Cardiac magnetic resonance assessment of left ventricular dilatation in chronic severe left-sided regurgitations: comparison with standard echocardiography.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential additional value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in the assessment of left ventricular (LV) dilatation and dysfunction by comparison to standard echocardiography in patients with chronic left-sided valvular regurgitation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients with chronic severe mitral regurgitation (MR) or aortic regurgitation (AR). They underwent standard echocardiography and CMR using aortic flow and LV-function sequences. LV dilatation or dysfunction was assessed with each technique, based on thresholds used for surgery indication. Reference regurgitation severity was defined following previously reported CMR-based regurgitant volume thresholds. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients with chronic severe MR (n=44) or severe AR (n=27) were prospectively included. There were 60 men and 11 women with a mean age of 61±14 (SD) years (range: 18-83 years). CMR-based regurgitation severity was significantly greater in the LV dysfunction group when assessed with CMR (MR, P=0.011; AR, P=0.006) whereas it was not different when LV dysfunction was assessed using standard echocardiography. Among standard echocardiography and CMR volumetric indices, CMR-derived end-diastolic volume showed the best ability to predict regurgitation severity (area under the curve [AUC]=0.78 for MR; AUC=0.91 for AR). Diagnostic thresholds identified on receiver operating characteristics-curve analysis were lower than those of current European recommendations and closer to North-American guidelines. CONCLUSION: CMR assessment of LV end-diastolic volume in chronic severe left-sided regurgitations is more reliably associated with CMR-based regurgitant volume by comparison with standard echocardiography diameter. CMR may provide useful evaluation before surgery decision for severe asymptomatic regurgitations.

Activity of GH/IGF-I axis in trauma and septic patients during artificial nutrition: different behavior patterns?

The aim of this study was to compare several parameters of GH/IGF-I axis activity in septic and trauma patients during Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay. To this goal, 13 patients with sepsis (SEP) and 16 with trauma (TRA) were studied. Thirty-three adult subjects (AS) were studied as controls. Serum IGF-I and -II, IGFBP-1, -2 and -3, GH and GHBP levels were studied on day 1, 3, 5 and 7 after ICU admission, during comparable artificial nutrition in SEP and TRA and basally in AS. In 5 patients with SEP and 6 with TRA, the GH response to GHRH was evaluated on day 3. On ICU day 1, IGF-I and -II and IGFBP-3 in SEP were lower (p<0.05) than in TRA which, in turn, were lower (p<0.01) than in AS. IGF-I increased (p<0.05) both in SEP and TRA, but, on ICU day 7, those in SEP persisted lower than in TRA, which became similar to those in AS. IGF-II levels increased (p<0.05) in SEP only, persisting lower (p<0.05) than in TRA. On ICU day 1, GH in SEP and TRA were similar and did not vary until day 7, overlapping those in AS. The GH response to GHRH in SEP and TRA was similar and lower (p<0.01) than in AS. These findings indicate that IGF-I activity is impaired more in septic than in trauma patients. Reduced IGF-I activity probably reflects peripheral GH resistance though basal and GHRH-induced GH levels were not increased in these conditions.

Low IGF-I levels are often uncoupled with elevated GH levels in catabolic conditions.

Increased GH together with decreased IGF-I levels pointing to peripheral GH insensitivity in critically ill patients have been reported by some but not by other authors. To clarify whether elevated GH levels are coupled with low IGF-I levels in all catabolic conditions, basal GH and IGF-I levels were evaluated in patients with sepsis (SEP, no.=13; age [mean+/-SE]=59.2+/-1.2 yr), trauma (TRA, no.=16; age=42.3+/-3.4 yr), major burn (BUR, no.=26; age=52.8+/-4.2 yr) and post-surgical patients (SUR, no.=11; age=55.0+/-4.7 yr) 72 hours after ICU admission or after cardiac surgery. GH and IGF-I levels were also evaluated in normal subjects (NS, no.=75; age=44.0+/-1.5 yr), in adult hypopituitaric patients with severe GH deficiency (GHD, no.=54; age=44.8+/-2.3 yr), in patients with liver cirrhosis (LC, no.=12; age=50.4+/-2.8 yr) and in patients with anorexia nervosa (AN, no.=19; age=18.7+/-0.8 yr). Basal IGF-I and GH levels in GHD were lower than in NS (68.6+/-6.4 vs 200.9+/-8.7 microg/l and 0.3+/-0.1 vs 1.4+/-0.2 microg/l; p<0.01). On the other hand, AN and LC showed IGF-I levels (70.4+/-9.1 and 52.4+/-10.5 microg/l) similar to those in GHD while GH levels (10.0+/-2.8 and 7.9+/-2.1 microg/l) were higher than those in NS (p<0.01). IGF-I levels in SEP (84.5+/-8.8 microg/l) were similar to those in GHD, AN and LC and lower than those in NS (p<0.01). IGF-I levels in BUR (105.2+/-10.9 microg/l) were lower than in NS (p<0.01) but higher than those in GHD, AN, LC and SEP (p<0.01). On the other hand, in TRA (162.8+/-17.4 microg/l) and SUR (135.0+/-20.7 microg/l) IGF-I levels were lower but not significantly different from those in NS and clearly higher than those in GHD, AN, LC, SEP and BUR. Basal GH levels in SEP (0.6+/-0.2 microg/l), TRA (1.8+/-0.5 microg/l), SUR (2.2+/-0.5 microg/l) and BUR (2.2+/-0.5 microg/l) were similar to those in NS, higher (p<0.05) than those in GHD and lower (p<0.01) than those in AN and LC. In conclusion, our data demonstrate that low IGF-I levels are not always coupled with elevated GH levels in all catabolic conditions. Differently from cirrhotic and anorectic patients, in burned and septic patients GH levels are not elevated in spite of very low IGF-I levels similar to those in panhypopituitaric GHD patients. These findings suggest that in some catabolic conditions peripheral GH insensitivity and somatotrope insufficiency could be concomitantly present.

