RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Our institution updated blunt liver and spleen injury (BLSI) protocols in 2019 in adherence to updated American Pediatric Surgery Association (APSA) recommendations. This retrospective study compares resource utilization for pediatric BLSI patients treated under old and updated guidelines. METHODS: BLSI patients without severe non-abdomen injuries aged under 18 treated with prior (04/2015-06/2019) and updated (06/2019-12/2022) guidelines were retrospectively reviewed and compared. Each patient received an adjusted injury severity score (ISS) to control for non-BLSI injuries. Multivariate analysis examined protocol group differences while controlling for adjusted ISS and BLSI grades. Primary outcomes were ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS (analyzed using Cox regression), and patient costs (linear regression). Secondary outcomes include readmission in two weeks and death rates (logistic regression). RESULTS: 176 and 170 BLSI patients were treated with old and updated protocols, respectively. Patient demographics, average BLSI grade, and adjusted ISS were similar in both groups. Patients treated with old protocols indicate decreased hazard, showing significantly more days before ICU discharge (coefficient = -0.3868, p < .0009) and hospital discharge (coefficient = -0.5507, p < .0001). Patient costs (coefficient = 0.0921, p = 0.1874) trend towards being lower in the new protocol. Readmission rates were significantly higher in the new protocol (coefficient = -1.1731, p = 0.0465), and death rates (coefficient = 0.0519, p = 0.9710) were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: BLSI patients treated under new APSA guidelines compared to old guidelines had significant decreases in ICU and hospital LOS, a decreasing trend in costs, comparable death rates, but higher readmission rates. Future studies with larger sample sizes and detailed cost analysis would explore whether updated guidelines reduce patient costs and help elucidate the veracity or potential cause of the increased readmission rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Therapeutic/Care Management.
RESUMO
IMPORTANCE: Complicated appendicitis is a common condition in children that causes substantial morbidity. Significant variation in practice exists within and between centers. We observed highly variable practices within our hospital and hypothesized that a clinical practice guideline (CPG) would standardize care and be associated with improved patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a CPG for complicated appendicitis could be associated with improved clinical outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A comprehensive CPG was developed for all children with complicated appendicitis at Monroe Carell Jr Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, a freestanding children's hospital in Nashville, Tennessee, and was implemented in July 2013. All patients with complicated appendicitis who were treated with early appendectomy during the study period were included in the study. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts, based on whether they were treated before or after CPG implementation. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were recorded for 30 months prior to and 16 months following CPG implementation. EXPOSURE: Clinical practice guideline developed for all children with complicated appendicitis at Monroe Carell Jr Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the occurrence of any adverse event such as readmission or surgical site infection. In addition, resource use, practice variation, and CPG adherence were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 313 patients included in the study, 183 were boys (58.5%) and 234 were white (74.8%). Complete CPG adherence occurred in 78.7% of cases (n = 96). The pre-CPG group included 191 patients with a mean (SD) age of 8.8 (4.0) years, and the post-CPG group included 122 patients with a mean (SD) age of 8.7 (4.1) years. Compared with the pre-CPG group, patients in the post-CPG group were less likely to receive a peripherally inserted central catheter (2.5%, n = 3 vs 30.4%, n = 58; P < .001) or require a postoperative computed tomographic scan (13.1%, n = 16 vs 29.3%, n = 56; P = .001), and length of hospital stay was significantly reduced (4.6 days post-CPG vs 5.1 days pre-CPG, P < .05). Patients in the post-CPG group were less likely to have a surgical site infection (relative risk [RR], 0.41; 95% CI, 0.27-0.74) or require a second operation (RR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.12-1.00). In the pre-CPG group, 30.9% of patients (n = 59) experienced any adverse event, while 22.1% of post-CPG patients (n = 27) experienced any adverse event (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.48-1.06). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Significant practice variation exists among surgeons in the management of pediatric complicated appendicitis. In our institution, a CPG that standardized practice patterns was associated with reduced resource use and improved patient outcomes. Most surgeons had very high compliance with the CPG.
