RESUMO
Background: Brachial plexus injuries are debilitating injuries resulting in paralyzed shoulder to global paralysis of the upper extremity. Treatment strategies have evolved over the years with nerve transfer forming the mainstay of surgical management. Phrenic nerve provides certain advantages as donor over other options but has been less preferred due to fear of pulmonary complications. In this study, we assess the functional outcomes of phrenic nerve transfer in brachial plexus injuries. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 18 patients operated between 2012 and 2017. The mean duration of injury to surgery was 4.56 months and mean follow-up was for 3.66 years. Phrenic nerve was used as donor to neurotize either biceps and brachialis branch of musculocutaneous nerve or suprascapular nerve. Assessment was done through Waikakul score for elbow flexion and Medical Research Council grading for shoulder abduction. Respiratory function assessment was done through questionnaire. Results: Twelve (80%) patients recovered grade 3 and above elbow flexion with 6 patients having a positive endurance test according to Waikakul and a "very good" result. In phrenic to suprascapular transfer group (3 patients), all patients had more than grade 3 recovery of shoulder abduction. No patient complained of respiratory problems. Conclusion: Phrenic nerve can be used as a reliable donor with suitable patient selection with good results in regaining muscle power without any anticipated effects on respiratory function.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Brachial plexus birth palsy (BPBP) is often caused by traction during birth. In some cases, reinnervation occurs during spontaneous recovery and it causes involuntary co-contraction between antagonistic muscles. When it comes up between the biceps and triceps muscles, smooth active motion of the elbow joint is impaired. We are presenting outcomes of intercostal nerve (ICN) to radial nerve transfer to minimize elbow motion abnormality due to co-contraction. METHODS: We present five cases (two males and three females) of biceps and triceps co-contraction in BPBP patients treated from 2005 to 2018. The mean age at surgery was 9.36 years (range, 4.8-16.4 years). They were treated by ICNs transfer to motor branch of the radial nerve to the triceps muscle. Preoperative electromyography was done in all cases to confirm biceps and triceps co-contraction and to assess the contractile status of both muscles. A 10-s flexion extension test was done pre and postoperatively to assess the efficacy of our procedure. RESULTS: The postop course was uneventful. No donor site morbidity or respiratory complications were recorded in any patient. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 83.9 months (range, 53.6-135.5 months). At the final follow-up, elbow flexion was M4 in the Medical Research Council (MRC) grading scale in all five patients and elbow extension was graded M4 or M4- in all five patients. There was significant increase in the 10 s flexion extension test results delineating the effectiveness of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: ICNs transfer to motor branch of the radial nerve to the triceps muscle for management of biceps and triceps co-contraction in BPBP is a good option with minimal morbidity and good success rate.