RESUMO
Background: Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is a rare, treatable cause of stroke. Even though CVST has an established medical treatment, 15% of patients remain refractory to treatment. These patients may be candidates for endovascular treatment (EVT), yet the selection of patients remains a challenge. The study aims to understand the profile and outcome of patients treated with EVT and the type of procedure associated with good outcomes. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective analysis of CVST patients who underwent EVT from 2009 till 2022. Patients who received only medical management were excluded. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤2 at 3 months was taken as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes assessed were hospital stay, death, recurrence, mRS ≤ 2 at discharge, and angiographic recanalization. Results: Fifty-two patients were included. Twenty-eight (53.8%) were males; the mean age was 33.3 ± 12.3 years. Headache (n = 44, 84.6%) predominated among the symptoms. The common risk factors were anemia (n = 13, 25.5%) and hyperhomocysteinemia (n = 13, 25.5%). Worsening of sensorium (n = 21, 40.3%) and non-improvement of symptoms (n = 15, 28.8%) were the common indications for the procedure. Twenty-five (48.1%) people underwent in situ thrombolysis (IST). Death occurred in eight (15.3%) patients. Thirty-six (73.5%; 36/49) patients had a good outcome at 3 months. IST had a significantly better outcome (mRS ≤ 2, n = 20, 80%) compared to other procedures (P = 0.04). Hospital stay was lesser in the IST subgroup, but without statistical significance. Midline shift >5 mm (odds ratio [OR] 6.8 [1.5-30.9], P = 0.01) and Glasgow Coma Scale <9 before the procedure (OR 27.2 [3.1-236.4], P = 0.002) predicted bad outcomes at 3 months. Female gender (OR 4.5 [1.07-8.8], P = 0.03), presence of altered sensorium (OR 10.2 [1.2-87.5], P = 0.01), encephalopathic syndrome (P = 0.02), presence of parenchymal bleed (OR 3.7 [0.9-4.5], P = 0.04), and midline shift (OR 4.8 [1.1-20.2], P = 0.03) were associated with poor outcome at discharge. Conclusion: EVT yielded good outcomes in carefully selected, medically refractory patients of CVST. IST performed well compared to other procedures.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Large core acute ischemic strokes have predominantly been excluded from endovascular therapy (EVT) studies due to perceived higher risks of hemorrhage and poorer functional outcomes. However, recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indicate that EVT for large vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes improves functional outcomes compared to medical management alone, despite higher hemorrhagic transformation rates, with no corresponding increase in symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) rates. The real-world outcomes of this intervention in Indian patients remain underexplored. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the real-world outcomes of EVT for large core acute ischemic strokes with LVO in an Indian population. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective observational study using a 7 years prospective database of EVT in anterior circulation stroke patients. Patients with Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) of 3-5 were included. Clinical and radiologic data were analyzed, with the primary endpoint being 90-day modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores. Safety outcomes included rates of sICH and mortality. Descriptive statistical analysis was done using Microsoft Excel. RESULTS: The study included 25 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Mean age of patients was 52.9 ± 14.3 years, and there were 13 (52%) males. Median ASPECTS was 5 (interquartile range 4-5). Successful recanalization, classified by modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score, was 92%. Good functional recovery, that is, 90-day mRS 0-3, was achieved in nine (36%) patients. Safety outcomes: sICH was seen in four (16%) and mortality was reported in nine (36%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results reaffirm findings from RCTs, provide updated real-world evidence, and suggest that EVT is a viable option to be considered in selected patients with large core ischemic infarcts.
