Cancer Patients' Attitudes Towards the Anti-Covid-19 Vaccine: A Collective Case Study.

AIM: The purpose of the present study was to determine cancer patients' attitudes toward the anti-COVID-19 vaccine. BACKGROUND: Historically, the scientific community's responsibility was to investigate attitudes about vaccination. The course of COVID-19 in cancer patients makes them a high priority for vaccination. Cancer patients are at greater risk of serious complications and death because of COVID-19 infection. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to determine cancer patients' attitudes toward the anti-COVID-19 vaccine. We examined several constructs that potentially influenced cancer patients' perceptions of the vaccine: health status, knowledge of COVID-19 and vaccination, cancer patients' perceptions of vulnerability, and attitudes toward general vaccines. METHODS: We conducted a collective case study with 200 cancer patients undergoing treatment, and divided the sample into two groups: patients who "expected to heal" (Group A) and patients who "expected to chronicize" (Group B). Data were collected through a purpose-built questionnaire consisting of 22 questions and a study of medical records. RESULTS: Data analysis showed that both groups, Group A (M= 3.89 SD= 0.64) and Group B (M= 3.98 SD= 0.64), had a favorable attitude toward the anti-COVID-19 vaccine. This favorable attitude toward the anti-COVID-19 vaccine depended on several factors: perception of vulnerability to COVID-19, perception of the severity of their oncological situation, and communication with oncologists. CONCLUSION: Our study highlighted the plurality of factors that influence attitudes toward the anti-COVID-19 vaccine. It is theref+ore of fundamental importance to increase the use of the shared decision-making approach (SDM) to guide the patient to an informed choice.

Dignity and time perspective: A pilot explorative study in cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the possible correlation between emotional distress linked to dignity and dysfunctional temporal orientations in the oncological context. METHODS: We conducted an exploratory study between December 2020 and February 2021, referring to a sample of 107 patients in active treatment for solid tumors belonging to the Oncology Department of the Fondazione Poliambulanza (Brescia, Italy). We administered two self-report questionnaires: the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI-IT) (Italian version, Grassi L, Costantini A, Caruso R, et al. (2017) Dignity and psychosocial-related variables in advanced and nonadvanced cancer patients by using the patient dignity inventory-Italian version. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 53(2), 279-287), as a measure of perceived level of dignity, and the Italian version of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory scale (ZTPI) (Zimbardo PG and Boyd JN (2009) Il paradosso del tempo. La nuova psicologia del tempo che cambierà la tua vita. Milano: Mondadori), as a measure of the experiential dimensions of time, such as past, present, and future. RESULTS: From the PDI-IT emerged that our sample reported high levels of physical and psychological distress. Furthermore, we founded higher distress in patients under 55 years (p = 0.04) and lower distress in retired patients (p = 0.01). The ZTPI showed in our patients prevailing orientations to the past-positive (39.3%) and the future (37.4%). We noticed a gender difference: men were mainly oriented to the future while women to the past-positive. Moreover, married subjects reported a prevalent orientation to past-positive and the future. Finally, data analysis found moderate positive correlation between the "Negative Past" dimension of ZTPI and high levels of physical (r = 0.203, p = 0.03) and psychological distress (r = 236, p = 0.01). SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: In our experience in oncology, dignity and time perspective play a central role as indicators of the quality of care. Our study shows the importance of a treatment path that integrates the constructs of Dignity and Time Perspective to favor a better psychological adaptation.

Cancer and Covid-19: A preliminary study on the trauma aspects of coronavirus in cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: Because of Covid 19, it has become necessary to revise the treatment of cancer patients ("how" and "when"). That has had important psychological repercussions. The purpose of this study is the evaluation of the impact of Covid19 in terms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Depression and the potential association with coping strategies. METHODS: We conducted an exploratory study with 106 patients undergoing treatment, using following questionnaires: Screening Questionnaire for Disaster Mental Health and Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer. RESULTS: Only 25.5% of our sample showed symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and 6.6% revealed a probable presence of depression. In addition, it came up a significant correlation between SQD_P and the coping styles "Hopelessness" (r = 0.41 p < 0.001) and "Anxious Preoccupation" (r = 0.45, p < 0.001). A strong correlation also emerged between non-Covid 19 patients and PTSD (r = 0.29, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary data did not reveal a prevalence of PTSD, but the persistence of the health emergency requires to focus future research on protective and risk factors related to PTSD and psychological distress in cancer patients, in order to reduce the mental health burden of Covid19.

