Clinical and Genomic Landscape of RAS Mutations in Gynecologic Cancers.

PURPOSE: We aimed to describe RAS mutations in gynecologic cancers as they relate to clinicopathologic and genomic features, survival, and therapeutic implications. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Gynecologic cancers with available somatic molecular profiling data at our institution between February 2010 and August 2022 were included and grouped by RAS mutation status. Overall survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariable analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: Of 3,328 gynecologic cancers, 523 (15.7%) showed any RAS mutation. Patients with RAS-mutated tumors were younger (57 vs. 60 years nonmutated), had a higher prevalence of endometriosis (27.3% vs. 16.9%), and lower grades (grade 1/2, 43.2% vs. 8.1%, all P < 0.0001). The highest prevalence of KRAS mutation was in mesonephric-like endometrial (100%, n = 9/9), mesonephric-like ovarian (83.3%, n = 5/6), mucinous ovarian (60.4%), and low-grade serous ovarian (44.4%) cancers. After adjustment for age, cancer type, and grade, RAS mutation was associated with worse overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.3; P = 0.001]. Specific mutations were in KRAS (13.5%), NRAS (2.0%), and HRAS (0.51%), most commonly KRAS G12D (28.4%) and G12V (26.1%). Common co-mutations were PIK3CA (30.9%), PTEN (28.8%), ARID1A (28.0%), and TP53 (27.9%), of which 64.7% were actionable. RAS + MAPK pathway-targeted therapies were administered to 62 patients with RAS-mutated cancers. While overall survival was significantly higher with therapy [8.4 years [(95% confidence interval (CI), 5.5-12.0) vs. 5.5 years (95% CI, 4.6-6.6); HR = 0.67; P = 0.031], this effect did not persist in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: RAS mutations in gynecologic cancers have a distinct histopathologic distribution and may impact overall survival. PIK3CA, PTEN, and ARID1A are potentially actionable co-alterations. RAS pathway-targeted therapy should be considered.

Histopathological, Clinical, And Molecular (HICAM) score for patients with colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: Histopathological and molecular features have been proposed to hold prognostic information, but few have been validated. The aim of this retrospective study was to validate the Genetic And Morphological Evaluation ('GAME') score and assess the impact of histological characteristics on the prognosis in patients with colorectal liver metastases. METHODS: Data were collected from 176 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer undergoing liver resection at Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau. Patients were classified into Genetic And Morphological Evaluation score groups and relapse-free survival and overall survival were calculated. Histopathological changes in colorectal liver metastases were documented and prognostic variables were selected to create a post-surgery score, called the Histopathological, Clinical, And Molecular ('HICAM') score. RESULTS: Regarding the Genetic And Morphological Evaluation score, the high-risk group had a median relapse-free survival of 8.8 months, compared with 20.5 months for the low-risk group (P = 0.005), and the high-risk group had a median overall survival of 37.8 months, compared with 67.0 months for the low-risk group (P = 0.005). Histological examination of 144 liver samples showed that the desertic immune phenotype was associated with worse overall survival in the multivariable analysis (P = 0.020). The Histopathological, Clinical, And Molecular score variables were age at diagnosis, tumour burden score, carcinoembryonic antigen levels greater than or equal to 20 ng/ml, primary tumour resection, TNM stage at diagnosis, molecular status, histopathological growth patterns, and immune phenotypes of the liver. The high-risk group had a median relapse-free survival of 8.4 months, compared with 20.4 months for the low-risk group (P < 0.001), and a median overall survival of 30.4 months, compared with 105.0 months for the low-risk group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The Genetic And Morphological Evaluation score was validated as a preoperative prognostic tool to predict candidacy for liver resection. The Histopathological, Clinical, And Molecular score could be useful to assess adjuvant treatment after hepatic resection.