Content and specificity of the Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in solutions for immunoglobulin replacement therapy.

BACKGROUND: Specific antibodies are important for post-vaccination and post-infection immune responses against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). The role of antibodies in preventing and treating Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in high-risk populations has been highlighted through the use of virus-specific monoclonal antibodies, which has raised the question of immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IRT) used in immunocompromised patients. METHODS: Virus-specific anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) and anti-nucleocapsid protein (NCAP) antibodies (assessed using a chemiluminescence assay and virus-neutralizing antibodies (virus neutralization test against Delta and Omicron variants)) were analyzed in 20 batches of 10 % (100 mg/mL) immunoglobulin solutions for intravenous IRT from two commercially available producers between January 2022 and March 2023 for clinical use. RESULTS: Anti-RBD and anti-NCAP antibodies were detected in all 20 batches of assessed IRT solutions (mean concentrations of 2817 IU/mL and 2380 IU/mL, respectively). Notably, the concentration of the virus-specific antibodies increased continuously during the follow-up period (from 822.5 IU/mL to 4066.4 IU/mL and 102 IU/mL to 3455.9 IU/mL). These antibodies demonstrated high virus-neutralizing activity against the Delta variant (mean titers of 436 and 325) but were limited to the Omicron variant (mean titers 78 and 70). The differences observed between the two brands were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: IRT solutions contain high concentrations of anti-SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies, which may prevent COVID-19; however, the efficacy can be influenced by variable virus-neutralizing activities against different viral strains. Therefore, appropriate IRT should be combined with other approaches, such as vaccination or pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis. Passively transmitted specific antibodies may also lead to false-positive serological test results.

The role of interleukin 6 in the pathogenesis and therapy of Castleman disease - an immunologist's perspective.

Castleman disease (CD) is a heterogeneous group of diseases characterized by lymphadenopathy and systemic inflammatory manifestations. CD can be divided into uni- (UCD) and multicentric form (MCD) according to the disease extent. MCD is usually accompanied by the features of a systemic inflammatory response including fever, weight loss, hepatosplenomegaly, ascites, and edema. In these patients, we can also observe elevation of inflammatory parameters and anemia within the laboratory assessment. Based on etiological nature, the CD can be further divided into human herpesvirus-8-associated (HHV8-associated) and idiopathic form. Interleukin 6 (IL-6) plays a central role in the disease pathogenesis. Inhibition of IL-6 has been shown to be an effective treatment modality. Currently, siltuximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody targeting IL-6, is the only approved treatment for MCD. Its short-term and long-term efficacy and safety have been demonstrated in a few clinical studies.

Encapsulation: A Strategy to Deliver Therapeutics and Bioactive Compounds?

There is a growing demand for efficient medical therapies without undesired side effects that limit their application. Targeted therapies such as deliveries of pharmacologically active compounds to a specific site of action in the human body are still a big challenge. Encapsulation is an effective tool for targeted deliveries of drugs and sensitive compounds. It has been exploited as a technique that can manage the required distribution, action and metabolism of encapsulated agents. Food supplements or functional foods containing encapsulated probiotics, vitamins, minerals or extracts are often part of therapies and currently also a consumption trend. For effective encapsulation, optimal manufacturing has to be ensured. Thus, there is a trend to develop new (or modify existing) encapsulation methods. The most-used encapsulation approaches are based on barriers made from (bio)polymers, liposomes, multiple emulsions, etc. In this paper, recent advances in the use of encapsulation in the fields of medicine, food supplements and functional foods are highlighted, with emphasis on its benefits within targeted and supportive treatments. We have focused on a comprehensive overview of encapsulation options in the field of medicine and functional preparations that complement them with their positive effects on human health.

Clinical Outcome of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Patients with Primary Antibody Deficiencies.

In 2019, the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, caused a worldwide pandemic, affecting more than 630 million individuals and causing 6.5 million deaths. In the general population, poorer outcomes have been associated with older age, chronic lung and cardiovascular diseases, and lymphopenia, highlighting the important role of cellular immunity in the immune response against SARS-CoV-2. Moreover, SARS-CoV-2 variants may have a significant impact on disease severity. There is a significant overlap with complications commonly found in inborn errors of immunity (IEI), such as primary antibody deficiencies. The results of various studies have provided ambiguous findings. Several studies identified risk factors in the general population with a minor impact on SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, other studies have found a significant contribution of underlying immunodeficiency and immune-system dysregulation to the disease course. This ambiguity probably reflects the demographic differences and viral evolution. Impaired antibody production was associated with prolonged viral shedding, suggesting a critical role of humoral immunity in controlling SARS-CoV-2 infection. This may explain the poorer outcomes in primary antibody deficiencies compared to other IEIs. Understanding coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pathogenesis and identifying risk factors may help us identify patients at high risk of severe COVID-19 for whom preventive measures should be introduced.

