Impact of Lymphocyte and Neutrophil Counts on Mortality Risk in Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia with or without Septic Shock.

BACKGROUND: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a frequent cause of death worldwide. As recently described, CAP shows different biological endotypes. Improving characterization of these endotypes is needed to optimize individualized treatment of this disease. The potential value of the leukogram to assist prognosis in severe CAP has not been previously addressed. METHODS: A cohort of 710 patients with CAP admitted to the intensive care units (ICUs) at Hospital of Mataró and Parc Taulí Hospital of Sabadell was retrospectively analyzed. Patients were split in those with septic shock (n = 304) and those with no septic shock (n = 406). A single blood sample was drawn from all the patients at the time of admission to the emergency room. ICU mortality was the main outcome. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis demonstrated that lymphopenia <675 cells/mm3 or <501 cells/mm3 translated into 2.32- and 3.76-fold risk of mortality in patients with or without septic shock, respectively. In turn, neutrophil counts were associated with prognosis just in the group of patients with septic shock, where neutrophils <8850 cells/mm3 translated into 3.6-fold risk of mortality. CONCLUSION: lymphopenia is a preserved risk factor for mortality across the different clinical presentations of severe CAP (sCAP), while failing to expand circulating neutrophils counts beyond the upper limit of normality represents an incremental immunological failure observed just in those patients with the most severe form of CAP, septic shock.

Differences in Hypotensive vs. Non-Hypotensive Sepsis Management in the Emergency Department: Door-to-Antibiotic Time Impact on Sepsis Survival.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis diagnosis can be incorrectly associated with the presence of hypotension during an infection, so the detection and management of non-hypotensive sepsis can be delayed. We aimed to evaluate how the presence or absence of hypotension, on admission at the emergency department, affects the initial management and outcomes of patients with community-onset severe sepsis. METHODS: Demographic, clinical, laboratory, process of care, and outcome variables were recorded for all patients, at the emergency department of our university hospital, who presented with community-onset severe sepsis, between 1 March and 31 August in three consecutive years. Patient management consisted of standardized bundled care with five measures: Detection, blood cultures and empirical antibiotics, oxygen supplementation and fluid resuscitation (if needed), clinical monitoring, and noradrenalin administration (if needed). We compared all variables between patients who had hypotension (mean arterial pressure <65 mmHg), on admission to the emergency department, and those who did not. RESULTS: We identified 153 episodes (84 (54.5%) men; mean age 73.6 ± 1.2; mean Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score 4.9 ± 2.7, and 41.2% hospital mortality). Hypotension was present on admission to the emergency department in 57 patients (37.2%). Hemodynamic treatment was applied earlier in patients who presented hypotension initially. Antibiotics were administered 48 min later in non-hypotensive sepsis (p = 0.08). A higher proportion of patients without initial hypotension required admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) (43.1% for patients initially hypotensive vs. 56.9% in those initially non-hypotensive, p < 0.05). Initial hypotension was not associated with mortality. A delay in door-to-antibiotic administration time was associated with mortality [OR 1.150, 95%CI: 1.043⁻1.268). CONCLUSIONS: Initial management of patients with community-onset severe sepsis differed according to their clinical presentation. Initial hypotension was associated with early hemodynamic management and less ICU requirement. A non-significant delay was observed in the administration of antibiotics to initially non-hypotensive patients. The time of door-to-antibiotic administration was related to mortality.

