Analysis of the first ten years of FDA's rare pediatric disease priority review voucher program: designations, diseases, and drug development.

BACKGROUND: The Rare Pediatric Disease (RPD) Priority Review Voucher (PRV) Program was enacted in 2012 to support the development of new products for children. Prior to requesting a voucher, applicants can request RPD designation, which confirms their product treats or prevents a rare disease in which the serious manifestations primarily affect children. This study describes the trends and characteristics of these designations. Details of RPD designations are not publicly disclosable; this research represents the first analysis of the RPD designation component of the program. RESULTS: We used an internal US Food and Drug Administration database to analyze all RPD designations between 2013 and 2022. Multiple characteristics were analyzed, including the diseases targeted by RPD designation, whether the product targeted a neonatal disease, product type (drug/biologic), and the level of evidence (preclinical/clinical) to support designation. There were 569 RPD designations during the study period. The top therapeutic areas were neurology (26%, n = 149), metabolism (23%, n = 131), oncology (18%, n = 105). The top diseases targeted by RPD designation were Duchenne muscular dystrophy, neuroblastoma, and sickle cell disease. Neonatology products represented 6% (n = 33), over half were for drug products and 38% were supported by clinical data. CONCLUSIONS: The RPD PRV program was created to encourage development of new products for children. The results of this study establish that a wide range of diseases have seen development-from rare pediatric cancers to rare genetic disorders. Continued support of product development for children with rare diseases is needed to find treatments for all children with unmet needs.

Orphan Drug Label Expansions: Analysis Of Subsequent Rare And Common Indication Approvals.

The Orphan Drug Act of 1983 was enacted to provide financial incentives to stimulate drug development for rare diseases. In recent years, concerns have been raised regarding these orphan drugs, including how many are being approved for both rare and common diseases and the number of subsequent indication approvals. Policy makers have suggested modifications to the Orphan Drug Act's incentives to address these concerns. In this study we investigated the approval "family trees" of orphan drugs. We found that 491 novel orphan drugs were approved between 1990 and 2022. To date, 65 percent have been approved for a single rare disease, 15 percent have been approved for multiple rare diseases, and 20 percent have been approved for both rare and common diseases. Ten percent of orphan drugs received a subsequent indication approval for a pediatric population of an orphan disease. Revenue estimates from 2021 show that one-third of the drugs approved for both rare and common indications and 6 percent of rare-only drugs were among the 200 top-selling drugs worldwide. The results have implications for the possible externalities of modifying the incentives of the Orphan Drug Act, such as a potential decrease in the initiation of programs to develop pediatric rare disease drugs.

Determining Commonalities in the Experiences of Patients with Rare Diseases: A Qualitative Analysis of US Food and Drug Administration Patient Engagement Sessions.

BACKGROUND: Rare diseases are estimated to affect more than one in ten Americans. However, most patients with a rare disease face significant emotional, physical, and social challenges. To better understand the burden of disease and unmet needs, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) conducts and supports multiple patient engagement platforms. We analyzed summaries from these discussions to identify commonalities among patients with disparate rare diseases, the results of which could inform priorities for cross-disease policies and medical product development. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative analysis of patient engagement session summaries to investigate shared experiences across rare diseases. Cross-disease similarities were identified within four dimensions: product development/regulatory, clinical/physical, social/psychological, and economic/financial. Summaries from 29 rare diseases were included in our analyses. RESULTS: Within the product development/regulatory dimension, we observed that patients and caregivers across rare diseases shared the desire for development of medical products that cured their disease or improved their overall quality of life. In the clinical/physical dimension, we found that patients had numerous common symptoms, including pain and fatigue. In the social/psychological dimension, we observed significant negative impact on mental health. Within the economic/financial dimension, patients and caregivers shared that disease burden caused significant financial hardships. CONCLUSION: We found remarkable similarities among patients with rare diseases across all four dimensions. Our results indicate that, even among rare diseases with diverse etiologies, patients share numerous commonalties due to their diseases: a lack of effective treatment options, certain physical symptoms, mental health challenges, and financial concerns.

A comprehensive study of the rare diseases and conditions targeted by orphan drug designations and approvals over the forty years of the Orphan Drug Act.

