A fast, easy and reliable method for hamstrings graft size prediction in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to describe and validate a simple and reliable method to pre-operatively predict the size of the ACL graft in the double strand technique with autologous semitendinosus-gracilis tendons on the same MRI used for ACL rupture diagnosis. METHODS: The study included 92 patients, with a median age of 31 years (IQR 26-41 years), 73/92 (79%) of whom were males. All patients that underwent an ACL reconstruction with doubled ST + GT between 2017 and 2022 were counted in the study. RESULTS: Overall, the median predicted graft diameter from MR imaging was similar to the actual graft diameter with no significant differences (n.s.). Regarding the comparison between predicted and actual graft size, concordance was 78/92 (85%, 95% CI 76-91%), with κ = 0.797 which corresponds to a level of agreement defined as "Strong". Tendon sizes calculated on pre-operative MRI were evaluated both with intra-observer and inter-observer reliability demonstrating a statistically reproducible method. The predicted graft was then compared to the reported one with a statistically significant reliability found. CONCLUSION: This study can help the surgeons to perform a fast pre-operative planning of an ACL reconstruction for graft selection. If the planned graft with ST and GT is smaller than 8 mm, the clinician can decide to switch to a different type of graft or plan a different graft preparing technique and, therefore, reduce the risk of post-operative ligament re-rupture. The method proposed is reliable and reproducible. The major strength of the planning technique proposed is that it relies on data that are already available for the clinician before surgery, without the need of further analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Effectiveness of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) as adjuvant therapy in the surgical treatment of congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia: a retrospective comparative study.

Congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia (CPT) is a rare disease characterised by the onset of bone anomalies or fractures, leading to deformities in paediatric patients. The aetiology of this pathology is unknown. The main theories include the presence of hamartomatous tissue related to Neurofibromatosis type 1, vascularisation deficit of the periosteum and alterations in the numbers and functions of the osteoblasts and osteoclasts in loco. Surgical treatment generally requires multiple operations during the patient's childhood and adolescence. The best outcomes seem to occur when using intramedullary nailing, vascularised fibular transplant and external fixation with the Ilizarov technique. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the effectiveness of in-situ injections of Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) as an adjuvant therapy for congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia in patients treated with external fixation and that of radiographic healing over time compared to external fixation treatment alone. We performed a retrospective review of clinical and radiographic records of patients affected by CPT and treated in the Paediatric Orthopaedics and Traumatology Department of the Gaetano Pini Orthopaedic Institute with in-situ injections of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) on the pseudoarthrosis site, in addition to pseudoarthrosis site excision and application of circular external fixator frame in compression (Group A). The time needed to reach the radiological consolidation of the resection site was recorded and compared to that needed for patients treated with only pseudoarthrosis site excision and application of circular external fixator frame in compression (Group B). There is a statistically relevant improvement of healing time in patients affected by congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia treated with external fixation and bone marrow aspirate concentrate compared to patients affected by the same pathology treated with external fixation only. Injection of MSC in the pseudoarthrosis site after focus removal in combination with circular external fixation achieves faster bone healing compared with external fixation only, and the lower refracture percentage may be associated with the better quality and structure of the new bone. However, it would be desirable to have a longer followup to determine if the results of the BMC as adjuvant therapy will hold up over time.