Vasopressin Injection Purse-String Ectopic Resection technique for laparoscopic management of cornual ectopic pregnancy.

Although cornual pregnancy is a rare form of ectopic pregnancy, the associated mortality rate is considerably higher than that of ectopic pregnancy overall. Historically, cornual ectopic pregnancy has been treated via laparotomy. With advancements in technology, equipment, and technique, laparoscopy offers a safer approach for the management of cornual pregnancy. However, laparoscopy of this nature requires excellent technique. The Vasopressin Injection Purse-String Ectopic Resection technique serves as an effective strategy for the laparoscopic management of cornual ectopic pregnancy. First, dilute vasopressin is administered into the myometrium surrounding the pregnancy. Next, a purse-string stitch is placed in the myometrium circumferential to the pregnancy. Finally, the pregnancy is excised by cornual wedge resection, and the defect is repaired using the attached remaining suture from the purse-string stitch. The Figure shows the graphical depiction of the Vasopressin Injection Purse-String Ectopic Resection technique, and the Video shows a laparoscopic recording of the Vasopressin Injection Purse-String Ectopic Resection technique. Between 2012 and 2022, 17 patients underwent a laparoscopic cornual ectopic pregnancy resection at a high-volume academic hospital and its affiliated community hospital. This case series revealed a mean operative time of 107 minutes, with a mean estimated blood loss of 41 mL for nonruptured ectopic pregnancies and 412 mL for ruptured ectopic pregnancies. No case was converted to laparotomy. Our findings suggest that the integration of the vasopressin administration and the pursue-string stitch placement minimizes blood loss and mitigates the risk of conversion to laparotomy for both nonruptured and ruptured cornual ectopic pregnancies.

Assessing Physician Adherence to Guidelines for Cervical Cancer Screening and Management of Abnormal Screening Results.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to survey obstetrician-gynecologists' cervical cancer screening practices and management of cervical abnormalities to ascertain adherence to guidelines. METHODS: From January to July 2019, obstetrician-gynecologists at 5 St. Louis area hospitals were surveyed online about cervical cancer screening and management practices through 13 clinical vignettes. Survey scores and the American Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP) app use were compared using Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: When screening 30- to 65-year-old participants, 114 (98%) of the 116 total participants used co-testing, but only 71 (61%) screened at 5-year intervals. None used primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing. For 21- to 29-year-old participants, 17 (15%) screened with annual cytology, whereas 14 (12%) used annual or every 3-year co-testing. Forty eight (41%) screened younger than 21 years, regardless of risk factors or only if immunocompromised. Eleven (9%) continued screening after total hysterectomy for benign indications. Only 2 (2%) responded to all clinical vignettes in adherence to guidelines. More than 30% of participants would pursue unnecessary HPV testing and/or loop electrosurgical excision procedure for persistent low-grade cytology. Fifty eight (48%) incorrectly reported hysterectomy as management for adenocarcinoma in situ on biopsy. Participants would undertreat young women with high-grade abnormalities including high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion/cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 (48, 41%) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion/cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1 (65, 56%). Forty one (35%) reported exiting women from screening prematurely. The median score for participants using the ASCCP app was significantly greater than those who did not (79% vs 71%, p = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Midwestern obstetrician-gynecologists' adherence to the guidelines for cervical cancer screening and management of abnormal results is suboptimal. Although co-testing for women aged 30-65 years has been broadly adopted, primary HPV testing has not. Physicians overscreen, overtreat low-grade lesions, and undertreat high-grade lesions in young women.

Investigating racial differences in risk factors for primary cesarean delivery.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to investigate differences in sociodemographic, medical, and obstetric risk factors for primary cesarean delivery between black and white women. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among 25,251 black and white women delivering a live, singleton infant with vertex presentation at a large, regional hospital between 2004 and 2010. Demographic and clinical data were derived from electronic hospital records. Differences in risk factors for primary cesarean delivery were analyzed using a modified Poisson regression approach stratified by race and parity. RESULTS: Black and white women had a primary cesarean delivery rate of 24.7% and 22.2%, respectively (P < .001). Black women had an increased risk of cesarean delivery after adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical risk factors (adjusted relative risk [RR], 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.29). Among nulliparas, labor induction had a greater effect on cesarean delivery for black women (adjusted RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.20-1.44) than for white women (adjusted RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.07-1.20). Among multiparas, labor induction reduced the risk of cesarean delivery for white women (adjusted RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.55-0.72), whereas no association was observed for black women (adjusted RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.92-1.28). Advanced maternal age was a stronger risk factor for black women (adjusted RR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.43-2.08) than for white women (adjusted RR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.11-1.52) among multiparas only. Among nulliparas, delivery at 37-38 weeks' gestation reduced the risk of cesarean delivery for black women (adjusted RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.73-0.92), whereas no association was observed for white women (adjusted RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.90-1.04). CONCLUSION: Labor induction, among nulliparous women, and advanced maternal age, among multiparous women, are stronger risk factors for primary cesarean delivery for black women than for white women.