Involvement of Chromosomally Encoded Homologs of the RRNPP Protein Family in Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm Formation and Urinary Tract Infection Pathogenesis.

Enterococcus faecalis is an opportunistic pathogen capable of causing infections, including endocarditis and urinary tract infections (UTI). One of the well-characterized quorum-sensing pathways in E. faecalis involves coordination of the conjugal transfer of pheromone-responsive plasmids by PrgX, a member of the RRNPP protein family. Members of this protein family in various Firmicutes have also been shown to contribute to numerous cellular processes, including sporulation, competence, conjugation, nutrient sensing, biofilm formation, and virulence. As PrgX is a plasmid-encoded RRNPP family member, we surveyed the genome of the multidrug-resistant strain V583 for additional RRNPP homologs using computational searches and refined those identified hits for predicted structural similarities to known RRNPP family members. This led us to investigate the contribution of the chromosomally encoded RRNPP homologs to biofilm processes and pathogenesis in a catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) model. In this study, we identified five such homologs and report that 3 of the 5 homologs, EF0073, EF1599, and EF1316, affect biofilm formation as well as outcomes in the CAUTI model.IMPORTANCEEnterococcus faecalis causes health care-associated infections and displays resistance to a variety of broad-spectrum antibiotics by acquisition of resistance traits as well as the ability to form biofilms. Even though a growing number of factors related to biofilm formation have been identified, mechanisms that contribute to biofilm formation are still largely unknown. Members of the RRNPP protein family regulate a diverse set of biological reactions in low-G+C Gram-positive bacteria (Firmicutes). Here, we identify three predicted structural homologs of the RRNPP family, EF0073, EF1599, and EF1316, which affect biofilm formation and CAUTI pathogenesis.

Interdisciplinary treatment of failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS): a comparison of FBSS and non-FBSS patients.

Many patients enrolled in chronic pain centers suffer from failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). However, there has been a paucity of research concerning how these patients differ from other chronic pain patients, and how to most effectively address their complex problems within an interdisciplinary chronic pain treatment environment. The current study represents the first large-scale examination of these issues, with two major aims: (1) to elucidate the differences between FBSS patients and other chronic lumbar pain patients; and (2) to clarify the role of injections in interdisciplinary treatment, particularly with FBSS patients. A total of 128 chronic lumbar pain patients who presented for treatment at an interdisciplinary center were included in the study. Patients completed various measures at pre-, mid-, and post-treatment intervals, including physical, functional, and psychosocial measures. Overall, both FBSS and Non-FBSS patients reported significantly decreased pain and disability, and significant improvements in physical and psychosocial functioning after interdisciplinary treatment. However, Non-FBSS patients were associated with greater reductions in self-reported pain and disability than FBSS patients. On the other hand, FBSS patients were significantly more improved on physical therapy measures, including Activities of Daily Living, Strength, and Fear of Exercise. Statistical comparisons of Injection (INJ) and No-Injection (No-INJ) groups yielded few significant findings.