Clinical Outcomes, Immunogenicity, and Safety of BNT162b2 Vaccine in Primary Antibody Deficiency.

BACKGROUND: Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is characterized by an impaired postvaccination response, high susceptibility to respiratory tract infections, and a broad spectrum of noninfectious complications. Thus, patients with CVID may be at high risk for COVID-19, and vaccination's role in prevention is questionable. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the clinical outcomes, safety, and dynamics of humoral and T-cell immune responses induced by the mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 in CVID. METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study focused on the clinical outcomes (proportion of infected patients and disease severity), safety (incidences of adverse events and changes in laboratory parameters), and dynamics of humoral (specific postvaccination and virus-neutralizing antibody assessment) and T-cell immune responses (anti-SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell detection) in 21 patients with CVID after a two-dose administration of BNT162b2. The patients were observed for 6 months. RESULTS: Humoral response was observed in 52% of patients (11 of 21) at month 1 after vaccination but continuously decreased to 33.3% at month 6 (five of 15). Nevertheless, they had a remarkably lower anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody titer compared with healthy controls. The T-cell response was measurable in 46% of patients with CVID (six of 13) at month 1 and persisted over the study period. Mild infection occurred in three patients within the follow-up period (14.3%). The vaccine also exhibited a favorable safety profile. CONCLUSIONS: The BNT162b2 vaccine elicited a measurable antibody response in a high proportion of patients, but it was limited by low titer of virus-neutralizing antibodies and rapid waning of anti-receptor-binding domain SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies. T-cell response was detected in one-third of patients and remained stable within the follow-up period. Vaccination has favorable safety and clinical-related outcomes in preventing severe COVID-19.

SARS-CoV-2-specific humoral and cellular immune responses to BNT162b2 vaccine in Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva patients.

Introduction: Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is characterized by progressive heterotopic ossification triggered by various conditions, such as trauma, infection, including COVID-19 infection, and vaccination. Although SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations prevent poor outcomes in the general population, there is limited evidence on safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines for inpatients with FOP. Methods: A case series of two patients with FOP focused on humoral, cellular post-vaccination response, and the incidence of adverse events after administration of the BNT162b2 vaccine (Comirnaty). Results: Injection site reactions, fever, myalgia, and fatigue were the most common adverse events (AE). Neither severe AE (SAE), nor disease flare-ups were observed. No differences between patients with FOP and healthy controls were observed in humoral and cellular responses. Conclusions: The BNT162b2 vaccine induced high humoral and cellular response levels in patients with FOP. Vaccination was not associated with SAE or disease relapse. The AEs spectrum was comparable to that of the general population.

Immunogenicity and safety of the booster BNT162b2 vaccine in patients with axial spondyloarthritis treated with biological disease-modifying drugs.

Background: Vaccination confers relatively short-term protection against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), indicating the need for booster doses. Immunocompromised individuals, including those with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), may have pronounced immune response waning. Vaccine-boosted humoral and T-cell responses minimize poor coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) outcome without increasing adverse events (AE). There is limited evidence of third-dose vaccination in axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA) patients. We investigated immune-response persistence after primary vaccination and immunogenicity and safety after the BNT162b2 booster vaccination. Methods: This prospective observational study enrolled an AxSpA cohort treated with interleukin-17 (IL-17) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) inhibitors. Serum SARS-CoV-2-specific and virus-neutralizing antibodies for humoral response and flow cytometric detection of intracellular cytokines following SARS-CoV-2-specific peptide-based stimulation for T-cell immune responses were assessed, and safety was evaluated via a clinical questionnaire. Results: Fifteen male AxSpA patients treated with TNFα (73·3%) or IL-17 (26·7%) inhibitors were enrolled and had humoral response persistence at 6 months: 905·6 ( ± 186·1 SD) and 409·1 ( ± 335·7) U/mL. Specific antibody concentrations further increased after booster vaccination to 989·7 ( ± 12·62) and 1000 U/mL and T-cell responders from 53·3% to 80%, with no differences between AxSpA (including "vaccination only" and "hybrid immunity" subgroups) and healthy control (HC) cohorts. No severe AE occurred; the AE spectrum was comparable to that of the general population. Conclusion: Immune-response persistence after primary vaccination and immunogenicity after booster vaccination were unaffected by anti-IL17 or anti-TNFα therapy with similar AE as in the general population.