Limitation of life support techniques at admission to the intensive care unit: a multicenter prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: To determine the frequency of limitations on life support techniques (LLSTs) on admission to intensive care units (ICU), factors associated, and 30-day survival in patients with LLST on ICU admission. METHODS: This prospective observational study included all patients admitted to 39 ICUs in a 45-day period in 2011. We recorded hospitals' characteristics (availability of intermediate care units, usual availability of ICU beds, and financial model) and patients' characteristics (demographics, reason for admission, functional status, risk of death, and LLST on ICU admission (withholding/withdrawing; specific techniques affected)). The primary outcome was 30-day survival for patients with LLST on ICU admission. Statistical analysis included multilevel logistic regression models. RESULTS: We recruited 3042 patients (age 62.5 ± 16.1 years). Most ICUs (94.8%) admitted patients with LLST, but only 238 (7.8% [95% CI 7.0-8.8]) patients had LLST on ICU admission; this group had higher ICU mortality (44.5 vs. 9.4% in patients without LLST; p < 0.001). Multilevel logistic regression showed a contextual effect of the hospital in LLST on ICU admission (median OR = 2.30 [95% CI 1.59-2.96]) and identified the following patient-related variables as independent factors associated with LLST on ICU admission: age, reason for admission, risk of death, and functional status. In patients with LLST on ICU admission, 30-day survival was 38% (95% CI 31.7-44.5). Factors associated with survival were age, reason for admission, risk of death, and number of reasons for LLST on ICU admission. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of ICU admission with LLST is low but probably increasing; nearly one third of these patients survive for ≥ 30 days.

[Epidemiology of community-acquired severe sepsis. A population-based study]. / Epidemiología de la sepsis grave adquirida en la comunidad. Estudio de base poblacional.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Most studies aimed at getting to know the incidence of severe sepsis have methodological limitations which condition results that are difficult to compare and are inapplicable when it comes to estimating the necessary resources. Our objective is to evaluate the incidence and epidemiological aspects of community-acquired severe sepsis which require intensive care unit admission. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Prospective observational population-based study in a population of 180,000 adults over 15 years old and a general hospital with 350 beds and 14 ICU beds. All episodes of community-acquired infection requiring admission to ICU due to severe sepsis were registered over a period of 9 years. The variables analyzed were: age, sex, SAPS II score, length of stay in ICU, type of infection, isolated microorganism, and deaths during their ICU admission. A statistical bivariate analysis and a multiple logistic regression were performed. RESULTS: Nine hundred and seventeen episodes with an average age of 65.2 years. The most frequent infectious focus was pulmonary (55.2%). The average SAPS II severity score index was 37.87 and mortality 19.7%. The annual incidence was 51.54 episodes per 100,000 adult inhabitants, meaning 1.97 ICU beds per day. In the multivariate analysis, the SAPS II score and a known aetiology were demonstrated as mortality risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: This study brings us some epidemiological data from a population-based perspective which help us to care for patients better in our geographical area. The average annual incidence is 51.5 cases per 100,000 adult inhabitants which means that 2 ICU beds per day to attend this population.

[Knowledge of the disease and the advance directives in patients with HIV infection]. / Conocimiento de la enfermedad y de los documentos de voluntades anticipadas en el paciente seropositivo para el VIH.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Advanced directives documents (ADD), allow respect and know patient's intentions in health matters, when they are not able by themselves, for decision making. The aim of this study is making a valoration of the knowledgment of this documents in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected patients, as well as their own knowledgment about this patology and possible complications. PATIENTS AND METHOD: HIV infected patients controlled in 2 centers (Hospital de Mataró and Hospital de Granollers). Plained interview as a questinonary, that permits evaluate: own knowledge of the patology, received medical information level of satisfaction, patient s medical decision making involving desire, aptitudes in front of different hypothetical health status, and ADD knowledge. Factors associated to both knowledges (patology and ADD) are also evaluated. RESULTS: 74.3% of the interviewed patients, showed a good patology knowledge. This result was associated with: youth, less functional level according to Karnofsky's scale, subjective perception on severity, previous admission at an intensive care unit, chronic hepatopathy, and previous parenteral drugs addiction. In the same way was associated with the negative to depend of mechanical ventilation or another people, and not being uncomfortable talking about this subjects. ADD's knowledge was relationated with the fact of being female (42.0% vs 26.8%; p = 0.024), higher academic formation (55.1% vs 25.5%; p < 0.001) and belief that medical decision making must be done by themselves (78.3% vs 53.6%; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Patology understanding and its complications, may be considered optimal in HIV population. One third of this group, has a good knowledge of ADDs, and is directly relationated with female sex, academic level, and clinical decisions making implication by the patients.

