Effect of sublingual immunotherapy on clinical and laboratory autoimmunity.

Background: There still are few data on the long-term safety of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). The aim of this study was to assess the appearance of autoimmune diseases in patients before and after SLIT. Materials & methods: New cases of autoimmune diseases were monitored. Patients in the SLIT group (n = 816) were compared with controls (n = 1096). Results: The new incidences of autoimmune diseases in the SLIT group were lower compared with the control group: 18 (2.2%) versus 58 (5.3%); p < 0.05. Systemic lupus erythematosus, psoriasis and Hashimoto appeared much more often in the control group. Conclusion: SLIT had no significant effect on the induction of autoimmune diseases.

The therapy for allergic people is named allergen-specific immunotherapy, and one of the ways of administering this therapy is sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), which means that the medication is kept in the mouth under the tongue. The authors assessed the safety of SLIT in terms of the risk of inducing autoimmune diseases, which means that the immune system is overactive, causing it to attack and damage the body's own tissues. Analysis of medical history for autoimmune diseases, clinical examinations and laboratory diagnostic tests were performed. SLIT did not significantly increase the incidences of autoimmune disease in the study group. SLIT is a safe therapy in long-term observation.

Progressive clinical effects of the combination omalizumab and HDM - allergen immunotherapy in asthma.

OBJECTIVE: The combination of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) and omalizumab is used to treat patients at risk of anaphylaxis. There is currently a very little evidence that this combination increases the effectiveness of AIT in patients with inhalant allergies. The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of HDM-SCIT therapy (injection immunotherapy for house dust mites) in combination with omalizumab in treating HDM-induced asthma. METHODS: This study was a placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter trial including 82 patients with HDM-driven mild to moderate asthma. Omalizumab alone (A), HDM SCIT + omalizumab (B), SCIT alone (C), or placebo (D) for 24 months were applied. All patients received asthma treatment in accordance with GINA recommendations. The treatment efficacy was defined by a reduction in the daily dose of inhaled steroids (ICS) and a reduction in the number of asthma exacerbations (AX). RESULTS: After 24 months of therapy, a statistically significant reduction in the daily doses of ICS in groups A and B was observed (p = 0.021 and p = 0.008). Daily ICS reduction was considerably more significant in group B (p = 0.01). During 24 months of observation, the AX was significantly reduced in all study groups, with the greatest significant difference observed between groups A and B and groups C and D (placebo) as follows: 0.42 patient/per year vs. 0.39 vs. 0.84 vs. 0.91 (p = 0.023). CONCLUSION: The combination of HDM SCIT and omalizumab is significantly and progressively reducing ICS use and AX in a 24-month study. The combination is significantly more effective than the single treatments or placebo.

Long-term benefit after allergen immunotherapy to HDM in elderly patients with allergic rhinitis.

Introduction: Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is an effective therapy for allergic rhinitis and may have long-term benefits. However, these benefits have not been strictly defined for older people. Aim: The evaluation of the effectiveness of AIT in patients over 60 with allergic rhinitis and house dust mites (HDM) allergy over a period of 7 years was performed. Material and methods: Patients after three years of HDM-AIT were observed to assess the sustained clinical effect of treatment. The average adjusted symptom score (AAdSS) and sIgG4 were monitored for 7 years after sublingual (SLIT) and injection AIT (SCIT). Results: After 3 years of HDM-AIT, a significant clinical effect was observed in the group after SLIT and SCIT based on AAdSS compared to the baseline and the placebo group (p < 0.05). After 7 years of follow-up, there was a sustained trend of decrease in clinical symptoms in desensitized patients relative to placebo. Serum sIgG4 was constantly present in all desensitized patients. Conclusions: AIT may be beneficial for treating seniors with allergic rhinitis and allergies to house dust mites.

The aspects of local allergic rhinitis in Polish children and adolescents.

Introduction: Local allergic rhinitis (LAR) is one of the endotypes of rhinitis which occurs commonly in different age groups. Aim: To present the occurrence and characteristics of LAR in Polish children and adolescents. Material and methods: In the study protocol, three hundred sixty-one patients aged 5-17 with chronic rhinitis were included from 8 centres in Poland. Medical history and diagnostic procedures were performed with aeroallergens: skin prick tests, allergen-specific serum IgE and nasal provocation tests. In addition to LAR, allergic rhinitis (AR), dual allergic rhinitis (DUAL) and non-allergic rhinitis (NAR) were explored and compared. Results: LAR was confirmed in 21% of patients, systemic allergic rhinitis (SAR) in 43.9%, DUAL in 9.4% and NAR in 33.9% of patients. Based on nasal provocation test (NPT), allergy to HDM prevailed in the LAR group (68%), grass in the SAR group (58%), and grass and HDM in the DUAL group (32% and 64%). Girls were prevalent in the LAR group, and severe rhinitis and asthma were more common than other endotypes (p < 0.05). Conclusions: LAR is a common disease in children and adolescents and is often associated with severe rhinitis and frequently coexists with asthma.

Endothelial Function Assessment by Flow-Mediated Dilation Method: A Valuable Tool in the Evaluation of the Cardiovascular System.