Efficacy and safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with inflammatory bowel disease on immunosuppressive and biological therapy: Prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: SARS-CoV-2 is a worldwide serious health problem and vaccination seems to have a crucial role in managing the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this prospective observational study was to monitor the trend of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 after vaccination with BNT162b2 (COMIRNATY) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated by immunosuppressive and/or biological therapy, demonstrate whether any type of this therapy is associated with poorer production of antibodies against COVID-19 and evaluate the safety of vaccination against COVID-19 in these patients. METHODS: Eighty-seven eligible patients from one tertiary gastroenterological center with inflammatory bowel disease (60 with CD, 27 with UC) treated by immunosuppressive and/or biological therapy from the antiTNFα group were indicated to vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. Effectiveness of vaccination was evaluated by the values of antibodies before and 4 weeks after 2nd dose of vaccine. Additional goal was to evaluate adverse events of vaccination. RESULTS: Before the 2nd dose of vaccine, geometric mean of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies were 40.7 U/ml in the biological therapy group, 34.8 U/ml in the azathioprine group and 44.8 U/ml in the combination therapy group of patients. The geometric means were 676.5.7 U/ml in the biological therapy group, 614.4 U/ml in the azathioprine group and 500.1 U/ml in the combination therapy group of patients four weeks after 2nd dose. Statistically significant differences between these groups were not proved. Several non-severe local and general adverse events were present in our patients with a majority of these events on the day of vaccine administration and the day after, no anaphylactic reactions were present. CONCLUSIONS: Our measurements proved the efficacy and safety of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated by immunosuppressive and/or biological therapy. Statistically significant differences between our groups of patients were not proved.

Immunoprofiling of monocytes in STAT1 gain-of-function chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis.

Patients with STAT1 gain-of-function (GOF) mutations suffer from an inborn error of immunity hallmarked by chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis (CMC). The pathogenesis behind this complex and heterogeneous disease is still incompletely understood. Beyond the well-recognized Th17 failure, linked to the STAT1/STAT3 dysbalance-driven abrogation of antifungal defense, only little is known about the consequences of augmented STAT1 signaling in other cells, including, interestingly, the innate immune cells. STAT1-mediated signaling was previously shown to be increased in STAT1 GOF CD14+ monocytes. Therefore, we hypothesized that monocytes might represent important co-orchestrators of antifungal defense failure, as well as various immunodysregulatory phenomena seen in patients with STAT1 GOF CMC, including autoimmunity. In this article, we demonstrate that human STAT1 GOF monocytes are characterized by proinflammatory phenotypes and a strong inflammatory skew of their secretory cytokine profile. Moreover, they exhibit diminished CD16 expression, and reduction of classical (CD14++C16-) and expansion of intermediate (CD14++16+) subpopulations. Amongst the functional aberrations, a selectively enhanced responsiveness to TLR7/8 stimulation, but not to other TLR ligands, was noted, which might represent a contributing mechanism in the pathogenesis of STAT1 GOF-associated autoimmunity. Importantly, some of these features extend to STAT1 GOF monocyte-derived dendritic cells and to STAT1 GOF peripheral myeloid dendritic cells, suggesting that the alterations observed in monocytes are, in fact, intrinsic due to STAT1 mutation, and not mere bystanders of chronic inflammatory environment. Lastly, we observe that the proinflammatory bias of STAT1 GOF monocytes may be ameliorated with JAK inhibition. Taken together, we show that monocytes likely play an active role in both the microbial susceptibility and autoimmunity in STAT1 GOF CMC.

Partial RAG deficiency in humans induces dysregulated peripheral lymphocyte development and humoral tolerance defect with accumulation of T-bet+ B cells.

The recombination-activating genes (RAG) 1 and 2 are indispensable for diversifying the primary B cell receptor repertoire and pruning self-reactive clones via receptor editing in the bone marrow; however, the impact of RAG1/RAG2 on peripheral tolerance is unknown. Partial RAG deficiency (pRD) manifesting with late-onset immune dysregulation represents an 'experiment of nature' to explore this conundrum. By studying B cell development and subset-specific repertoires in pRD, we demonstrate that reduced RAG activity impinges on peripheral tolerance through the generation of a restricted primary B cell repertoire, persistent antigenic stimulation and an inflammatory milieu with elevated B cell-activating factor. This unique environment gradually provokes profound B cell dysregulation with widespread activation, remarkable extrafollicular maturation and persistence, expansion and somatic diversification of self-reactive clones. Through the model of pRD, we reveal a RAG-dependent 'domino effect' that impacts stringency of tolerance and B cell fate in the periphery.

