RESUMO
Amyloid-ß (Aß) positivity is defined using different biomarkers and different criteria. Criteria used in symptomatic patients may conceal meaningful early Aß pathology in preclinical Alzheimer. Therefore, the description of sensitive cutoffs to study the pathophysiological changes in early stages of the Alzheimer's continuum is critical. Here, we compare different Aß classification approaches and we show their performance in detecting pathophysiological changes downstream Aß pathology. We studied 368 cognitively unimpaired individuals of the ALFA+ study, many of whom in the preclinical stage of the Alzheimer's continuum. Participants underwent Aß PET and CSF biomarkers assessment. We classified participants as Aß -positive using five approaches: (1) CSF Aß42 < 1098 pg/ml; (2) CSF Aß42/40 < 0.071; (3) Aß PET Centiloid > 12; (4) Aß PET Centiloid > 30 or (5) Aß PET Positive visual read. We assessed the correlations between Aß biomarkers and compared the prevalence of Aß positivity. We determined which approach significantly detected associations between Aß pathology and tau/neurodegeneration CSF biomarkers. We found that CSF-based approaches result in a higher Aß-positive prevalence than PET-based ones. There was a higher number of discordant participants classified as CSF Aß-positive but PET Aß-negative than CSF Aß-negative but PET Aß-positive. The CSF Aß 42/40 approach allowed optimal detection of significant associations with CSF p-tau and t-tau in the Aß-positive group. Altogether, we highlight the need for sensitive Aß -classifications to study the preclinical Alzheimer's continuum. Approaches that define Aß positivity based on optimal discrimination of symptomatic Alzheimer's disease patients may be suboptimal for the detection of early pathophysiological alterations in preclinical Alzheimer.
