Public engagement with genomics.

As detailed in its flagship report, Genome UK, the UK government recognises the vital role that broad public engagement across whole populations plays in the field of genomics. However, there is limited evidence about how to do this at scale. Most public audiences do not feel actively connected to science, are oftenunsure of the relevance to their lives and rarely talk to their family and friends about; we term this dis-connection a 'disengaged public audience'. We use a narrative review to explore: (i) UK attitudes towards genetics and genomics and what may influence reluctance to engage with these topics; (ii) innovative public engagement approaches that have been used to bring diverse public audiences into conversations about the technology. Whilst we have found some novel engagement methods that have used participatory arts, film, social media and deliberative methods, there is no clear agreement on best practice. We did not find a consistently used, evidence-based strategy for delivering public engagement about genomics across diverse and broad populations, nor a specific method that is known to encourage engagement from groups that have historically felt (in terms of perception) and been (in reality) excluded from genomic research. We argue there is a need for well-defined, tailor-made engagement strategies that clearly articulate the audience, the purpose and the proposed impact of the engagement intervention. This needs to be coupled with robust evaluation frameworks to build the evidence-base for population-level engagement strategies.

The impact of a structured assessment and decision tool (I-DECIDED®) on improving care of peripheral intravenous catheters: A multicenter, interrupted time-series study.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral intravenous catheters are the most widely used invasive device in hospitals but have serious risks. OBJECTIVE: To determine if a structured assessment and decision tool (I-DECIDED®) improves daily peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and care decisions. DESIGN: Prospective, interrupted time-series study. SETTINGS: Seven adult inpatient wards in three Australian hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: 825 adults with 867 peripheral intravenous catheters. METHODS: Between August 2017 and December 2018, peripheral intravenous catheter assessments and chart audits were undertaken with informed patient consent. Following a 4-month pre-intervention period (with 2-weekly measures), the I-DECIDED® tool was implemented over 3 months (no data collection) using multiple strategies (stakeholder meetings, vascular access device form, education sessions, ward champions, lanyard cards, and posters), followed by a 4-month post-intervention period (with 2-weekly measures). Primary outcomes were device utilization (number of peripheral intravenous catheters per total number of patients screened); idle/unused catheters; insertion site complications, substandard dressing quality; and primary bloodstream infections. RESULTS: Of 2055 patients screened, 1175 (57.2%) had a peripheral intravenous catheter, and 825 patients (867 catheters) consented and were included in the final analysis. Device utilization increased from 42.0% of catheters at baseline to 49.6% post-intervention (absolute risk difference [ARD] 7.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.8, 10.3; relative risk [RR] 1.18, 95% CI 1.11, 1.25; p < 0.001). The proportion of idle catheters reduced from 12.7% to 8.3% (ARD -4.4%, 95% CI -8.5, -0.3; RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.44, 0.97; p = 0.035). Peripheral intravenous catheter complications reduced from 16.1% to 10.9% (ARD -5.2%, 95% CI -9.7, -0.6; RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48, 0.96; p = 0.026). Substandard dressings reduced from 24.6% to 19.5% (ARD -5.2%, 95% CI -10.7, 0.4; RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.61, 1.02; p = 0.067). Only one primary bloodstream infection occurred (post-intervention). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a comprehensive device assessment and decision tool (I-DECIDED®) reduced idle catheters and catheter complications, despite higher device utilization. Dressing quality improved but was not statistically significant. Further implementation of the tool could improve hospital safety for patients with an intravenous catheter. ANZCTR TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12617000067370. Date of registration 13 January 2017. Date of first data collection 3rd August 2017. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: #IDECIDEDassessment reduces prevalence of idle peripheral catheters and device complications.

Improving the handover of complex trauma patients by implementing a standardised process.

