quantified by using a verbal scale (from 0 to 10). Analgesic usage and myalgias limiting ambulation were recorded. After discharge from the ambulatory surgery unit, patients were contacted by telephone on Postoperative Day 1. If patients complained of myalgias, they were contacted by telephone on Days 2 and 3. Only one patient (in the mivacurium-treated group) reported myalgia as a limiting factor in ambulation or resumption of normal activity. There were no differences between groups with respect to the incidence (21% in the succinylcholine-treated group and 18% in the mivacurium-treated group), location, or severity of myalgia. In conclusion, succinylcholine (preceded by pretreatment with d-tubocurarine and lidocaine) is not associated with an increased incidence of myalgias, compared with mivacurium, when used to facilitate tracheal intubation in patients undergoing ambulatory nasal surgery. IMPLICATIONS: The results of this study show that the frequency of muscle pains after surgery in outpatients is approximately 20%, regardless of whether succinylcholine (after precurarization) or mivacurium is used to assist in insertion of the breathing tube.

Propofol versus propofol-ketamine sedation for retrobulbar nerve block: comparison of sedation quality, intraocular pressure changes, and recovery profiles.

UNLABELLED: We compared sedation quality, intraocular pressure (IOP) changes, and recovery profiles in patients who received propofol or propofol-ketamine sedation during placement of the retrobulbar nerve block (RBB). Seventy elderly patients undergoing cataract extraction according to a prospective, randomized, double-blinded protocol were preoperatively evaluated with a Mini-Mental State examination and baseline IOP. A hypnotic dose was provided with either propofol (Group P) or a propofol-ketamine (Group PK) combination. The IOP measurement was repeated, and the surgeon initiated the RBB. Supplemental study drug was given if needed. The level of sedation was considered acceptable if the patient exhibited minimal or no movement and grimacing with needle insertion. Patients were evaluated in terms of quality of sedation, cardiopulmonary stability, and recovery profile. Compared with patients in Group P, patients in Group PK had a significantly faster onset of acceptable sedation (Group P 235 +/- 137 s versus Group PK 164 +/- 67 s) and required significantly less supplemental sedation (Group P 1.1 +/- 1.9 mL versus Group PK 0.15 +/- 0.3 mL). Additionally, none of the Group PK patients required ventilatory assistance, but two patients in Group P required assisted mask ventilation. In conclusion, the addition of ketamine (13.2 +/- 3.3 mg) to propofol (44 +/- 11 mg) decreased the hypnotic requirement and improved the quality of sedation without prolonging recovery. IMPLICATIONS: Anesthesiologists frequently perform retrobulbar blocks while simultaneously providing sedation. Using ketamine to supplement propofol sedation provided a faster onset and improved the quality of sedation during the retrobulbar block procedure.

Does the choice of anesthetic technique affect the recovery of bowel function after radical prostatectomy?

OBJECTIVES: Return of bowel function after radical prostatectomy surgery may be the limiting factor in discharging these patients from the hospital. Recent studies have shown that postoperative epidural infusion of bupivacaine decreases time to return of bowel function compared with intravenous and epidural morphine in patients after abdominal surgery. This study focuses on the role of the intraoperative anesthetic technique on recovery of bowel function, intraoperative blood loss, and the incidence of postoperative deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. METHODS: Forty patients undergoing prostatectomy were randomized to either group A (general endotracheal anesthesia, including muscle relaxation and mechanical ventilation, followed by postoperative intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia) or group B (thoracic epidural anesthesia using bupivacaine, combined with "light" general anesthesia using a laryngeal mask airway and spontaneous ventilation, followed by epidural morphine analgesia). Intra- and postoperative data were collected on blood loss, volumes of crystalloid and colloid infused, blood transfused, duration of anesthesia and surgery, anesthetic and surgical complications, time to recovery of bowel function, quality of postoperative pain control, and time to discharge from hospital. Each patient underwent lower extremity venous ultrasonography to detect DVT. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients received general anesthesia and 19 received combined epidural and general anesthesia. Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the epidural group, and times to first flatus and first bowel movement were also shorter in this group. There were no significant differences in duration of anesthesia or surgery, quality of postoperative analgesia, side effects of analgesia, or time to discharge from hospital. There was no DVT detected in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: The combined anesthetic technique of thoracic epidural anesthesia and "light" general anesthesia with spontaneous ventilation decreased intraoperative blood loss and shortened the time to return of bowel function. However, this earlier return of bowel function was not great enough to realize a difference in time to hospital discharge. There was no evidence of increased complications secondary to epidural anesthesia or of prolonged anesthetic time necessary to place epidural catheters.