BACKGROUND: Rare diseases affect more than 30 million Americans. The passage of the Orphan Drug Act (ODA) in the United States in 1983 represented a launching point for a rare disease drug development revolution for these patients. Financial incentives provided by the ODA through its Orphan Drug Designation Program, in addition to remarkable scientific advances over the past 40 years, have led to hundreds of drug approvals for rare diseases. Our research examines the rare diseases that have been targeted by orphan drug designations and subsequent approvals since the law was enacted. METHODS: Using an internal FDA database, we classified and analyzed all orphan drug designations and approvals from 1983 to 2022 by disease and therapeutic area. RESULTS: Over the 40 years of the ODA, 6,340 orphan drug designations were granted, representing drug development for 1,079 rare diseases. Additionally, 882 of those designations resulted in at least one FDA approval for use in 392 rare diseases. Much of this development has been concentrated in oncology as seven of the top ten most designated and approved diseases were rare cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Researchers have estimated that there may be 7000-10,000 rare diseases that have been identified and described. Based on our study, we can conclude that around 5% of rare diseases have an FDA-approved drug and up to 15% of rare diseases have at least one drug that has been developed and shown promise in their treatment, diagnosis or prevention. Funding of basic and translational science for rare disease drug development should continue in order to bring therapies to the millions of affected patients who remain without treatment options.

The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on US Food and Drug Administration-funded clinical trials and natural history studies for rare diseases.

BACKGROUND: Since 1983, the Orphan Product Grants Program, administered by the US Food and Drug Administration, provides funding for clinical trials and natural history studies in rare diseases. The COVID-19 pandemic created new challenges in rare disease product development. This study sought to determine the effects of the pandemic on rare disease studies using data from grantees of this program, and determine lessons learned that can potentially be applied to future trials in rare diseases. METHODS: All grants that were being funded by the Orphan Products Grants Program between March 2020 and March 2021 were included in the study. Data was gathered from grantees and described the effects of the pandemic on multiple aspects of the studies including enrollment, patient follow-up, protocol, and budget. RESULTS: There were 62 grants active during the study period, and of these 54 (87%) were clinical trials and 8 (13%) were natural history studies. 94% of the grantees reported their studies being affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, and the addition of virtual capabilities was reported by 34 (55%) of grantees. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested two important lessons learned. First, virtual capabilities, when appropriate, can be an important component of trials because they decrease the travel burden on participants and reduce in-person risks, which should increase patient recruitment and retention. Second, building in flexibility in clinical trials is critical in the post-COVID era and could include increasing the use of multi-site trials, clinical networks, and innovative designs and collaborations to speed up trials without compromising study data.

Drugs and biologics receiving FDA orphan drug designation: an analysis of the most frequently designated products and their repositioning strategies.

Background: The Orphan Drug Act was created to stimulate the development of drugs and biologics for rare diseases. Investigating products that have received orphan drug designation provide a greater understanding of rare disease drug development, as well as the repositioning business models of developers. Research design and methods: We used a dataset containing all orphan drug designations between 1983 and 2019. To analyze the orphan products, we constructed a variable, 'unique product,' that allowed for the standardization of generic names of drugs and biologics. Additional analysis was performed on the most frequently designated unique products and their repositioning strategies. Results: We found 5,099 orphan drug designations representing 3,269 unique products, of which 508 had an orphan-designated approval from FDA. Unique products with only a single designation represented 2,448 (75%) of the total products and 26 (1%) products had 10 or more designations. Over 60% of these unique products with 10 or more designations were antineoplastics or immunomodulators. Conclusions: The most designated unique products revealed a continuum of repositioning strategies, from the repurposing of approved drugs to parallel indication development programs for recently developed drugs. The fact that over 3,000 unique products have been studied for rare diseases indicates that future repositioning opportunities may become increasingly available.

Using four decades of FDA orphan drug designations to describe trends in rare disease drug development: substantial growth seen in development of drugs for rare oncologic, neurologic, and pediatric-onset diseases.