BACKGROUND: Patient handover continues to be an international health priority in the prevention of patient harm. Transitioning patients from the intensive care unit (ICU) to the ward is complex, particularly for trauma patients, due to the multifaceted aspects of their care requirements as a result of multiple injuries and different speciality teams. OBJECTIVES/AIM: To design, implement, and evaluate the efficacy of a standardised handover process and tool for the transfer of ICU trauma patients. METHODS: A multimethod before/after study design was used. This included observations before and after an implemented transfer process and semistructured interviews with ICU and ward nurses caring for trauma patients. Comparisons were made of data before and after the intervention. RESULTS: Eleven patient handovers were observed, and 21 nurses (11 from the ICU and 10 from the ward) were interviewed. Patients and family members were included during the handover following the intervention (n = 0/10 [0%] vs n = 4/11 [36%]) and the ward nurses were asked if they had any concerns (n = 5/10 [50%] vs n = 10/11 [91%]). Improvements in patient observations handed over were reported following the intervention. However, omissions remained in some key areas including patient introduction, patient identity, fluid balance, and allergies/alerts. Thematic analysis of interviews revealed that the new handover process was perceived advantageous by both ICU and ward nurses because of its structured and comprehensive approach. Identified future improvements included the need for hospital service managers to ensure integration of ICU and ward electronic health record systems. CONCLUSION: Precise, accurate, and complete handover remains a patient safety concern. Improvements were achieved using a standardised process and handover tool for the transfer of complex trauma patients. Further improvements are required to reduce the failure to hand over essential patient information.

Measuring changes in nursing students' workplace performance following feedback encounters: A quasi-experimental study.

BACKGROUND: Work-integrated learning and performance is intimately linked with assessment and feedback; however, empirical evidence concerning the impact of feedback on student performance in workplace settings is limited. A novel practice-based feedback intervention-the REMARK (nuRse fEedback iMplementAtion frameworRK) program-was developed and implemented. Sustainable feedback processes that involve both learners and learning partners can ultimately maximise learning outcomes, optimise self-regulation, and impact performance. OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of implementing an educational intervention based on best practice principles of feedback on undergraduate nursing student performance during clinical placements in acute healthcare settings. METHODS: A non-equivalent, quasi-experimental design was used. A pre- and post-assessment strategy for both control and intervention groups was employed. The REMARK program was based on known attributes of effective feedback critiqued in the literature that foster interactions between a learner and learning partner and, hence, support dialogic feedback. RESULTS: Clinical assessment data of 214 final-year nursing students collected at three time points were analysed. Using multivariate modelling, the results indicated that students participating in the REMARK programme (intervention group) had statistically higher performance scores than students in the control group when time and placement setting were controlled. CONCLUSIONS: This research provides evidence that engagement with an intervention based on attributes of effective feedback improves nursing students' workplace performance during clinical placement. To achieve the greatest advantage, incorporating strategies that encourage students to adopt an active role in feedback conversations that relate to the student's learning goals are recommended.

The effect of the ABCDE/ABCDEF bundle on delirium, functional outcomes, and quality of life in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The effect of the ABCDEF bundle (Assess, prevent, and manage pain; Both spontaneous awakening and spontaneous breathing trials; Choice of analgesia and sedation; Delirium: assess, prevent, and manage; Early mobility and exercise; and Family engagement and empowerment) on patient outcomes such as delirium is potentially optimised when the bundle is implemented in its entirety. OBJECTIVE: To systematically synthesise the evidence on the effectiveness of the ABCDEF bundle delivered in its entirety on delirium, function, and quality of life in adult intensive care unit patients. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCE: Electronic databases including MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Joanna Briggs Institute's Evidence Based Practice, Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, and Embase were searched from 2000 until December 2021. REVIEW METHODS: Inclusion criteria included (1) adult intensive care unit patients (2) studies that described the ABCDE or ABCDEF bundle in its entirety (3) studies that evaluated delirium, functional outcomes, or quality of life. Studies were excluded if they investigated long-term intensive care unit rehabilitation patients. Two reviewers independently screened records and full text, extracted data, and undertook quality appraisals with discrepancies discussed until consensus was reached. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted for delirium but was not possible for other outcomes. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to assess the certainty of the synthesised findings of the body of evidence. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD 42019126407). RESULTS: A total of 18 studies (29,576 patients) were included in the descriptive synthesis. Meta-analysis of six studies (2000 patients) identified decreased delirium incidence following implementation of the ABCDEF bundle when compared with standard practice, (risk ratio = 0.57; CI, 0.36-0.90 p = 0.02) although heterogeneity was high (I2 = 92%). When compared with standard practice, a meta-analysis of five studies (3418 patients) showed the ABCDEF bundle statistically significantly reduced the duration of intensive care unit delirium (mean difference (days) - 1.37, 95% CI -2.61 to -0.13 p = 0.03; I2 96%). Valid functional assessments were included in two studies, and quality of life assessment in one. CONCLUSIONS: Although the evidence on the effect of the ABCDEF bundle delivered in its entirety is limited, positive patient delirium outcomes have been shown in this meta-analysis. As this meta-analysis was based on only 4736 patients in eight studies, further evidence is required to support its use in the adult intensive care unit. REGISTRATION DETAILS: PROSPERO (CRD 42019126407).