Yoga Protocol for Cancer Patients: A Systematic Exploration of Psychophysiological Benefits.

BACKGROUND: Several studies report that practicing Yoga may lead to numerous psychophysiological benefits in patients undergoing treatment for cancer. Moreover, it may result in an effective alternative for coping with sleep disturbances, anxiety, depression and fatigue symptoms. A study based on the "Yoga in Oncology" project of the Foundation Poliambulanza was carried out, and it was designed to explore the benefits of Yoga, therefore corroborating Yoga as a therapeutic activity that can have a beneficial impact on patients diagnosed with cancer. METHODS: Seventy patients were recruited, of whom 20% were males and 80% were females 18 years of age and older. All patients were being treated at the oncology department for gastrointestinal, mammary or genital carcinoma, and the disease was metastatic in 80% of patients. Data were collected between April 2013 and May 2017. The protocol consisted of a weekly 90-minute Yoga lesson for 8 consecutive weeks, and the data collection was carried out in 2 phases: (T0) preprotocol assessment and (T1) postprotocol assessment. Psychophysiological assessment was carried out with the following scales: the (BFI) Brief Fatigue Inventory, (HADS) Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and (PSQI) Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. RESULTS: Data analysis showed a significant difference between the (T0) and (T1) HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) scores. The constructs of this scale consist of psychological variables for the assessment of anxiety and depression. In contrast, scores from the (BFI) Brief Fatigue Inventory and (PSQI) Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index did not show significant differences between (T0) and (T1): such scales are relative to psychophysiological variables for an assessment of the perception of fatigue and quality of sleep. CONCLUSION: It is noteworthy that the data, once analyzed, showed a significant difference between preprotocol and postprotocol levels of anxiety and depression but not for the perception of fatigue or the quality of sleep. In accordance with the scientific literature, data from this study highlight that practicing Yoga may promote changes in the levels of perceived anxiety and depression in patients undergoing treatment for cancer, thus positively affecting their (QoL). It is clear that the difference in significance between the psychological and physiological variables considered here and the statistical significance found only in levels of anxiety and depression encourage further studies to account for the nature of fatigue and sleep disturbances and how to address these symptoms in oncological patients. Moreover, other points of interest for future clinical research regard the evaluation of the reason for the possible denial to participate to this kind of study, as well as the social-cultural differences in patients' behavior.

Hair Loss Prevention by a Scalp Cooling Device in Early Breast Cancer Patients: The Poliambulanza Preliminary Experience.

BACKGROUND: The most effective agents in the treatment of breast cancer have a common side effect, the hair loss. Some studies reported a reduction of hair loss with the use of the scalp cooling device. Indeed, it decreases the drug accumulation in the hair follicles. We report our preliminary experience with a scalp cooling device in reducing chemotherapy-induced alopecia and related distress in breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Hair loss grading and treatment tolerability were evaluated during chemotherapy every 21 days and 3 weeks after the last cycle of chemotherapy via Dean's scale by patients and operators and a comfort analogic scale by patients. We administered the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire at the baseline and at the end of treatment to assess the distress related to chemotherapy- induced alopecia. RESULTS: Among the 46 patients identified, 27 accepted the device. The eligible chemotherapy regimens included docetaxel+cyclophosphamide (TC), doxorubicin+cyclophosphamide (AC) and paclitaxel (P) weekly+trastuzumab (T). 24 pts (89%) completed the treatment; 3 pts (11%) treated with AC prematurely interrupted use of the scalp-cooling device due to inefficacy. After the last cycle of chemotherapy, the number of patient who perceived a HL < grade 2 was 16 (59%). The hair retention reported by operators has been higher (78%). 81.5% of patients well tolerated the treatment. CONCLUSION: In our study, the scalp-cooling device reduced chemotherapy-induced alopecia in taxane- based chemotherapy. Furthermore, it suggests a discordance in hair loss perception between patients and operators.