Use of vegetated agricultural drainage ditches to decrease pesticide transport from tomato and alfalfa fields in California, USA.

Irrigation and storm water runoff from agricultural fields has the potential to cause impairment to downstream aquatic receiving systems. Over the last several years, scientists have discovered the benefit of using edge-of-field practices, such as vegetated agricultural drainage ditches, in the mitigation of pesticides and sediment. After demonstrating this practice's feasibility in California, field trials were initiated to document irrigation runoff pesticide mitigation in California alfalfa and tomato fields. In the alfalfa field, chlorpyrifos concentration was decreased by 20% from the inflow to the ditch outflow. Thirty-two percent of the measured chlorpyrifos mass was associated with ditch plant material. In the tomato field, permethrin concentration was decreased by 67% and there was a 35% reduction in suspended sediment concentration from inflow to the ditch outflow. When surface water was not present in the ditch systems, the sediment was a significant repository for pesticides. Based on the field trials, vegetated agricultural drainage ditches can be successfully used as part of a suite of management practices to reduce pesticide and sediment runoff into aquatic receiving systems.

Applications of carboxylesterase activity in environmental monitoring and toxicity identification evaluations (TIEs).

This review has examined a number of issues surrounding the use of carboxylesterase activity in environmental monitoring. It is clear that carboxylesterases are important enzymes that deserve increased study. This class of enzymes appears to have promise for employment in environmental monitoring with a number of organisms and testing scenarios, and it is appropriate for inclusion in standard monitoring assays. Given the ease of most activity assays, it is logical to report carboxylesterase activity levels as well as other esterases (e.g., acetylcholinesterase). Although it is still unclear as to whether acetylcholinesterase or carboxylesterase is the most "appropriate" biomarker, there are sufficient data to suggest that at the very least further studies should be performed with carboxylesterases. Most likely, data will show that it is optimal to measure activity for both enzymes whenever possible. Acetylcholinesterase has the distinct advantage of a clear biological function, whereas the endogenous role of carboxylesterases is still unclear. However, a combination of activity measurements for the two enzyme systems will provide a much more detailed picture of organism health and insecticide exposure. The main outstanding issues are the choice of substrate for activity assays and which tissues/organisms are most appropriate for monitoring studies. Substrate choice is very important, because carboxylesterase activity consists of multiple isozymes that most likely fluctuate on an organism- and tissue-specific basis. It is therefore difficult to compare work in one organism with a specific substrate with work performed in a different organism with a different substrate. An attempt should therefore be made to standardize the method. The most logical choice is PNPA (p-nitrophenyl acetate), as this substrate is commercially available, requires inexpensive optics for assay measurements, and has been used extensively in the literature. However, none of these beneficial properties indicates that the substrate is an appropriate surrogate for a specific compound, e.g., pyrethroid-hydrolyzing activity. It will most likely be necessary to have more specific surrogate substrates for use in assays that require information on the ability to detoxify/hydrolyze specific environmental contaminants. The use of carboxylesterase activity in TIE protocols appears to have excellent promise, but there are further technical issues that should be addressed to increase the utility of the method. The main concerns include the large amount of nonspecific protein added to the testing system, which can lead to undesirable side effects including nonspecific reductions in observed toxicity, decrease in dissolved oxygen content, and organism growth. It is probable that these issues can be resolved with further assay development. The ideal solution would be to have a commercial recombinant carboxylesterase that possessed elevated pyrethroid-hydrolysis activity and which was readily available, homogeneous, and inexpensive. The availability of such an enzyme would address nearly all the current method shortcomings. Such a preparation would be extremely useful for the aquatic toxicology community. Further work should focus on screening available esterases for stability, cost, and activity on pyrethroids, with specific focus on esterases capable of distinguishing type I from type II pyrethroids. It would also be beneficial to identify esterases that are not sensitive to OP insecticides. Many esterases and lipases are available as sets to test chemical reactions for green chemistry, enabling large-scale screening. Other potential approaches to increase the utility of the enzyme include derivatization with polyethylene glycol (PEG) or cyanuric acid chloride to increase stability and reduce microbial degradation. It is also possible that the enzyme could be formulated in a sol gel preparation to increase stability. It is likely that the use of carboxylesterase addition will increase for applications in sediment TIEs. Carboxylesterases are an interesting and useful enzyme family that deserves further study for applications in environmental monitoring as well as to increase our understanding of the fundamental biological role(s) of these enzymes. There are, of course, other enzymes that show high esterase activity on pyrethroids but are not technically carboxylesterases in the alpha/beta-hydrolase fold protein family. These enzymes should also be examined for use in TIE protocols and "esterase" arrays as well as for general applications in environmental monitoring. One can envision the creation of a standardized screen of enzymes with esterase activity to (1) identify environmental contaminants, (2) estimate the potential toxic effects of new compounds on a range of organisms, and (3) monitor organism exposure to agrochemicals (and potentially other contaminants). This approach would provide a multibiomarker integrative assessment of esterase-inhibiting potential of a compound or mixture. In conclusion, much is still unknown about this enzyme family, indicating that this area is still wide open to researchers interested in the applications of carboxylesterase activity as well as basic biological questions into the nature of enzyme activity and the endogenous role of the enzyme.