Dying in intensive care: An analysis of the perspectives of families and clinicians on end-of-life care.

BACKGROUND: Despite a growing body of research into end-of-life care (EOLC) in intensive care units (ICUs), few studies have concurrently explored the perspectives of families and clinicians. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify the characteristics of high-quality EOLC in the ICU from family and clinician perspectives and by examining the care documented in medical records. METHODS: A convergent mixed-methods study incorporating electronic health record audits (n = 20), structured interview surveys with families (n = 20), clinician surveys (n = 189), and focus groups (n = 10) was undertaken at a 30-bed, level 3 ICU at a metropolitan public adult teaching hospital in Australia. Descriptive statistics were calculated from quantitative data, and inductive thematic analysis was used to analyse qualitative data. RESULTS: Overall, families were very satisfied with EOLC and the quality of communication yet, felt that earlier, clearer communication that the patient was dying was required. Families spoke of the attentiveness, or lack thereof, by ICU clinicians and the opportunity to be present for the patient's death. The majority of ICU clinicians felt EOLC could be improved. Nurses highlighted communication challenges when family meetings were delayed. Some nurses expressed a lack of clarity of how to withdraw care, resulting in hesitancy to cease potentially inappropriate care, and to provide EOLC outside ICU practice norms. In many instances, observations, invasive monitoring, and interventions were documented after EOLC commenced. A lack of documented personal cares was also noted. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new insights into EOLC from the dual perspectives of families and clinicians. There is a need for institutional guidelines to support ICU clinicians' EOLC practices and education to improve clinician confidence with communication.

Fostering positive emotions, psychological well-being, and productive relationships in the intensive care unit: A before-and-after study.

BACKGROUND: Intensive care units (ICUs) are emotionally demanding workplaces. Exposure to stress can negatively impact ICU staff members' emotional resilience, health, and capacity to provide care. Despite recognition of the benefits of promoting "healthy workplaces", there are limited interventional studies aimed at improving the well-being of ICU staff. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention for improving well-being of staff working in a tertiary ICU. METHODS: A before-and-after interventional study was conducted over a 2-year period, between 2019 and 2021. Interventions included social activities, fitness, nutrition, and emotional support. An electronic version of the PERMA-Profiler questionnaire was used to assess the well-being of a convenience sample of ICU staff before (n = 96) and after (n = 137) the intervention. Ten focus groups (each involving 12-18 nurses) were held to explore nurses' perceptions of the intervention's effectiveness. RESULTS: After the intervention, a significantly greater proportion of participants described their work week as draining (32% vs 19%, χ2 = 4.4 df + 1, P = 0.03) and at least a bit harder than normal (38% vs 22%, χ2 = 6.4 df + 1, p = 0.01) compared to baseline surveys. However, well-being scores after the intervention (mean = 6.95, standard deviation = 1.28) were not statistically different (p = 0.68) from baseline scores (mean = 7.02, standard deviation = 1.29). Analysis of focus groups data revealed three key categories: boosting morale and fostering togetherness, supporting staff, and barriers to well-being. CONCLUSIONS: After the intervention, there was a preserved level of well-being from baseline despite a statistically significant increase in staff reporting the work week as draining and at least a little bit harder than normal. These findings must be considered in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, which started after baseline data collection and continues to impact the community, including staff workload and pressures in intensive care. The study findings may inform strategies for improving ICU staff members' well-being.