Allergic manifestations of inborn errors of immunity and their impact on the diagnosis: A worldwide study.

Background: Allergies have long been observed in Inborn Errors of Immunity (IEI) and might even be the first presentation resulting in delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis in some cases. However, data on the prevalence of allergic diseases among IEI patients are limited and contradictory. Objective: To provide a worldwide view of allergic diseases, across a broad spectrum of IEI, and their impact on the timely diagnosis of IEI. Methods: This is a worldwide study, conceived by the World Allergy Organization (WAO) Inborn Errors of Immunity Committee. A questionnaire was developed and pilot-tested and was sent via email to collect data from 61 immunology centers known to treat pediatric and/or adult IEI patients in 41 countries. In addition, a query was submitted to The United States Immunodeficiency Network (USIDNET) at its website. Results: Thirty centers in 23 countries caring for a total 8450 IEI patients responded. The USIDNET dataset included 2332 patients. Data from responders showed that a median (IQR) of 16.3% (10-28.8%) of patients experienced allergic diseases during the course of their IEI as follows: 3.6% (1.3-11.3%) had bronchial asthma, 3.6% (1.9-9.1%) atopic dermatitis, 3.0% (1.0-7.8%) allergic rhinitis, and 1.3% (0.5-3.3%) food allergy. As per the USIDNET data, the frequency of allergy among IEI patients was 68.8% (bronchial asthma in 46.9%). The percentage of IEI patients who presented initially with allergic disorders was 8% (5-25%) and diagnosis delay was reported in 7.5% (0.9-20.6%). Predominantly antibody deficiencies had the highest frequency of allergic disease followed by combined immunodeficiency with a frequency of 40.3% (19.2-62.5%) and 20.0% (10-32%) respectively. As per the data of centers, anaphylaxis occurred in 25/8450 patients (0.3%) whereas per USIDNET dataset, it occurred in 249/2332 (10.6%); drugs and food allergy were the main causes in both datasets. Conclusions: This multinational study brings to focus the relation between allergic diseases and IEI. Major allergies do occur in IEI patients but were less frequent than the general population. Initial presentation with allergy could adversely affect the timely diagnosis of IEI. There is a need for policies to raise awareness and educate primary care and other referring specialties on the association of allergic diseases with IEI. This study provides a network among centers for future prospective studies in the field.

Genomics Driving Diagnosis and Treatment of Inborn Errors of Immunity With Cancer Predisposition.

Inborn errors of immunity (IEI) are genetically and clinically heterogeneous disorders that, in addition to infection susceptibility and immune dysregulation, can have an enhanced cancer predisposition. The increasing availability of upfront next-generation sequencing diagnostics in immunology and oncology have uncovered substantial overlap of germline and somatic genetic conditions that can result in immunodeficiency and cancer. However, broad application of unbiased genetics in these neighboring disciplines still needs to be deployed, and joined therapeutic strategies guided by germline and somatic genetic risk factors are lacking. We illustrate the current difficulties encountered in clinical practice, summarize the historical development of pathophysiological concepts of cancer predisposition, and review select genetic, molecular, and cellular mechanisms of well-defined and illustrative disease entities such as DNA repair defects, combined immunodeficiencies with Epstein-Barr virus susceptibility, autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndromes, regulatory T-cell disorders, and defects in cell intrinsic immunity. We review genetic variants that, when present in the germline, cause IEI with cancer predisposition but, when arising as somatic variants, behave as oncogenes and cause specific cancer entities. We finally give examples of small molecular compounds that are developed and studied to target genetically defined cancers but might also proof useful to treat IEI.

Current treatment options for monogenic periodic fever syndromes - the role of interleukin 1 inhibitors.