Double blind randomized study using oral or injectable bromocriptine in patients with hyperprolactinaemia.

OBJECTIVE: A new long-acting injectable form of bromocriptine has become available for long-term treatment of hyperprolactinaemic patients. The objective of this study was to compare efficacy and tolerability of injectable and oral forms of bromocriptine. DESIGN: A double-blind randomized study. All patients received either one injection of bromocriptine 50 mg intramuscularly and placebo tablets for 28 days (Group A) or one placebo injection and oral bromocriptine 7.5 mg daily for 28 days (Group B). PATIENTS: Twenty-three (12 patients for Group A and 11 patients for Group B) hyperprolactinaemia patients with (19 patients) or without (4 patients) CT/MRI evidence of tumour were studied. MEASUREMENTS: Plasma PRL levels and serum bromocriptine levels were assessed during a follow-up of 42 days. MRI and/or CT were evaluated before and 28 days after the beginning of the study. RESULTS: All patients had significant reductions of PRL levels from 1000 h and 1100 h of day 1 to 2000 h of day 35. Normoprolactinaemia was shown in eight patients of Group A and six of Group B on days 1-28. Normal PRL levels were still present in five patients of Group A and in one patient of Group B on day 35; only three patients of Group A had normoprolactinaemia on day 42. A significantly greater decrease in Group A in comparison with Group B was shown at 1200 h on day 1 and at all times as a percentage decrease from basal levels. Significantly higher levels of bromocriptine were shown in Group A at all timepoints studied. No difference was shown in tolerability and incidence of side-effects. CONCLUSION: Our data show that injectable bromocriptine more frequently induced a prolonged normoprolactinaemia than did the oral drug. Moreover, bromocriptine levels released during injectable bromocriptine were significantly higher than during oral bromocriptine. On the other hand no difference was shown in the tolerability of bromocriptine according to the route of administration.

Long term therapy of patients with macroprolactinoma using repeatable injectable bromocriptine.

The efficacy and tolerability of a long term treatment (21-53 months; mean, 36) with a new injectable form of bromocriptine (Parlodel LAR, Sandoz) was assessed in 13 patients (9 males and 4 females, aged 14-68 yr) with macroprolactinoma. Parlodel LAR was administered deeply im once monthly, with 50 mg as the first dose. Depending on the patient's tolerability to the drug and the PRL levels, the dose was individually progressively increased to 100 mg (2 patients), 150 mg (3 patients), or 250 mg (4 patients). Persistently normal PRL levels were recorded in 4 patients even after the first injection and in 5 other patients treated with higher doses of Parlodel LAR (2 patients with 100 mg/month; 3 patients with 150 mg/month). The remaining 4 patients who were treated with 250 mg/month had a marked reduction of PRL levels (72-94%), but did not reach normalization. Two patients treated with 150 mg/month maintained normoprolactinemia in spite of subsequent dose reduction of Parlodel LAR to 50-100 mg/month. In 1 patient PRL plasma concentrations remained within normal range for 3 months after the transitory discontinuation of Parlodel LAR at the end of the first year of therapy. Regular menses were resumed in 1 of 3, and galactorrhea disappeared in 2 of 3 women. All male patients had a return of libido and potency; gynecomastia disappeared in both male patients, and galactorrhea disappeared in 1 of 2 male patients. Visual fields improved in all 5 patients; complete normalization occurred in 2 of them. A consistent shrinkage of the macroadenoma (23-100%) at different times after therapy was shown by magnetic resonance imaging and/or computed tomography in 12 of 13 patients. Six patients reported mild/moderate side-effects (nausea, vomiting, orthostatic hypotension, or dizziness) within 24 h after the first injection. In 2 of these patients, mild side-effects persisted for 1-2 days after the first 3-6 injections, and in one patient, mild nausea was reported after each injection. In conclusion, in patients with macroprolactinoma, Parlodel LAR is an effective and well tolerated preparation of bromocriptine when administered once a month.