Soft collar for acute cervical spine injury immobilisation -patient experiences and outcomes: A single centre mixed methods study.

BACKGROUND: Cervical collars are used as standard care for neck immobilisation after cervical spine injury. Although evidence for the most effective type of collar is lacking, there is evidence regarding adverse patient outcomes when managed in a semi or rigid collar. In response to the evidence of complications and adverse effects when using a hard collar, a large Australian adult trauma hospital that specializes in spinal care, changed its policy from hard to soft collars when managing acute cervical spine injury. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate patients' experiences and outcomes when wearing a soft collar for acute cervical spine injury management in hospital. METHOD: A single centre mixed method sequential study design was used. RESULTS: Medical records from 136 patients were examined and no adverse events resulting from collar use were recorded. Interviews with 20 patients revealed that they understood the value of wearing a soft collar. The soft collars were considered supportive and well tolerated, with good adherence to recommendations for use. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the patients' experiences informs better care management. This study suggests that soft collars are well tolerated, do not result in pressure injuries or other adverse events and are suitable for managing acute cervical spine injury.

Chemical, Biological, Radiological, or Nuclear Response in Queensland Emergency Services: A Multisite Study.

A disaster overwhelms the normal operating capacity of a health service. Minimal research exists regarding Australian hospitals' capacity to respond to chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear (CBRN) disasters. This article, and the research supporting it, begins to fill that research gap. We conducted a descriptive quantitative study with 5 tertiary hospitals and 1 rural hospital in Queensland, Australia. The study population was the hospitals' clinical leaders for disaster preparedness. The 25-item survey consisted of questions relating to each hospital's current response capacity, physical surge capacity, and human surge capacity in response to a CBRN disaster. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The survey data indicated that over the previous 12 months, each site reached operational capacity on average 66 times and that capacity to respond and create additional emergency, intensive care, or surgical beds varied greatly across the sites. In the previous 12 months, only 2 sites reported undertaking specific hospital-wide training to manage a CBRN disaster, and 3 sites reported having suitable personal protective equipment required for hazardous materials. There was a noted shortfall in all the hospitals' capacity to respond to a radiological disaster in particular. Queensland hospitals are crucial to CBRN disaster response, and they have areas for improvement in their response and capacity to surge when compared with international preparedness benchmarks. CBRN-focused education and training must be prioritized using evidence-based training approaches to better prepare hospitals to respond following a disaster event.

An interprofessional team approach to early mobilisation of critically Ill adults: An integrative review.

BACKGROUND: Early mobilisation is beneficial to minimise complications and promote the recovery and physical function of critically ill adult patients. An interprofessional team approach may assist in early mobilisation of these patients; however, adopting this approach may be challenging and optimal strategies to support early mobilisation are unknown. Understanding specific implementation strategies is required to effectively support its implementation in the critically ill adult patient population. OBJECTIVE: To synthesise and critically analyse the literature on interprofessional team approaches to early mobilisation in critically ill adult patients. DESIGN: An integrative review METHODS: The methodology of this integrative review was guided by Whittemore and Knafl's approach. A literature search of online databases including Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Excerpta Medica database, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, and PubMed was conducted on 13 April 2020 and updated on 2 August 2021. No date limits were applied. Backward citation searching of included articles was used to identify additional articles. Articles were screened by title and abstract following pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria, and then by full text using the same criteria. Data describing an interprofessional team approach to early mobilisation were extracted into a specifically designed form. Quality appraisal was undertaken using the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set for quality improvement studies and the Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tools was used for cohort studies, retrospective studies, and randomised controlled trials. A narrative synthesis was conducted to integrate and summarise the findings. RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies were included. All studies described team compositions, roles, and responsibilities. Multiple strategies were used to support the implementation of a team approach to early mobilisation, most of which included the use of instruction tools, team meetings/team rounds, staff education, and knowledge sharing, and safety criteria. Improving patient's readiness to perform early mobilisation using clinical interventions was also described in 17 studies. Crucial factors that can help or hinder the implementation of an interprofessional team approach to early mobilisation were identified including organisational structure, staff attitudes and staff abilities. CONCLUSIONS: An interprofessional team approach to early mobilisation may be a useful strategy to improve early mobilisation practice; however, team compositions, roles, and responsibilities to support its implementation in individual setting is recommended. Multiple strategies and clinical interventions should be used to overcome barriers for implementing an interprofessional team approach to early mobilisation in critically ill adult patients. REGISTRATION NUMBER: This review was registered into PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic review (CRD42020179943). TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Use of an interprofessional team approach to improve early mobilisation practice in adult critically ill patients.