BACKGROUND: Orphan drug designations are a useful proxy to investigate trends in rare disease drug development. Drug developers must receive a designation before they are eligible for the economic incentives of the Orphan Drug Act in the United States. We created a database of all orphan drugs designated between 1983 and 2019 that included numerous drug characteristics, including therapeutic area. In addition, we constructed a "broad disease" categorization of designations as an alternative to therapeutic area, based on disease etiology and age of onset rather than organ system. By looking at the pattern of orphan drug designations over the past four decades, this analysis studied the impact of the evolving rare disease drug development landscape and considers the future of rare disease therapies over the coming decades. RESULTS: Between 1983 and 2019, a total of 5099 drugs and biologics received orphan drug designation. Designations more than doubled between the 1980s and 1990s, almost doubled between the 1990s and 2000s, and almost tripled in number between the 2000s and 2010s. The top three therapeutic areas represented in the orphan drug designations were: oncology (1910, 37%), neurology (674, 13%), and infectious diseases (436, 9%). The broad disease categorization found that the proportion of designations for pediatric-onset diseases has increased in the most recent decade to 27%. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the last four decades of orphan drug designation indicates seismic shifts have occurred in the rare disease drug development space. The number of designations granted more than quadrupled between the 1990s and 2010s. While these substantial increases led to growth in the absolute number of designations within all therapeutic areas (bar one) and broad disease categories, the relative proportions have seen considerable change over time. In the most recent decade, there have been notable increases in the proportion of drugs in oncology, pediatric-onset diseases, and neurologic disorders. The dramatic rise in overall orphan designations over the past four decades suggests we may continue to see an upward trajectory in designations leading to an increased number of approvals for drugs and biologics designed specifically for diagnosing, preventing, and treating rare diseases in the coming decades.

FDA orphan products clinical trial grants: assessment of outcomes and impact on rare disease product development.

BACKGROUND: The Office of Orphan Products Development (OOPD) of the United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has awarded over 700 grants to conduct clinical trials of medicals products for rare diseases since 1983, leading to over 70 marketing approvals. However, despite recent progress in rare disease product development, thousands of rare diseases still have no approved treatments. An assessment of this clinical trial grants program was undertaken to provide an in-depth analysis of the characteristics and outcomes of the program. Results of this analysis will be used to inform future goals of the program, as well as internal data collection to continue to maximize the program's impact in supporting rare disease product development. RESULTS: Between fiscal years 2007-2011, OOPD funded 85 clinical trial grants. These grants spanned 18 therapeutic areas, included all pre-approval phases (Phases 1-3), and approximately 75% of the grants studied small molecule drugs. Nine (11%) product approvals, of seven drugs and two devices, were at least partially supported by grants funded within this 5-year timeframe. Four of the seven drugs approved were new molecular entities (NMEs). The average time from funding to approval was seven years. We also found a suggested association between collaboration with multiple types of stakeholders and the success of grants, where we defined success as either positive or negative study findings or a future marketing approval. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical trials funded by OOPD provided valuable information for future product development, and there were a notable number of approvals that occurred using the support of the grants program. There was a suggested association between collaboration and successful outcomes. Efficient and innovative trial designs and collaboration among stakeholders appear vital to continue to effectively bring products to rare disease patients. Ongoing program assessments will ensure that the funding continues to be used to optimally meet the treatment needs of the rare disease community.

A sequential 3D bioprinting and orthogonal bioconjugation approach for precision tissue engineering.

Recent advances in 3D bioprinting have transformed the tissue engineering landscape by enabling the controlled placement of cells, biomaterials, and bioactive agents for the biofabrication of living tissues and organs. However, the application of 3D bioprinting is limited by the availability of cytocompatible and printable biomaterials that recapitulate properties of native tissues. Here, we developed an integrated 3D projection bioprinting and orthogonal photoconjugation platform for precision tissue engineering of tailored microenvironments. By using a photoreactive thiol-ene gelatin bioink, soft hydrogels can be bioprinted into complex geometries and photopatterned with bioactive moieties in a rapid and scalable manner via digital light projection (DLP) technology. This enables localized modulation of biophysical properties such as stiffness and microarchitecture as well as precise control over spatial distribution and concentration of immobilized functional groups. As such, well-defined properties can be directly incorporated using a single platform to produce desired tissue-specific functions within bioprinted constructs. We demonstrated high viability of encapsulated endothelial cells and human cardiomyocytes using our dual process and fabricated tissue constructs functionalized with VEGF peptide mimics to induce guided endothelial cell growth for programmable vascularization. This work represents a pivotal step in engineering multifunctional constructs with unprecedented control, precision, and versatility for the rational design of biomimetic tissues.

Photopolymerizable Biomaterials and Light-Based 3D Printing Strategies for Biomedical Applications.

