[Medical information of patients with implants: Findings and prospects]. / Information médicale du patient porteur d'implants : constats et perspectives.

OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this study was to assess the level of knowledge and information received by patients regarding their implants and to discuss the role of community pharmacists. METHODS: A prospective survey was conducted in 3 pharmacies among patients presenting for various reasons. Firstly, on the same day, all patients visiting the pharmacy were asked if they had an implant. Secondly, patients with implants were offered a short survey consisting of 16 questions concerning the implant and the information received. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The survey was conducted with 178 patients, among whom 11.4% had implants. The majority of them reported having osteoarticular, dental, or ophthalmic implants. Women were 67.1% of the cohort. None of the 178 patients with implants in the survey had complete information about their implant and its follow-up, which would enable optimal care and effective reporting in case of potential complications. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients visiting the pharmacy had received limited or inadequate information about their implants. Community pharmacists, as local healthcare providers, in collaboration with hospitals, could play a crucial role in patient education. During the initial dispensing of postoperative treatments, pharmacists could inform and advise patients to enhance their patient journey.

Patient information pathway in orthopedic surgery: Roles of ERAS and pharmacists.

INTRODUCTION: Enhanced Rehabilitation After Surgery (ERAS) pathways significantly improve the care of patients in orthopedic surgery. However, patient knowledge and memorization of the information provided are currently poorly documented. HYPOTHESIS: The information provided by a postoperative pharmacist could have a positive impact on patient care, in particular by improving knowledge about their prosthesis. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This prospective feasibility study included a cohort of 80 patients operated on for a hip or knee prosthesis and who received postoperative pharmacist interviews (POPI). These POPIs informed the patient about the prosthesis, the complications, positions to avoid, as well as the postoperative follow-up. The objective was to measure the patient's knowledge before and after the POPI. Qualitative and quantitative analyses, by indication and patient pathway, were performed. RESULTS: The patient's knowledge before POPI was 70% correct. After POPI this rate rose to 91%. DISCUSSION: Patients' knowledge was weak and heterogeneous, especially regarding the implanted prosthesis. The POPI led to significant improvement and standardization of knowledge which should contribute to the prevention of iatrogenic harm (positions to avoid, infection prevention, compliance with analgesics and anticoagulants). CONCLUSION: A POPI with a pharmacist improves overall patient management during hip or knee arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; non-randomized prospective feasibility study.