Investigating the construct and concurrent validity of the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire with intensive care unit patients and home sleepers.

BACKGROUND: Sleep is vital to our wellbeing. Critically ill patients are vulnerable with effects of sleep deprivation including weakened immune function, decreased glucose tolerance, and increased sympathetic activity. Intensive care unit (ICU) patients' sleep evaluation is difficult and often not reliable. The most commonly used instrument for assessing ICU patients' perspective of their sleep, Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ), has not been reported to have undergone known-group construct validity testing or concurrent validity testing with the criterion measure of feeling refreshed. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to explore the construct validity of the RCSQ with known-groups technique and concurrent validity with the criterion measure of feeling refreshed on awakening. METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive survey study using the RCSQ was conducted on people sleeping at home (n = 114) over seven nights. The results were compared with the RCSQ sleep scores of nonintubated alert oriented adult ICU patients (n = 114). Home sleepers were also asked to rate how refreshed they felt on awakening. The study was executed and reported in accordance with the STROBE checklist for observational studies. FINDINGS: RCSQ construct validity was supported because home sleepers' and ICU sleepers' sleep evaluations differed significantly. Home sleepers rated their sleep significantly better than ICU patients in all five sleep domains of the RCSQ. Concurrent validity was supported because the item "feeling refreshed on awakening" correlated strongly with all sleep domains. CONCLUSIONS: Sleep quality may be accurately measured using the RCSQ in alert people both in the ICU and at home. This study has added to the validity discussion around the RCSQ. The RCSQ can be used for sleep evaluation in ICUs to promote wellbeing and recovery.

Pressure injury prevalence in Australian intensive care units: A secondary analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pressure injuries (PIs) are an enduring problem for patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) because of their vulnerability and numerous risk factors. METHOD: This study reports Australian data as a subset of data from an international 1-day point prevalence study of ICU-acquired PI in adult patients. Patients aged 18 years or older and admitted to the ICU on the study day were included. The outcome measure was the identification of a PI by direct visual skin assessment on the study day. Data collected included demographic data and clinical risk factors, PI location and stage, and PI prevention strategies used. Descriptive statistics were used to describe PI characteristics, and odds ratios (ORs) were used to identify factors associated with the development of a PI. RESULTS: Data were collected from 288 patients from 16 Australian ICUs. ICU-acquired PI prevalence was 9.7%, with 40 PIs identified on 28 patients. Most PIs were of stage 1 and stage 2 (26/40, 65.0%). Half of the ICU-acquired PIs were found on the head and face. The odds of developing an ICU-acquired PI increased significantly with renal replacement therapy (OR: 4.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.49-12.11), impaired mobility (OR: 3.13, 95% CI: 1.08-9.12), fastest respiratory rate (OR: 1.05 [per breath per minute], 95% CI: 1.00-1.10), longer stay in the ICU (OR: 1.04 [per day], 95% CI: 1.01-1.06), and mechanical ventilation on admission (OR: 0.36, CI: 0.14-0.91). CONCLUSION: This study found that Australian ICU-acquired PI prevalence was 9.7% and these PIs were associated with many risk factors. Targeted PI prevention strategies should be incorporated into routine prevention approaches to reduce the burden of PIs in the Australian adult ICU patient population.