Since the advent of additive manufacturing, known commonly as 3D printing, this technology has revolutionized the biofabrication landscape and driven numerous pivotal advancements in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Many 3D printing methods were developed in short course after Charles Hull first introduced the power of stereolithography to the world. However, materials development was not met with the same enthusiasm and remained the bottleneck in the field for some time. Only in the past decade has there been deliberate development to expand the materials toolbox for 3D printing applications to meet the true potential of 3D printing technologies. Herein, we review the development of biomaterials suited for light-based 3D printing modalities with an emphasis on bioprinting applications. We discuss the chemical mechanisms that govern photopolymerization and highlight the application of natural, synthetic, and composite biomaterials as 3D printed hydrogels. Because the quality of a 3D printed construct is highly dependent on both the material properties and processing technique, we included a final section on the theoretical and practical aspects behind light-based 3D printing as well as ways to employ that knowledge to troubleshoot and standardize the optimization of printing parameters.

An Analysis of Follow-On Development in New Drug Classes, January 1986-June 2018.

Follow-on drugs-new medicines approved within an established drug class-provide incremental treatment improvements, additional choices for clinicians and patients, and potential price competition. We examine the timing, quantity, and product characteristics of within-class drug approvals for new drug classes approved by the US Food and Drug Administration since January 1986. We find that nearly two-thirds of first-in-class drugs do not face a subsequent follow-on product. Follow-on innovation within a drug class was more common and occurred more rapidly in the 1990s than during the 2000s. We also find that fewer drug classes have multiple competitors entering the market during the 2000s. First-in-class drugs treating rare disorders experienced lower rates of follow-on entry than drugs treating common medical conditions. The decreased pace of follow-on development likely results from greater industry focus on rare diseases and increasing reimbursement pressure on products lacking clear advantages over existing products.

3D printed micro-scale force gauge arrays to improve human cardiac tissue maturation and enable high throughput drug testing.

Human induced pluripotent stem cell - derived cardiomyocytes (iPSC-CMs) are regarded as a promising cell source for establishing in-vitro personalized cardiac tissue models and developing therapeutics. However, analyzing cardiac force and drug response using mature human iPSC-CMs in a high-throughput format still remains a great challenge. Here we describe a rapid light-based 3D printing system for fabricating micro-scale force gauge arrays suitable for 24-well and 96-well plates that enable scalable tissue formation and measurement of cardiac force generation in human iPSC-CMs. We demonstrate consistent tissue band formation around the force gauge pillars with aligned sarcomeres. Among the different maturation treatment protocols we explored, 3D aligned cultures on force gauge arrays with in-culture pacing produced the highest expression of mature cardiac marker genes. We further demonstrated the utility of these micro-tissues to develop significantly increased contractile forces in response to treatment with isoproterenol, levosimendan, and omecamtiv mecarbil. Overall, this new 3D printing system allows for high flexibility in force gauge design and can be optimized to achieve miniaturization and promote cardiac tissue maturation with great potential for high-throughput in-vitro drug screening applications. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: The application of iPSC-derived cardiac tissues in translatable drug screening is currently limited by the challenges in forming mature cardiac tissue and analyzing cardiac forces in a high-throughput format. We demonstrate the use of a rapid light-based 3D printing system to build a micro-scale force gauge array that enables scalable cardiac tissue formation from iPSC-CMs and measurement of contractile force development. With the capability to provide great flexibility over force gauge design as well as optimization to achieve miniaturization, our 3D printing system serves as a promising tool to build cardiac tissues for high-throughput in-vitro drug screening applications.

Scanningless and continuous 3D bioprinting of human tissues with decellularized extracellular matrix.

Decellularized extracellular matrices (dECMs) have demonstrated excellent utility as bioscaffolds in recapitulating the complex biochemical microenvironment, however, their use as bioinks in 3D bioprinting to generate functional biomimetic tissues has been limited by their printability and lack of tunable physical properties. Here, we describe a method to produce photocrosslinkable tissue-specific dECM bioinks for fabricating patient-specific tissues with high control over complex microarchitecture and mechanical properties using a digital light processing (DLP)-based scanningless and continuous 3D bioprinter. We demonstrated that tissue-matched dECM bioinks provided a conducive environment for maintaining high viability and maturation of human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived cardiomyocytes and hepatocytes. Microscale patterning also guided spontaneous cellular reorganization into predesigned striated heart and lobular liver structures through biophysical cues. Our methodology enables a light-based approach to rapidly bioprint dECM bioinks with accurate tissue-scale design to engineer physiologically-relevant functional human tissues for applications in biology, regenerative medicine, and diagnostics.

Investigating the landscape of US orphan product approvals.

