Risk of stroke in patients with prior VKA or DOAC: A population-based real-world registry analysis.

INTRODUCTION: To date, risk assessment of suffering ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke in individuals under oral anticoagulation (OAC) is limited to hospital-based cohorts and patients with atrial fibrillation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Through the combination of three individual datasets, (1) the population-based Tyrolean Stroke Pathway database, prospectively documenting all (unselected) stroke patients in the entire federal state of the Tyrol and (2) nation-wide prescription data, detailing each reimbursed prescription in Austria as well as (3) the Austrian Stroke Unit Registry, a nation-wide registry comprising data on all patients admitted to any of the 38 stroke units in Austria, we assessed risk of stroke in patients with prior oral anticoagulation and compared characteristics of patients taking direct oral anticoagulants and Vitamin-K-Antagonists. RESULTS: In Austria, oral anticoagulant prescription reimbursements increased from 292,475 in 2015 to 389,407 in 2021. In the Tyrol, prior oral anticoagulation treatment was evident in 586 of 3861 (15.2%) patients with ischemic and 131 of 523 (25.0%) with hemorrhagic stroke, with 20% and 35% of those stroke patients respectively having prior oral anticoagulation due to other indications than non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Considering prescription rates, treatment with direct oral anticoagulants was associated with a reduced stroke risk compared to Vitamin-K-Antagonists, especially in ischemic (1.05% vs 0.62%; RR 0.59, p < 0.001) but also in hemorrhagic stroke, even if less pronounced (0.21% vs 0.14%; RR 0.68, p = 0.06). In Austria, prior intake of direct oral anticoagulants was associated with lower risk of suffering acute large vessel occlusion stroke (RR 0.79, p = 0.003). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: One in seven patients suffering ischemic and one in four suffering hemorrhagic stroke had prior oral anticoagulation treatment. Both ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes are less frequent in those with direct oral anticoagulant intake compared to those taking Vitamin-K-Antagonists. Establishment of clear standard operating procedures on how to best care for acute stroke patients with oral anticoagulation is essential.

IV Thrombolysis vs Early Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Mild Noncardioembolic Ischemic Stroke.

BACKGROUND OBJECTIVES: It is unclear whether IV thrombolysis (IVT) outperforms early dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in the acute setting of mild ischemic stroke. The aim of this study was to compare the early safety and efficacy of IVT with that of DAPT. METHODS: Data of mild noncardioembolic stroke patients with admission NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≤3 who received IVT or early DAPT in the period 2018-2021 were extracted from a nationwide, prospective stroke unit registry. Study endpoints included symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), early neurologic deterioration ≥4 NIHSS points (END), and 3-month functional outcome by modified Rankin scale (mRS). RESULTS: A total of 1,195 mild stroke patients treated with IVT and 2,625 patients treated with DAPT were included. IVT patients were younger (68.1 vs 70.8 years), had less hypertension (72.8% vs 83.5%), diabetes (19% vs 28.8%), and a history of myocardial infarction (7.6% vs 9.2%), and slightly higher admission NIHSS scores (median 2 vs median 1) when compared with DAPT patients. After propensity score matching and multivariable adjustment, IVT was associated with sICH (4 [1.2%] vs 0) and END (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.8, 95% CI 1.1-7.5), and there was no difference in mRS 0-1 at 3 months (aOR 1.3, 95% CI 0.7-2.6). DISCUSSION: This analysis from a prospective nationwide stroke unit network indicates that IVT is not superior to DAPT in the setting of mild noncardioembolic stroke and may eventually be associated with harm. Further research focusing on acute therapy of mild stroke is highly warranted. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that IVT is not superior to DAPT in patients with acute mild (NIHSS score ≤3) noncardioembolic stroke. The study lacks the statistical precision to exclude clinically important superiority of either therapy.

Endovascular stroke therapy outside core working hours in a nationwide stroke system.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular therapy (EVT) has been established as a major component in the acute treatment of large vessel occlusion stroke. However, it is unclear whether outcome and other treatment-related factors differ if patients are treated within or outside core working hours. METHODS: We analyzed data from the prospective nationwide Austrian Stroke Unit Registry capturing all consecutive stroke patients treated with EVT between 2016 and 2020. Patients were trichotomized according to the time of groin puncture into treatment within regular working hours (08:00-13:59), afternoon/evening (14:00-21:59) and night-time (22:00-07:59). Additionally, we analyzed 12 EVT treatment windows with equal patient numbers. Main outcome variables included favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale scores of 0-2) 3 months post-stroke as well as procedural time metrics, recanalization status and complications. RESULTS: We analyzed 2916 patients (median age 74 years, 50.7% female) who underwent EVT. Patients treated within core working hours more frequently had a favorable outcome (42.6% vs 36.1% treated in the afternoon/evening vs 35.8% treated at night-time; p=0.007). Similar results were found when analyzing 12 treatment windows. All these differences remained significant in multivariable analysis adjusting for outcome-relevant co-factors. Onset-to-recanalization time was considerably longer outside core working hours, which was mainly explained by longer door-to-groin time (p<0.001). There was no difference in the number of passes, recanalization status, groin-to-recanalization time and EVT-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of delayed intrahospital EVT workflows and worse functional outcomes outside core working hours in this nationwide registry are relevant for optimization of stroke care, and might be applicable to other countries with similar settings.

Measuring Comprehensive, General Health Literacy in the General Adult Population: The Development and Validation of the HLS19-Q12 Instrument in Seventeen Countries.

