Direct assessment of body iron balance in women with and without iron supplementation using a long-term isotope dilution method in Benin and Switzerland.

BACKGROUND: Long-term isotopic dilution measurements of body iron may allow quantification of basal body iron balance and iron gains during an iron intervention with higher precision and accuracy than conventional iron indices. OBJECTIVES: We compared body iron balance before, during, and after oral iron supplementation in women in Benin and in Switzerland. METHODS: In prospective studies, Beninese (n = 11) and Swiss (n = 10) women previously labeled with stable iron isotopes were followed preintervention for 90-120 d, then received 50-mg iron daily for 90-120 d and were followed postintervention for 90-120 d. We used changes in blood isotopic composition to calculate iron absorption (Feabs), iron loss (Feloss), and net iron balance (Fegain). RESULTS: Compliance with supplementation was >90%. In Benin, during the preintervention, intervention, and postintervention periods, Fe means ± SDs were as follows: 1) Feabs: 0.92 ± 1.05, 3.75 ± 2.07, and 0.90 ± 0.93 mg/d; 2) Feloss: 1.46 ± 1.95, 1.58 ± 1.57, and 1.84 ± 1.61 mg/d; and 3) Fegain: -0.55 ± 1.56 mg/d, 2.17 ± 1.81 mg/d, and -0.94 ± 1.13 mg/d. In Switzerland, the corresponding values were: 1) 1.51 ± 0.37, 4.09 ± 1.52, and 0.97 ± 0.41 mg/d; 2) 0.76 ± 1.37, 2.54 ± 1.43, and 2.08 ± 1.05 mg/d; and 3) 0.75 ± 1.37, 1.55 ± 1.75, and -1.11 ± 1.06 mg/d. Inflammation was low in both settings, and isotopically calculated iron balance was comparable to that calculated from changes in conventional iron indices. CONCLUSION: Without iron supplementation, Beninese women had lower long-term dietary iron absorption and higher iron losses in the preintervention period than Swiss women. During iron supplementation, both groups had high iron absorption and similar iron gains. However, there was a 3-fold increase in iron losses in the Swiss women during the supplementation and postintervention period compared with the preintervention period. Body iron isotope dilution is a promising new method for quantifying long-term body iron balance and for assessing the impact of iron interventions. The studies were registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02979080 and NCT02979132, respectively.

Dietary Iron Bioavailability: A Simple Model That Can Be Used to Derive Country-Specific Values for Adult Men and Women.

BACKGROUND: Reference intakes for iron are derived from physiological requirements, with an assumed value for dietary iron absorption. A new approach to estimate iron bioavailability, calculated from iron intake, status, and requirements was used to set European dietary reference values, but the values obtained cannot be used for low- and middle-income countries where diets are very different. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to test the feasibility of using the model developed from United Kingdom and Irish data to derive a value for dietary iron bioavailability in an African country, using data collected from women of child-bearing age in Benin. We also compared the effect of using estimates of iron losses made in the 1960s with more recent data for whole body iron losses. METHODS: Dietary iron intake and serum ferritin (SF), together with physiological requirements of iron, were entered into the predictive model to estimate percentage iron absorption from the diet at different levels of iron status. RESULTS: The results obtained from the 2 different methods for calculating physiological iron requirements were similar, except at low SF concentrations. At a SF value of 30 µg/L predicted iron absorption from the African maize-based diet was 6%, compared with 18% from a Western diet, and it remained low until the SF fell below 25 µg/L. CONCLUSIONS: We used the model to estimate percentage dietary iron absorption in 30 Beninese women. The predicted values agreed with results from earlier single meal isotope studies; therefore, we conclude that the model has potential for estimating dietary iron bioavailability in men and nonpregnant women consuming different diets in other countries.

Rural Beninese Children Are at Risk of Zinc Deficiency According to Stunting Prevalence and Plasma Zinc Concentration but Not Dietary Zinc Intakes.