Inhibition by salbutamol of GHRH-induced GH release in type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (IDDM) show augmented GH secretion, which is implicated in the pathogenesis of microvascular complications. On the other hand, it is well known that beta-adrenergic receptors have inhibitory influence on GH secretion, likely via stimulation of hypothalamic somatostatin. Since the possibility of pharmacological suppression of GH secretion would be of value in IDDM, we investigated the effect of salbutamol (SAL, 4 mg orally at -60 min) on the GH response to GHRH (1 micrograms/kg iv at 0 min) in 6 well-controlled (mean HbA1c +/- SEM: 7.3 +/- 0.5%) patients with IDDM. Salbutamol was able to inhibit basal GH levels (p < 0.05) as well as to abolish the GHRH-induced GH rise. After SAL administration, a significant (p < 0.05) reduction of glucagon levels was also found. Our data show that the enhancement of beta 2 adrenergic activity by oral therapeutical doses of SAL inhibits basal and GHRH-stimulated GH secretion in patients with IDDM.

Arginine abolishes the inhibitory effect of glucose on the growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing hormone in man.

Acute hyperglycemia inhibits the growth hormone (GH) response to several stimuli including growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH), likely acting by stimulation of endogenous somatostatin release. The aim of our study was to verify whether arginine ([Arg] 30 g intravenously [IV] in 30 minutes), a well-known GH secretagogue likely acting via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release, counteracts the inhibitory effect of oral glucose (OG) administration (100 mg orally) on the GH response to GHRH (1 micrograms/kg IV bolus) in seven normal subjects (aged 20 to 30 years). The GH response to GHRH (peak, 11.6 +/- 1.8 micrograms/L) was inhibited by previous OG load (peak, 7.4 +/- 0.8 micrograms/L; P less than .02 v GHRH alone) and potentiated by Arg coadministration (peak, 36.2 +/- 8.8 micrograms/L; P less than .03 v GHRH alone). The potentiating effect of Arg on the GHRH-induced GH increase was unaffected by previous OG load (peak, 30.4 +/- 6.9 micrograms/L). In conclusion, our results show that Arg abolishes the inhibitory effect of OG administration on the GHRH-induced GH response in man. These data, although indirect, suggest that both acute hyperglycemia and Arg act at the hypothalamic level, stimulating and inhibiting, respectively, the release of somatostatin.

Long-term follow-up of 'cured' prolactinoma patients after successful adenomectomy.

The long-term follow-up (greater than or equal to 4 years) of clinical, hormonal and radiological aspects in 22 'cured' prolactinoma patients after adenomectomy was studied. Dynamic secretion of PRL and TSH was also evaluated, in order to identify the persistence of any underlying abnormality of hypothalamic pituitary control and to predict relapses. A relapse into hyperprolactinaemia was shown in 36% of patients 5-90 months (mean 46) after surgery. This was accompanied by reappearance of clinical symptoms but not by the radiological demonstration of the adenoma in any patients. A significant PRL rise after domperidone, a dopaminergic antagonist drug, was shown in cured patients after surgery (mean +/- SEM peak, 2977 +/- 645 mU/l) but this was markedly lower than that observed in control subjects (5732 +/- 440 mU/l). In fact, normal PRL increments were shown in only 6/16 (37%) patients. TSH hyper-responsiveness to domperidone normalized in only 46% of patients. Similar PRL responses to those obtained with domperidone were shown when a TRH test was given. A relapse into hyperprolactinaemia was observed in six of ten (60%) non-responders to domperidone and in four of seven (57%) non-responders to TRH, whereas six normal responders to domperidone and TRH had not relapsed at that time. Plasma PRL levels during pregnancy showed increments lower than those observed in normal pregnant women only in domperidone and TRH non-responder patients. These results indicate that a relapse into hyperprolactinaemia and a blunted PRL rise during pregnancy were present only in patients with persistently reduced PRL response to dynamic tests.