The effect of preoperative dexamethasone on the immediate and delayed postoperative morbidity in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy.

UNLABELLED: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we examined the effect of preoperative dexamethasone on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and 24-h recovery in children undergoing tonsillectomy. One hundred thirty children, 2-12 yr of age, ASA physical status I or II, completed the study. All children received oral midazolam 0.5-0.6 mg/kg preoperatively. Anesthesia was induced with halothane and nitrous oxide in 60% oxygen and maintained with nitrous oxide and isoflurane. Intubation was facilitated by mivacurium 0.2 mg/kg. Each child received fentanyl 1 microgram/kg i.v. before initiation of surgery, as well as dexamethasone 1 mg/kg (maximal dose 25 mg) (steroid group) or an equal volume of saline (control group). Intraoperative fluids were standardized to 25-30 mL/kg lactated Ringer's solution. All tonsillectomies were performed under the supervision of one attending surgeon using an electrodissection technique. Postoperatively, fentanyl and acetaminophen with codeine elixir were administered as needed for pain. Rescue antiemetics were administered when a child experienced two episodes of retching and/or vomiting. Before home discharge, the incidence of PONV, need for rescue antiemetics, quality or oral intake, and analgesic requirements did not differ between groups. However, during the 24 h after discharge, more patients in the control group experienced PONV (62% vs 24% in the steroid group) and complained of poor oral intake. Additionally, more children in the control group (8% vs 0% in the steroid group) returned to the hospital for the management of PONV and/or poor oral intake. The preoperative administration of dexamethasone significantly decreased the incidence of PONV over the 24 h after home discharge in these children. IMPLICATIONS: In this double blind, placebo-controlled study, we examined the efficacy of a single large dose (1 mg/kg; maximal dose 25 mg) of preoperative dexamethasone on posttonsillectomy postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in children 2-12 yr of age undergoing tonsillectomy. Compared with placebo, dexamethasone significantly decreased the incidence of PONV in the 24 h after discharge, improved oral intake, decreased the frequency of parental phone calls, and resulted in no hospital returns for the management of PONV and/or poor oral intake.

The recovery profile of hyperbaric spinal anesthesia with lidocaine, tetracaine, and bupivacaine.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Surgical procedures previously considered too lengthy for the ambulatory surgery setting are now being performed during spinal anesthesia. The complete recovery profile of tetracaine and bupivacaine are now of interest but are not available in the literature. This study was conducted to compare times to ambulation, voiding, and complete block resolution, as well as the incidence of back and radicular pain, after spinal anesthesia with lidocaine, bupivacaine, and tetracaine. METHODS: Twelve adult volunteers underwent spinal anesthesia on three separate occasions with three local anesthetics (lidocaine 100 mg, bupivacaine 15 mg, and tetracaine 15 mg in hyperbaric solutions) in random order and in a double-blind fashion. A 24-gauge Sprotte spinal needle was placed at the L2-3 interspace. The level of analgesia to pinprick was determined moving cephalad in the midclavicular line until a dermatome was reached at which the prick felt as sharp as over an unblocked dermatome. One dermatome caudad to this point was recorded every 5 minutes as the level of analgesia. We also recorded the times to voiding, unassisted ambulation, and complete resolution of sacral anesthesia. RESULTS: There was no difference between tetracaine and bupivacaine in time taken for two- and four-segment regression of the analgesia level. However, times to ambulation and complete resolution of the block were significantly shorter with bupivacaine then with tetracaine. With lidocaine, times to four-segment regression, ambulation, voiding, and complete regression of the block were significantly shorter than with bupivacaine and tetracaine. Time to two-segment regression did not differ among local anesthetics. Back and radicular pain symptoms were reported by three subjects after lidocaine subarachnoid block but not after tetracaine or bupivacaine. CONCLUSION: Among individual subjects, lidocaine exhibited the shortest recovery profile. However, the recovery profiles of the three anesthetics were very variable between subjects. Time to meeting discharge criteria after bupivacaine or tetracaine was faster in a few subjects than that after lidocaine in other subjects. For ambulatory anesthesia, times to two- and four-segment regression do not accurately predict time to readiness for discharge after spinal anesthesia.