The Paediatric AirWay Suction (PAWS) appropriateness guide for endotracheal suction interventions.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Endotracheal suction is an invasive and potentially harmful technique used for airway clearance in mechanically ventilated children. Choice of suction intervention remains a complex and variable process. We sought to develop appropriate use criteria for endotracheal suction interventions used in paediatric populations. METHODS: The RAND Corporation and University of California, Los Angeles Appropriateness Method was used to develop the Paediatric AirWay Suction appropriateness guide. This included defining key terms, synthesising current evidence, engaging an expert multidisciplinary panel, case scenario development, and two rounds of appropriateness ratings (weighing harm with benefit). Indications (clinical scenarios) were developed from common applications or anticipated use, current practice guidelines, clinical trial results, and expert consultation. RESULTS: Overall, 148 (19%) scenarios were rated as appropriate (benefit outweighs harm), 542 (67%) as uncertain, and 94 (11%) as inappropriate (harm outweighs benefit). Disagreement occurred in 24 (3%) clinical scenarios, namely presuction and postsuction bagging across populations and age groups. In general, the use of closed suction was rated as appropriate, particularly in the subspecialty population 'patients with highly infectious respiratory disease'. Routine application of 0.9% saline for nonrespiratory indications was more likely to be inappropriate/uncertain than appropriate. Panellists preferred clinically indicated suction versus routine suction in most circumstances. CONCLUSION: Appropriate use criteria for endotracheal suction in the paediatric intensive care have the potential to impact clinical decision-making, reduce practice variability, and improve patient outcomes. Furthermore, recognition of uncertain clinical scenarios facilitates identification of areas that would benefit from future research.

Developing intersubjectivity and teamwork skills through learning circles on clinical placement: A mixed methods study.

AIM: To determine the efficacy of learning circles on developing intersubjectivity and teamwork skills and determine barriers to and facilitators of, learning circles as a learning tool. BACKGROUND: Teamwork skills are vital for safe, effective nursing care and are dependent on individual team members' shared understandings or intersubjectivity. Work-based learning circles offer a potential pedagogic strategy to promote teamwork. METHODS: In work-based learning circles conducted in 2018, students drew a concept map based on a clinical case and discussed an element of it with the group. Using a convergent parallel mixed methods design, a cross-sectional survey of students using a student clinical experience questionnaire and a qualitative descriptive approach for interviews with clinical facilitators was conducted. RESULTS: Overall, 128 Bachelor of Nursing students (88.9% response) completed the survey and five facilitators (50%) attended group interviews. Students agreed that core teamwork skills were developed during their placement and clinical facilitators reported (1) student engagement in the learning circle processes; (2) learning much about students' abilities; and (3) developing subtle teaching skills to enhance discussion. Sharing experiences from different wards and clinical experiences was a platform for developing intersubjectivity. CONCLUSIONS: To promote intra-professional teamwork skills, conducting learning circles with students from different disciplines may further enhance intersubjectivity and is an area for further research.

Intensive care doctors and nurses personal preferences for Intensive Care, as compared to the general population: a discrete choice experiment.

BACKGROUND: To test the hypothesis that Intensive Care Unit (ICU) doctors and nurses differ in their personal preferences for treatment from the general population, and whether doctors and nurses make different choices when thinking about themselves, as compared to when they are treating a patient. METHODS: Cross sectional, observational study conducted in 13 ICUs in Australia in 2017 using a discrete choice experiment survey. Respondents completed a series of choice sets, based on hypothetical situations which varied in the severity or likelihood of: death, cognitive impairment, need for prolonged treatment, need for assistance with care or requiring residential care. RESULTS: A total of 980 ICU staff (233 doctors and 747 nurses) participated in the study. ICU staff place the highest value on avoiding ending up in a dependent state. The ICU staff were more likely to choose to discontinue therapy when the prognosis was worse, compared with the general population. There was consensus between ICU staff personal views and the treatment pathway likely to be followed in 69% of the choices considered by nurses and 70% of those faced by doctors. In 27% (1614/5945 responses) of the nurses and 23% of the doctors (435/1870 responses), they felt that aggressive treatment would be continued for the hypothetical patient but they would not want that for themselves. CONCLUSION: The likelihood of returning to independence (or not requiring care assistance) was reported as the most important factor for ICU staff (and the general population) in deciding whether to receive ongoing treatments. Goals of care discussions should focus on this, over likelihood of survival.