Conocimiento de la enfermedad y de los documentos de voluntades anticipadas en el paciente seropositivo para el VIH / Knowledge of the disease and the advance directives in patients with HIV infection

Fundamento y objetivo: Los documentos de voluntades anticipadas (DVA) permiten conocer y respetar los deseos del enfermo en materia de salud cuando éste no es competente para decidir. El estudio pretende valorar el conocimiento de estos documentos en pacientes infectados por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH) y el conocimiento de la propia enfermedad y de sus complicaciones. Pacientes y método: Pacientes con infección por el VIH controlados en el Hospital de Mataró y en el Hospital de Granollers, a los que se les administró una entrevista estructurada como un cuestionario que valora el conocimiento de la propia enfermedad, la satisfacción con la información médica recibida, los deseos de participar en la toma de decisiones médicas, la disposición a tolerar diferentes estados hipotéticos de salud y el conocimiento de los DVA. Se valoran los factores asociados al conocimiento de la enfermedad y al conocimiento de los DVA. Resultados: El 74,3% de los entrevistados mostró un buen conocimiento de la enfermedad, circunstancia que se relacionó con el hecho de ser joven, presentar un peor nivel funcional según la escala de Karnofsky, percepción subjetiva de mayor gravedad, no haber ingresado en la unidad de cuidados intensivos, tener hepatopatía crónica y haber sido adicto a drogas por vía parenteral. Asimismo se relacionó con no estar dispuesto a vivir conectado a un respirador ni dependiendo de otra persona y no sentirse incómodo hablando de estos temas. El conocimiento de los DVA fue del 31,1%, y se relacionó con ser mujer (el 42,0 frente al 26,8%; p = 0,024), con mayor nivel de estudios (el 55,1 frente al 25,5%; p < 0,0001) y con creer que las decisiones médicas deben tomarlas ellos mismos (el 78,3 frente al 53,6%; p = 0,002). Conclusiones: El conocimiento de la enfermedad y sus complicaciones puede considerarse aceptable en la población infectada por el VIH. Una tercera parte de esta población conoce los DVA, circunstancia que se relaciona con el hecho de ser mujer, tener mayor nivel de estudios y desear implicarse en las decisiones médicas

Background and objective: Advanced directives documents (ADD), allow respect and know patient's intentions in health matters, when they are not able by themselves, for decision making. The aim of this study is making a valoration of the knowledgment of this documents in human inmunodeffinecy virus (HIV) infected patients, as well as their own knowledgment about this patology and possible complications. Patients and method: HIV infected patients controlled in 2 centers (Hospital de Mataró and Hospital de Granollers). Plained interview as a cuestinonary, that permits evaluate: own knowledge of the patology, received medical information level of satisfaction, patient´s medical decision making involving desire, aptitudes in front of different hipotetical health status, and ADD knowledge. Factors associated to both knowledges (patology and ADD) are also evaluated. Results: 74.3% of the interviewed patients, showed a good patology knowledge. This result was associated with: youth, less functional level acording to Karnofsky's scale, subjective perception on severity, previous admission at an intensive care unit, cronic hepatopathy, and previous parenteral drugs addiction. In the same way was associated with the negative to depend of mechanical ventilation or another people, and not being uncomfortable talking about this subjects. ADD's knowledge was relationated with the fact of being female (42.0% vs 26.8%; p = 0.024), higher academic formation (55.1% vs 25.5%; p < 0.001) and belief that medical decision making must be done by themselves (78.3% vs 53.6%; p = 0.002). Conclusions: Patology understanding and its complications, may be considered optimal in HIV population. One third of this group, has a good knowledge of ADDs, and is directly relationated with female sex, academic level, and clinical decisions making implication by the patients