Time course of the effects of cervical epidural anesthesia on pulmonary function.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: During cervical epidural anesthesia the C4, C5, and sometimes C3 nerve roots are anesthetized. One might therefore expect pulmonary compromise due to the block of the phrenic nerve if anesthesia extends to C3. This study was conducted to measure the effects of cervical epidural anesthesia using 2% lidocaine on pulmonary function, with specific attention given to the time course of pulmonary changes in relation to spread of analgesia. METHODS: Fifteen adult patients without preexisting lung disease undergoing carotid endarterectomy, breast surgery, or cervical epidural steroid injection were enrolled. Cervical epidural anesthesia was performed at the C7-T1 interspace using 300 mg lidocaine with epinephrine. Pulmonary function, including forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), and SpO2 while breathing room air were measured prior to and 5, 10, 20, and 40 minutes after lidocaine injection. RESULTS: Analgesia to pinprick reached median dermatomes of C3 to T8 (range: C2-T12) by 20 minutes after lidocaine injection. FEV1 and FVC decreased approximately 12-16% between 20 and 40 minutes after injection. Maximum inspiratory pressure and SpO2 did not significantly change. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical epidural anesthesia using 300 mg lidocaine results in measurable reduction in bedside pulmonary functions concomitant with the spread of analgesia to the C3 dermatome. These changes were complete 20 minutes after lidocaine injection. In patients without preexisting lung disease, these changes were not clinically significant, except in one patient. We conclude that motor block of the phrenic nerve is incomplete under the conditions of this study.

Sympathetic block during spinal anesthesia in volunteers using lidocaine, tetracaine, and bupivacaine.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Spinal anesthesia to high thoracic dermatomes is alleged to result in almost complete block of all sympathetic efferent nerves. To examine the degree of sympathectomy during spinal anesthesia, the sympathetic response to a cold pressor test (CPT) applied to unblocked dermatomes before and during spinal anesthesia was measured with use of three different local anesthetics. METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers were studied in a randomized and double-blind fashion on three separate occasions. In random order, each volunteer received approximately equipotent spinal doses of tetracaine 15 mg, bupivacaine 15 mg, and lidocaine 100 mg in hyperbaric solutions. Prior to and 30 minutes after spinal injection of local anesthetic, a CPT was applied for 2 minutes, and changes from baseline resting conditions in five physiologic variables were measured. RESULTS: The CPT 1 given before anesthetic administration resulted in an increase in heart rate, mean arterial pressure, cardiac index, and plasma concentrations of norepinephrine and epinephrine. Spinal anesthesia to a median level of T3 resulted in a decrease in mean arterial pressure by 10-12% but did not significantly decrease the other variables. Spinal anesthesia did not change the increase in heart rate or cardiac index in response to the second CPT, but the increase in mean arterial pressure was attenuated compared to the CPT before anesthesia. No increase in norepinephrine or epinephrine concentration was observed during the CPT given during spinal anesthesia. There was no significant relationship between level of analgesia and sympathetic response to stress. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric solutions of tetracaine 15 mg, bupivacaine 15 mg, and lidocaine 100 mg attenuated sympathetic function but did not produce complete sympathectomy. The effects were independent of the local anesthetic used.

Deliberate epidural air injection in dogs: a radiographic study.

To investigate whether and to what extent air bubbles are present in the epidural space after injections of air, the authors designed an experiment using a chronic dog model. The epidural space was entered at the sixth or seventh lumbar interspace in six mongrel dogs (weight, 20 to 27 kg). Loss-of-resistance (LOR) to saline was tested to identify the epidural space. Three milliliters of air were injected via a Tuohy needle, followed by 5 ml of contrast material (Isovue 300, Squibb Diagnostics). Anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral radiographs were taken on day 1. On days 2, 4, and 8, the procedure was repeated, omitting the air injection. Radiographs were read by a neuroradiologist. Air bubbles were radiographically demonstrated in all six dogs on day 1, and in three of six dogs on day 2. No air was seen on later films. The air bubbles seen were small and few in number but often located near intervertebral spaces. The authors' findings suggest that injection of large volumes of epidural air should be avoided, particularly when N2O is used as part of the anesthetic or when performing diagnostic peridurography since N2O may expand the volume of existing bubbles and interfere with filling of the epidural space by local anesthetics or contrast material.