Effectiveness of the ABCDEF bundle on delirium, functional outcomes and quality of life in intensive care patients: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial with embedded process evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: Hospital mortality for critically ill patients has decreased significantly throughout the developed world over the past two decades, attributable to improvements in the quality of intensive care, advances in critical care medicine and technologies that provide long-term multiorgan support. However, the long-term outcomes of intensive care unit (ICU) survivors is emerging as a real issue. Cognitive and physical impairments suffered by ICU survivors are common including profound weakness, pain and delirium which are inextricably linked. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the Assess, prevent and manage pain; Both spontaneous awakening and spontaneous breathing trials; Choice of sedation and analgesia; Delirium: assess, prevent and manage; Early mobility and exercise; Family engagement and empowerment (ABCDEF) bundle in reducing ICU-related short-term and long-term consequences of critical illness through a randomised controlled trial (RCT). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study will be a single-centre, prospective RCT. A total of 150 participants will be recruited and randomised to either receive the ABCDEF bundle protocol or non-protocolised standard care for the duration of the participant's admission in the ICU. The primary outcome is delirium status measured using the Confusion Assessment Measure for ICU (CAM-ICU). Secondary outcomes include physical function measured by the Functional Independence Measure and quality of life measured by the European Quality of Life five dimensions, five-level questionnaire. A mixed-method process evaluation will contribute to understanding the experience of health teams who implement the ABCDEF bundle into practice. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was provided by the Metro South Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) (EC00167) and the Griffith University's HREC prior to study commencement.Study results will be disseminated by presentations at conferences and via publications to peer-review journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12620000736943; Pre-results.

Utilising the invitational theory provides a framework for understanding assessors' experiences of failure to fail.

AIM: The aim of this paper is to describe how the Invitational Theory were used to frame each of the phases of this sequential mixed methods study to provide valuable insights to the failure to fail phenomenon. BACKGROUND: The assessment of student nurses in clinical courses in undergraduate programmes remains problematic, with some students passing clinical courses when they do not meet standards for practice - failure to fail. Failure to fail is the allocation of passing grades to students who do not meet standards for practice. An understanding of assessors' experiences is central to unravelling the complexities surrounding the phenomenon of failure to fail. Traditionally, such inquiry has been specific and narrow. The Invitational Theory is offered as a comprehensive approach to provide insights and understanding into the complex phenomenon of failure to fail. DESIGN: The five domains of the Invitational Theory; people, processes, programmes, policies and places, were used to inform this sequential exploratory mixed methods study. METHODOLOGY: Phase 1 consisted of an integrative literature review. Phase 2 involved interviews and focus groups with tertiary assessors involved in assessment of students in clinical courses. Phase 3 involved the development, testing and piloting of a survey with tertiary and industry assessors. Phase 4 consisted of a meta-integration of all phases of the study. RESULTS: Key findings of the synthesis of these study phases demonstrated that the domains of the Invitational Theory enable a comprehensive and unique viewpoint of assessment during clinical practicum. All five domains of the Invitational Theory were evident throughout this study and provided unique insights into failure to fail. This research has identified the theoretical underpinnings of the Invitational Theory and its application can be of value in the area of nurse education and specifically assessments. CONCLUSION: The Invitational Theory domains provides a comprehensive and unique viewpoint of assessment of nursing students and contributed to the emerging body of literature regarding failure to fail. How the theoretical framework facilitates the understanding of failure to fail is described in this paper.