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in the course of atherosclerosis are one of the most critical public health problems in the world. Endothelial cells synthesize numerous biologically active substances involved in regulating the functions of the cardiovascular system. Endothelial dysfunction is an essential element in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Thus, the assessment of endothelial function in people without overt CVD allows for a more accurate estimate of the risk of developing CVD and cardiovascular events. The assessment of endothelial function is primarily used in scientific research, and to a lesser extent in clinical practice. Among the tools for assessing endothelial function, we can distinguish biochemical and physical methods, while physical methods can be divided into invasive and non-invasive methods. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) is based on the ultrasound assessment of changes in the diameter of the brachial artery as a result of increased blood flow. FMD is a non-invasive, safe, and repeatable test, but it must be performed by qualified and experienced medical staff. The purpose of this paper is to present the literature review results on the assessment of endothelial function using the FMD method, including its methodology, applications in clinical practice and research, limitations, and future perspectives.

Allergy to Der p 23 influences the cytokine profile in patients with allergic asthma - a preliminary study.

OBJECTIVE: Der p 23 is a major allergen of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, which could contribute to allergic asthma. The study compared the cytokine profile (Il-1beta, Il-4, Il-5, Il-6, Il-13, Il-17, TNF-alpha) in patients with allergic asthma, with confirmed allergy to D. pteronyssinus and with the presence or absence of allergy to Der p 23. METHODS: Among 173 included patients, the following combinations were analyzed: profile A - Der p 1 (+), Der p 2 (+), and Der p 23 (-) observed in 38 (22%) patients; profile B - Der p 1 (+), Der p 2 (+), and Der p 23 (+) in 87 (50.3%) patients; and profile C - Der p 1 (-), Der p 2 (-), and Der p 23 (+) in 15 (8.7%) patients. RESULTS: The mean concentration of Il-1beta was significantly lower in profile A than in profiles B and C: 10.51 ± 5.22 (pg/ml) vs. 21.92 ± 11.34 vs. 23.1 ± 8.56 (A vs. B for p = 0.03 and A vs. C for p = 0.019). Similar trends were observed for Il-5: 38.5 ± 10.45 (pg/ml) vs. 94.8 ± 54.11 vs. 103.61 ± 34.9 (A vs. B for p = 0.008 and A vs. C for p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The higher Il-1 and Il-5 activities observed in profiles B and C with Der p 23 (+) could be responsible for the more effective acceleration of allergic inflammation than in profile A with Der p 23.

Influence of SARS-CoV-2 Virus Infection on the Course of Psoriasis during Treatment with Biological Drugs.

Background and objectives: Biological treatment is an important and effective therapy for psoriasis. During the COVID-19 pandemic, it remains unclear whether this type of therapy affects the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The aim of the study was to observe patients with psoriasis undergoing biological or other systemic treatment in relation to the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the course of psoriasis and the COVID-19 disease itself. Materials and methods: A one-year observational study included 57 patients with diagnosed psoriasis who qualified for biological treatment and a group of 68 similar patients who were administered a different systemic treatment. Patients were analyzed monthly for psoriasis (including Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) assessment) and constantly for SARS-CoV-2 infection (telephone contact). Cases of COVID-19 were confirmed by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) at the study center. Results: SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed by a positive Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) test in eight patients (14.0%) with psoriasis on biological therapy. None of the cases in this group required hospitalization for COVID-19. Similar data were obtained in the control group. Specifically, 11 (16%) patients were confirmed to be infected with SARS-CoV-2. These results were statistically comparable (p > 0.05). In the group of patients undergoing biological treatment, six (75%) of eight patients developed an exacerbation of psoriasis during SARS-CoV-2 infection, and similar results were noted in the control group, with eight (72%) patients experiencing an exacerbation of psoriasis. Conclusions: Patients with psoriasis who were administered biological treatment or other systemic therapy may experience a mild course of SARS-CoV-2 infection but might also experience a temporary exacerbation of skin lesions.

The Effect of SARS-CoV-2 Virus Infection on the Course of Atopic Dermatitis in Patients.

Background and Objectives: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a disease with a complex pathophysiology involving immune-mediated reactions that lead to skin lesions that are typically localized and recurrent. Following the outbreak of the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic, attempting to assess the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on diseases caused by complex immune mechanisms has become important. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the course of AD, including immunosuppressive therapy, in patients with a severe form of the disease. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 21 adults aged 18 to 52 years with AD diagnosed with COVID-19, including patients requiring hospitalization, was performed. Results: During SARS-CoV-2 infection, temporary exacerbation of skin lesions and/or skin pruritus was observed in nine (43%) patients but without the need for systemic treatment intervention. Patients with severe AD who received immunosuppressive therapy most often manifested mild exacerbation of skin symptoms. The skin condition improved in three patients. There was no significant effect of disease severity on the risk of severe COVID-19 (HR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.32-0.65). Conclusions: The course of atopic dermatitis during SARS-CoV-2 infection may be different from the severity of its symptoms due to the lack of a significant influence. The immunosuppressive treatment used in patients with severe AD did not significantly affect the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection.