The CT-STAT (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Systematic Triage of Acute Chest Pain Patients to Treatment) trial.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficiency, cost, and safety of a diagnostic strategy employing early coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) to a strategy employing rest-stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in the evaluation of acute low-risk chest pain. BACKGROUND: In the United States, >8 million patients require emergency department evaluation for acute chest pain annually at an estimated diagnostic cost of >$10 billion. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized clinical trial in 16 emergency departments ran between June 2007 and November 2008. Patients were randomly allocated to CCTA (n = 361) or MPI (n = 338) as the index noninvasive test. The primary outcome was time to diagnosis; the secondary outcomes were emergency department costs of care and safety, defined as freedom from major adverse cardiac events in patients with normal index tests, including 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: The CCTA resulted in a 54% reduction in time to diagnosis compared with MPI (median 2.9 h [25th to 75th percentile: 2.1 to 4.0 h] vs. 6.3 h [25th to 75th percentile: 4.2 to 19.0 h], p < 0.0001). Costs of care were 38% lower compared with standard (median $2,137 [25th to 75th percentile: $1,660 to $3,077] vs. $3,458 [25th to 75th percentile: $2,900 to $4,297], p < 0.0001). The diagnostic strategies had no difference in major adverse cardiac events after normal index testing (0.8% in the CCTA arm vs. 0.4% in the MPI arm, p = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: In emergency department acute, low-risk chest pain patients, the use of CCTA results in more rapid and cost-efficient safe diagnosis than rest-stress MPI. Further studies comparing CCTA to other diagnostic strategies are needed to optimize evaluation of specific patient subsets. (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Systematic Triage of Acute Chest Pain Patients to Treatment [CT-STAT]; NCT00468325).

A randomized cross-over study for evaluation of the effect of image optimization with contrast on the diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine echocardiography in coronary artery disease The OPTIMIZE Trial.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the addition of a contrast agent to dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) improves its diagnostic accuracy for coronary artery disease (CAD) and to determine the effect of image quality on the diagnostic impact of contrast agent use in this setting. BACKGROUND: Contrast agents can improve endocardial border definition. To date, however, there are no randomized trials that have evaluated the impact of contrast agent use on the accuracy of DSE. METHODS: Patients referred for stress testing with dobutamine echocardiography underwent 2 DSE studies: 1 with and 1 without a contrast agent, at least 4 h apart in a randomized order and within a 24-h period. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients underwent both DSE studies. Similar hemodynamics were achieved during the 2 stress testing sessions. The use of a contrast agent improved the percentage of segments adequately visualized at baseline (from 72 +/- 24% to 95 +/- 8%) and more so at peak stress (67 +/- 28% to 96 +/- 7%); both p < 0.001. Interpretation of wall motion with high confidence also increased with contrast agent use from 36% to 74% (p < 0.001). Segment visualization with the use of a contrast agent improved in all views, but was more pronounced in the apical views. In unenhanced DSE, 36% of studies were normal, 51% had ischemia, and 8% were uninterpretable-all of which became interpretable with the use of a contrast agent. When compared with angiography (n = 92; 55 patients with CAD), accurate detection of ischemia was higher with contrast-enhanced studies versus nonenhanced studies (p = 0.02). As endocardial visualization and confidence of interpretation decreased in unenhanced studies, a greater impact of the use of a contrast agent on DSE accuracy was observed (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: During dobutamine stress echocardiography, contrast agent administration improves endocardial visualization at rest and more so during stress, leading to a higher confidence of interpretation and greater accuracy in evaluating CAD. The lesser the endocardial border visualization, the higher the impact of contrast echocardiography on accuracy.

Non-blood contacting biventricular support for severe heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Direct mechanical ventricular actuation (DMVA) is a non-blood contacting method of biventricular support. DMVA employs a vacuum attached, pneumatically regulated, flexible membrane to transfer both systolic and diastolic forces to the ventricular myocardium. The purpose of this study was to determine if DMVA effectively restores pump performance when applied to the severely failing heart. METHODS: Bovines (n = 10) underwent thoracotomy and were instrumented for continuous hemodynamic monitoring. Cardiac failure was induced by beta1-blockade to achieve a cardiac index of < 1.5 l/min/m2 for 1 hour. Heart rate was maintained at 100 bpm by atrioventricular sequential pacing. Synchronous DMVA support was then applied for 3 hours. RESULTS: Eight animals achieved significant reductions in cardiac index and mean arterial pressures (35%* and 43%* control, respectively; *p < 0.05). DMVA restored cardiac index to baseline and significantly increased arterial pressures (p < 0.05; DMVA versus cardiac failure). Pulmonary flow and mean pulmonary artery pressures were similar to baseline during DMVA (p = NS). Pathologic exam did not demonstrate evidence of significant device trauma. CONCLUSIONS: DMVA support can effectively restore pump performance of the acutely failing heart. Synchronization may be inherent to the stimulus of cardiac compression. These data further substantiate DMVA's potential as an adjunct to the field of circulatory support.