An extensive quantitative analysis of the effects of errors in beat-to-beat intervals on all commonly used HRV parameters.

Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis is often used to estimate human health and fitness status. More specifically, a range of parameters that express the variability in beat-to-beat intervals are calculated from electrocardiogram beat detections. Since beat detection may yield erroneous interval data, these errors travel through the processing chain and may result in misleading parameter values that can lead to incorrect conclusions. In this study, we utilized Monte Carlo simulation on real data, Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests and Bland-Altman analysis to carry out extensive analysis of the noise sensitivity of different HRV parameters. The used noise models consider Gaussian and student-t distributed noise. As a result we observed that commonly used HRV parameters (e.g. pNN50 and LF/HF ratio) are especially sensitive to noise and that all parameters show biases to some extent. We conclude that researchers should be careful when reporting different HRV parameters, consider the distributions in addition to mean values, and consider reference data if applicable. The analysis of HRV parameter sensitivity to noise and resulting biases presented in this work generalizes over a wide population and can serve as a reference and thus provide a basis for the decision about which HRV parameters to choose under similar conditions.

Evaluation of a wrist-worn photoplethysmography monitor for heart rate variability estimation in patients recovering from laparoscopic colon resection.

To evaluate the accuracy of heart rate variability (HRV) parameters obtained with a wrist-worn photoplethysmography (PPG) monitor in patients recovering from minimally invasive colon resection to investigate whether PPG has potential in postoperative patient monitoring. 31 patients were monitored for three days or until discharge or reoperation using a wrist-worn PPG monitor (PulseOn, Finland) with a Holter monitor (Faros 360, Bittium Biosignals, Finland) as a reference measurement device. Beat-to-beat intervals (BBI) and HRV information collected by PPG were compared with RR intervals (RRI) and HRV obtained from the ECG reference after removing artefacts and ectopic beats. The beat-to-beat mean error (ME) and mean absolute error (MAE) of good quality heartbeat intervals obtained by wrist PPG were estimated as - 1.34 ms and 10.4 ms respectively. A significant variation in the accuracy of the HRV parameters was found. In the time domain, SDNN (9.11%), TRI (11.4%) and TINN (11.1%) were estimated with low relative MAE, while RMSSD (34.3%), pNN50 (139%) and NN50 (188%) had higher errors. The logarithmic parameters in the frequency domain (VLF Log, LF Log and HF Log) exhibited the lowest relative error, and for non-linear parameters, SD2 (7.5%), DFA α1 (8.25%) and DFA α2 (4.71%) were calculated much more accurately than SD1 (34.3%). The wrist PPG shows some potential for use in a clinical setting. The accuracy of several HRV parameters analyzed post hoc was found sufficient to be used in further studies concerning postoperative recovery of patients undergoing laparoscopic colon resection, although there were large errors in many common HRV parameters such as RMSSD, pNN50 and NN50, rendering them unusable.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04996511, August 9, 2021, retrospectively registered.