BACKGROUND: Three commonly recommended indicators for risk assessment of population zinc deficiency are stunting rates among children aged <5 y, prevalence of inadequate dietary zinc intake, and prevalence of low plasma zinc (PZn). Data on zinc status in Benin are mainly drawn from stunting rates and data on PZn and dietary zinc intake are lacking. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were 1) to assess the risk of zinc deficiency in preschool and school-age children from rural communities in northern Benin by means of the 3 indicators for population assessment, 2) to evaluate their level of agreement, and 3) to identify predictors of PZn and height-for-age z scores (HAZ). METHODS: We analyzed preintervention data collected during 2 efficacy trials and cross-sectionally assessed the risk of zinc deficiency in preschool (1-5 y, n = 326) and school-age children (5-10 y, n = 272) by 1) conducting a 3-d weighed food record survey, coupled with direct zinc and phytic acid analysis of consumed foodstuffs, and calculating usual dietary zinc intakes in a subsample of school-age children (n = 36); 2) analyzing PZn in all children (n = 598); and 3) measuring anthropometry indexes for assessment of stunting (HAZ <-2 SD) in all children (n = 594) and in <5-y-old children only (n = 273). We derived predictors of PZn and HAZ by using multivariate regression with mixed-effect models. RESULTS: Prevalence of inadequate intakes of zinc ranged from 11% to 80% depending on whether the estimated average requirements (EARs) by the International Zinc Nutrition Consultative Group or the EARs derived from the WHO's recommended nutrient intakes were used. Prevalence of low PZn adjusted for acute-phase protein status was 45.7%, with higher rates among preschoolers than school-age children (P = 0.002). The stunting rate in <5-y-old children was 51.3%. PZn was predicted by age, methodologic factors, and socioeconomic status, whereas HAZ was predicted by age, sex, hemoglobin, and socioeconomic status. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of <5-y stunting and the prevalence of low PZn indicate that the risk of zinc deficiency is elevated in this population. Risk estimates based on the prevalence of inadequacy of zinc intakes varied depending on the EARs used, and a consensus would facilitate nutrition survey evaluations. These trials were registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01472211 and NCT01790321.

Efficacy of highly bioavailable zinc from fortified water: a randomized controlled trial in rural Beninese children.

BACKGROUND: Zinc deficiency and contaminated water are major contributors to diarrhea in developing countries. Food fortification with zinc has not shown clear benefits, possibly because of low zinc absorption from inhibitory food matrices. We used a novel point-of-use water ultrafiltration device configured with glass zinc plates to produce zinc-fortified, potable water. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine zinc bioavailability from filtered water and the efficacy of zinc-fortified water in improving zinc status. DESIGN: In a crossover balanced study, we measured fractional zinc absorption (FAZ) from the zinc-fortified water in 18 healthy Swiss adults using zinc stable isotopes and compared it with zinc-fortified maize porridge. We conducted a 20-wk double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) in 277 Beninese school children from rural settings who were randomly assigned to receive a daily portion of zinc-fortified filtered water delivering 2.8 mg Zn (Zn+filter), nonfortified filtered water (Filter), or nonfortified nonfiltered water (Pump) from the local improved supply, acting as the control group. The main outcome was plasma zinc concentration (PZn), and the 3 groups were compared by using mixed-effects models. Secondary outcomes were prevalence of zinc deficiency, diarrhea prevalence, and growth. RESULTS: Geometric mean (-SD, +SD) FAZ was 7-fold higher from fortified water (65.9%; 42.2, 102.4) than from fortified maize (9.1%; 6.0, 13.7; P < 0.001). In the RCT, a significant time-by-treatment effect on PZn (P = 0.026) and on zinc deficiency (P = 0.032) was found; PZn in the Zn+filter group was significantly higher than in the Filter (P = 0.006) and Pump (P = 0.025) groups. We detected no effect on diarrhea or growth, but our study did not have the duration and power to detect such effects. CONCLUSIONS: Consumption of filtered water fortified with a low dose of highly bioavailable zinc is an effective intervention in children from rural African settings. Large community-based trials are needed to assess the effectiveness of zinc-fortified filtered water on diarrhea and growth. These trials were registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01636583 and NCT01790321.