BACKGROUND: For improving health literacy (HL) by national and international public health policy, measuring population HL by a comprehensive instrument is needed. A short instrument, the HLS19-Q12 based on the HLS-EU-Q47, was developed, translated, applied, and validated in 17 countries in the WHO European Region. METHODS: For factorial validity/dimensionality, Cronbach alphas, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Rasch model (RM), and Partial Credit Model (PCM) were used. For discriminant validity, correlation analysis, and for concurrent predictive validity, linear regression analysis were carried out. RESULTS: The Cronbach alpha coefficients are above 0.7. The fit indices for the single-factor CFAs indicate a good model fit. Some items show differential item functioning in certain country data sets. The regression analyses demonstrate an association of the HLS19-Q12 score with social determinants and selected consequences of HL. The HLS19-Q12 score correlates sufficiently highly (r ≥ 0.897) with the equivalent score for the HLS19-Q47 long form. CONCLUSIONS: The HLS19-Q12, based on a comprehensive understanding of HL, shows acceptable psychometric and validity characteristics for different languages, country contexts, and methods of data collection, and is suitable for measuring HL in general, national, adult populations. There are also indications for further improvement of the instrument.

Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Stroke Patients with Moderate to Severe Pre-Stroke Disability.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Studies on mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with preexisting disability are limited. We aimed to compare the outcomes of MT versus best medical treatment (BMT) in these patients. METHODS: In the nationwide Austrian registry and Swiss monocentric registry, we identified 462 AIS patients with pre-stroke disability (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score ≥3) and acute large vessel occlusion. The primary outcome was returning to pre-stroke mRS or better at 3 months. Secondary outcomes were early neurological improvement (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score improvement ≥8 at 24 to 48 hours), 3-month mortality, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). Multivariable regression models and propensity score matching (PSM) were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Compared with the BMT group (n=175), the MT group (n=175) had younger age, more severe strokes, and lower pre-stroke mRS, but similar proportion of receiving intravenous thrombolysis. MT was associated with higher odds of returning to baseline mRS or better at 3 months (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39 to 4.47), early neurological improvement (aOR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.41 to 4.88), and lower risk of 3-month mortality (aOR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.49). PSM analysis showed similar findings. MT was not associated with an increased risk of sICH (4.0% vs. 2.1% in all patients; 4.2% vs. 2.4% in the PSM cohort). CONCLUSIONS: MT in patients with pre-stroke mRS ≥3 might improve the 3-month outcomes and short-term neurological impairment, suggesting that pre-stroke disability alone should not be a reason to withhold MT, but that individual case-by-case decisions may be more appropriate.

Temporal Trends of Functional Outcome in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated With Intravenous Thrombolysis.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous thrombolysis improves functional outcome in patients with acute stroke and frequencies of r-tPA (recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator) treatment have been increasing over time. We aimed to assess whether functional outcome in r-tPA-treated patients improved over time and to investigate the influence of clinical variables on functional outcome. METHODS: We analyzed data of r-tPA-treated patients in the Austrian Stroke Unit Registry from 2006 to 2019. Favorable functional outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2. Frequencies of modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 were assessed for the overall population and in prespecified subgroups; multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess associations of baseline characteristics including clinically relevant interactions, and outcome. RESULTS: Overall, 4865 out of 9409 r-tPA-treated patients (51.7%) achieved favorable functional outcome 3 months post stroke. Between 2006 and 2019, frequencies of favorable functional outcome increased from 45.9% to 56.8%. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, year of treatment (adjusted odds ratio [adjOR], 1.08 [95% CI, 1.01-1.15]) was associated with favorable functional outcome. Stroke severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, adjOR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.85-0.87]), age (61-70 years: adjOR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.55-0.80], 71-80 years: adjOR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.35-0.50], >80 years: adjOR, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.13-0.20]), female sex (adjOR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.79-0.99]), and various comorbidities (eg, atrial fibrillation, prior stroke, diabetes) were negatively associated. Inclusion of interaction terms into the multivariable logistic regression model suggests a positive effect of year of treatment and endovascular treatment by increasing stroke severity on functional outcome (interaction between year of treatment and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: adjOR, 1.01 [95% CI, 1.00-1.02], interaction between National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and endovascular treatment: adjOR, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.01-1.03]). CONCLUSIONS: Frequencies of favorable functional outcome in r-tPA-treated patients have been increasing over time, likely driven by improved outcome in patients with more severe strokes receiving endovascular treatment. However, some subgroups are still less likely to achieve functional independency and deserve particular attention.

Time trends in stroke severity in the years 2005 to 2020: results from the Austrian Stroke Unit Registry.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: With aging population, there is an increase of atrial fibrillation (AF) and other vascular risk factors. We investigated trends in stroke severity at hospital admission with respect to AF and other risk factors in a prospective national stroke registry from 2005 to 2020. METHODS: Data from the prospective Austrian Stroke Unit Registry were used to study demographic and clinical factors associated with the change in admission stroke severity over years. Time trends in admission stroke severity of patients with pre-stroke modified Rankin Score ≤ 3 were investigated with respect to clinical variables and predefined age groups 18-54, 55-64, 65-74, 75-84 and ≥ 85 years. Time trends were studied using robust generalized linear models assuming normal distribution with a log link. Stroke severity on admission was assessed according to the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score (NIHSS). RESULTS: In total, 140,312 patients with acute ischemic stroke were included in the analysis. Within the study period, mean patients' age increased from 70 to 72 years (p < 0.001) and median NIHSS at admission decreased from 4 to 3 (p < 0.001). The frequency of AF increased from 25 to 32% (p < 0.001). The decrease in median admission NIHSS was evident in all relevant subgroups but more pronounced in patients with risk factors including AF, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, smoking, elderly patients and those with pre-stroke disability. CONCLUSION: Despite an aging population and generally increasing AF frequency, we observed a consistent trend towards less disabling strokes on admission.