Role of resection for extrahepatopulmonary metastases of colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although surgical resection for liver or lung metastases of colorectal cancer has been widely accepted, the use of this approach for extrahepatopulmonary metastases remains debatable due to the systemic nature of the disease. The aim of this study was to clarify the utility of resection along with perioperative chemotherapy for patients with extrahepatopulmonary metastases of colon cancer. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-arm study at a single institution. Forty-two patients with resectable extrahepatopulmonary metastases who underwent metastasectomy with curative intent between 2009 and 2018 at Nagoya University Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcomes measured were overall and relapse-free survival. RESULTS: The most common metastatic site was the peritoneum (n = 31), followed by the distant lymph nodes (n = 10), ovary (n = 1) and spleen (n = 1), with overlaps. Preoperative and postoperative chemotherapies were administered to 22 and 8 patients, respectively; the remaining 14 patients received surgery alone. R0 resection was achieved in 36 patients (85.7%). The 5-year overall survival and 3-year relapse-free survival rates were 58.6% and 33.8%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, R1 resection was associated with a poor relapse-free survival rate (P = 0.02). In the multivariate analysis, the absence of perioperative chemotherapy was an independent risk factor for poor overall survival rates (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection benefited selected patients with extrahepatopulmonary metastases with favorable long-term survival outcomes. Surgery alone without systemic chemotherapy is likely to bring poor outcome; therefore, preoperative induction might be promising to keep up with chemotherapy.

The carcinoembryonic antigen ratio is a potential predictor of survival in recurrent colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) "value" itself is often useless in patients with a normal CEA level at initial presentation and those with tumor-irrelevant elevated CEA. Although the unified marker using CEA has been desirable for recurrent tumor staging as well as for primary tumor staging, little is known concerning its relationship with the survival of patients with recurrent colorectal cancer in particular. METHODS: This retrospective historical study included patients who experienced disease relapse after curative surgery for stage I-III colorectal cancer between 2006 and 2018. A total of 129 patients with recurrent disease after curative surgery for colorectal cancer were included. We focused on the CEA "ratio" (CEA-R: the ratio of the CEA level at the time of recurrence to that measured 3 months before recurrence) and aimed to evaluate the correlation between CEA-R and survival in recurrent colorectal cancer. RESULTS: Patients with a high CEA-R (≥ 2) exhibited significantly worse 2 year survival than those with a low CEA-R (< 2) (88.1% vs. 44.9%, P < 0.001), irrespective of the CEA value before primary resection. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that the CEA-R (HR; 3.270, 95% CI 1.646-6.497, P = 0.001) was a significant prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: The CEA-R is a potential marker stratifying the survival of patients with disease relapse who exhibit aggressive biology at recurrent disease foci. As a novel marker, the CEA-R would serve as a clinical guide for tailoring treatment strategies at the time of disease relapse in patients with colorectal cancer.