RESUMO
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder defined by deficits in social communication and stereotypical behaviours. ASD's aetiology remains mostly unclear, because of a complex interaction between genetic and environmental factors. Recently, a strong consensus has developed around ASD's immune-mediated pathophysiology, which is the subject of this review. For many years, neuroimmunological studies tried to understand ASD as a prototypical antibody- or cell-mediated disease. Other findings indicated the importance of autoimmune mechanisms such as familial and individual autoimmunity, adaptive immune abnormalities and the influence of infections during gestation. However, recent studies have challenged the idea that autism may be a classical autoimmune disease. Modern neurodevelopmental immunology shows the double-edged nature of many immune effectors, which can be either beneficial or detrimental depending on tissue homeostasis, stressors, neurodevelopmental stage, inherited and de novo gene mutations and other variables. Nowadays, mother-child interactions in the prenatal environment appear to be crucial for the occurrence of ASD. Studies of animal maternal-foetal immune interaction are being fruitfully carried out using different combinations of type and timing of infection, of maternal immune response and foetal vulnerability and of resilience factors to hostile events. The derailed neuroimmune crosstalk through the placenta initiates and maintains a chronic foetal neuroglial activation, eventually causing the alteration of neurogenesis, migration, synapse formation and pruning. The importance of pregnancy can also allow early immune interventions, which can significantly reduce the increasing risk of ASD and its heavy social burden.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of oral alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) ± palmitoyl-ethanolamide (PEA) on neuropathic symptoms in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and to identify factors related to the efficacy of the treatment. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational pilot study evaluating 49 patients with diabetes and positive Neuropathy Symptoms Score (NSS). Clinical and biochemical variables, including NSS, were compared between untreated patients and patients treated with oral 600 mg/day ALA ± 600 mg/day PEA at baseline (first occurrence of NSS ≥ 3) and at least 2 months after baseline. Number of days between treatment initiation and symptoms' relief and related factors were also investigated. RESULTS: Thirty subjects were treated with ALA ± PEA and 19 subjects did not receive any specific treatment for neuropathy symptoms. Follow-up visits occurred after 98 ± 46 days. NSS significantly decreased in patients treated with ALA ± PEA (5.4 ± 1.3 at baseline vs. 1.7 ± 2.4 at follow-up, p < 0.001), but not in untreated patients (p = 0.164). Subjects treated with ALA ± PEA reported a mean time from treatment initiation to symptoms' relief of 18.4 ± 9.0 days. The number of days of treatment needed for symptoms' relief was inversely related to HDL-cholesterol levels (r = -0.503, p = 0.010) and to eGFR (r = -0.428, p = 0.033), whereas there was no significant relationship between time to symptoms' relief and age, HbA1c, lipid profile and the severity of symptoms at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: This study documents that oral administration of ALA ± PEA helps in controlling neuropathy symptoms in diabetes. Moreover, our data show that higher HDL-c levels and better renal function are associated to a faster therapeutic effect, suggesting them as biomarkers of response to therapy with ALA ± PEA.
