RESUMO
Objective: Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) is a dental surgical procedure that uses barrier membranes to prevent soft tissue invasion and conduct new bone growth. This study aimed to define a Prognosis Recovery score (PR score) to objectively classify post-surgery responders from non-responder patients who underwent GBR using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). Methods: This prospective-observational-longitudinal-cohort study recruited 250 individuals who were assigned to: Conventional-Apical-Surgery (CAS, n = 39), Apical-Surgery using human fascia lata Membrane placement (ASM, n = 42), and Apical-Surgery using human fascia lata Membrane placement and lyophilized allograft Bone powder (ASMB, n = 39); and Apical-Surgery using collagen membrane Porcine origin and Bovine Bone-matrix (ASPBB, n = 130), an independent external validation cohort. Surgery was performed, and evolution was monitored by CBCTs at 0, 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24 months post-surgery. Results: Normalized lesion volumes were calculated, and non-linear time evolution morphology curves were characterized. The three-time evolution bone growth patterns were: a linear tendency (PR0), "S'' shaped log-logistic (PR1), and "C" cellular growth (PR2). The treatment success rates were PR2-46 %, PR2-88 %, and PR2-95 %/PR1-5% for CAS, ASM, and ASMB groups. The xenograft ASPBB counterpart achieved PR2-92 % and PR1-8%. The score PR had a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 100 %. Conclusions: Patients' treatment success can be quantitatively, objectively, and precisely predicted with the Prognosis Recovery score (using only two CBCTs), according to their biological response to allograft or xenograft materials (time-evolution bone growth curves), reducing cost and radiation exposure. Clinical significance: Through digital imaging and bioinformatic analysis of bone regeneration observed in CBCTs, we defined a Prognosis Recovery (PR) score using only two CBCT volume assessments (0 and 6 months). The PR score allowed us to define three time-evolution curves depending on the biomaterials used and to classify patients in a quantitative, objective, and accurate way.
RESUMO
Se presentó a la Cátedra de Endodoncia de la Facultad de Odontología de la Universidad de Buenos Aires un paciente masculino de 62 años de edad que al examen clínico presentaba una fístula vestibular en la zona de la pieza 1.2 y dolor a la percusión. Al examen radiográ-fico se identificó una lesión apical extensa abarcando las piezas dentarias 1.2 y 1.1 endodónticamente trata-das con alteración severa de la anatomía del espacio endodóntico, así como la presencia de postes metáli-cos que no respetaban el eje del canal radicular. Ante el análisis tomográfico se observó una perforación de la pieza 1.2 y una lesión periapical extensa afectando ambas corticales (vestibular y palatina). Se decidió un abordaje microquirúrgico con técnicas de regenera-ción ósea guiada (ROG) y se realizaron los controles clínico-tomográficos a los 6, 12 y 24 meses. Por otro lado, se evaluó con micromografía de rayos X la ana-tomía de los ápices radiculares resecados. La lesión extirpada fue analizada histológicamente (AU)
A 62-year-old male patient attended the Endodontics department of the Buenos Aires University. He was examined clinically and a vestibular fistula in 1.2 area and pain under percussion were found. Radiographic examination identified an extended periapical lesion compromising teeth 1.2 and 1.1 with endodontic treatment severely altering the root canal anatomy, as well as metallic cast posts that did not preserve root canal axis. Regarding the tomographic analysis, a vestibular root perforation was observed (1.2), and both, vestibular and palatal corticals, were affected. We decided to perform a surgical approach with guided bone regeneration techniques (GBR). Clinical-CBCT controls were done at 6, 12 and 24 months. Furthermore, the anatomy of the resected root apex-es was evaluated with X ray microtomography. The removed lesion was histologically analyzed (AU)