Monogenic periodic fever syndromes are heterogeneous group of autoinflammatory diseases including distinct syndromes, such as cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome (CAPS), tumor necrosis factor alpha receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS), mevalonate kinase deficiency/hyper IgD syndrome (MKD/HIDS), and familial Mediterranean fever (FMF). Individual diseases differ in pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and severity. However, cytokines from the interleukin 1 (IL-1) family play a key role in all of them. Inhibition of these cytokines, especially IL-1, thus plays a crucial role in their treatment. At present, we have a wide range of drugs that differ in structure, mechanism of action, efficacy, and spectrum of side effects. The most available are anakinra, canakinumab and rilonacept. Moreover, several clinical trials are currently underway with other very promising drugs, such as gevokizumab, tadekinig alfa or tranilast. In the following review, we provide a new perspective on the efficacy and safety of IL-1 inhibitors that have provided the novel results coming from recently published clinical trials.

Delayed treatment with a tumor necrosis factor alpha blocker associated with worse outcomes in patients with spondyloarthritis: data from the Czech National Registry ATTRA.

Introduction: The administration of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors, is observed to interfere with the disease activity and progression. In this study, we aimed to assess the effectiveness and response predictors of adalimumab (ADA), a TNF-α blocker, in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA). Methods: This study was a historical prospective, registry-based observational study on patients with AxSpA treated with first-line ADA after conventional drug failure. For evaluation and comparison, patients were divided into three groups according to the number of years from AxSpA diagnosis to initiation of ADA treatment: (A) <5 years, (B) 5-10 years, and (C) >10 years. The assessment instruments ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score (ASDAS), Bath ankylosing spondylitis activity index (BASDAI), Bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index (BASFI), health assessment questionnaire (HAQ), Short Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36), and EuroQoL 5 dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) were regularly administered for up to 24 months of follow-up. Results: This study included 1043 patients with AxSpA (9.2% with non-radiographic AxSpA, 68.9% men). By month 6, a significantly higher proportion of patients with ASDAS remission (<1.3) was achieved upon earlier intervention in group A (30.1%) and B (32.9%) than in the late intervention group C (22.6%) (p ⩽ 0.05). At month 6, lower age and better BASFI at treatment initiation were identified as the strongest predictors of ASDAS remission in both univariable [odds ratio (OR): 0.956, p ⩽ 0.001; OR: 0.834, p ⩽ 0.001, respectively] and multivariable analyses (OR: 0.963, p ⩽ 0.001; OR: 0.859, p ⩽ 0.001, respectively). Earlier intervention also led to improvement in most patient-reported outcomes (PROs) based on HAQ, SF-36, and EQ-5D. Conclusion: Results from the ATTRA registry concur with previous clinical trials that supported efficacy of TNF-α blockers and showed better treatment outcomes with early interventions, including reduction of disease activity and improvement in PROs. We identified age and BASFI as the main factors influencing treatment effectiveness.

Risk Factors for Severe COVID-19 and Hospital Admission in Patients With Inborn Errors of Immunity - Results From a Multicenter Nationwide Study.

Despite the progress in the understanding how COVID-19 infection may impact immunocompromised patients, the data on inborn errors of immunity (IEI) remain limited and ambiguous. Therefore, we examined the risk of severe infection course and hospital admission in a large cohort of patients with IEI. In this multicenter nationwide retrospective survey-based trial, the demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected by investigating physicians from 8 national referral centers for the diagnosis and treatment of IEI using a COVID-19-IEI clinical questionnaire. In total, 81 patients with IEI (including 16 with hereditary angioedema, HAE) and confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were enrolled, and were found to have a 2.3-times increased (95%CI: 1.44-3.53) risk ratio for hospital admission and a higher mortality ratio (2.4% vs. 1.7% in the general population). COVID-19 severity was associated with the presence of clinically relevant comorbidities, lymphopenia, and hypogammaglobulinemia, but not with age or BMI. No individuals with HAE developed severe disease, despite a hypothesized increased risk due to perturbed bradykinin metabolism. We also demonstrated a high seroconversion rate in antibody-deficient patients and the safety of anti-spike SARS CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies and convalescent plasma. Thus, IEI except for HAE, represent significant risk factors for a severe COVID-19. Therefore, apart from general risk factors, immune system dysregulation may also be involved in the poor outcomes of COVID-19. Despite the study limitations, our results support the findings from previously published trials.

Accelerated Maturation, Exhaustion, and Senescence of T cells in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome.