Use of carboxylesterase activity to remove pyrethroid-associated toxicity to Ceriodaphnia dubia and Hyalella azteca in toxicity identification evaluations.

Increases in the use and application of pyrethroid insecticides have resulted in concern regarding potential effects on aquatic ecosystems. Methods for the detection of pyrethroids in receiving waters are required to monitor environmental levels of these insecticides. One method employed for the identification of causes of toxicity in aquatic samples is the toxicity identification evaluation (TIE); however, current TIE protocols do not include specific methods for pyrethroid detection. Recent work identified carboxylesterase treatment as a useful method for removing/detecting pyrethroid-associated toxicity. The present study has extended this earlier work and examined the ability of carboxylesterase activity to remove permethrin- and bifenthrin-associated toxicity to Ceriodaphnia dubia and Hyalella azteca in a variety of matrices, including laboratory water, Sacramento River (CA, USA) water, and Salinas River (CA, USA) interstitial water. Esterase activity successfully removed 1,000 ng/L of permethrin-associated toxicity and 600 ng/L of bifenthrin-associated toxicity to C. dubia in Sacramento River water. In interstitial water, 200 ng/L of permethrin-associated toxicity and 60 ng/L of bifenthrin-associated toxicity to H. azteca were removed. The selectivity of the method was validated using heat-inactivated enzyme and bovine serum albumin, demonstrating that catalytically active esterase is required. Further studies showed that the enzyme is not significantly inhibited by metals. Matrix effects on esterase activity were examined with municipal effluent and seawater in addition to the matrices discussed above. Results confirmed that the esterase retains catalytic function in a diverse array of matrices, suggesting that this technique can be adapted to a variety of aquatic samples. These data demonstrate the utility of carboxylesterase treatment as a viable step to detect the presence of pyrethroids in receiving waters.

Influence of container adsorption upon observed pyrethroid toxicity to Ceriodaphnia dubia and Hyalella azteca.

Pyrethroid insecticides are known for their potential toxicity to aquatic invertebrates and many fish species. A significant problem in the study of pyrethroid toxicity is their extreme hydrophobicity. They can adsorb to test container surfaces and many studies, therefore, report pyrethroid levels as nominal water concentrations. In this study, pyrethroid adsorption to sampling and test containers was measured and several container treatments were examined for their ability to decrease pyrethroid adsorption. None of the chemical treatments were successful at preventing pyrethroid loss from aqueous samples, but vortexing of containers served to resuspend pyrethroids. The effects of the observed adsorption on Ceriodaphnia dubia and Hyalella azteca permethrin toxicity were examined. Species-specific results showed a time-dependent decrease in toxicity following pyrethroid adsorption to test containers for C. dubia, but not for H. azteca. These results demonstrate that pyrethroid adsorption to containers can significantly affect the observed outcome in toxicity-testing and serves as a caution for researchers and testing laboratories.

Development of toxicity identification evaluation procedures for pyrethroid detection using esterase activity.

Recent agrochemical usage patterns suggest that the use of organophosphate (OP) pesticides will decrease, resulting in a concomitant increase in pyrethroid usage. Pyrethroids are known for their potential toxicity to aquatic invertebrates and many fish species. Current toxicity identification evaluation (TIE) techniques are able to detect OPs, but have not been optimized for pyrethroids. Organophosphate identification methods depend upon the use of piperonyl butoxide (PBO) to identify OP-induced toxicity. However, the use of PBO in TIE assays will be confounded by the co-occurrence of OPs and pyrethroids in receiving waters. It is necessary, therefore, to develop new TIE procedures for pyrethroids. This study evaluated the use of a pyrethroid-specific antibody, PBO, and carboxylesterase activity to identify pyrethroid toxicity in aquatic toxicity testing with Ceriodaphnia dubia. The antibody caused significant mortality to the C. dubia. Piperonyl butoxide synergized pyrethroid-associated toxicity, but this effect may be difficult to interpret in the presence of OPs and pyrethroids. Carboxylesterase activity removed pyrethroid-associated toxicity in a dose-dependent manner and did not compromise OP toxicity, suggesting that carboxylesterase treatment will not interfere with TIE OP detection methods. These results indicate that the addition of carboxylesterase to TIE procedures can be used to detect pyrethroids in aquatic samples.