Long-term treatment with a new repeatable injectable form of bromocriptine, Parlodel LAR, in patients with tumorous hyperprolactinemia.

A new long-acting repeatable injectable form of bromocriptine, (Parlodel LAR, Sandoz, Basle, Switzerland) has recently been developed. We studied the clinical, hormonal and radiological changes in six female patients with microprolactinomas and eight (3 female and 5 male) with macroprolactinomas receiving monthly injections of Parlodel LAR 50 to 100 mg for 6 months. Five patients with microadenomas and 4 with macroadenomas had normal prolactin (PRL) levels with Parlodel LAR 50 mg after one (5 patients), two (2 patients), or five (2 patients) injections; two patients with macroadenomas had normal or near normal PRL levels only after 4 monthly injections of 100 mg. Clinical improvement paralleled the changes in serum PRL. A complete normalization of a visual field defect occurred in one patient after 5 months of therapy. Marked shrinkage of the adenoma was shown by magnetic resonance and/or computed tomographical imaging in three patients with macroadenomas after 1 week. Side-effects were mild and usually transient. Parlodel LAR represents a novel treatment of hyperprolactinemic states which is both effective and well tolerated, and appears to be a useful alternative to oral therapy for long-term treatment.

Effectiveness and tolerability of long term treatment with cabergoline, a new long-lasting ergoline derivative, in hyperprolactinemic patients.

Cabergoline (CAB) is a new oral dopaminergic compound showing a very long-lasting PRL-lowering activity and reported to be well tolerated. The efficacy and tolerability of chronic treatment with CAB in 30 female hyperprolactinemic patients, aged 18-52 yr (6 microadenomas, 3 macroadenomas, and 21 functional hyperprolactinemias), were studied. In a group of 10 patients who received CAB (0.8 mg once weekly or 0.4 mg twice weekly) for 8 weeks PRL levels normalized while on treatment and remained normal (8 patients) or greatly reduced (1 patient) for 1-2 months after discontinuation of the drug. Twenty-six patients underwent chronic treatment (6-12 months) with an initial dose of 0.5 mg once weekly, subsequently increased to 1-2 mg in 10 patients and decreased in the other 2. Due to severe side-effects CAB was discontinued in 3 patients, in 1, 8, and 12 weeks. A significant reduction of PRL levels was already observed after the first week of treatment (mean +/- SEM basal values, 90.1 +/- 13.3 vs. 29.5 +/- 6.3 micrograms/L; P less than 0.001). Twenty-two patients had normal PRL levels in 1-36 weeks (mean, 6 weeks) with 0.5-2 mg CAB. Twenty-two patients resumed regular menses; 2 patients became pregnant after 3-11 months of treatment. Thirteen patients complained of side-effects (nausea, hypotension, headache, gastric pain, dizziness, and weakness) that disappeared with time in 10 of them. The comparison with a previous bromocriptine treatment regimen in 20 patients had shown that the number of patients requiring discontinuation of the latter drug was significantly higher (7 vs. 3 patients; P less than 0.001). However, 2 patients who needed to discontinue CAB were able to tolerate bromocriptine therapy. A computed tomographic scan performed after 12 months of therapy in 7 patients showed a significant reduction (50%) of the adenoma in 5. In conclusion, our results show that CAB is a well tolerated new dopamine agonist with long-lasting activity that represents an advance in chronic medical treatment of hyperprolactinemic conditions.

Natural killer activity in hyperprolactinemic patients.

Several pieces of evidence suggest the existence of a relationship between neuroendocrine and immune systems. Prolactin (PRL) has been demonstrated to modulate some immune responses and its influence seems to be permissive or inhibitory depending on its concentration. Previous studies have reported a reduced natural killer (NK) cell function in patients with hyperprolactinemia. In 36 patients (34 females and 2 males, aged 14-46 years) with hyperprolactinemia (mean +/- SEM PRL 142.2 +/- 42.1 micrograms/l) of tumorous (19 patients) and functional (17 patients) origins, NK activity of peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) was studied. Patients had NK cell activity against the K562 cell line which did not differ from that of lymphocytes from 36 age- and sex-matched healthy donors (mean +/- SEM lytic units (LU) 619.0 +/- 103.0 and 531.9 +/- 52.6 respectively). No correlation between PRL levels and LU values was found (r = 0.28). When patients with tumors or functional hyperprolactinemia were separately analysed no difference was found between these two groups (mean +/- SEM LU 690.0 +/- 117.7 vs. 606.0 +/- 148.8). In conclusion, our data demonstrate that neither the elevated PRL levels nor the PRL-secreting tumor per se interfere with the NK system of hyperprolactinemic patients.