BACKGROUND: The Orphan Drug Act was enacted in 1983 to encourage the development of drugs for rare diseases. Previous research has attempted to examine the impact of the Act by assessing either the number of orphan designations that have been granted or the number of new orphan drugs approved for marketing. This study provides a more in-depth understanding of the effect of the Orphan Drug Act by investigating all types of drug approvals with an orphan designation, along with multiple characteristics of the drugs, over the entire 35 years of the Act. These orphan approvals include: new molecular entities (new drugs approved first for a rare disease), secondary indications (an expansion from the first approved indication), and new formulations. RESULTS: The results show that the number of approvals for orphan indications has been increasing over time, and the upward trend is especially large in the most recent years. Much of this increase has been driven by the increase in secondary indications being approved for previously approved drugs, although there have also been increases in the number of approved new drugs. We also find that while oncology indications have been increasing significantly, there has also been an increase in other therapeutic areas. Additionally, we find that the proportion of biologic drugs being approved has increased over time. Lastly, while other parts of this drug landscape have dramatically altered over time, the proportion of orphan approvals receiving priority review has not changed. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the Orphan Drug Act appears to have stimulated significant drug development for rare diseases. Additionally, approvals of orphan indications have been increasing over time. This increasing effect has not targeted a single area of the rare disease space, rather, gains in approvals have been seen across: therapeutic areas, approval types (both new drugs and secondary indications), and for both biologics and small molecule drugs.

Is the priority review voucher program stimulating new drug development for tropical diseases?

Congress created the tropical disease priority review voucher program to stimulate new drug development for tropical diseases. An analysis of the pharmaceutical pipeline indicates that the development of drugs for these tropical diseases has increased. However, the effects of the program are not uniform across all diseases, as malaria and tuberculosis have seen significant new drug development, while other diseases have not.

Anti-thrombotic strategies for microfluidic blood processing.

The redundant mechanisms involved in blood coagulation are crucial for rapid hemostasis. Yet they also create challenges in blood processing in medical devices and lab-on-a-chip systems. In this work, we investigate the effects of both shear stress and hypothermic blood storage on thrombus formation in microfluidic processing. For fresh blood, thrombosis occurs only at high shear, and the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban is highly effective in preventing thrombus formation. Blood storage generally activates platelets and primes them towards thrombosis via multiple mechanisms. Thrombus formation of stored blood at low shear can be adequately inhibited by glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. At high shear, von Willebrand factor-mediated thrombosis contributes significantly and requires additional treatments with thiol-containing antioxidants-such as N acetylcysteine and reduced glutathione-that interfere with von Willebrand factor polymerization. We further demonstrate the effectiveness of these anti-thrombotic strategies in microfluidic devices made of cyclic olefin copolymer, a popular material used in the healthcare industry. This work identifies effective anti-thrombotic strategies that are applicable in a wide range of blood- and organ-on-a-chip applications.

New Opioid Analgesic Approvals and Outpatient Utilization of Opioid Analgesics in the United States, 1997 through 2015.

BACKGROUND: The opioid epidemic, driven in part by increased prescribing, is a public health emergency. This study examines dispensed prescription patterns and approvals of new opioid analgesic products to investigate whether the introduction of these new drugs increases prescribing. METHODS: Prescribing patterns based on dispensed prescription claims from the U.S. retail setting were assessed with new brand and generic opioid analgesic products approved in the United States from 1997 through 2015. RESULTS: From 1997 through 2015, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (Silver Spring, Maryland) approved 263 opioid analgesic products, including 33 brand products. Dispensed prescriptions initially increased 80% from 145 million prescriptions in 1997 to a peak of 260 million prescriptions in 2012 before decreasing by 12% to 228 million prescriptions in 2015. Morphine milligram equivalents dispensed per prescription increased from 486 in 1997 to a peak of 950 in 2010, before decreasing to 905 in 2015. In 2015, generic products accounted for 96% (218/228 million prescriptions) of all opioid analgesic prescriptions dispensed. The remaining prescriptions were dispensed for brand products, of which nearly half were dispensed for one brand product (OxyContin, Purdue, USA). CONCLUSIONS: There has been a dramatic increase in prescriptions dispensed for opioid analgesics since 1997 and an increasing number of opioid analgesic approvals; however, the number of prescriptions dispensed has declined since 2012 despite an increasing number of approvals. Examination of dispensed prescriptions shows a shifting and complex market where multiple factors likely influence prescribing; the approval of new products alone may not be sufficient to be a primary driver of increased prescribing. VISUAL ABSTRACT: An online visual overview is available for this article at http://links.lww.com/ALN/B705.