Normal saline and lung recruitment with paediatric endotracheal suction (NARES): A pilot, factorial, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Endotracheal suction is one of the most common and harmful procuedres performed on mechanically ventilated children. The aim of the study was to establish the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) examining the effectiveness of normal saline instillation (NSI) and a positive end-expiratory pressure recruitment manoeuvre (RM) with endotracheal suction in the paediatric intensive care unit. METHODS: Pilot 2 × 2 factorial RCT. The study was conducted at a 36-bed tertiary paediatric intensive care unit in Australia. Fifty-eight children aged less than 16 years undergoing tracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation. (i) NSI or no NSI and (ii) RM or no RM with endotracheal suction . The primary outcome was feasibility; secondary outcomes were ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), change in end-expiratory lung volume assessed by electrical impedance tomography, dynamic compliance, and oxygen saturation-to-fraction of inspired oxygen (SpO2/FiO2) ratio. RESULTS/FINDINGS: Recruitment, retention, and missing data feasibility criteria were achieved. Eligibility and protocol adherence criteria were not achieved, with 818 patients eligible and 58 enrolled; cardiac surgery was the primary reason for exclusion. Approximately 30% of patients had at least one episode of nonadherence. Children who received NSI had a reduced incidence of VAP; however, this did not reach statistical significance (incidence rate ratio = 0.12, 95% confidence interval = 0.01-1.10; p = 0.06). NSI was associated with a significantly reduced SpO2/FiO2 ratio up to 10 min after suction. RMs were not associated with a reduced VAP incidence (incidence rate ratio = 0.31, 95% confidence interval = 0.05-1.88), but did significantly improve end-expiratory lung volume at 2 and 5 min after suction, dynamic compliance, and SpO2/FiO2 ratio. CONCLUSION: RMs provided short-term improvements in end-expiratory lung volume and oxygenation. NSI with suction led to a reduced incidence of VAP; however, a definitive RCT is needed to test statistical differences. A RCT of study interventions is worthwhile and may be feasible with protocol modifications including the widening of participant eligibility.

The intensive care unit visiting study: A multisite survey of visitors.

BACKGROUND: Being able to visit a critically ill relative provides comfort to family members and has recognised benefits to the patient. Limited research has been conducted on demographic characteristics and visiting behaviours of family members with a relative in the intensive care unit (ICU). OBJECTIVES: The objective was to provide an overview of local ICU visitor behaviours and practices across four metropolitan units in Australia. METHODS: A convenience sample of 440 participants from four ICUs across a metropolitan city in eastern Australia was required for the study. A descriptive 22-item self-report survey was used. Data were collected from four ICUs in a metropolitan city in eastern Australia. Sample characteristics and other variables were analysed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Data collection was undertaken from April 2018 to May 2019. Four hundred sixty-two (n = 462) ICU visitors responded. There were no significant differences between visitor characteristics across the four hospitals. The mean age of the respondents was 49 years, the youngest participant being 18 years and the oldest being 93 years, with most visitors being women (n = 312, 68%). The participants were more likely to be close relatives such as spouses (n = 117, 25%), parents (n = 113, 24%), or children (n = 79, 17%). Visitors reported different methods by which they received information about visiting policies across units and indicated that they would have visited more frequently if able. Although most respondents rated their ICU visiting experience favourably, some reported being frequently asked to leave the patient's bedside impacted their experience. CONCLUSIONS: This study has highlighted that families want to remain in close proximity when they have a relative in the ICU. Despite visiting hours being flexible, most families visit midmorning so that they can talk with staff. Data captured in this study can be used toward improving the ICU visiting experience for family members.

Application of the READY framework supports effective communication between health care providers and family members in intensive care.

Effective communication between intensive care health care providers and family is crucial to support surrogate or shared decision-making and to individualise care. Despite its importance in health care standards and policy, the quality of communication with families in intensive care is regarded as suboptimal. Furthermore, an intensive care admission is an extremely stressful event for families, which may impact their understanding and subsequent decision-making. Communicating with family members is a routine practice in intensive care; however, health care providers often receive no formal communication training. To date, family-focused communication interventions in intensive care have targeted end-of-life care and are not generalisable across all types of family-health care provider communication interactions. Mugweni et al. recently reported the results of a multiprofessional training intervention involving 26 health care professionals to improve the delivery of different news to families during pregnancy and at birth. A critique of this article has been undertaken to inform routine communication with critically ill family members and optimise the delivery of care in intensive care units.