PURPOSE: 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) is a primary immunodeficiency characterized chiefly by the hypoplasia of the thymus resulting in T cell lymphopenia, increased susceptibility to infections, and higher risk of autoimmune diseases. The irregular thymic niche of T cell development may contribute to autoimmune and atopic complications, whereas the compensatory mechanism of homeostatic T cell proliferation and continuous immune stimulation may result in T cell senescence and exhaustion, further aggravating the immune system dysregulation. METHODS: We used flow cytometry to investigate T cell maturation, delineation, proliferation, activation, and expression of senescence and exhaustion-associated markers (PD1, KLRG1, CD57) in 17 pediatric and adolescent patients with 22q11.2DS and age-matched healthy donors. RESULTS: 22q11.2DS patients aged 0-5 years had fewer naïve but more effector memory T cells with a tendency to approach normal values with increasing age. Young patients in particular had a higher percentage of proliferating T cells and increased expression of PD1, KLRG1, and CD57, as well as cells co-expressing several exhaustion-associated molecules (PD1, KLRG1, Tbet, Eomes, Helios). Additionally, high-risk 22q11.2DS patients with very low numbers of CD4 T cells had significantly higher percentage of Th1 and Th17 T cells, driven in part by higher proportion of mature T cell forms. CONCLUSION: The low thymic output and accelerated T cell differentiation remain the principal features of 22q11.2DS patient immunity, especially in young patients of < 5 years. Later in life, homeostatic proliferation drives expression of T cell exhaustion and senescence-associated markers, suggesting functional aberrations in addition to numeric T cell deficiency.

Granulomatous-lymphocytic interstitial lung disease: an international research prioritisation.

The first ever research prioritisation exercise in GLILD: this survey identified areas of interest in the diagnosis, treatment and management of GLILD, which can be used as a roadmap for future research https://bit.ly/3nVuzti.

An immunologist's perspective on anti-COVID-19 vaccines.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Antisevere acute respiratory syndrome-corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines may provide prompt, effective, and safe solution for the COVID-19 pandemic. Several vaccine candidates have been evaluated in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Furthermore, data from observational studies mimicking real-life practice and studies on specific groups, such as pregnant women or immunocompromised patients who were excluded from RCTs, are currently available. The main aim of the review is to summarize and provide an immunologist's view on mechanism of action, efficacy and safety, and future challenges in vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. RECENT FINDINGS: mRNA and recombinant viral vector-based vaccines have been approved for conditional use in Europe and the USA. They show robust humoral and cellular responses, high with efficacy in prevention of COVID-19 infection (66.9 95%) and favorable safety profile in RCTs. High efficacy of 80-92% was observed in real-life practice. A pilot study also confirmed good safety profile of the mRNA vaccines in pregnant women. Unlike in those with secondary immunodeficiencies where postvaccination responses did not occur, encouraging results were obtained in patients with inborn errors of immunity. SUMMARY: Although both RCTs and observational studies suggest good efficacy and safety profiles of the vaccines, their long-term efficacy and safety are still being discussed. Despite the promising results, clinical evidence for specific groups such as children, pregnant and breastfeeding women, and immunocompromised patients, and for novel virus variants are lacking. VIDEO ABSTRACT: http://links.lww.com/COAI/A21.

Natural Course of Activated Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase Delta Syndrome in Childhood and Adolescence.

Activated phosphoinositide 3-kinase delta syndrome (APDS), caused by mutations in PI3Kδ catalytic p110δ (PIK3CD) or regulatory p85α (PIK3R1) subunits, is a primary immunodeficiency affecting both humoral and cellular immunity, which shares some phenotypic similarities with hyper-IgM syndromes and common variable immunodeficiency (CVID). Since its first description in 2013, over 200 patients have been reported worldwide. Unsurprisingly, many of the newly diagnosed patients were recruited later in life from previously long-standing unclassified immunodeficiencies and the early course of the disease is, therefore, often less well-described. In this study, we report clinical and laboratory features of eight patients followed for APDS, with particular focus on early warning signs, longitudinal development of their symptoms, individual variations, and response to therapy. The main clinical features shared by our patients included recurrent bacterial and viral respiratory tract infections, gastrointestinal disease, non-malignant lymphoproliferation, autoimmune thyroiditis, and susceptibility to EBV. All patients tolerated vaccination with both attenuated live and subunit vaccines with no adverse effects, although some failed to mount adequate antibody response. Laboratory findings were characterized by dysgammaglobulinaemia, elevated serum IgM, block in B-cell maturation with high transitional B cells, and low naïve T cells with CD8 T-cell activation. All patients benefited from immunoglobulin replacement therapy, whereas immunosuppression with mTOR pathway inhibitors was only partially successful. Therapy with specific PI3K inhibitor leniolisib was beneficial in all patients in the clinical trial. These vignettes, summary data, and particular tell-tale signs should serve to facilitate early recognition, referral, and initiation of outcome-improving therapy.